Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Capacity retention

The filter elements should remove particles of five microns, must be water-resistant, have a high flow rate capability with low pressure drop, possess high dirt-retention capacity, and be rupture-resistant. The clean pressure drop should not exceed five psig at 100 °F (38 °C). The elements must have a minimum collapse differential pressure of 50 psig. Pleated-paper elements are preferred—provided they meet these requirements. Usually, the pleated-paper element will yield the five psig clean drop when used in a filter that was sized to use depth-type elements. This result is due to the greater surface area of the pleated element, more than twice the area of a conventional stacked disc-type or other depth-type elements. [Pg.551]

Due to the wide variety of filter media, filter designs, suspension properties, conditions for separation and cost, selection of the optimum filter medium is complex. Filter media selection should be guided by the following rule a filter medium must incorporate a maximum size of pores while at the same time providing a sufficiently pure filtrate. Fulfilment of this rule invokes difficulties because the increase or decrease in pore size acts in opposite ways on the filtration rate and solids retention capacity. [Pg.148]

Different filter media, regardless of the specific application, are distinguished by a number of properties. The principal properties of interest are the permeability of the medium relative to a pure liquid, its retention capacity relative to solid particles of known size and the pore size distribution. These properties are examined in a laboratory environment and are critical for comparing different filter media. [Pg.149]

Polar compounds present the most problems because of their low breakthrough volumes with common sorbents. In the last few years, highly crosslinked polymers have become commercially available which involve higher retention capacities for the more polar analytes (37, 38). Polymers have also been chemically modified with polar groups in order to increase the retention of the compounds previously mentioned (35, 37). [Pg.345]

It is seen that the polymer resin does not have the same retentive capacity as the conventional reverse phase column and thus, will not exhibit the same resolution or the equivalent loading capacity. Nevertheless, the polymer column will function over a wide range of pH whereas the silica based columns will be restricted to operating within a pH of 4.0 to 8.0 at the most. [Pg.86]

NR, styrene-butadiene mbber (SBR), polybutadiene rubber, nitrile mbber, acrylic copolymer, ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer, and A-B-A type block copolymer with conjugated dienes have been used to prepare pressure-sensitive adhesives by EB radiation [116-126]. It is not necessary to heat up the sample to join the elastomeric joints. This has only been possible due to cross-linking procedure by EB irradiation [127]. Polyfunctional acrylates, tackifier resin, and other additives have also been used to improve adhesive properties. Sasaki et al. [128] have studied the EB radiation-curable pressure-sensitive adhesives from dimer acid-based polyester urethane diacrylate with various methacrylate monomers. Acrylamide has been polymerized in the intercalation space of montmorillonite using an EB. The polymerization condition has been studied using a statistical method. The product shows a good water adsorption and retention capacity [129]. [Pg.866]

Topsoil should have a loose and open structure so that it drains fast to keep the ground surface dry. At the same time, it must be able to retain enough moisture in order that plants growing in it are not constantly subjected to drought stress. The properties of interest include particle gradation, clay content, nutrient content, and retention capacity. [Pg.190]

In a similar investigation Sastry and Fuerstenau (S4) used up to 1.5% Wyoming bentonite in a teconite feed with 48.4, 50.3, and 52.3% volume moisture. The water retention capacity was calculated as 0.47 0.11, independent of the water and bentonite contents. An evaluation of bentonites from three sources by Nicol and Adamiak (N3) indicates that the Wyoming bentonite has the highest cation exchange capacity and also the maximum retardation effect on the balling rate. [Pg.104]

Phenyl (Cohesive Technologies), the polymer-based Oasis HLB (Waters), the Cyclone (Cohesive Technologies), and the porous graphitized carbon-based Hypercarb (ThermoHypersil, Cheshire, UK) Cohesive s 2300 system was the HTLC component. Merck s monolithic reversed-phased Chromolith Speed ROD (RP-C18 (50 x 4.6 mm) served as the analytical column. The Oasis HLB, Cyclone TFC, and Hypercarb yielded the best retention capacity and good elution efficiency and volume. Recovery was 42 to 94% with a sample volume of 10 mL. Run time was 14 min. LODs were 0.4 to 13 ng/L for most compounds. [Pg.293]

In order to validate the hypothesis mentioned above, the Ni retention capacity of the Lac Tio waste rock was estimated using a batch sorption test performed on a fresh (C1) and weathered (C4) sample, followed by a 3-step Sequential Extraction Procedure (or SEP). The batch sorption test was done using a 10 mg/L Ni solution with an initial pH of 6, an ionic force adjusted to 0.05 M with NaN03 and with a liquid/solid ratio of 25. Some of the batch sorption results are presented in Figure 3. [Pg.365]

Typical Oil Retention Capacities for Kerosene in Unsaturated Soils... [Pg.153]

Many manufacturers sell the same types of stationary phase materials,6 but the most popular stationary phase materials, e.g. octadecyl-bonded silica gels, from different sources, even from the same manufacturer, often demonstrate different retention capacities and selectivities. Such differences are due to the aggressive reactivity of the silylation method and the different bonding reactions that are used, as described earlier. [Pg.46]

Several improved stationary phase materials have been synthesized for reversed-phase liquid chromatography. One material is vinyl alcohol copolymer gel. This stationary phase is quite polar and chemically very stable however, it demonstrated a strong retention capacity for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.45 9 Although stable octadecyl- and octyl-bonded silica gels have been synthesized from pure silica gel50,51 and are now commercially available, such an optimization system has not yet been built. Further experiments are required to elucidate the retention mechanism, and to systematize it within the context of instrumentation. [Pg.131]

Typically, Nation ionomer is the predominant additive in the catalyst layer. However, other types of CLs with various hygroscopic or proton conductor additives have also been developed for fuel cells operafed xmder low relative humidity (RH) and/or at elevated temperatures. Many studies have reported the use of hygroscopic y-Al203 [52] and silica [53,54] in the CE to improve the water retention capacity and make such CEs viable for operation af lower relative humidity and/or elevated temperature. Alternatively, proton conducting materials such as ZrP [55] or heteropoly acid HEA [56] have also been added... [Pg.80]

Contaminants may reach the subsurface in a gaseous phase, dissolved in water, as an immiscible hquid, or as suspended particles. Contaminant partitioning in the subsurface is controlled by the physicochemical properties and the porosity of the earth materials, the composition of the subsurface water, as well as the properties of the contaminants themselves. While the physicochemical and mineralogical characteristics of the subsurface sohd phase define the retention capacity of contaminants, the porosity and aggregation stams determine the potential volume of liquid and air that are accessible for contaminant redistribution among the subsurface phases. Enviromnental factors, such as temperature and water content in the subsurface prior to contamination, also affect the pollution pattern. [Pg.92]

The effect of aggregation of the subsurface solid phase on kerosene volatilization was studied by Fine and Yaron (1993), who compared the rate of aggregation in two size fractions of a vertisol soil the <1 mm fraction and 2 mm aggregates. The total porosity of these two fractions was similar (53% and 55% of the total volume, respectively). Differences in aggregation are reflected in the air permeability that is, their respective values were 0.0812 0.009 cm and 0.145 0.011 cm Figure 8.10 presents the volatilization of kerosene as affected by the soil aggregation, when the initial amount applied was equivalent to the retention capacity. The more permeable fraction releases kerosene faster and thus enhances volatilization. [Pg.160]

The residual content of immiscible liquids can be defined by the amount of NAPL remaining in the subsurface when pore geometry permits NAPL flow greater than the retention capacity. In an outdoor pilot experiment. Fine and Yaron (1993) studied the effect of soil constituents and soil moisture contents on the retention of kerosene in the subsurface. This retention is termed the kerosene residual content (KRC). Ten soils were studied, with a broad spectrum of clay and organic matter contents, together with four soil moisture contents corresponding to oven-dried, air-dried. [Pg.199]


See other pages where Capacity retention is mentioned: [Pg.187]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.538]    [Pg.546]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.527]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.1025]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.193]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.213 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.151 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.195 ]




SEARCH



Analyte capacity/retention factor

Column retentivity (capacity factor

Membrane filtration retention capacity

Moisture retention capacity

Retention capacity factor

Retention times and capacity factors

Water holding capacity retention

© 2024 chempedia.info