Rubber additive analysis

Recently, Lattimer et al. [22,95] advocated the use of mass spectrometry for direct analysis of nonvolatile compounding agents in polymer matrices as an alternative to extraction procedures. FAB-MS was thus applied as a means for surface desorption/ionisation of vulcanisates. FAB is often not as effective as other ionisation methods (El, Cl, FI, FD), and FAB-MS is not considered particularly useful for extracted rubber additives analysis compared to other methods that are available [36], The effectiveness of the FAB technique has been demonstrated for the analysis of a live-component additive mixture [96]. 

It should be understood that the reported practices of polymer/additive analysis, being the focus of this book, equally well apply to additive analysis of rubbers, textile fibres, surface coatings, paints, resins, adhesives, paper and food, but specific product knowledge gives the edge. Both fresh and aged materials may be analysed, as well as those of both industrial and forensic origin. 

Principles and Characteristics A first step in additive analysis is the identification of the matrix. In this respect the objective for most polymer analyses for R D purposes is merely the definition of the most appropriate extraction conditions (solvent choice), whereas in rubber or coatings analysis usually the simultaneous characterisation of the polymeric components and the additives is at stake. In fact, one of the most basic tests to carry out on a rubber sample is to determine the base polymer. Figure 2.1 shows the broad variety of additive containing polymeric matrices. 

Conventional rubber compound analysis requires several instrumental techniques, in addition to considerable pretreatment of the sample to isolate classes of components, before these selected tests can be definitive. Table 2.5 lists some general analytical tools. Spectroscopic methods such as FTIR and NMR often encounter difficulties in the analysis of vulcanised rubbers since they are insoluble and usually contain many kinds of additives such as a curing agent, plasticisers, stabilisers and fillers. Pyrolysis is advantageous for the practical analysis of insoluble polymeric materials. 

It is quite clear from Schemes 2.1-2.5 that in rubbers polymer identification and additive analysis are highly interlinked. This is at variance to procedures used in polymer/additive analysis. The methods for qualitative and quantitative analysis of the composition of rubber products are detailed in ASTM D 297 Rubber Products-Chemical Analysis [39]. 

At Goodyear laser-desorption MS has been used for direct analysis of rubber additives (e.g. antioxidants, antiozonants, vulcanising agents, processing oils, silica fillers, etc.), in situ at the surface of an elastomeric vulcanisate [74,75]. 

Alternative approaches consist in heat extraction by means of thermal analysis, thermal volatilisation and (laser) desorption techniques, or pyrolysis. In most cases mass spectrometric detection modes are used. Early MS work has focused on thermal desorption of the additives from the bulk polymer, followed by electron impact ionisation (El) [98,100], Cl [100,107] and field ionisation (FI) [100]. These methods are limited in that the polymer additives must be both stable and volatile at the higher temperatures, which is not always the case since many additives are thermally labile. More recently, soft ionisation methods have been applied to the analysis of additives from bulk polymeric material. These ionisation methods include FAB [100] and LD [97,108], which may provide qualitative information with minimal sample pretreatment. A comparison with FAB [97] has shown that LD Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance (LD-FTTCR) is superior for polymer additive identification by giving less molecular ion fragmentation. While PyGC-MS is a much-used tool for the analysis of rubber compounds (both for the characterisation of the polymer and additives), as shown in Section 2.2, its usefulness for the in situ in-polymer additive analysis is equally acknowledged. 

Applications Shake-flask extraction nowadays finds only limited application in polymer/additive analysis. Carlson et al. [108] used this technique to extract antioxidants from rubber vulcanisates for identification purposes (NMR, IR, MS). Wrist-action shaking at room temperature was also used as the sample preparation step for the UV and IR determination of Ionol CP, Santonox R and oleamide extracted from pelletised polyethylene using different solvents [78]. BHT could be extracted in 98 % yield from powdered PP by shaking at room temperature for 30 min with carbon disulfide. 

For the purpose of polymer/additive analysis most applications refer to vulcanisate analysis. Weber [370] has determined various vulcanisation accelerators (Vulkazit Thiuram/Pextra N/Merkapto/AZ/DM) in rubbers using PC. Similarly, Zijp [371] has described application of PC for identification of various vulcanisation accelerator classes (guanidines, dithiocarbaminates, thiuramsulfides, mercapto-substituted heterocyclic compounds, thioureas, etc.). The same author has also... 

Applications Conventional TLC was the most successful separation technique in the 1960s and early 1970s for identification of components in plastics. Amos [409] has published a comprehensive review on the use of TLC for various additive types (antioxidants, stabilisers, plasticisers, curing agents, antistatic agents, peroxides) in polymers and rubber vulcanisates (1973 status). More recently, Freitag [429] has reviewed TLC applications in additive analysis. TLC has been extensively applied to the determination of additives in polymer extracts [444,445]. 

Applications Open-column chromatography was used for polymer/additive analysis mainly in the 1950-1970 period (cf. Vimalasiri et al. [160]). Examples are the application of CC to styrene-butadiene copoly-mer/(additives, low-MW compounds) [530] and rubbers accelerators, antioxidants) [531]. Column chromatography of nine plasticisers in PVC with various elution solvents has been reported [44], as well as the separation of CHCI3 solvent extracts of PE/(BHT, Santonox R) on an alumina column [532]. Similarly, Santonox R and Ionol CP were easily separated using benzene and Topanol CA and dilaurylthiodipropionate using cyclohexane ethyl acetate (9 1 v/v) [533]. CC on neutral alumina has been used for the separation of antioxidants, accelerators and plasticisers in rubber extracts [534]. Column chromatography of polymer additives has been reviewed [160,375,376]. 

Stabilisers are usually determined by a time-consuming extraction from the polymer, followed by an IR or UV spectrophotometric measurement on the extract. Most stabilisers are complex aromatic compounds which exhibit intense UV absorption and therefore should show luminescence in many cases. The fluorescence emission spectra of Irgafos 168 and its phosphate degradation product, recorded in hexane at an excitation wavelength of 270 nm, are not spectrally distinct. However, the fluorescence quantum yield of the phosphate greatly exceeds that of the phosphite and this difference may enable quantitation of the phosphate concentration [150]. The application of emission spectroscopy to additive analysis was illustrated for Nonox Cl (/V./V -di-/i-naphthyl-p-phcnylene-diamine) [149] with fluorescence ex/em peaks at 392/490 nm and phosphorescence ex/em at 382/516 nm. Parker and Barnes [151] have reported the use of fluorescence for the determination of V-phenyl-l-naphthylamine and N-phenyl-2-naphthylamine in extracted vulcanised rubber. While pine tar and other additives in the rubber seriously interfered with the absorption spectrophotometric method this was not the case with the fluoromet-ric method. 

Table 10.32 is a shortlist of the characteristics of the ideal polymer/additive analysis technique. It is hoped that the ideal method of the future will be a reliable, cost-effective, qualitative and quantitative, in-polymer additive analysis technique. It may be useful to briefly compare the two general approaches to additive analysis, namely conventional and in-polymer methods. The classical methods range from inexpensive to expensive in terms of equipment they are well established and subject to continuous evolution and their strengths and deficiencies are well documented. We stressed the hyphenated methods for qualitative analysis and the dissolution methods for quantitative analysis. Lattimer and Harris [130] concluded in 1989 that there was no clear advantage for direct analysis (of rubbers) over extract analysis. Despite many instrumental advances in the last decade, this conclusion still largely holds true today. Direct analysis is experimentally somewhat faster and easier, but tends to require greater interpretative difficulties. Direct analysis avoids such common extraction difficulties as ... 

The keen observer may have noticed that modern methods of additive analysis in polymers overlap with those in allied areas (Figure 10.4) rubber [150,151], paints [152,153] and coatings [152], adhesives [153], inks [153], food [154], impregnated paper and faced paperboard [155], etc. Clearly, tool-boxes will differ to some extent, as do the analytes. 

The applications of simultaneous TG-FTIR to elastomeric materials have been reviewed in the past. Manley [32] has described thermal methods of analysis of rubbers and plastics, including TGA, DTA, DSC, TMA, Thermal volatilisation analysis (TVA), TG-FTIR and TG-MS and has indicated vulcanisation as an important application. Carangelo and coworkers [31] have reviewed the applications of the combination of TG and evolved gas analysis by FTIR. The authors report TG-FTIR analysis of evolved products (C02, NH3, CHjCOOH and olefins) from a polyethylene with rubber additive. The TG-FTIR system performs quantitative measurements, and preserves and monitors very high molecular weight condensibles. The technique has proven useful for many applications (Table 1.6). Mittleman and co-workers [30] have addressed the role of TG-FTIR in the determination of polymer degradation pathways. 

Some general applications of TG-FTIR are evolved gas analysis, identification of polymeric materials, additive analysis, determination of residual solvents, degradation of polymers, sulphur components from oil shale and rubber, contaminants in catalysts, hydrocarbons in source rock, nitrogen species from waste oil, aldehydes in wood and lignins, nicotine in tobacco and related products, moisture in pharmaceuticals, characterisation of minerals and coal, determination of kinetic parameters and solid fuel analysis. 

This technique has found limited applications in polymer additive analysis in plastics and rubbers. These include aromatic amines and antiozonants in rubber extracts [2, 50-62], and di-laurylthiodipropionate in polymer extracts [56]. 

Pastor-Sempere [45] treated two styrene-butadiene rubbers with fumaric acid in a butan-2-ol/ethanol mixture. This resulted in improved adhesion in both cases, but the improvement with one formulation was significantly greater than the other. The lower peel strength was attributed to the presence of paraffin wax and zinc stearate. Roughening prior to treatment with fumaric acid resulted in additional improvements with both rubbers. Infrared analysis indicated that the fumaric acid was effective by introducing C=0 bonds and by reducing the concentration of zinc stearate. In addition, the fumaric acid caused a roughening of both rubbers. 

Plitt et al. [542] have surveyed the literature eov-ering the fluorescence of fibres, rubber, cellulose, polymers, and plastics long ago. On the whole, fluorescence and phosphorescence techniques find restricted practical application for polymer/additive analysis. There is also little information in the literature on the quantitative aspects of the direct examination of polymer films by luminescence techniques. 

More recently, Lattimer et al. [2,678] have used direct methods of qualitative rubber analysis. Various direct single-stage mass spectrometric methods were found to be effective for identifying organic additives in rubber. Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) increases the specificity and sensitivity of detection and identification of additives in direct rubber compound analysis [431,744], Again, Py-FIMS turned out to be a good technique for analysis of both the organic additives and rubber components in the same experiment [675], Results of these studies have been summarised in a review paper on rubber compound analysis [745],... 

---