Performance Evaluation of Catalysts

The performance of catalyst generally refers to selectivity (no selectivity for ammonia synthetic catalyst) and stability including chemical stability (deactivation) and physical stability (heat-resistance, mechanical strength). 

---

Performance evaluation of catalysts subjected to forced deactivation. 

Performance Evaluation. Successful catalyst development requires a satisfactory means to determine the performance of the catalyst. The only significant proof of improvement in catalyst performance Hes in evaluation in a reactor under the proper conditions. 

Mechanism The understanding of mechanisms in catalytic reactions is sometimes crucial for the creative development of new applications. In a first approach, the main interest was to develop high surface area titanium nitride as a material for catalytic applications and, therefore, evaluation of catalysts prepared under different conditions was performed. 

Fig. 1. Performance evaluation of prepared electro-catalysts as an electrode of PEMFC. Cell temperature 70 C, active area 50cm, platinum loading anode(0.3mgPt/cm )/cathode(0.45mg Pt/cm ), fuel utilization H2/O2 = 80%/50%, RH 100% RFl, pressure H2/O2 = 0 psig/0 psig.

The oxidative dehydrogenation of methanol to formaldehyde was choosen as model reaction by BASF for performance evaluation of micro reactors [1, 49-51, 108]. In the industrial process a methanol-air mixture of equimolecular ratio of methanol and oxygen is guided through a shallow catalyst bed of silver at 150 °C feed temperature, 600-650 °C exit temperature, atmospheric pressure and a contact time of 10 ms or less. Conversion amounts to 60-70% at a selectivity of about 90%. 

A blend of Polywax 500 and 655 (81.3 and 18.7 wt%, respectively) with a CO-activated ultrafine iron catalyst was used for the evaluation of catalyst/ wax slurry filtration performance of the filter module with and without an alcohol compound. All of the filtration tests were conducted with a TMP of... 

A fast FID consists of a main control unit and two remote sampling heads (which house the FIDs). The dual channel nature of the instrument enables simultaneous real-time measurement in two locations allowing, for example, evaluation of catalyst performance. 

A feasible solution for this complex challenge is to implement at least two analytical methods with which the course of the reaction can be followed a fast first method that allows qualitative control of the status of the catalyst performance and a second accurate, and in most cases more time consuming, analysis method that will allow a detailed evaluation of catalyst performance. The two analysis methods can be run on one analytical unit, e.g. a gas chromatograph with two different analysis protocols, or separate analytical units such as a gas chromatograph for accurate performance evaluation in combination with a non-dispersive infrared unit for fast qualitative analysis. 

Following our success in finding a suitable silane and catalyst for the first step in the synthesis of unsymmetrical bis-alkoxy si lanes, we set out to evaluate catalysts to achieve the second alcoholysis. We were aware from prior reports in the literature that there were a variety of catalysts capable of performing alcoholysis of silanes.10 17 From prior evaluation of catalysts in the first step, we knew that 10 % Pd/C, Rh2(pfb)4, and CuH all catalyze the reaction of the second step with diethylsilane and Rh2(pfb)4 catalyzes the reaction of the second step (10 %) with diphenylsilane (Table 4). Rli2(OAc)4 was ruled out by our discovery that only one addition of alcohol occurred with diisopropylsilane. 

While ASTM procedures for both steaming and MAT testing have been established (ASTM D-4463 and D-3907, respectively), a general survey of the petroleum industry indicates that neither of these methods are specifically practiced. Instead, each laboratory has developed individualized steaming and MAT testing procedures that best suit their needs. While many laboratories perform complete chemical and physical analyses on fresh FOC catalysts, the vast majority do not perform such analyses on the steamed catalysts. The latter actually represent the catalysts evaluated vhile the former are in essence a "precursor". While it may be argued that fresh properties can be used as an indicator of steamed properties, a thorough evaluation of catalysts should include an examination of the steamed chemical and physical properties. 

The electron microscope offers a unique approach for measuring individual nano-sized volumes which may be catalytically active as opposed to the averaging method employed by spectroscopic techniques. It is just this ability of being able to observe and measure directly small crystallites or nano-volumes of a catalyst support that sets the microscope apart from other analyses. There have been many studies reported in the literature over the past fifteen years which emphasize the use of analytical and transmission electron microscopy in the characterization of catalysts. Reviews (1-5) of these studies emphasize the relationship between the structure of the site and catalytic activity and selectivity. Most commercial catalysts do not readily permit such clear distinction of physical properties with performance. The importance of establishing the proximity of elements, elemental distribution and component particle size is often overlooked as vital information in the design and evaluation of catalysts. For example, this interactive approach was successfully used in the development of a Fischer-Tropsch catalyst (6). Although some measurements on commercial catalysts can be made routinely with a STEM, there are complex catalysts which require... 

Akande, A.J., Idem, R.O., and Dalai, A.K. Synthesis, characterization and performance evaluation of Ni/Al203 catalysts for reforming of crude ethanol for hydrogen production. Applied Catalysis. A, General, 2005, 287 (2), 159. 

Dual particle or separate traps such as RV4+ must have attrition and fluidization properties similar to FCC catalyst. Their advantages are that they do not change the selectivity of the base catalyst and theoretically have a higher capacity for vanadium capture. Performance evaluation of dual particle traps is usually simpler. They can often be isolated from equilibrium catalyst and analyzed for vanadium capture. Confirmation of preferential pick up on integral traps tends to be a bit more qualitative. A disadvantage may be that they are more dependent on vanadium mobility than integral traps. 

Design, preparation, and testing should be treated as a unit with continuous feedback, leading to optimized performance. Characterization is important since proper evaluation of catalyst parameters is necessary. These methods and procedures are discussed in Chapter 7. 

To enable a relatively quick and easy evaluation of catalyst performance, the following three model reactions (Schemes A through C) were used in this catalyst development program. 

Einaga, H. Ibusuki, T. and Futamura, S. Performance evaluation of a hybrid system comprising silent discharge plasma and manganese oxide catalysts for benzene decomposition IEEE Trans. Ind. Applicat., 2001, 37, 1476-1482... 

Catalyst Characterization. - Although a wide range of techniques is available for the characterization of active supported hydroformylation catalysts there are very few studies which have contained a complete characterization of catalysts together with an evaluation of catalyst performance. 

Transport Criteria in PBRs In laboratory catalytic reactors, basic problems are related to scaling down in order to eliminate all diffusional gradients so that the reactor performance reflects chemical phenomena only [24, 25]. Evaluation of catalyst performance, kinetic modeling, and hence reactor scale-up depend on data that show the steady-state chemical activity and selectivity correctly. The criteria to be satisfied for achieving this goal are defined both at the reactor scale (macroscale) and at the catalyst particle scale (microscale). External and internal transport effects existing around and within catalyst particles distort intrinsic chemical data, and catalyst evaluation based on such data can mislead the decision to be made on an industrial catalyst or generate irrelevant data and felse rate equations in a kinetic study. The elimination of microscale transport effects from experiments on intrinsic kinetics is discussed in detail in Sections 2.3 and 2.4 of this chapter. 

Bej SK. Performance evaluation of hydroprocessing catalysts— A review of experimental techniques. Energy Fuels 2002 16 774-784. 

The single fuel cell test is one of the most direct and effective methods for the evaluation of catalyst layers and MEAs. Even if the results obtained by a half-cell test are very promising, the single-cell test is still a necessary step for performance validation of the developed catalyst layer and MEA. 

Pig. 7.3 Flowsheet of high-pressure test for performance evaluation of ammonia synthesis catalyst... 

This book comprises 10 chapters which can be classified into four parts. The first part deals with the catalyst itself, including the development (Chapter 1), chemical components and physical structure (Chapter 3) preparation and reduction (Chapters 4 5) and the performance evaluation of the catalysts (Chapter 7). Those of ruthenium catalysts are solely put in Chapter 6. The second part is about the reaction mechanism and kinetics of ammonia synthesis (Chapter 2). The third part is a combination of the above two, namely, is centered on the relationship between the performance of catalysts and reaction, which includes reaction condition, reactor, process and application condition and its impact on the economic benefit of... 

In the development phase of catalyst research, testing of the catalyst s chemical and physical properties and evaluation of the catalyst s performance ate two essential tasks. In the manufacturing process, many of the same analyses and evaluations are used for quaHty assurance. A number of the testing procedures outlined eadier for catalyst supports can also be appHed to catalysts (32). 

The data most frequentiy collected and reported in catalyst performance evaluations are activity or turnover number, selectivity to the desired product(s), overall yield, catalyst life, and the identities and yields of by-products produced. These data are used to further catalyst or process development research efforts, to monitor catalyst manufacture, and to provide quaUty assurance information to catalyst users. 

Design parameters of the anode catalyst for the polymer electrolyte membrane fiiel cells were investigated in the aspect of active metal size and inter-metal distances. Various kinds of catalysts were prepared by using pretreated Ketjenblacks as support materials. The prepared electro-catalysts have the morphology such as the sizes of active metal are in the range from 2.0 to 2.8nm and the inter-metal distances are 5.0 to 14.2nm. The electro-catalysts were evaluated as an electrode of PEMFC. In Fig. 1, it looked as if there was a correlation between inter-metal distances and cell performance, i.e. the larger inter-metal distances are related to the inferior cell performance. 

CO concentration at the outlet of each zone was continuously measured using a CO analyzer (Shimadzu CGT-7000). To evaluate the performance of the reactors, the conversion of CO for the PBR (Xco) with 4g of catalyst and the time-average conversion of CO for the SCMBR (Tea) with 2g of catalyst in each zone were calculated and compared. It should be noted that the CO concentration wave used for Eq. (1) was obtained whrai the system is at cyclic steady state (after 30 min of operation). 

---