Psychometric models

The problem of the difference between objective risk and subjective risk perception is avoided by the so-called psychometric models which aim to directly record subjective evaluations as a basis for decision-making processes. The expressed preference method [9-10], which uses opinion polls, did, however, show the change in the way the population evaluates technical developments. 

Clark, L. A., Watson, D. (1991). Tripartite model of anxiety and depression Psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. Journal of Abnormal PsychoP ogy, 100, 316-336. 

Downs, R. M., and Stea, D. (1977). Maps in minds. New York Harper and Row. Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 58 (270). Eliot, J. (1987). Models of psychological space psychometric, developmental, and experimental approaches. New York Springer-Verlag. 

The effort to understand those brain functions that account for variance in psychometric intelligence produced a set of replicated correlations with indices at different levels of explanation. Future work will add to these associations and should devote more effort to explaining these correlations. A part of this explanatory toil must come from linking individual differences at different levels of description. Some contributions toward that end were offered, including statistical modelling, pharmacological intervention, functional brain imaging and event related potential studies. 

Carroll s (1993) comprehensive reanalysis of the psychometric literature led to the development of a three-stratum hierarchical model in which g occupies a singular stratum at the apex of the hierarchy accounting for approximately 50% of the covariance among diverse measures of intellect. Carroll s synthesis of the factor analytic literature is subject to two related criticisms. Horn (2000) noted that the g factor is not invariant in several different studies and thus cannot constitute a well-defined theoretical constmct. Gustafsson (1999) noted that Carroll used exploratory rather than confirmatory factor analyses. Gustafsson s confirmatory factor analyses led to the conclusion that g is identical with fluid ability (gf) and that there is no need to hypothesize an independent factor. 

MMCC s transition from a compliance assessment model to an axiological assessment model parallels the paradigm shift from indirect, psychometric assessment models to direct, social constructivist assessment models in the composition field. Educators now recognize the necessity for establishing rhetorical, locally-contextualized, assessment research models based upon constructivist principles. Stations... 

A short historical introduction of multi-way analysis is given here. Most of this historical work comes from psychometrics and the most important references related to the models presented in the following sections are given. The pioneering work began in the middle of the twentieth century and ended around 1980, when the most important multi-way models and their algorithms had been introduced. 

Benzodiazepines have been extensively used in the treatment of anxiety. However, the untoward CNS impairment effects of benzodiazepines are much more readily quantified using cognitive neuromotor testing than measures of anxiolytic effects due to lack of effective PD markers. Psychometric tests (hand-eye coordination, memory, body sway, and psychomotor speed), anesthetic effects (sleeping time), eye movement, and neurophysiological effects have been used as the PD end points to model the PK/PD relationships of benzodiazepines. 

The first part of diis chapter has presented what we call "paper and pencil" tips regarding a variety of issues that can be considered when developing surveys and tests. One step in survey or test design is to compute a reliability statistic, such as Cronbach alpha. Typically, researchers collect data with their instrument and commence their statistical analysis. However, researchers should include a second analysis step that utilizes psychometric theory to guide die development of surveys and tests, to provide techniques Aat allow die functioning of surveys and tests to be monitored and improved, and to prepare data for statistical calculations. In the second part of the chapter, we provide an overview of one psychometric technique (the Rasch model) diat allows researchers to easily carryout this important second analysis step. 

In this section, we will provide a brief overview of Rasch analysis - How it can be used to develop tests and surveys. - How the technique can be used to improve tests and surveys, - How the technique can be used to prepare data for analysis. This summary is meant to provide a simple overview. For a more thorough understanding, we encourage readers to consult texts such as Best Test Design (7), Rating Scale Analysis (2) and Applying the Rasch Model Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences ( ), for additional details with respect to the psychometric technique. 

There has been considerable IS research interest in decision under uncertainty and the impacts of onUne security risks. However, there has not been a systematic model and approach available to address the impacts of variant uncertainties of knowledge of onUne information security risks on consumer decision making in the B2C e-commerce context. The theoretical basis for prior research on decision under risk and uncertainty primarily falls into three categories utility theoiy, attitudinal theories, and the psychometric paradigm. 

Scholars point out that PLS is more suitable with smaller sample sizes than covariance-based structural equation models (Hair et al. 2011b). Chin (1998) established the rule of ten as rule of thumb. Following this rule, the sufficient sample size can be calculated by multiplying the most complex formative relationship in the model times 10. Yet researchers point out that this rule is rule is contingent on factors like data distribution, missing data, psychometric properties, and other factors (Marcoulides and Saunders 2006). In my case, the rule of ten postulates a minimum sample size of 40 answers (the most complex formative relationships are the dependent variables in model 2, which are influenced by four formative factors). The obtained sample is thus larger than required. Also, there is no missing data present which would increase the needed sample size. 

---