Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Molecular interactions, complexity

Interactions between macromolecules (protems, lipids, DNA,.. . ) or biological structures (e.g. membranes) are considerably more complex than the interactions described m the two preceding paragraphs. The sum of all biological mteractions at the molecular level is the basis of the complex mechanisms of life. In addition to computer simulations, direct force measurements [98], especially the surface forces apparatus, represent an invaluable tool to help understand the molecular interactions in biological systems. [Pg.1741]

Knowledge of the spatial dimensions of a molecule is insufficient to imderstand the details of complex molecular interactions. In fact, molecular properties such as electrostatic potential, hydrophilic/lipophilic properties, and hydrogen bonding ability should be taken into account. These properties can be classified as scalar isosurfaces), vector field, and volumetric properties. [Pg.135]

Molecular Interaction. The examples of gas lasers described above involve the formation of chemical compounds in their excited states, produced by reaction between positive and negative ions. However, molecules can also interact in a formally nonbonding sense to give complexes of very short lifetimes, as when atoms or molecules collide with each other. If these sticky collisions take place with one of the molecules in an electronically excited state and the other in its ground state, then an excited-state complex (an exciplex) is formed, in which energy can be transferred from the excited-state molecule to the ground-state molecule. The process is illustrated in Figure 18.12. [Pg.130]

Absorption, metaboHsm, and biological activities of organic compounds are influenced by molecular interactions with asymmetric biomolecules. These interactions, which involve hydrophobic, electrostatic, inductive, dipole—dipole, hydrogen bonding, van der Waals forces, steric hindrance, and inclusion complex formation give rise to enantioselective differentiation (1,2). Within a series of similar stmctures, substantial differences in biological effects, molecular mechanism of action, distribution, or metaboHc events may be observed. Eor example, (R)-carvone [6485-40-1] (1) has the odor of spearrnint whereas (5)-carvone [2244-16-8] (2) has the odor of caraway (3,4). [Pg.237]

Molecular Interactions. Various polysaccharides readily associate with other substances, including bile acids and cholesterol, proteins, small organic molecules, inorganic salts, and ions. Anionic polysaccharides form salts and chelate complexes with cations some neutral polysaccharides form complexes with inorganic salts and some interactions are stmcture specific. Starch amylose and the linear branches of amylopectin form inclusion complexes with several classes of polar molecules, including fatty acids, glycerides, alcohols, esters, ketones, and iodine/iodide. The absorbed molecule occupies the cavity of the amylose helix, which has the capacity to expand somewhat to accommodate larger molecules. The starch—Hpid complex is important in food systems. Whether similar inclusion complexes can form with any of the dietary fiber components is not known. [Pg.71]

The solvent and the key component that show most similar liquid-phase behavior tend to exhibit little molecular interactions. These components form an ideal or nearly ideal liquid solution. The ac tivity coefficient of this key approaches unity, or may even show negative deviations from Raoult s law if solvating or complexing interactions occur. On the other hand, the dissimilar key and the solvent demonstrate unfavorable molecular interactions, and the activity coefficient of this key increases. The positive deviations from Raoult s law are further enhanced by the diluting effect of the high-solvent concentration, and the value of the activity coefficient of this key may approach the infinite dilution value, often aveiy large number. [Pg.1314]

At long range, complex interactions having their origin in quantum mechanics are negligible, and molecular interactions can be described by classical electrostatics of nuclei and electron density. [Pg.95]

S. Scheiner, Ed., Molecular Interactions From van der Waals to Strongly Bonded Complexes, Wiley, Chichester, 1997. [Pg.82]

In this equation, % is a proportionality factor known as the bead-solvent friction coefficient which purports to account in some kind of average way for the complex molecular interactions as the polymer segments (schematized by the bead) move about in the solvent. Following Stokes law of drag resistance, this friction coefficient is usually given as = 67trisa, with a equal to the bead radius. [Pg.89]

Analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) Molecular weight M, molecular weight distribution, g(M) vs. M, polydispersity, sedimentation coefficient, s, and distribution, g(s) vs. s solution conformation and flexibility. Interaction complex formation phenomena. Molecular charge No columns or membranes required [2]... [Pg.213]

The molecular modelling approach, taking into account the pyruvate—cinchona alkaloid interaction and the steric constraints imposed by the adsorption on the platinum surface, leads to a reasonable explanation for the enantio-differentiation of this system. Although the prediction of the complex formed between the methyl pyruvate and the cinchona modifiers have been made for an ideal case (solvent effects and a quantum description of the interaction with the platinum surface atoms were not considered), this approach proved to be very helpful in the search of new modifiers. The search strategy, which included a systematic reduction of the cinchona alkaloid structure to the essential functional parts and validation of the steric constraints imposed to the interaction complex between modifier and methyl pyruvate by means of molecular modelling, indicated that simple chiral aminoalcohols should be promising substitutes for cinchona alkaloid modifiers. Using the Sharpless symmetric dihydroxylation as a key step, a series of enantiomerically pure 2-hydroxy-2-aryl-ethylamines... [Pg.57]

Rawashdeh-Omary, M.A., Pietroni, B.R. and Staples, R.J. (2000) Supramolecular chain assemblies formed by interaction of a B molecular acid complex of mercury with B-Base trinuclear gold complexes. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 122, 11264. [Pg.43]

The study of electron density distributions resulting from molecular interactions in gas-phase complexes or in molecular crystals, is known [1,2] to facilitate our understanding of the physical mechanisms underlying such interactions. Indeed, the action of these mechanisms is reflected in the interaction density, defined as the difference between the electron density distribution (EDD) of the molecular complex or crystal and that obtained by superimposing the EDDs of free molecules. [Pg.104]

In this paper a method [11], which allows for an a priori BSSE removal at the SCF level, is for the first time applied to interaction densities studies. This computational protocol which has been called SCF-MI (Self-Consistent Field for Molecular Interactions) to highlight its relationship to the standard Roothaan equations and its special usefulness in the evaluation of molecular interactions, has recently been successfully used [11-13] for evaluating Eint in a number of intermolecular complexes. Comparison of standard SCF interaction densities with those obtained from the SCF-MI approach should shed light on the effects of BSSE removal. Such effects may then be compared with those deriving from the introduction of Coulomb correlation corrections. To this aim, we adopt a variational perturbative valence bond (VB) approach that uses orbitals derived from the SCF-MI step and thus maintains a BSSE-free picture. Finally, no bias should be introduced in our study by the particular approach chosen to analyze the observed charge density rearrangements. Therefore, not a model but a theory which is firmly rooted in Quantum Mechanics, applied directly to the electron density p and giving quantitative answers, is to be adopted. Bader s Quantum Theory of Atoms in Molecules (QTAM) [14, 15] meets nicely all these requirements. Such a theory has also been recently applied to molecular crystals as a valid tool to rationalize and quantitatively detect crystal field effects on the molecular densities [16-18]. [Pg.105]

Gresh N, Cisneros GA, Darden TA, Piquemal J-P (2007) Anisotropic, polarizable molecular mechanics studies of inter-, intra-molecular interactions, and ligand-macromolecule complexes. A bottom-up strategy. J Chem Theory Comput 3 1960... [Pg.169]

Schulman, J.H. and Cockrain, E.G. "Molecular Interactions at Oil/Water Interfaces. Part I. Molecular Complex Formation and the Stability of Oil in Water Emulsions," Trans. Faraday Soc.. 1940, 36, 24. [Pg.675]

The general theory is now reduced to a toy model , using the following assumption there are simple, arbitrary rules for the probability of a molecular interaction. The complex network of biochemical reaction chains is expressed by one single formula. [Pg.232]

The lifetime of the excited state of fluorophores may be altered by physical and biochemical properties of its environment. Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) is thus a powerful analytical tool for the quantitative mapping of fluorescent molecules that reports, for instance, on local ion concentration, pH, and viscosity, the fluorescence lifetime of a donor fluorophore, Forster resonance energy transfer can be also imaged by FLIM. This provides a robust method for mapping protein-protein interactions and for probing the complexity of molecular interaction networks. [Pg.108]


See other pages where Molecular interactions, complexity is mentioned: [Pg.492]    [Pg.492]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.906]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.450]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.454]    [Pg.457]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.147]   


SEARCH



Complexes interaction

Molecular complex

Molecular interactions

Molecular interactive

© 2024 chempedia.info