Peak detection

Peak detection is an important step in the identification process. Sometimes only a few experimental peptide masses in the fingerprint match the theoretical masses, and therefore the failure to detect a relevant peak can hinder the correct identification of a protein. However, if too many false peaks are considered, this may lead to erroneous database matches causing false identifications, as well as increasing search duration. Furthermore, it is important to precisely determine the peptide masses. 

Algorithms that perform peak detection usually take into consideration the probable isotopic distribution when looking for the relevant monoisotopic masses. For example, Breen et al. [52] use a Poisson model to calculate the isotope distribution in order to select the monoisotopic peaks. These algorithms should also be able to separate overlapping isotopic patterns. 

In some cases, peak detection software s delivered with the spectrometer hardware, designed to determine the monoisotopic masses, do not have the necessary flexibility. In our case, for example, the peak detection software had to be rewritten in order to be integrated into the automated high throughput identification pipeline. A genetic algorithm was proposed to optimise the thresholds needed for peak detection [53]. We have then shown the important correlation between peak detection thresholds and identification results. 

Retention time is calculated Yrom the elapsed time from the start of the run to the time increment corresponding to the peak height. Calculations of peak height and retention time are carried out in real time so that the retention time can be printed soon after the peak maximum has occurred. 

---

Woodruff and co-workers introduced the expert system PAIRS [67], a program that is able to analyze IR spectra in the same manner as a spectroscopist would. Chalmers and co-workers [68] used an approach for automated interpretation of Fourier Transform Raman spectra of complex polymers. Andreev and Argirov developed the expert system EXPIRS [69] for the interpretation of IR spectra. EXPIRS provides a hierarchical organization of the characteristic groups that are recognized by peak detection in discrete ames. Penchev et al. [70] recently introduced a computer system that performs searches in spectral libraries and systematic analysis of mixture spectra. It is able to classify IR spectra with the aid of linear discriminant analysis, artificial neural networks, and the method of fe-nearest neighbors. 

A powerful tool now employed is that of diode array detection (DAD). This function allows peaks detected by UV to be scanned, and provides a spectral profile for each suspected microcystin. Microcystins have characteristic absorption profiles in the wavelength range 200-300 nm, and these can be used as an indication of identity without the concomitant use of purified microcystin standards for all variants. A HPLC-DAD analytical method has also been devised for measurement of intracellular and extracellular microcystins in water samples containing cyanobacteria. This method involves filtration of the cyanobacteria from the water sample. The cyanobacterial cells present on the filter are extracted with methanol and analysed by HPLC. The filtered water is subjected to solid-phase clean-up using C g cartridges, before elution with methanol and then HPLC analysis. 

A ICO p-i-n-i-pflCOIp-i-nlmci.d stack has been designed as a three-color sensor [643,644], An extra contact is made to the middle TCO. With appropriate bandgaps the peak detection is at 450, 530, and 635 nm for the blue, green, and red, respectively. 

A typical MALDI spectrum of a bacterial sample has a number of peaks that vary greatly in intensity superimposed on a relatively noisy baseline. This can be problematic for many peak detection routines. Therefore methods that eliminate the need for peak detection also eliminate problems associated with poor peak detection performance. Full-spectrum identification algorithms use the (usually smoothed) spectral data without first performing peak detection. 

However, they do generally require an effective peak detection routine to ensure that both large and small key peaks are used, and that noise spikes are not detected as peaks. The reader is referred to Jarman et al.16 for a discussion and comparison of some different peak detection routines applied to MAID I data of bacterial samples. 

Proteomics ultimately hinges upon protein identification to reveal the meaning behind the masses, spots, or peaks detected by other means. Because fraction collection is a natural component of HPLC separations, intact proteins can be readily collected either for direct analysis or for proteolytic digestion and identification using peptide mass fingerprinting (PMF) in conjunction with matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS). 

Glycerol monostearate can also be determined by LC-MS. Detection by positive APCI is possible. Figure 15 shows a typical chromatogram for the technical product eluting from a Phenomenex Aqua Ci8 column with methanol-water gradient (70-100% methanol). The molecular ion (M + H)+ mass spectra of the two main peaks detected are shown in Figures 16 and 17. 

In a subsequent development, a novel, real-time peak detection algorithm known as intelligent automated LC/MS/MS (INTAMS) was developed for the analysis of samples generated by in vitro systems.27 INTAMS also requires two separate chromatographic runs for each sample. It allows the user to detect the two most abundant ions of all components and also any predetermined metabolite precursor ions. In the second chromatographic run, INTAMS conducts automatic product ion scanning of molecular ions of metabolites detected in the first full scan analysis. 

Dixon, S.J., Brereton, R.G, Soini, H.A., Novotny, M.V. and Penn, D.J. (2007) An automated method for peak detection and matching in large gas chromatography-mass spectrometry data sets. Journal of Chemometrics In press. 

A and 12.094A. The presence of copper in a sample would be indicated by the presence of XRF peaks detected either at these wavelengths, or at their corresponding energies. 

Despite these advancements in chromatographic data processing, peak detection and integration algorithms were crude, the user interface was cumbersome, and there was very little flexibility in the types of reports that these systems could generate. 

When dealing with noise, one should consider use of a peak detection algorithm optimized for CE. This algorithm, which is readily available on some CE systems, will allow a much lower signal-to-noise ratio and an improvement of reproducibility by a factor 1.5—5, and thereby, of the LOD. 

Whatever the application, MS-based analyses of FAC effluent will always be faced with the need to support a wide range of buffer components, ranging from variable ionic strength, surfactant levels to required cofactors. In select situations such as indicator analyses, online methods may be appropriate but it is clear that the insertion of an intermediate LC step offers sigmficantly improved performance. This changes the nature of the data analysis, from the detection of sigmoidal breakthrough curves to peak detection and differential analysis across multiple fractions. 

Elute the protein with 5 x column volume of Elution Buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7.5, BOO mM NaCI, BOO mM imidazole) collecting the peak detected at 280 nm. 

---