Surface droplet pressure method

Automated droplet-based manipulation methods described in this article include electrowetting, dielectrophoretic, thermocapillary, surface acoustic wave (SAW), and pressure-driven channel-based droplet systems. Fabrication of arrays of elements to control these droplet manipulation methods typically involves the use of photolithography. The methods of addressing of the elements have become increasingly sophisticated with several efforts to utilize passive- and active-matrix control strategies. Trends and issues associated with each method are described. 

The third method for measuring dilational elasticity and viscosity is the maximum bubble pressure method (33). Although this method overcomes some of the problems encountered in the surface wave and droplet deformational methods, it can only be applied for measurement at the air/liquid interface. 

Ambient MS is another advance in the field. It allows the analysis of samples with little or no sample preparation. Following the introduction of desorption electrospray ionization (DESI) [108,109], direct analysis in real time (DART) [110], and desorption atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (DAPCI) [111, 112], a number of ambient ionization methods have been introduced. They include electrospray-assisted laser desorption/ionization (ELDI) [113], matrix-assisted laser desorption electrospray ionization (MALDESI) [114], atmospheric solids analysis probe (ASAP) [115], jet desorption ionization (JeDI) [116], desorption sonic spray ionization (DeSSI) [117], field-induced droplet ionization (FIDI) [118], desorption atmospheric pressure photoionization (DAPPI) [119], plasma-assisted desorption ionization (PADI) [120], dielectric barrier discharge ionization (DBDI) [121], and the liquid microjunction surface sampling probe method (LMJ-SSP) [122], etc. All these techniques have shown that ambient MS can be used as a rapid tool to provide efficient desorption and ionization and hence to allow mass spectrometric characterization of target compounds. 

When separating low-density solid particles or oil droplets from water, the most common method used is dissolved-air flotation. A typical arrangement is shown in Figure 8.12b. This shows some of the effluent water from the unit being recycled, and air being dissolved in the recycle under pressure. The pressure of the recycle is then reduced, releasing the air from solution as a mist of fine bubbles. This is then mixed with the incoming feed that enters the cell. Low-density material floats to the surface with the assistance of the air bubbles and is removed. 

Desorption Electrospray Ionization (DESI). DESI is a novel gentle ionization method for surface analysis (Figure 2.6).[19,20] Like classical ESI, it operates at atmospheric pressure. No sample preparation is required. A solvent passes through the capillary of the electrospray source charged droplets are produced (primary ions) and they are directed to a solid sample. Their impact with the surface causes sample molecules to be ionized and... 

The recommended method is from Guidelines for Pressure Relief and Effluent Handling Systems (AIChE-CCPS, 1998). It is an improvement over the method presented in the 7th edition of this Handbook. The procedure involves calculating a terminal velocity for a selected droplet size, then providing enough residence time in the vapor space to allow the droplets to fall from the top of the vessel to the level of liquid collected. Also, the vapor velocity in the separator must not exceed the value above which liquid may Be entrained from the liquid surface in the separator. The tank is treated as a simple horizontal cylinder, neglecting the volume of liquid in the heads. 

The process parameters influencing droplet sizes may include liquid pressure, flow rate, velocity ratio of air to liquid (mass flow rate ratio of air to liquid), and atomizer geometry and configuration. It has been clearly established that increasing the velocity ratio of air to liquid is the most important practical method of improving atomization)211] In industrial applications, however, the use of mass flow rate ratio of air to liquid has been preferred. As indicated by Chigier)2111 it is difficult to accept that vast quantities of air, that do not come into any direct contact with the liquid surface, have any influence on atomization although mass flow rates of fluids include the effects of velocities. 

Direct analysis of solid samples or analytes present on solid surfaces without any sample preparation has always been a topic of interest. Desorption electrospray ionization (DESI) is an atmospheric pressure desorption ionization method introduced by Cooks et al., producing ions directly from the surface to be analyzed, which are then sampled with the mass spectrometer [22, 37]. DESI is based on charged liquid droplets that are directed by a high velocity gas jet (in the order of 300 m s ) to the surface to be analyzed. Analytes are desorbed from the surface and analyzed by mass spectrometer (Eig. 1.15). 

Since it is relatively easy to transfer molecules from bulk liquid to the surface (e.g. shake or break up a droplet of water), the work done in this process can be measured and hence we can obtain the value of the surface energy of the liquid. This is, however, obviously not the case for solids (see later section). The diverse methods for measuring surface and interfacial energies of liquids generally depend on measuring either the pressure difference across a curved interface or the equilibrium (reversible) force required to extend the area of a surface, as above. The former method uses a fundamental equation for the pressure generated across any curved interface, namely the Laplace equation, which is derived in the following section. 

The pressure of a fast turnaround time for the expensive LC-MS instrument and false confidence in MS mass resolution power often leads to compromised methods with shortened chromatographic runs. With limited sample clean-up for macromolecules and inadequate chromatographic separation, matrix components can co-elute with the analyte. They may compete for the limited charge or impede (or promote) movement of the analyte ions to the surface of the droplets, resulting in matrix effects [54]. Matrix effects can impact on selectivity, sensitivity, linearity and reproducibility of the assay. For ESI, competition for ionization can occur both in the mobile phase and the gas phase [55]. The pH, volatility, and surface tension of the mobile phase will affect ionization efficiency. The major suppres-... 

These direct ion sources exist under two types liquid-phase ion sources and solid-state ion sources. In liquid-phase ion sources the analyte is in solution. This solution is introduced, by nebulization, as droplets into the source where ions are produced at atmospheric pressure and focused into the mass spectrometer through some vacuum pumping stages. Electrospray, atmospheric pressure chemical ionization and atmospheric pressure photoionization sources correspond to this type. In solid-state ion sources, the analyte is in an involatile deposit. It is obtained by various preparation methods which frequently involve the introduction of a matrix that can be either a solid or a viscous fluid. This deposit is then irradiated by energetic particles or photons that desorb ions near the surface of the deposit. These ions can be extracted by an electric field and focused towards the analyser. Matrix-assisted laser desorption, secondary ion mass spectrometry, plasma desorption and field desorption sources all use this strategy to produce ions. Fast atom bombardment uses an involatile liquid matrix. 

A new ionization method called desorption electrospray ionization (DESI) was described by Cooks and his co-workers in 2004 [86]. This direct probe exposure method based on ESI can be used on samples under ambient conditions with no preparation. The principle is illustrated in Figure 1.36. An ionized stream of solvent that is produced by an ESI source is sprayed on the surface of the analysed sample. The exact mechanism is not yet established, but it seems that the charged droplets and ions of solvent desorb and extract some sample material and bounce to the inlet capillary of an atmospheric pressure interface of a mass spectrometer. The fact is that samples of peptides or proteins produce multiply charged ions, strongly suggesting dissolution of the analyte in the charged droplet. Furthermore, the solution that is sprayed can be selected to optimize the signal or selectively to ionize particular compounds. 

Electrospray ionization involves the introduction of a liquid solution directly into the atmospheric pressure source through an emitter. The liquid forms a droplet at the end of the emitter, where it is exposed to a high electrical field (Fig. 1). This results in a buildup of multiple charges on the surface of the droplet. The coulombic forces from these charges ultimately result in the droplet s expulsion from the surface. The ions produced in the ion source are then extracted into the mass analyzer. ESI is now widely used for identifying small molecules, proteins, studying large non-covalent complexes, structural analysis, and as a detector for separation methods such as HPLC and capillary... 

Only the two first methods allow measurement of the temperature coefficient of the surface energy. The maximum bubble pressure technique is well-adapted for metals with low and intermediate melting points and specially for oxidizable metals, while the sessile drop technique has been applied with success to measure ctlv values up to 1500°C. The drop weight method is particularly useful for very high melting-point metals because it avoids liquid contact with container materials. This is also true for the recently developed levitation drop technique that analyses the oscillation spectrum of a magnetically levitated droplet. 

A variant is the micro-pipette method, which is also similar to the maximum bubble pressure technique. A drop of the liquid to be studied is drawn by suction into the tip of a micropipette. The inner diameter of the pipette must be smaller than the radius of the drop the minimum suction pressure needed to force the droplet into the capillary can be related to the surface tension of the liquid, using the Young-Laplace equation [1.1.212). This technique can also be used to obtain interfacial tensions, say of individual emulsion droplets. Experimental problems include accounting for the extent of wetting of the inner lumen of the capillary, rate problems because of the time-dependence of surfactant (if any) adsorption on the capillary and, for narrow capillaries accounting for the work needed to bend the interface. Indeed, this method has also been used to measure bending moduli (sec. 1.15). 

---