Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Soil constituents clays

Thermodynamic aspects of ionic reactions on inorganic soil constituents (clays, oxides, zeolites, and minerals) have received considerable attention over the years. These studies allow quantification of interactive phenomena, but fail to provide insight into the dynamics, mechanisms, and facets of great importance for construction of effective models. [Pg.96]

Clays have layers of linked (Al, Si)04 tet-rahedra combined with layers of Mg(OH)2 or AI(0H)3- Clays are very important soil constituents and are used in pottery, ceramics, as rubber, paint, plastic and paper fillers, as adsorbents and in drilling muds. [Pg.102]

Of the various inorganic soil constituents, smectites (montmorillonite clays) have the greatest potential for sorption of pesticides on account of their large surface area and abundance in soils. Weak base pesticides, both protonated and neutral species, have been shown to be sorbed as interlayer complexes. Sorption of atrazine on smectites ranges from 0 to 100% of added atrazine, depending on the surface charge density of the smectite (36). [Pg.220]

Some compounds, i.e. benzoic and cinnamic acids are not protected against biodegradation to a high degree by linkage and/or absorption on soil constituents such as clay or humus (184), hence they may have a rapid turnover rate in soils. [Pg.315]

Since hot add hydrolysis was required to release practically all of the amino adds and amino sugars from the soils, it is likely that the amino adds occur in soils in the form of peptides, polypeptides, and proteins dosely assodated with and protected by SOM and inorganic soil constituents such as clay minerals and hydrous oxides of iron and aluminum. Similarly, amino sugars do not appear to exist in soils as free compounds. [Pg.119]

The residual content of immiscible liquids can be defined by the amount of NAPL remaining in the subsurface when pore geometry permits NAPL flow greater than the retention capacity. In an outdoor pilot experiment. Fine and Yaron (1993) studied the effect of soil constituents and soil moisture contents on the retention of kerosene in the subsurface. This retention is termed the kerosene residual content (KRC). Ten soils were studied, with a broad spectrum of clay and organic matter contents, together with four soil moisture contents corresponding to oven-dried, air-dried. [Pg.199]

Farmer VC (1978) Water on partial surfaces In Greenland DJ and Hayes MHB (eds) The chemistry of soil constituents. Wiley, New York, pp 405 49 Farmer VC, Russel JD (1967) Infrared absorption spectrometry in clay studies. Clays Clay Miner. 15 121-142. [Pg.374]

The relatively strong interaction of cationic contaminants with negatively charged soil constituents, for example, is expected to decrease bioavailability. This has been shown to be the case for diquat, in which intercalation into internal clay surfaces eliminates microbial degradation of the compound (Weber and Coble, 1968). Decreased bioavailabilities forbenzylamine in association with montmorillonite (Miller Alexander, 1991), quinoline bound to hectorite or montmorillonite (Smith etal., 1992), and cationic surfactants with humic materials or montmorillonite (Knaebel et al., 1994) have also been reported. [Pg.46]

The issue of bioavailability is further clouded by the physical characteristics of soil and the role of a possible mass transfer limitation. Soil constituents are not simply flat surfaces with free and equal access to all bacterial species. The formation of aggregates from sand-, silt-, and clay-sized particles results in stable structures which control microbial contact with the substrate (Figure 2.7). Discussion of sorption mechanisms and binding affinities must include the possible impact of intra-aggregate transport of the substrate. If the substrate is physically inaccessible to the microorganism then both desorption from soil constituents and diffusion to an accessible site are necessary. The impact of intra-aggregate diffusion on degradation kinetics has been modeled for y-hexachlorocyclohexane (Rijnaarts et al., 1990) and naphthalene (Mihelcic Luthy, 1991). [Pg.47]

Studies on sorption of triazines by individual soil constituents and by model sorbents have been very helpful in evaluating sorption mechanisms and in assessing the potential contribution of various constituents to triazine sorption by soils. However, intimate associations between organic substances, silicate clays, and oxyhydroxide materials modify the sorptive properties of the individual constituents. Associations between soil constituents influence soil properties - such as pH, specific surface area, and functional group availability - which in turn influence triazine sorption behavior. For instance, atrazine and simazine sorption behavior is different for synthetic mixtures of model soil... [Pg.284]

The determination of mechanistic rate laws for soil chemical processes is very difficult since microscopic heterogeneity is pronounced in soils and even for most soil constituents such as clay minerals, humic substances, and oxides. Heterogeneity can be enhanced due to different particle sizes, types of surface sites, etc. As will be discussed more completely in Chapter 3, the determination of mechanistic rate laws is also complicated by the type of kinetic methodology one uses. With some methods used by soil and environmental scientists, transport-controlled reactions are occurring and thus mechanistic rate laws cannot be determined. [Pg.7]

The use of centrifugation to separate the liquid from solid phases in traditional batch or tube techniques has several disadvantages. Centrifugation could create electrokinetic effects close to soil constituent surfaces that would alter the ion distribution (van Olphen, 1977). Additionally, unless filtration is used, centrifugation may require up to 5 min to separate the solid from the liquid phases. Many reactions on soil constituents are complete by this time or less (Harter and Lehmann, 1983 Jardine and Sparks, 1984 Sparks, 1985). For example, many ion exchange reactions on organic matter and clay minerals are complete after a few minutes, or even seconds (Sparks, 1986). Moreover, some reactions involving metal adsorption on oxides are too rapid to be observed with any batch or, for that matter, flow technique. For these reactions, one must employ one of the rapid kinetic techniques discussed in Chapter 4. [Pg.41]

Most of the studies involving ion exchange kinetics on soil constituents have been concerned with inorganic components such as clay minerals, oxides, etc., as just discussed. Rates of ion exchange on humic substances, while extremely important, have not been extensively studied. [Pg.119]

The sorption and desorption of pesticides by soils and soil constituents such as clay minerals and humic substances has generally been characterized by an initial rapid rate folllowed by a much slower approach to an apparent equilibrium (Haque et al., 1968 Leenheer and Ahlrichs, 1971 Khan, 1973 McCall and Agin, 1985). The initial reaction(s) have been associated with diffusion of the pesticides to and from the surface of the sorbent, while the slower reaction(s) have been related to PD of the pesticides into and out of micropores of the sorbent. [Pg.131]

The multireaction approach, often referred to as the multisite model, acknowledges that the soil solid phase is made up of different constituents (clay minerals, organic matter, iron, and aluminum oxides). Moreover, a heavy metal species is likely to react with various constituents (sites) via different mechanisms (Amacher et al 1988). As reported by Hinz et al. (1994), heavy metals are assumed to react at different rates with different sites on matrix surfaces. Therefore, a multireaction kinetic approach is used to describe heavy metal retention kinetics in soils. The multireaction model used here considers several interactions of one reactive solute species with soil matrix surfaces. Specifically, the model assumes that a fraction of the total sites reacts rapidly or instantaneously with solute in the soil solution, whereas the remaining fraction reacts more slowly with the solute. As shown in Figure 12.1, the model includes reversible as well as irreversible retention reactions that occur concurrently and consecutively. We assumed that a heavy metal species is present in the soil solution phase, C (mg/L), and in several phases representing metal species retained by the soil matrix designated as Se, S, S2, Ss, and Sirr (mg/kg of soil). We further considered that the sorbed phases Se, S, and S2 are in direct contact with the solution phase (C) and are governed by concurrent reactions. Specifically, C is assumed to react rapidly and reversibly with the equilibrium phase (Se) such that... [Pg.319]

Fig. 10.8. Simple biogeochemical model for metal mineral transformations in the mycorhizosphere (the roles of the plant and other microorganisms contributing to the overall process are not shown). (1) Proton-promoted (proton pump, cation-anion antiport, organic anion efflux, dissociation of organic acids) and ligand-promoted (e.g. organic adds) dissolution of metal minerals. (2) Release of anionic (e.g. phosphate) nutrients and metal cations. (3) Nutrient uptake. (4) Intra- and extracellular sequestration of toxic metals biosorption, transport, compartmentation, predpitation etc. (5) Immobilization of metals as oxalates. (6) Binding of soluble metal species to soil constituents, e.g. clay minerals, metal oxides, humic substances. Fig. 10.8. Simple biogeochemical model for metal mineral transformations in the mycorhizosphere (the roles of the plant and other microorganisms contributing to the overall process are not shown). (1) Proton-promoted (proton pump, cation-anion antiport, organic anion efflux, dissociation of organic acids) and ligand-promoted (e.g. organic adds) dissolution of metal minerals. (2) Release of anionic (e.g. phosphate) nutrients and metal cations. (3) Nutrient uptake. (4) Intra- and extracellular sequestration of toxic metals biosorption, transport, compartmentation, predpitation etc. (5) Immobilization of metals as oxalates. (6) Binding of soluble metal species to soil constituents, e.g. clay minerals, metal oxides, humic substances.
Trace elements in cationic form are probably not dominantly sorbed on 001 faces of phyllosilicates because they are always vastly outnumbered by other cations with which they compete (Jackson, 1998). They may be strongly sorbed only on the edges of the phyllosilicates. However, clay minerals also have an important role as carriers of associated oxides and humic substances forming organomineral complexes, which present peculiar sorption capacities different from those of each single soil constituent (Jackson, 1998 Violante and Gianfreda, 2000 Violante et al., 2002c). [Pg.173]

This method is also referred to as the miscible-displacement or continuous-flow method. In this method a thin disk of dispersed solid phase is deposited on a porous membrane and placed in a holder. A pump is used to maintain a constant flow velocity of solution through the thin disk and a fraction collector is used to collect effluent aliquots. A diagram of the basic experimental setup is shown in Fig. 2-6. A thin disk is used in an attempt to minimize diffusion resistances in the solid phase. Disk thickness, disk hydraulic conductivity, and membrane permeability determine the range of flow velocities that are achievable. Dispersion of the solid phase is necessary so that the transit time for a solute molecule is the same at all points in the disk. However, the presence of varying particle sizes and hence pore sizes may produce nonuniform solute transit times (Skopp and McCallister, 1986). This is more likely to occur with whole soils than with clay-sized particles of soil constituents. Typically, 1- or 2-g samples are used in kinetic studies on soils with the thin disk method, but disk thicknesses have not been measured. In their study of the kinetics of phosphate and silicate retention by goethite, Miller et al. (1989) estimated the thickness of the goethite disk to be 80 /xm. [Pg.36]

The most prominent inorganic soil constituents with ion-exchange properties are oxides, clays, minerals, and zeolites. Each have their own characteristics, which will be briefly reviewed here. [Pg.111]

KeCO, in epathic iron, clay ironstone and bog ore and os FeS, in pyrites It is also a constituent of most soils and clays, exists in many mineral waters, and in the red blood pigment of animals. [Pg.128]


See other pages where Soil constituents clays is mentioned: [Pg.380]    [Pg.1165]    [Pg.471]    [Pg.1165]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.2298]    [Pg.565]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.529]    [Pg.582]    [Pg.677]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.768]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.76 ]




SEARCH



Soil constituents

© 2024 chempedia.info