Risk tools evaluation

Vulnerability assessment is not a predictive science—it is an objective way of analyzing subjective issues. Given these realities and the evolving threat environment, the CCPS SVA method, with the specific changes made to address transportation issues, provides a transparent and flexible set of tools to evaluate a wide variety of chemicals, modes of transportation, routes, and to efficiently determine vulnerabilities, assess related risks, and evaluate countermeasures to minimize those risks. 

The corporate office wanted to be sure that the new safety risk assessment process would work and was sustainable. So they piloted it on various product lines in different countries. This gave the company the ability to see if similar safety risks would be identified, determine if risks were evaluated consistently, and test the applicability and ease of the tool to actual safety hazards. It was a resounding success and quickly led to the promulgation of the methodology across all operations worldwide. 

The acronym for chemical process quantitative risk analysis. It is the process of hazard identification followed by numerical evaluation of incident consequences and frequencies, and their combination into an overall measure of risk when applied to the chemical process industry. It is particularly applied to episodic events. It differs from, but is related to, a probabilistic risk analysis (PRA), a quantitative tool used in the nuclear industry... 

Several tools can be used to evaluate the environmental consequences of an industrial ventilation project. Some of the most common methods used are covered in this chapter. The life cycle assessment tool is considered in detail, as it is a comprehensive and product-oriented approach that is covered by international standardization. Other tools, such as risk assessment, cost-benefit... 

In a tiny fraction of cases, a quick formula can be used. For most cases, the analysis uses an options tree, with one leaf per possible outcome. However, this falls prey to the curse of dimensionality —the number of leaves on the tree grows exponentially in the number of risk and decision dimensions considered. Thus only a limited, simple set of situations can be optimized in this way because one has to severely limit the decisions and risks that are considered. Tools available to help automate and simplify options analysis, widely used in pharmaceutical project evaluation, include Excel addons such as R1SK [11] and more graphically based solutions such as DPL [12]. Both of these support the creation and evaluation of decision trees and of influence diagrams Figure 11.2 shows a simple example of each of these. A primer in applied decision theory is Clemen s book Making Hard Decisions, other sources may be found in the website of James Vornov, Director of Clinical Research at Guildford Pharmaceuticals, a recent convert to decision theory for options analysis [13]. 

Using a tool such as a qualitative risk ranking matrix can be very useful in identifying low-risk buildings. For those events that have potentially major or catastrophic consequences to buildings and their occupants, however, a qualitative risk matrix may not always be an appropriate final evaluation. For events that are potentially major or catastrophic, regardless... 

As a practical matter, risk reduction should always be considered before proceeding with QRA. If the cost of proposed risk-reduction measures is high, a detailed QRA may be justified. In this event, various risk-reduction options can be evaluated to determine which options produce the greatest benefit at the lowest cost. Additional guidance on risk-based decision making is available in the CCPS s Tools for Making Acute Risk Decisions with Chemical Process Apphcations (Ref. 77). 

In many cases, various risk-reduction alternatives will result in a tolerable level of risk. Cost-benefit analysis can be a useful tool in evaluating alternative approaches. Costs are generally straightforward and easy to estimate however, estimating benefits may be more difficult, requiring assumptions that allow all benefits to be expressed using a common basis, usually monetary. 

Chapters 3 and 4 described a series of screening tools that can be used to evaluate the design and siting of buildings in process plants. The results from the screening for a particular building will fall into one of three risk categories ... 

The methodologies offered in this book allow some degree of building evaluation without the development of explicit risk tolerance criteria. However, additional guidance in the development and selection of risk tolerance criteria will benefit those companies that wish to fully utilize risk screening and quantitative risk assessment as evaluation tools. 

Information on exposure levels is fundamental for the assessment and management of health risks related to occupational and environmental exposure to pesticides. Biological monitoring is a primary tool for exposure evaluation,... 

There is a growing need to better characterize the health risk related to occupational and environmental exposure to pesticides. Risk characterization is a basic step in the assessment and management of the health risks related to chemicals (Tordoir and Maroni, 1994). Evaluation of exposure, which may be performed through environmental and biological monitoring, is a fundamental component of risk assessment. Biomarkers are useful tools that may be used in risk assessment to confirm exposure or to quantify it by estimating the internal dose. Besides their use in risk assessment, biomarkers also represent a fundamental tool to improve the effectiveness of medical and epidemiological surveillance. 

In order to achieve that an environmental fate model is successfully applied in a screening level risk assessment and ultimately incorporated into the decisionmaking tools, the model should have computational efficiency and modest data input. Moreover, the model should incorporate all relevant compartments and all sources of contamination and should consider the most important mechanisms of fate and transport. Although spatial models describe the environment more accurately, such models are difficult to apply because they require a large amount of input data (e.g., detailed terrain parameters, meteorological data, turbulence characteristics and other related parameters). Therefore, MCMs are more practical, especially for long-term environmental impact evaluation, because of their modest data requirements and relatively simple yet comprehensive model structure. In addition, MCMs are also widely used for the comparative risk assessment of new and existing chemicals [28-33]. 

FOOTPRINT (http //www.eu-footprint.org) is an EC 6th Framework Programme project aiming to develop computer tools to evaluate and reduce the risk of pesticides impacting on water resources in the EU SSPI-CT-2005-022704. 

The most useful tool in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux is the clinical history, including both presenting symptoms and associated risk factors. Patients with mild, typical reflux symptoms do not usually require invasive evaluation a clinical diagnosis of GERD can be assumed in patients who respond to appropriate therapy. 

---