Multisite Models

Several predictions of this model have been experimentally supported, including the estimated heme-heme distance, and the protection of various (charged) groups on cytochrome c and ccp. However, as already noted, other theoretical models have suggested that multiple binding sites are possible within the cyt c ccp complex. The available spectroscopic and crystallographic data, reviewed in this section, tend to support a multisite model, rather than a highly specific lock and key structural model. 

Multisite model site-specific model input data... 

The multireaction approach, often referred to as the multisite model, acknowledges that the soil solid phase is made up of different constituents (clay minerals, organic matter, iron, and aluminum oxides). Moreover, a heavy metal species is likely to react with various constituents (sites) via different mechanisms (Amacher et al 1988). As reported by Hinz et al. (1994), heavy metals are assumed to react at different rates with different sites on matrix surfaces. Therefore, a multireaction kinetic approach is used to describe heavy metal retention kinetics in soils. The multireaction model used here considers several interactions of one reactive solute species with soil matrix surfaces. Specifically, the model assumes that a fraction of the total sites reacts rapidly or instantaneously with solute in the soil solution, whereas the remaining fraction reacts more slowly with the solute. As shown in Figure 12.1, the model includes reversible as well as irreversible retention reactions that occur concurrently and consecutively. We assumed that a heavy metal species is present in the soil solution phase, C (mg/L), and in several phases representing metal species retained by the soil matrix designated as Se, S, S2, Ss, and Sirr (mg/kg of soil). We further considered that the sorbed phases Se, S, and S2 are in direct contact with the solution phase (C) and are governed by concurrent reactions. Specifically, C is assumed to react rapidly and reversibly with the equilibrium phase (Se) such that... 

Non-Flory molecular weight distributions have also been attributed to the presence of several types of active sites with different probabilities for chain growth and for chain termination to olefins and paraffins (45). Two-site models have been used to explain the sharp changes in chain growth probability that occur for intermediate-size hydrocarbons on Fe-based catalysts (46,47). Many of these reports of non-Flory distributions may instead reflect ineffective dispersal of alkali promoters on Fe catalysts or inadequate mass balances and product collection protocols. Recently, we have shown that multisite models alone cannot explain the selectivity changes that occur with increasing chain size, bed residence time, and site density on Ru and Co catalysts (4,5,40,44). 

CCR3 Receptor Structure. Chimera studies of CCR3 and CCRl receptors show that the N-terminal segments of CCR3 appear to be important for eotaxin binding (77). However, eotaxin remained an effective agonist at this chimeric receptor in either calcium flux or chemotaxis assays. These data are consistent with a multisite model for chemokine-chemo-kine receptor interaction. 

Multisite models analogous to those discussed in this section have been applied to humic acid [633,770,771], Also, charging curves of ZnS have been interpreted in terms of protonation/deprotonation of multiple surface species [772],... 

Hinz, C., B. Buchter, and H.M. Selim. 1992. Heavy metal retention in soils Application of multisite models to zinc sorption, p. 141-170. In I.K. Iskandar and H.M. Selim (ed.) Engineering aspects of metal-waste management. Lewis Publ., Boca Raton, FL. 

A second consequence of a multisite model might be the more difficult sorption-desorption of sample molecules, because many attachments must be simultaneously broken (or made) for desorption (or sorption) to occur. The result of such an effect would be broader sample bands than predicted by the model of Table VIII. This was discussed in Section VII,B. 

Figure 9.3 Multisite models of water (a) three-site, (b] four-site, (c) five-site.

Overall, the QM results indicate both a large quadrupole and out-of-plane character in the charge distribution of a water molecule in the liquid phase. Only SSDQOl has multipoles consistent with both features, although somewhat too little for the former and too much for the latter. Furthermore, it was shown that multisite models require at least six points to reproduce moments consistent with the QM results [55], as has also been found for polarizable multisite models [37, 57]. On the other hand, it was also shown [55] that multipole models are able to reproduce electrostatic potentials due to the QM charge distribution with moments up to the octupole. 

A vast literature exists on the experimental properties of bulk liquid water at different temperatures and pressures and the AIMD simulations mentioned in the introduction can also provide qualitative information with the caveats noted in the introduction. The ability of different rigid multisite models to reproduce various properties of water is partly due to how well the model represents the key molecular features and but is also partly due to how well the parameters have been optimized for the properties, with more sites giving more degrees of freedom to optimize. As mentioned in the introduction, the focus here is on how the different types of models... 

Van der Burg, M.W., Chadwick, J.C., Sudmejer, O., and Tulleken, H.J.A.F., Probabilistic multisite modelling of propene pol5mierization using Markoff models, Makromol. Chem. Theory Simul, 2, 399 (1993). 

Extract the data using a DNA microarray data analysis software package and analyse the initial velocity data according to standard competitive inhibitor enzyme kinetics using a biphasic multisite model in order to determine the k for the binding of the unlabelled test compound to CYP3A4. 

Other versions of the multisite model use hard sphere repulsions at each site and attractive interactions of several kinds. These include the London (dispersion)... 

In the two-site model, it is assumed that the catalytic sites have the same polymerization activity (propagation activity) but they differ in their chain transfer capabilities. The two-site model is the simplest of the multisite model and its main advantage is that the number of adjustable parameters is minimal. The weight chain length distribution function of the two-site model takes the following form ... 

---