Resistance diffusion

Thus his experiments were the first to indicate the surprising result that relation (6,1) remains valid even in conditions where bulk diffusion resistance is completely dominant. Accordingly (6.1), perhaps the most important single experimental result on diffusion in porous media, will be referred to as Graham s relation. 

This equation predicts that the height of a theoretical diffusion stage increases, ie, mass-transfer resistance increases, both with bed height and bed diameter. The diffusion resistance for Group B particles where the maximum stable bubble size and the bed height are critical parameters may also be calculated (21). 

When selecting a suitable feed symp, the main criteria are optimization of enzyme productivity and minimization of the formation of by-products. Typical feed symp specifications are shown in Table 5. Higher symp concentration and higher viscosity results in a reduced isomerization rate due to diffusion resistance in the pores of the immobilized enzyme. A deaeration step is desirable to remove dissolved oxygen that would otherwise iacrease the formation of by-products. The pH is adjusted to the optimum level for the productivity of the enzyme. 

The dispersion of a solute band in a packed column was originally treated comprehensively by Van Deemter et al. [4] who postulated that there were four first-order effect, spreading processes that were responsible for peak dispersion. These the authors designated as multi-path dispersion, longitudinal diffusion, resistance to mass transfer in the mobile phase and resistance to mass transfer in the stationary phase. Van Deemter derived an expression for the variance contribution of each dispersion process to the overall variance per unit length of the column. Consequently, as the individual dispersion processes can be assumed to be random and non-interacting, the total variance per unit length of the column was obtained from a sum of the individual variance contributions. 

From Darcy s equation we can determine a formula for the counterforce produced by the porous material to the flowing or diffusing component A, If this counterforce is found, it can be added to the diffusion resistance force caused by component B to component A hence the sum of these two forces represents the total diffusion resistance. 

This gives a model for Eq. (4,305b), but not a model for force While force gives the flow force caused by the material, it is normal to represent this fact so that gives the pure diffusion resistance force that is not caused by the material. This requires treating independently from the material or porosity. For (f) = 1 or E = °°, where 0 EQ- (4.306) gives... 

Sweating, the other powerful heat loss mechanism actively regulated by the thermoregulatory center, is most developed in humans. With about 2,6 million sweat glands distributed over the skin and neurally controlled, sweat secretion can vary from 0 to 1 I7(h m ). The other, lesser, passive evaporative process of the skin is from the diffusion of water. The primary resistance to this flow is the stratum corneum or outermost 15 pm of the skin. The diffusion resistance of the skin is high in comparison to that of clothing and the boundary layer resistance and as a result makes water loss by diffusion fairly stable at about 500 grams/day. 

High thermodynamic selectivity (7) demands that the initially formed cis olefin be displaced rapidly relative to its saturation or to its isomerization. As the reaction nears completion and the acetylene concentration diminishes, its effectiveness in displacing olefin will diminish and selectivity will fall. Displacement by acetylene is also impeded through depletion of acetylene in the vicinity of the catalyst owing to intra- or interpartile diffusion resistance (53a). A change in a reaction parameter thus can have different influences... 

Van Deemter considered peak dispersion results from four spreading processes that take place in a column, namely, the Multi-Path Effect, Longitudinal Diffusion, Resistance to Mass Transfer in the Mobile Phase and Resistance to Mass Transfer in the Stationary Phase. Each one of these dispersion processes will now be considered separately... 

Although hydrogenation of 4-CBA over Pd/C is very fast, there is strong diffusion resistance. Furthermore, apparent kinetic equations on different catalyst particle sizes have been obtained from experimental data. 

There are several correlations for estimating the film mass transfer coefficient, kf, in a batch system. In this work, we estimated kf from the initial concentration decay curve when the diffusion resistance does not prevail [3]. The value of kf obtained firom the initial concentration decay curve is given in Table 2. In this study, the pore diffusion coefficient. Dp, and surface diffusion coefficient, are estimated by pore diffusion model (PDM) and surface diffusion model (SDM) [4], The estimated values of kf. Dp, and A for the phenoxyacetic acids are listed in Table 2. 

Equation (1) consists of various resistance terms. l/Kj a is the gas absorption resistance, while 1/ K,a corresponds to the maleic anhydride diffusion resistance and l/i k represents the chemical reaction resistance. The reaction rate data obtained under the reaction conditions of 250°C and 70 atm were plotted according to equation (1). Although catalytic reaction data with respect to time on stream were not shown here, a linear correlation between reaction rate data and catalyst loading was observed as shown in Fig. 2. The gas absorption resistance (1/ a) was -1.26 h, while the combined reaction-diffusion resistance (lJK,a + 1 T]k) was determined to be 5.57 h. The small negative value of gas absorption resistance indicates that the gas-liquid diffusion resistance was very small and had several orders of magnitude less than the chanical reaction resistance, as similarly observed for the isobutene hydration over Amberlyst-15 in a slurry reactor [6]. This indicates that absorption of malei c anhydride in solvent was a rapid process compared to the reaction rate on the catalyst surface. 

Equation (6.42) is a generalization of Eqs. (6.25) and (6.30) it shows that the formal resistance is the sum of reaction resistance (the first term in parentheses) and diffusion resistance (the second and third terms). Equation (6.40) yields directly the important relation... 

Water status of the seedlings was determined each afternoon by obtaining leaf diffusive resistance, water potential, and osmotic potential. Diffusive resistance was measured on both the adaxial and abaxial surfaces of the youngest fully expanded leaf for six randomly selected plants in each treatment using a Lambda Model LI-60 meter and a narrow aperture sensor. Total leaf resistance (R) was calculated from the component resistances (r) as follows ... 

The dry weights (104 C, 48 hr) of ten plants from each treatment group were taken at the termination of each experiment in order to compare growth effects with plant water status. Dry weight data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan s multiple-range test. Diffusive resistance and water potential were evaluated using the t-test. Each of these and subsequent experiments was replicated. 

Note — Values are the 6-day mean + SE with diffusive resistance taken from six seedlings each day and water potential from four seedlings each day. Kochi a data adapted with permission from Einhellig and Schon (29), Copyright 1982, the National Research Council of Canada. 

The reported (14) mechanisms of action of allelochemlcals Include effects on root ultrastructure and subsequent Inhibition of Ion absorption and water uptake, effects on hormone-induced growth, alteration of membrane permeability, changes In lipid and organic acid metabolism, inhibition of protein synthesis and alteration of enzyme activity, and effects on stomatal opening and on photosynthesis. Reduced leaf water potential Is one result of treatment with ferulic and p-coumaric acids (15). Colton and Einhellig (16) found that aqueous extracts of velvetleaf (Abutllon theophrastl Medic.) Increased diffusive resistance In soybean fGlycine max. (L.) Merr.] leaves, probably as a result of stomatal closure. In addition, there was evidence of water stress and reduced quantities of chlorophyll In Inhibited plants. 

Membrane transport represents a major application of mass transport theory in the pharmaceutical sciences [4], Since convection is not generally involved, we will use Fick s first and second laws to find flux and concentration across membranes in this section. We begin with the discussion of steady diffusion across a thin film and a membrane with or without aqueous diffusion resistance, followed by steady diffusion across the skin, and conclude this section with unsteady membrane diffusion and membrane diffusion with reaction. 

In the example above, the solutions are assumed to be well stirred and mixed the aqueous resistance is negligible, and the membrane is the only transport barrier. However, in any real case, the solutions on both sides of the membrane become less and less stirred as they approach the surface of the membrane. The aqueous diffusion resistance, therefore, very often needs to be considered. For example, for very highly permeable drugs, the resistance to absorption from the gastrointestinal tract is mainly aqueous diffusion. In the section, we give a general solution to steady diffusion across a membrane with aqueous diffusion resistance [5],... 

We have discussed steady diffusion across a membrane with or without aqueous diffusion resistance. If the membrane is extremely thick or if solute diffusion in the membrane is extremely slow, the membrane may behave as if it is almost... 

---