Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Derivative limitations

Solving the Poisson equation is not an easy thing to do. Assumptions must be made to relate, p to ib so that p can be eliminated from the equation. After this is done, approximations are required to simplify the resulting equation so that it can be solved. The assumptions used in the derivation limit the applicability of the resulting equations to low concentrations. [Pg.336]

The fraction of Pn conformer in denatured proteins can be roughly estimated from the work of Park et al. (1997). They analyzed the data of Drake et al. (1988) on poly(Lys) over the temperature range of —100 to +80°C plus their own data on the peptide AcYEAAAKEAPAKEAAAKANMHs at temperatures from 0° to 90°C. They used a two-state model, justified by the tight isodichroic points observed in each system, and derived limiting 222 nm ellipticity values of +9500 deg cm2 dmol-1 for the Pn conformation and —5560 deg cm2 dmol-1 for the high-temperature ensemble of conformers. This leads to Eq. (1) (Bienkiewicz etal., 2000) ... [Pg.229]

The molecular ion peak directly provides valuable information on the analyte. Provided the peak being of sufficient intensity, in addition to mere molecular mass, the accurate mass can reveal the molecular formula of the analyte, and the isotopic pattern may be used to derive limits of elemental composition (Chaps. 3.2 and 3.3). Unfortunately, the peak of highest m/z in a mass spectrum must not necessarily represent the molecular ion of the analyte. This is often the case with El spectra either as a result of rapidly fragmenting molecular ions or due to thermal decomposition of the sample (Chaps. 6.9 and 6.10.3)... [Pg.263]

Assessments of the risks of radiation exposure have been made to assist in establishing a basis on which to recommend permissible limits or the appropriateness of already derived limits of radiation exposure for various activities and populations. The permissible limits of exposure vary somewhat for different situations, primarily because of the variation in the risks from causes other than radiation exposure. For example, the recommended maximum annual radiation exposure for an astronaut is 0.5 Sv (50 rem) (other risks are high and the years of... [Pg.121]

Haywood, S.M. (1987) Revised generalized derived limits for radioisotopes of strontium, iodine, caesium, plutonium, americium and caesium. Report NRPB-GS8. National Radiological Protection Board, Chilton, Oxon. [Pg.191]

Simmonds, J.R., Harrison, N.T. Linsley, G.S. (1982) Generalised Derived Limits for Plutonium. Report DL5. Chilton, Oxon National Radiological Protection Board. [Pg.192]

The fractional saturation of tetramer YT and the fractional saturation of dimer YD are functions only of [02] at specified T, P, pH, etc., as shown by equations 7.1-18 and 7.3-6. However, since the tetramer form is partially dissociated into dimers, the fractional saturation of heme Y is a function of both [02] and [heme]. Ackers and Halvorson (1974) derived an expression for the function Y([02], [heme]). When Legendre transforms are used, a simpler form of this function is obtained, and it can be used to derive limiting forms at high and low [heme]. These limiting forms are of interest because they show that if data can be obtained in regions where Y is linear in some function of [heme], extrapolations can be made to obtain YT and YD. These fractional saturations can be analyzed separately to obtain the Adair constants for the tetramer and the dimmer (Alberty, 1997a). [Pg.129]

The condensation of amino acids esters with diketones leads to cylic derivatives. Limited success was achieved in this respect with acetyl acetone [262] amino acids were condensed prior to GC analysis with 2,5-hexanedione by Walle [263] (Scheme 5.24). The free carboxyl group of the reaction product was esterified with methanolic HC1. However, the procedure was applied to only a few amino acids. [Pg.140]

No detailed fragmentation studies were performed on 1,5-thiazocines reported in the past decade. Mass data on five thiazocine derivatives, limited to the molecular ions <1996JME2559, 2002JOC8662, 2003JOC3315> or quasi-molecular ions <2003JOC92>, were reported. [Pg.411]

The requirement that a substrate containing labile hydrt en atoms must be present for efficient photoinitiation by benzophenone derivatives limits the applicability of these systems. One possible way of... [Pg.72]

The SITP is a quantity derived from the Annual Limit on Intake (ALI), an internationally accepted concept that has been acknowledged by the Government s Radioactive Waste Management Committee (RWMAC) as a valid method of establishing equivalent hazards of different waste types. The ALI is a derived limit for the permissible amount of radioactive material taken into the body of an adult radiation worker by inhalation or ingestion in a year. The ALI is the smaller value of intake of a given radionuclide in a year by the reference man that would result in either a committed effective dose equivalent of 0.05 Sv or 0.5 Sv to any individual organ or tissue. [Pg.129]

Reynolds, W.F. and Topsom, R.D. (1984). Field and Resonance Substituent Constants for Aromatic Derivatives Limitations of Swain s Revised Fand R Constants for Predicting Aromatic Substituent Effects. J.Org.Chem., 49,1989-1992. [Pg.637]

Reynolds, W.E. and Topsom, R.D. (1984) Field and resonance substituent constants for aromatic derivatives limitations of Swain s revised F and R constants for predicting aromatic substituent effects. /. Oig. Chem., 49, 1989—1992. [Pg.1155]

According to article 8 of framework directive 80/1107/EEC, a mandate has been given to the European Community to set occupational limit values and to establish procedures and rules for deriving limit values. This regulation turned out to be a first major step toward harmonization of occupational exposure limit values, which until then had been established by the member states on their own responsibility. However, this led to the unfortunate situation of a great variety and scatter of limit values in Europe. In a first run, limit values should be worked out by a committee for 11 chemicals, listed in annex I of EU directive 80/1107/EEC. The chemicals are ... [Pg.148]

The first European framework directive 80/1107/EEC on occupational safety (now repealed and replaced by directives 89/391/EEC and 98/24/EC) foresaw in article 8 the estabhshment of indicative as well as binding limit values for certain chemical substances. The aim of this mandate given to the European Council was to establish procedures and rules for deriving limit values and, of course, to set exposure limits based on these. In order to achieve this, the further harmonization and raising of occupational safety standards in relation to chemicals should be striven for as a practical step toward the realization of the social dimension of the common market in Europe. [Pg.189]

The PFOA and derivatives limit values have become much stricter since April 1, 2015, for OEKO-TEX , see Table 1.5. Also the limit value for PFOS is stricter (<1 pg/m, previously <1 pg/m ). [Pg.9]

In practical radiological protection there has in the past existed, and there continues to exist, a ueed to establish standards associated with quantities other than the basic dose limits. Standards of this type are normally known as secondary or derived limits. When such limits are related to the primary limits of dose by a defined model, they are referred to as derived limits. Derived limits have been used in the Regulations. [Pg.32]

Examples of derived limits in the Regulations include the maximum activity limits Aj and Aj, maximum levels for non-fixed contamination, radiation levels at the surfaces of packages and in their proximity, and segregation distances associated with the transport index. The Regulations reqnire assessment and measurement to ensure that standards are being complied with. [Pg.32]

WRIXON, A.D., LINSLEY, G.S., BINNS, K.C., WHITE, D.F., Derived Limits for Surface Contamination, NRPB-DL2, HMSO, London (1979). [Pg.95]


See other pages where Derivative limitations is mentioned: [Pg.268]    [Pg.992]    [Pg.499]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.764]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.556]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.539]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.517]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.95 , Pg.96 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info