Chatt-Duncanson model

Features (2) and (3) are explicable in terms of the Dewar-Chatt-Duncanson model for bonding in alkene complexes (Figure 3.63), which involves... 

In low oxidation states, transition metals possess filled or partly filled d shells. The Dewar-Chatt-Duncanson model envisages some of that electron density in (local) d (e.g. d., d y) orbitals being donated into the empty n orbitals of the carbon monoxide ... 

Surprisingly, in contrast to the reaction of the Si=P bond with mesityl azide, the reaction of 15a with diphenyldiazomethane resulted in the formation of the [2+l]-cycloadduct 35 (Scheme S).38 The bonding situation in 35 (Fig. 11) may be described in terms of a 7r-complex, by employing the Dewar-Chatt-Duncanson model, in which the Si=P bond acts as v donor and acceptor at the same time (Scheme 9). The corresponding [2+31-cycloaddition product 36 was generated only on thermal activation of 35. 

Scheme 9. Description of 35 as 77-complex (Dewar-Chatt-Duncanson model) (a) Si=P bond as ir-donor (b) Si=P bond as 77-acceptor.

Fig. 3. Schematic bonding pictures for transition metal atoms (M) binding to C2H4 via the Dewar-Chatt-Duncanson model.

The bonding between these two fragments can be understood using the Dewar-Chatt-Duncanson model of donation and backdonation [79, 80], The frontier orbitals responsible for these interactions between 15 and 16-R are drawn to scale in Figure 15. 

In accord with the Dewar-Chatt-Duncanson model, we find that the dominant interaction is donation from the C C n bond into the rhodium LUMO. This interaction is enhanced when the double bond lies in the rhodium-diphosphine plane and with electron donating substituents which raise the energy of 7ito more closey match the LUMO Charge Decomposition Analysis (CDA) [81] shows that the amount of donation is... 

The use of CO as a chemical probe of the nature of the molecular interactions with the surface sites of metallic catalysts [6] was the first clear experimental example of the transposition to surface science and in particular to chemisorption of the concepts of coordination chemistry [1, 2, 5], In fact the Chatt-Duncanson model [7] of coordination of CO, olefins, etc. to transition metals appeared to be valid also for the interactions of such probes on metal surfaces. It could not fit with the physical approach to the surface states based on solid state band gap theory [8], which was popular at the end of 1950, but at least it was a simple model for the evidence of a localized process of chemical adsorption of molecules such as olefins, CO, H, olefins, dienes, aromatics, and so on to single metal atoms on the surfaces of metals or metal oxides [5]. 

The Dewar-Chatt-Duncanson model of the binding of an olefin in a transition metal complex involves two types of interactions. Transfer of electron density from the relatively high-lying olefinic ic-orbital to the metal (cf. 20) represents a Lewis acid Lewis base interaction (a-bonding). A metal-olefin jr-bond due to interaction... 

The electronic structure of the surface chemical bond is discussed in depth in the present chapter for a number of example systems taken from the five categories of bonding types (i) atomic radical, (ii) diatomics with unsaturated -systems (Blyholder model), (iii) unsaturated hydrocarbons (Dewar-Chatt-Duncanson model), (iv) lone pair interactions, and (v) saturated hydrocarbons (physisorption). 

Fig. 2. The Dewar-Chatt-Duncanson model for olefin bonding showing the

Positively-charged fragments such as [ML,]+, CH , and H + are all strong electrophiles ( superelectrophiles in the extreme sense (13)) towards the Lewis basic H2, but transition metals can uniquely stabilize H2 and other cr-bond coordination by back donation from d-orbitals that main group analogues cannot do. This bonding is then remarkably analogous (14) to the Dewar-Chatt- Duncanson model (15) for ji-complexes (6). 

---