Reactor auxiliary systems power operation

The reactor auxiliary systems are similar to those found on other PWRs and typically include a primary water volume control and inventory system, a primary water purification system, radioactive liquid and gaseous effluent treatment systems, and a ventilation system. At low power levels, many of these systems may be required only on an intermittent basis and would be valved out during periods of autonomous operation. 

Reactor criticality took place on 4th August and was followed by a neutronic test phase at less than 3% power, carried through at various temperature levels between 180 C and 345 C. These tests showed that the behaviour of the Superphenix core remained conform to forecasts, and that the main and auxiliary sodium circuits operated In a satisfactory manner. The 345 C temperature level was put to advantage to check the calibration by hydrogen injection of the steam generator leak detection systems. 

As in the case of the emergency cooling systems, the safety-related auxiliary electrical power supply equipment is divided into four independent and physically separated parts, or subdivisions, and the reactor protection system operates on a 2-out-of-4 logic for signal transmission and actuation. 

Four primary reactor auxiliary cooling systems (PRACS) are used A cooling coil is installed in the inlet plenum of each IHX and a heat transfer coil is installed in the mr cooler of ultimate heat sink Coolant is circulated by EM pumps supported by emergency AC power The air cooler consists of a blower, a stack, vanes and dampers The blower is supported by the emergency AC power The vanes and the dampers are operated by the emergency DC power Decay heat removal by natural circulation is possible to mitigate a total blackout event (loss of all AC power)... 

The System 80+ Standard Design utilizes offsite and onsite power systems to supply the unit auxiliaries during normal operation, and these plus the Reactor Protection System and Engineered Safety Features Systems during abnormal and accident conditions. In addition, the onsite and offsite power systems are designed in accordance with accepted industry codes and standards (see CESSAR-DC Section 8.0), and do not employ load break switches. 

The HPCS system can operate independently of normal auxiliary AC power, plant service air, or the emergency cooling water system. Operation of the system is automatically initiated from independent redundant signals indicating low reactor vessel water level or high pressure in the primary containment. The system also provides for remote-manual startup, operation, and shutdown. A testable check valve in the discharge line prevents backflow from the reactor pressure vessel when the reactor vessel pressure exceeds the HPCS system pressure such as may occur during initial activation of the system. A low flow bypass system is placed into operation until pump head exceeds the nuclear system pressure and permits flow into the reactor vessel. 

In the operation of nuclear power plants a number of additional systems are needed to support the regular functioning of the main systems. These systems, which are mainly located in the reactor auxiliary building, essentially have to fulfil the following functions ... 

The reactor unit of a land-based ABV nuclear power plant (see Fig. V-6 and V-7) includes the steam-generating unit, the biological shielding, and equipment of the main and auxiliary systems providing heat removal from the reactor and safe reactor operation under normal and emergency conditions. 

The main and auxiliary cooling systems are based on natural circulation of water coolant. The containment vessel (CV) is water-filled, preventing activity release to the environment and acting as a radiation shield. The control rod drive mechanism (CRDM) is in-vessel type, with no penetrations in the reactor pressure vessel (RPV). No chemical and volume control system is used during reactor power operation. The PSRD has a passive reactor shutdown system. 

For heat removal from a shutdown reactor, two independent passive systems are provided, which are the reactor vessel auxiliary cooling system (RVACS) and the intermediate reactor auxiliary cooling system (IRACS). The RVACS is completely passive and removes shutdown heat from the surfaces of the guard vessel using natural circulation of air. There is no valve, vane, or damper in the flow path of the air therefore, the RVACS is always in operation, even when the reactor operates at rated power. Two stacks are provided to obtain a sufficient draft. 

A simple scheme of the reactor module and the fact that all modules installed are of the same type make it possible to reduce the number of personnel for operation and maintenance of the modular NPP as compared with the NPP unit comprising one large-power reactor that incorporates many safety systems, such as protection systems, localizing accident systems, and control and auxiliary systems. For example, the safety systems of the AP-1000 reactor [XIX-16] have 184 pumps, 1400 valves, and 40 km of pipelines and cables [XIX-16]. 

With respect to the re-deposition of a coating on the first wall, the obvious advantage is the compatibility with Tokamak operation since it requires a minimum of auxiliary equipment and modification, particularly if a continuous, high frequency discharge is used. The power requirements for such an approach appear to be acceptable134. An rf heating system, if incorporated into the reactor design (e. g. 

There are three groups of instruments, furnishing information to the operator and to the control system (1) the reactor instruments measuring neutron flux or power level, (2) the rod position and motion indicators, and-(3) the instruments for the auxiliary facilities and energy conversion and storage. These groups will be discussed in the order mentioned. The way in which the instrument signals are presented to the operator, recorded, or used in the control system will be discussed in later sections. 

The capacities of the emergency core cooling systems suffice to provide water under all postulated pipe break conditions. This statement is also valid assuming that only two of the four redundant subsystems are operable. The postulated loss-of-coolant conditions include a hypothetical 80 cm leak at the bottom of the reactor vessel In this context, it can be noted that the capacity of the low pressure coolant injection punq)S has been reduced for BWR 90, following comprehensive core cooling analyses. As a secondary effect, it has been possible to simplify the auxiliary power supply systems. 

Reactor pressure increase Several events may cause this e.g., inadvertent closure of one turbine control valve, pressure regulator downscale failure, generator load rejection, turbine trip MSIV closure, loss of condenser vacuum, loss of nonemergency AC power to station auxiliaries, loss of feedwater etc. All these have been analysed. Features are included in the instrumentation and control systems or redundancies to maintain reactor pressure through a combination of component automatic responses or operator actions, depending on the identified cause. 

A scheme of the 4S-LMR main heat transport system with the indication of heat removal path in normal operation and in accidents is given in Fig. XV-11. The reactor incorporates redundant passive decay heat removal systems. Specifically, a reactor vessel auxiliary cooling system (RVACS) is adopted in which the natural convection airflow removes the decay heat radiated through the guard vessel. The heat removal capability depends on the thermal radiation area. A specific (per thermal power) heat radiation area of small reactors is larger than that of medium sized or large reactors. It is expected that about 1% of the nominal power could be removed with the RVACS. 

A stationary complex including the protective containment for the reactor installation, the auxiliary reactor systems and equipment, and the installations for power generation and desalination. It is assumed that this complex can be constructed, owned and operated by a user-country, which would also finance all these activities ... 

The HGP, owned by the Supply System, received steam via the steam piping system from the N Reactor. The HGP consists of two 430-MW (electrical) low-pressure turbine generator systems with associated auxiliary equipment normally found in a steam power station. The HGP is operated by the Supply System. The HGP condensers and auxiliary cooling systems were supplied by raw water pumped from the Columbia River and discharged back to the river approximately 90 m (300 ft) upstream from the N Reactor raw water intake structure. 

Heat removal from PWR plants following reactor trip and a loss of off-site power is accomplished by the operation of several systems, including the secondary system via the steam relief to the atmosphere. The auxiliary (emergency) feedwater system (AFW) functions as a safety system because it is the only source of makeup water to the steam generators for decay heat removal when the main feedwater systems becomes inoperable. 

The decay heat and residual heat could be cooled for about 30 minutes through the natural circulation of primary coolant in the primary system, and through the operation of turbine operation auxiliary water supply pump and the main steam safety valve. Necessary power for the safety protection systems and the turbine-driven auxiliary feedwater systems is supplied from highly reliable batteries to secure the safety of reactor even during the total loss of power. 

After various maintenance work, plant operation started again at the beginning of February 1987 but was again hampered successively by water hammer on the A auxiliary feedwater plant piping, putting it out of action for three months, then at the end of March by the detection of a sodium leak on the storage drum. This led to reactor shutdown at the end of May 1987, after a second calibration test on the clad rupture detection systems at 90% of nominal power. 

The assessment of operational costs was based on utilities experience of nuclear power plant operation. A goal of EFR design is to avoid there being significant differences in operation and maintenance (O M) costs compared with PWRs, this intention being supported by a comparison of the number and complexity of the nuclear related systems and auxiliary plant. It is an established fact that radiation doses to operators are substantially lower in a fast reactor station than a PWR this has favourable consequences for O M costs. 

---