Polymers additives/components

Acryhc modifiers for cement impact strength and adhesion to substrates are discussed in reference 211. Both water-soluble acryhc and acryhc emulsion polymers are used in the ceramic industry as temporary binders, deflocculants, and additive components in ceramic bodies and glazes (212) (see Ceramcs). 

Ternary Blends. Discussion of polymer blends is typically limited to those containing only two different components. Of course, inclusion of additional components may be useful in formulating commercial products. The recent Hterature describes the theoretical treatment and experimental studies of the phase behavior of ternary blends (10,21). The most commonly studied ternary mixtures are those where two of the binary pairs are miscible, but the third pair is not. There are limited regions where such ternary mixtures exhibit one phase. A few cases have been examined where all three binary pairs are miscible however, theoretically this does not always ensure homogeneous ternary mixtures (10,21). 

Pyrotechnic mixtures may also contain additional components that are added to modify the bum rate, enhance the pyrotechnic effect, or serve as a binder to maintain the homogeneity of the blended mixture and provide mechanical strength when the composition is pressed or consoHdated into a tube or other container. These additional components may also function as oxidizers or fuels in the composition, and it can be anticipated that the heat output, bum rate, and ignition sensitivity may all be affected by the addition of another component to a pyrotechnic composition. An example of an additional component is the use of a catalyst, such as iron oxide, to enhance the decomposition rate of ammonium perchlorate. Diatomaceous earth or coarse sawdust may be used to slow up the bum rate of a composition, or magnesium carbonate (an acid neutralizer) may be added to help stabilize mixtures that contain an acid-sensitive component such as potassium chlorate. Binders include such materials as dextrin (partially hydrolyzed starch), various gums, and assorted polymers such as poly(vinyl alcohol), epoxies, and polyesters. Polybutadiene mbber binders are widely used as fuels and binders in the soHd propellant industry. The production of colored flames is enhanced by the presence of chlorine atoms in the pyrotechnic flame, so chlorine donors such as poly(vinyl chloride) or chlorinated mbber are often added to color-producing compositions, where they also serve as fuels. 

Before dealing with reinforcement of elastomers we have to introduce the basic molecular features of mbber elasticity. Then, we introduce—step-by-step—additional components into the model which consider the influence of reinforcing disordered solid fillers like carbon black or silica within a rabbery matrix. At this point, we will pay special attention to the incorporation of several additional kinds of complex interactions which then come into play polymer-filler and filler-filler interactions. We demonstrate how a model of reinforced elastomers in its present state allows a thorough description of the large-strain materials behavior of reinforced mbbers in several fields of technical applications. In this way we present a thoroughgoing line from molecular mechanisms to industrial applications of reinforced elastomers. 

For standard or proprietary polymer additive blends there is the need for analytical certification of the components. Blend technology has been developed for two- to six-component polymer additive blend systems, with certified analytical results [81]. Finally, there exist physical collections of reference additive samples, both public [82] and proprietary. The Dutch Food Inspection Service reference collection comprises 100 of the most important additives used in food contact plastics [83-85]. Reference compounds of a broad range of additives used in commercial plastics and rubber formulations are generally also available from the major additive manufacturers. These additive samples can be used as reference or calibration standards for chromatographic or spectroscopic analysis. DSM Plastics Reference Collection of Additives comprises over 1400 samples. 

Polymer/additive analysis then usually proceeds by separation of polymer and additives (cf. Scheme 2.12) using one out of many solvent extraction techniques (cf. Chapter 3). After extraction the residue is pressed into a thin film to verify that all extractables have been removed. UV spectroscopy is used for verification of the presence of components with a chromophoric moiety (phenolic antioxidants and/or UV absorbers) and IR spectroscopy to verify the absence of IR bands extraneous to the polymer. The XRF results before and after extraction are compared, especially when the elemental analysis does not comply with the preliminary indications of the nature of the additive package. This may occur for example in PA6/PA6.6 blends where... 

Some typical applications in SFE of polymer/additive analysis are illustrated below. Hunt et al. [333] found that supercritical extraction of DIOP and Topanol CA from ground PVC increased with temperature up to 90 °C at 45 MPa, then levelled off, presumably as solubility became the limiting factor. The extraction of DOP and DBP plasticisers from PVC by scC02 at 52 MPa increased from 50 to 80 °C, when extraction was almost complete in 25 min [336]. At 70 °C the amount extracted increased from 79 to 95 % for pressures from 22 to 60 MPa. SFE has the potential to shorten extraction times for traces (<20ppm) of additives (DBP and DOP) in flexible PVC formulations with similar or even better extraction efficiencies compared with traditional LSE techniques [384]. Marin et al. [336] have used off-line SFE-GC to determine the detection limits for DBP and DOP in flexible PVC. The method developed was compared with Soxhlet liquid extraction. At such low additive concentrations a maximum efficiency in the extractive process and an adequate separative system are needed to avoid interferences with other components that are present at high concentrations in the PVC formulations, such as DINP. Results obtained... 

The polymer/additive system in combination with the proposed extraction technique determines the preferred solvent. In ASE the solvent must swell but not dissolve the polymer, whereas MAE requires a high dielectric solvent or solvent component. This makes solvent selection for MAE more problematical than for ASE . Therefore, MAE may be the preferred method for a plant laboratory analysing large numbers of similar samples (e.g. nonpolar or polar additives in polyolefins [210]). At variance to ASE , in MAE dissolution of the polymer will not block any transfer lines. Complete dissolution of the sample leads to rapid extractions, the polymer precipitating when the solvent cools. However, partial dissolution and softening of the polymer will result in agglomeration of particles and a reduction in extraction rate. 

SPE is a useful device for working up of polymer additive dissolutions the apolar polymer is retained on the Cj 8 sorbent, while analytes may be eluted. In the fractionation of dissolutions it is advantageous to make use of the differences in polarity and affinity of the components with the sorbent. SPE of applied samples may be done with cartridges or disks, either off- or on-line. A flow-chart for the use of SPE has been published [3], Applications of SPE have been described in several monographs [511,512]. 

Wieboldt et al. [560] have described SFE-SFC-FTIR analysis of hindered phenol primary antioxidants and phosphite secondary antioxidants in PE. SFE is more selective for the lower-range low-MW polymer than Soxhlet-type extraction. This yields a chromatogram with less interference from low-MW polymer peaks in the region where the additive components elute. As a result, SFE appears to be a better choice than Soxhlet-type extraction for the selective removal of additives from flaked polymer. SFE and dissolution/precipitation methods were compared for a PVC/stabiliser system [366]. 

Applications On a comparative basis, HTGC is a relatively new tool and extremely valuable for the analyses of extracted polymer additives, as shown by industrial problem solving. For satisfactory analysis of in-polymer additives by HTGC two specific conditions are to be met. The instrument should be equipped with a cool on-column injection port to better preserve some of the additives and/or their by-products that may be thermally labile. The instrument must also have electronic pressure control so that some of the very high-boiling components, such as Irganox 1010, are... 

Berger [340] has examined the use of pSFC in polymer/additive analysis. As many polymer additives are moderately polar and nonvolatile SFC is an appropriate separation technique at temperatures well below those at which additives decompose [300,341,342], SFC is also a method of choice for additives which hydrolyse easily. Consequently, Raynor et al. [343] and others [284,344] consider that SFC (especially in combination with SFE) is the method of choice for analysing polymer additives as a relatively fast and efficient sample preparation method. Characterisation of product mixtures of nonpolar to moderately polar components encompassing a wide range of molecular masses can be accomplished by cSFC-FID. Unknown polymer additives may be identified quite adequately by means of cSFC-FID by comparison with retention times of standards [343], However, identification by this method tends to be time-consuming and requires that all the candidate compounds are on hand. SFC-FID of some low-to-medium polarity additives on reversed-phase packed columns... 

SFC-FID is widely used for the analysis of (nonvolatile) textile finish components. An application of SFC in fuel product analysis is the determination of lubricating oil additives, which consist of complex mixtures of compounds such as zinc dialkylthiophosphates, organic sulfur compounds (e.g. nonylphenyl sulfides), hindered phenols (e.g. 2,6-di-f-butyl-4-methylphenol), hindered amines (e.g. dioctyldiphenylamines) and surfactants (sulfonic acid salts). Classical TLC, SEC and LC analysis are not satisfactory here because of the complexity of such mixtures of compounds, while their lability precludes GC determination. Both cSFC and pSFC enable analysis of most of these chemical classes [305]. Rather few examples have been reported of thermally unstable compounds analysed by SFC an example of thermally labile polymer additives are fire retardants [360]. pSFC has been used for the separation of a mixture of methylvinylsilicones and peroxides (thermally labile analytes) [361]. 

Cyclic oligomers of PA6 can be separated by PC [385,386] also PET and linear PET oligomers were separated by this technique [387]. Similarly, PC has been used for the determination of PEGs, but was limited by its insensitivity and low repeatability [388]. PC was also used in the determination of Cd, Pb and Zn salts of fatty acids [389]. ATR-IR has been used to identify the plasticisers DEHP and TEHTM separated by PC [390]. Although this combined method is inferior in sensitivity and resolution to modem hyphenated separation systems it is simple, cheap and suitable for routine analysis of components like polymer additives. However, the applicability of ATR-IR for in situ identification of components separated by PC is severely restricted by background interference. 

Normal-phase chromatography is still widely used for the determination of nonpolar additives in a variety of commercial products and pharmaceutical formulations, e.g. the separation of nonpolar components in the nonionic surfactant Triton X-100. Most of the NPLC analyses of polymer additives have been performed in isocratic mode [576]. However, isocratic HPLC methods are incapable of separating a substantial number of industrially used additives [605,608,612-616], Normal-phase chromatography of Irgafos 168, Irganox 1010/1076/3114 was shown [240]. NPLC-UV has been used for quantitative analysis of additives in PP/(Irganox 1010/1076, Irgafos 168) after Soxhlet extraction (88%... 

---