Occupational limit

After the use of a chemical becomes widespread, new deleterious effects on human health may be observed. In such situations, the occupational limit values will have to be modified. Usually the OELS tend to decrease when more information on the toxicity of a chemical is obtained. Knowledge of the specific features of various chemicals is thus extremely important for planning ventilation of industrial premises. It is important to be especially aware of those chemicals that may cause long-term effects without causing any acute effects. There are also compounds such as isocyanates that are extremely irritating at concentrations as low as 0.5 ppm. However, some workers may become sensitized to isothiocyanates at a concentration of 10 ppb, and therefore this has to be taken into consideration when planning the industrial ventilation. Thus, one has to plan against compounds that can cause serious health effects at concentrations at which their presence cannot be observed by the human senses, i.e., irritation or odor. 

Blast resistant design, or the structural strengthening of buildings, is one of the measures an owner may employ to minimize the risk to people and facilities from the hazards of accidental explosions in a plant, Other mitigative or preventive measures, including siting (adequate spacing from potential explosion hazards) and hazard reduction (inventory and process controls, occupancy limitations, etc.), arc not covered in this report. 

Fig. 6. Orbital correlation diagram for the DHP-cis-stilbene conrotatory path. R is the C(4a) — C(4b) separation. The dotted line indicates the ground state occupancy limit. The molecular orbitals were computed by the Extended Hiickel method )...

Many common VOCs have well-documented health effects at elevated levels. In most indoor environments however, the exposure is described as low since concentrations are negligible in comparison to occupational limit values. Sensory responses to VOCs also include odor response, nasal irritation (pungency) and eye irritation ( Devos et al., 1990 and Cometto-Mu iz and Cain, 1990). The maximum concentrations determined in Singapore buildings were compared with some of the common health and comfort guidelines. The values are presented in Table 10.5. It is observed that the maximum concentrations for the majority of the target compounds are within recommended guidelines. Levels are very low as compared to threshold limit values related to health and irritation. 

Weighing Advantages and Limitations of Using Occupational Limit Values... 

In Australia, the most extensive set of data involves 4640 blood samples analysed for OCPs at the New South Wales Workcare Authority from 1987 to 1989. The vast majority of samples contained less than the occupational limits 50ppb (pg L-1) of dieldrin and less than 20ppb (pg L-1) of heptachlor. Of the 49 samples above the occupational limit 44 of these were from pest control operators (NHMRC, 1992). An earlier NSW study by Siyali (1972) compared whole blood levels of organochlorine insecticides from persons with and without industrial pesticide exposure. Levels of HCB, total DDT, dieldrin and HCH (BHC) were substantially higher in the exposed group, particularly for dieldrin. 

With the uncertainties involved in the designation of occupational exposure standards and the variability of the occupational environment, it would be unreasonable to interpret occupational limits as rigidly as one might interpret an engineering standard or specification. Fortunately, there has been a recent effort to make these rather subjective judgements more scientific and uniform by the application of statistics. The latter makes it possible to develop decisionmaking strategies that can prescribe how many samples to take, where and when to take them in the workplace, and how to interpret the results. 

EPA has also decided that any accidental uranium waste containing 0.1 curies of radioactivity (150 kilograms) must be cleaned up. EPA calls this the Reportable Quantity Accidental Release. EPA also has established a standard for uranium mill tailings, hi the workplace, NIOSH/OSHA has set a Recommended Exposure Limit (REL) and a Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 0.05 mg/m (34 pCi/m ) for uranium dust, while the NRC has an occupational limit of 0.2 mg/m (130 pCi/m ). The NRC has set uranium release limits at 0.06 pCi/m (0.09 pg/m ) of air and 300 pCi/liter (450 pg/liter) of water. NRC and OSHA expect that the public will normally be exposed to much lower concentrations. For more information about recommendations the federal government has made to protect your health, see Chapter 7. 

C(4b) separation. The dotted line indicates the ground state occupancy limit. The molecular... 

The occupational limits for thorium, uranium and some critical decay products are listed in Table 26.1-2. For the chemotoxicity limit of uranium, American and German values for different exposure situations are given. Due to the dominance of the radiotoxicity in the case of thorium, permissible concentration limits are generally based only on the radioactivity. However, former Eastern bloc countries have set a threshold limit for thorium in workroom air (ILO 1980). The annual limit of intake (ALI) will result... 

According to article 8 of framework directive 80/1107/EEC, a mandate has been given to the European Community to set occupational limit values and to establish procedures and rules for deriving limit values. This regulation turned out to be a first major step toward harmonization of occupational exposure limit values, which until then had been established by the member states on their own responsibility. However, this led to the unfortunate situation of a great variety and scatter of limit values in Europe. In a first run, limit values should be worked out by a committee for 11 chemicals, listed in annex I of EU directive 80/1107/EEC. The chemicals are ... 

In 1988, directive 80/1107/EEC was amended for the last time by EU directive 88/642/EEC [6-4]. It contained several additions concerning the procedure for exposure measurements and setting occupational limit values. The newly implemented annex Ila contained important and useful information on the updated definition of particulate matter (dust, fume, and mist) and on the exposure measurement strategy, with detailed descriptions of sampling conditions, especially for dusts. 

The biological limit values, according to directive 98/24/EC, are intended as binding limit values similar to the binding occupational limits for air exposure (BOELV) discussed in the previous Section. They have to be brought into force by the member states. National values must not exceed the community values. 

Though there exists only one single biological occupational limit value, in many European member states limit values have been set on a national basis. In Germany, as an example, the technical rule for hazardous substances TRGS 905 contains biological limit values (called BAT values) for 51 chemical substances [6-50]. 

Second, since micelles have molecular dimensions, the number of reactants they comprise is usually small. Therefore, one has to deal with a discrete statistical distribution of reactants among the micelles instead of conventional concentrations. The overall kinetics in the ensemble of micelles is obtained by averaging the microscopic intramicellar kinetics with a given number of reactants over the occupancy distribution [367]. In the low occupancy limit this distribution is Poissonian. The dynamic nature of amphiphilic aggregates means that the number of reactants in a given micelle fluctuate with time. These fluctuations are slow (microseconds), so that the reaction inside the micelle can normally be treated as kinetically independent. 

The occupational limits for VCM are currently set at 1 ppm averaged over an 8 hour period and 5 ppm averaged over any period not exceeding 15 minutes, with an annual maximum exposure limit of 3 ppm. 

We have learned methods to minimize exposures to chemicals during laboratory operations. But how can we know whether our methods are effective to prevent or minimize exposures This is especially important to your safety if the chemicals being used are very toxic. Remember that the greater the toxicity the greater the hazard, and the greater the protection that is needed. Perhaps the hood in Incident 6.3.1.1 would have been sufficient for a much less toxic compound, but for a very toxic compound having a very low occupational limit, it was not adequate. 

Occupational Limits and Limits to the Public Concentrations in Drinking Water and Diet Metabolism and Excretion Normal Levels in Human Tissues and Blood... 

---