The sampler

Sample water is pumped into the analytical system either from a direct seawater inlet (continuous recording) or from individual sample bottles by means of a sampler. Most samplers consist of a stepwise rotating plate carrying cups, tubes or bottles with individual samples (Fig. 10-15). 

Random position samplers are also available, which can randomly select, under programme control, sample containers in racks or on trays. The sizes of the sample plate and containers depend on the amount of sample required for the determination of each individual compound. Using the peak-recording principle 2-3 mL of sample usually is needed per analysis of each compound while the steady-state method uses twice the amount. A pick-up device controlled by a mechanical or electrical timer directs a thin stainless steel tube into the sample vessel and the sample is pumped into the analytical system for a pre-determined time interval. The pick-up is then lifted and moved into a rinsing solution reservoir filled with the appropriate zero water . Using the peak-detecting method, the rinsing time equals 

The choice of the sample containers is a compromise between minimizing the sample volumes and required volumes for the analyses. Small sample cups of 2-5 mL volumes allow small samplers with large numbers of samples, however, at least one additional sample transfer is required between water sampler and analyser sample container and the surface/ volume ratio is rather high for small cups. Considering that the contamination risk is proportional to time and the area of sample contact with the environment, sample containers which contain enough sample for repeated analysis (if required) taken directly from the water sampler are preferable to small cups. 

An example of a commercial sampler with rotating sample plates is shown in Fig. 10-15. 

A sampler for CFA should position the sample inlet for pre-set time intervals (0.1-5 min) in the desired sample (sequentially or randomly) and in an intermediate wash container. Some samplers are equipped to select additional standard and/or blank reservoirs by mechanical positioning through solenoid valves. The common procedure, however, is insertion of the desired standards or blanks in the same way as samplea 

---

While with-in the mobile x-ray system, the waste in the sampler, is contained within a replaceable (and disposable) polyvinyl chloride (PVC) sleeve with a wall thickness of approximately 0.2-inches and a sealed bottom. It was anticipated that the PVC tube or sleeve would, with use, become highly contaminated with waste residues which drip of fall-off the sampler. The sleeve is coated with a conductive coating to prevent static electricity buildup . There are no sources of ignition in this sealed spare. The sampler (and waste) is coupling which includes a positive pressure gasket. This barrier is further isolated by a second barrier consisting of an epoxy coated aluminum sleeve also sealed-off from the main x-ray cabinet and PVC sleeve. There are also no potential sources of ignition in this isolated secondary space as well. 

Disadvantages include the tendency to lose finer-grained sediment particles as water flows out of the sampler and the loss of spatial information, both laterally and with depth, due to mixing of the sample. 

The end or front of the plasma flame impinges onto a metal plate (the cone or sampler or sampling cone), which has a small hole in its center (Figure 14.2). The region on the other side of the cone from the flame is under vacuum, so the ions and neutrals passing from the atmospheric-pressure hot flame into a vacuum space are accelerated to supersonic speeds and cooled as rapid expansion occurs. A supersonic jet of gas passes toward a second metal plate (the skimmer) containing a hole smaller than the one in the sampler, where ions pass into the mass analyzer. The sampler and skimmer form an interface between the plasma flame and the mass analyzer. A light... 

For a plasma temperature of 8000 K and N(,= lO Vml, A, is about 0.0006 mm, which is very much smaller than the 1-mm sampler orifice, so ions can pass through easily. Hot gases from the plasma impinge on the edges of the sampler orifice so deposits build up and then reduce its diameter with time. The surrounds of the sampler orifice suffer also from corrosive effects due to bombardment by hot species from the plasma flame. These problems necessitate replacement of the sampler from time to time. 

Proximity to Breathing Zone. Whereas all exposure measurement methods attempt to sample from air that is likely to be inhaled, some methods do so better than others. A sampler fixed some distance away from a breathing area is not usually accurate in measuring exposure. Even using mobile samplers that move with the worker, the few centimeters in distance from the nose and mouth to the position of the sampler, has been found to make a difference. 

Eor toxic materials, it usually is advisable to provide ventilated sampling hoods or breathing-air stations and masks, to assure that the sampler is adequately protected from toxic or flammable vapors and dusts. Special provision for access to and exit from sampling points also may be needed at elevated locations and to avoid tripping or bumping ha2ards and to ensure that the sampler does not transverse areas not intended as walkways, eg, tank covers or roofs. 

Air—electric samplers can be installed directly in the pipe wall. One type of Hquid sampler is operated by a solenoid valve that activates an air cylinder. A shaft is moved in and out of the pipe by this cylinder and samples are expeUed into a container below the sampler. Sample volumes of from 2—30 mL are possible. 

The resolution of the analog I/O channels of the controller vaiy somewhat, with 12-bit and 14-bit conversions quite common. Sample rates for the majority of the constant sample rate controllers range from I to 10 samples/second. Hard-wired single-pole, low-pass filters are installed on the analog inputs to the controller to protect the sampler from aliasing errors. 

Repeating an axiom stated earher, mechanical samplers are designed to extrac t increments of sample from a bulk quantity of material B in a manner that increments S are representative within statistical bounds of the bulk B. Further, the sampler is designed and constructed in conformance to criteria stated previously under Mechanical Delimitations of Sampling to assure that negligible errors arise from mechanical influence. 

Permeation systems can be calibrated in the laboratory and then used in the field for sample collection for a fixed period of time, e.g., 8 hr or 7 days. The sampler is returned to the laboratory for analysis. These systems can be made for specific compounds by selecting the appropriate collection medium and the polymer membrane (Table 13-2). 

Canada, and Mexico (23). The National Atmospheric Deposition Program has established the nationwide sampling network of —100 stations in the United States. The sampler is shown in Fig. 14-9 with a wet collection container. The wet collection bucket is covered with a lid when it is not raining. A sensor for rain moves the lid to open the wet collector bucket and cover the dry bucket at the beginning of a rainstorm. This process is reversed when the rain stops. 

Instruct the employee to notify the supervisor if the sampler requires temporary removal. 

Check pump status every two hours. More frequent checks may be necessary with heavy filter loading. Ensure that the sampler is still assembled properly and that the hose has not become pinched or detached from the cassette or the pump. For filters, observe for symmetrical deposition, fingerprints, or large particles, etc. Record the flow rate, if possible. 

Integrated Sampling Device an air sampling device that allows estimation of air quality components over a period of time (e.g., two weeks) through laboratory analysis of the sampler s medium. 

With liquids, dangers frequently arise from easily volatilised and readily flammable liquids. In all cases precautions should be greater than under normal circumstances due to the unpredictable nature and conditions of taking samples. The sampler must always be prepared for the unexpected, as can arise, for example, if a container has built up excess pressure, or if the wrong liquid has been packed. Toxic and unknown liquids should never be sucked along tubes or into pipettes by mouth. 

It is advantageous to attach the micropipet to a sampler diluter. In this manner, the sample is aspirated by means of a plunger. The technician is not required to adjust the volume nor to make a judgement, because this is being done by a plunger, and accuracy is a function of the sampler diluter. If then one wipes off the tip and then ejects a diluting fluid, one could then proceed to measure out very small samples limited only on the nature of the tip. This can be seen in the sequence of events in Figure 7. 

A second fully automated device, the HPTLC applicator AS 30 (described earlier), can be employed in connection with a sampling device. Automated refilling of the syringe is performed by editing a volume factor, e.g., 10 for application of 10 times 100 pi. This device can be recommended if loss of sample is not relevant (e.g., owing to automatic rinsing operations that afford at least 70 pi dead volume for a minimal 20-cm tube connection). However, the fully automatic mode is not recommended for valuable samples. Sample volume still present in the Teflon tube between the sampler and AS 30 syringe will be wasted and lost because this operation cannot be circumvented by the user. 

After aerosols are produced, various optical techniques can be used to determine their actual sizes and concentrations prior to introducing the aerosols to a sampling device. Various sizes of monodisperse aerosols can be introduced to the sampler, and its efficiency determined by measuring breakthrough using optical techniques and by... 

Collection efficiency is a measure of the amount of material collected by the sampler relative to the amount of material to which the sampler was exposed. Collection efficiencies for many types of samples can be obtained from literature references. If not available in the literature, collection efficiencies can be obtained by comparing the amount collected by the sampler with the amount collected by samplers with known collection efficiency (e.g., nominal 100% for isokinetic samplers). Alternatively, the collection efficiency can be determined by measuring the amount of material collected in a low-speed wind mnnel or spray chamber relative to the release of a known amount of material. Some samplers have collection efficiencies below 100% (e.g., wide collectors sampling small droplets), while others may exceed 100% if they sweep the air of more material than passes a given location based on sampling area alone (e.g., high-volume air samplers). 

---