Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

ATMOSPHERIC MODELING

A variety of models have been developed to study acid deposition. Sulfuric acid is formed relatively slowly in the atmosphere, so its concentrations are beUeved to be more uniform than o2one, especially in and around cities. Also, the impacts are viewed as more regional in nature. This allows an even coarser hori2ontal resolution, on the order of 80 to 100 km, to be used in acid deposition models. Atmospheric models of acid deposition have been used to determine where reductions in sulfur dioxide emissions would be most effective. Many of the ecosystems that are most sensitive to damage from acid deposition are located in the northeastern United States and southeastern Canada. Early acid deposition models helped to estabUsh that sulfuric acid and its precursors are transported over long distances, eg, from the Ohio River Valley to New England (86—88). Models have also been used to show that sulfuric acid deposition is nearly linear in response to changing levels of emissions of sulfur dioxide (89). [Pg.386]

ApSimon, H. M., and WUson, J. J, N., Modeling atmospheric dispersal of the Chernobyl release across Europe. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 41, 123-133 (1987). [Pg.289]

Fig. 4.14 The conversion of apatite to phosphate under the influence of electrical discharges in a model atmosphere containing 60%... Fig. 4.14 The conversion of apatite to phosphate under the influence of electrical discharges in a model atmosphere containing 60%...
Astronomical Observatory, were used to carry out the calculations of theoretical equivalent widths of lines, synthetic spectra and a set of plane parallel, line-blanketed, flux constant LTE model atmospheres. The effective temperatures of the stars were determined from photometry, the infrared flux method and corrected, if needed, in order to achieve the LTE excitation balance in the iron abundance results. The gravities were found by forcing Fe I and Fe II to yield the same iron abundances. The microturbulent velocities were determined by forcing Fe I line abundances to be independent of the equivalent width. For more details on the method of analysis and atomic data see Tautvaisiene et al. (2001). [Pg.14]

Our multi-level carbon model atom is adapted from D. Kiselman (private communication), with improved atomic data and better sampling of some absorption lines. The statistical equilibrium code MULTI (Carlsson 1986), together with ID MARCS stellar model atmospheres for a grid of 168 late-type stars with varying Tefj, log g, [Fe/H] and [C/Fe], were used in all Cl non-LTE spectral line formation calculations, to solve radiative-transfer and rate equations and to find the non-LTE solution for the multi-level atom. We put particular attention in the study of the permitted Cl lines around 9100 A, used by Akerman et al. (2004). [Pg.54]

Fig. 1. Model Spectra re-binned to CRIRES Resolution To demonstrate the potential for precise isotopic abundance determination two representative sample absorption spectra, normalized to unity, are shown. They result from a radiative transfer calculation using a hydrostatic MARCS model atmosphere for 3400 K. MARCS stands for Model Atmosphere in a Radiative Convective Scheme the methodology is described in detail e.g. in [1] and references therein. The models are calculated with a spectral bin size corresponding to a Doppler velocity of 1 They are re-binned to the nominal CRIRES resolution (3 p), which even for the slowest rotators is sufficient to resolve absorption lines. The spectral range covers ss of the CRIRES detector-array and has been centered at the band-head of a 29 Si16 O overtone transition at 4029 nm. In both spectra the band-head is clearly visible between the forest of well-separated low- and high-j transitions of the common isotope. The lower spectrum is based on the telluric ratio of the isotopes 28Si/29Si/30Si (92.23 4.67 3.10) whereas the upper spectrum, offset by 0.4 in y-direction, has been calculated for a ratio of 96.00 2.00 2.00. Fig. 1. Model Spectra re-binned to CRIRES Resolution To demonstrate the potential for precise isotopic abundance determination two representative sample absorption spectra, normalized to unity, are shown. They result from a radiative transfer calculation using a hydrostatic MARCS model atmosphere for 3400 K. MARCS stands for Model Atmosphere in a Radiative Convective Scheme the methodology is described in detail e.g. in [1] and references therein. The models are calculated with a spectral bin size corresponding to a Doppler velocity of 1 They are re-binned to the nominal CRIRES resolution (3 p), which even for the slowest rotators is sufficient to resolve absorption lines. The spectral range covers ss of the CRIRES detector-array and has been centered at the band-head of a 29 Si16 O overtone transition at 4029 nm. In both spectra the band-head is clearly visible between the forest of well-separated low- and high-j transitions of the common isotope. The lower spectrum is based on the telluric ratio of the isotopes 28Si/29Si/30Si (92.23 4.67 3.10) whereas the upper spectrum, offset by 0.4 in y-direction, has been calculated for a ratio of 96.00 2.00 2.00.
We present here the results of abundance measurements of iron, calcium and nickel in four open clusters, from UVES spectra of solar type stars. A code developed by one of the authors (Francois) performs line recognization, equivalent width measurements and finally obtains the abundances by means of OSMARCS LTE model atmosphere [4]. Temperature, gravity and microturbulence velocity have to be input to the program. This is made in an automatic way for a grid of values chosen on photometric basis. Those that best reproduce excitation and ionization equilibria are selected and used, namely when no significant trend of the computed abundances is seen, neither versus the excitation potential of the line nor versus its equivalent width, and for which the abundances obtained with lines of different ionization stages of the same specie give equal results within the errors. This check is made with iron lines, we have in fact at least thirty Fe I lines in each star, and six Fell lines. [Pg.72]

A weak but useful carbon line [Cl] 8727.13 A disappears in halo dwarfs with metallicities below —1. To measure carbon abundance in halo stars one can use four Cl high excitation lines near 9100 A and the CH band at 4300 A. The Cl lines at 9100 A together with the OI triplet at 7771 A have been used by Tomkin et al. (1992) and Akerman et al. (2004) to study the behaviour of C/O versus metallicity. However, Cl and OI lines employed in these papers are sensitive to a non-LTE effects and one has to bare in mind that this sensitivity is different for C and O. The CH band at 3145 A used by Israelian et al. (1999) is almost saturated in disk stars and several blends makes the abundance analysis less accurate. To ensure a homogeneous analysis of the C/O and N/O ratio from NH,CH and OH lines in the near-UV, we used the same model atmospheres and tools as in our previous studies. The oxygen abundances were compiled from Israelian et al. (1998, 2001) and Boesgaard et al. (1999). [Pg.110]

Abstract. The chemical composition of B 12, a Be star in the SMC cluster NGC 330, is analysed using high-resolution UVES/VLT spectra and the non-LTE model atmosphere code TLUSTY. A differential analysis relative to a SMC standard star AV 304 revealed (1) a general under-abundance of metals compared with that expected for the SMC, and (2) the lack of nitrogen enhancement. The former is attributed to the presence of a disk, and its contribution to the overall emission is estimated. Possible explanations for the lack of rotational mixing in the apparently rapidly rotating star are discussed. [Pg.140]

The selected extragalactic carbon stars have been observed with the VLT/UVES instrument in service mode. The spectral resolution was around 40000 over the domains 420-500 nm and 670-900 nm. We used carbon-rich MARCS model atmospheres and specific linelists in order to derive the abundances of metals,... [Pg.262]

Fig. 2. (Left panel) evolutionary tracks using FST in the logTefj vs. log g plane (solid line non gray models with rph = 10 by Montalban et al.,2004) and 2D calibrated MLT (dashed line).(Right panel) Lithium evolution for the solar mass with different assumptions about convection and model atmospheres. The dotted line at bottom represents today s solar lithium abundance. MLT models with AH97 model atmospheres down to Tph = 10 and 100 are shown dotted for cum = 1 and dash-dotted for cpr, = 1.9. The Montalban et al. (2004) MLT models with Heiter et al. (2002) atmospheres down to Tph = 10 (lower) and 100 (upper) are dashed The continuous lines show the non gray FST models for rph = 10 and 100, and, in between, the long dashed model employing the 2D calibrated MLT. Fig. 2. (Left panel) evolutionary tracks using FST in the logTefj vs. log g plane (solid line non gray models with rph = 10 by Montalban et al.,2004) and 2D calibrated MLT (dashed line).(Right panel) Lithium evolution for the solar mass with different assumptions about convection and model atmospheres. The dotted line at bottom represents today s solar lithium abundance. MLT models with AH97 model atmospheres down to Tph = 10 and 100 are shown dotted for cum = 1 and dash-dotted for cpr, = 1.9. The Montalban et al. (2004) MLT models with Heiter et al. (2002) atmospheres down to Tph = 10 (lower) and 100 (upper) are dashed The continuous lines show the non gray FST models for rph = 10 and 100, and, in between, the long dashed model employing the 2D calibrated MLT.
We see that the models which best reproduce the location of all the six data points are the tracks which do not fit the solar location. The models whose convection is calibrated on the 2D simulation make a poor job, as the FST models and other models with efficient convection do therefore this result can not be inputed to the fact that we employ local convection models. A possibility is that we are in front of an opacity problem, more that in front of a convection problem. Actually we would be inclined to say that opacities are not a problem (we have shown this in Montalban et al. (2004), by comparing models computed with Heiter et al (2002) or with AH97 model atmospheres), but something can still be badly wrong, as implied by the recent redetermination of solar metallicity (Asplund et al., 2004). A further possibility is that the inefficient convection in PMS requires the introduction of a second parameter -linked to the stellar rotation and magnetic field, as we have suggested in the past (Ventura et al., 1998 D Antona et al., 2000), but this remains to be worked out. [Pg.292]

The results of the differential study are presented in table 1. Similarly as found by [3] for dwarf and subgiant stars, 3D model atmospheres of metal-poor red giants appear to be significantly cooler at the surface than their ID counterparts. Consequently, at a given abundance, the populations of neutral atoms and molecules (e.g. Fe I, Ca I, OH) in these upper layers tend to be enhanced in 3D models comparing to ID, leading to negative abundance corrections. [Pg.307]

Fig. 3.3. Cartoon indicating steps in abundance analysis using model atmospheres. After Gustafsson (1980). Fig. 3.3. Cartoon indicating steps in abundance analysis using model atmospheres. After Gustafsson (1980).
In a more sophisticated application, one calculates an abscissa log X, which is a theoretical value of log W/X taking into account all atmospheric effects except saturation, as a function of the desired abundance ratio M/H log X = log (M/H) + log gf + log T, where T is calculated for given excitation and ionization potentials, ionic partition functions and the model atmosphere. The abundance is then chosen to give the optimal fit for weak lines. The same curve can also be used (with due... [Pg.68]

A vast and very complete data set for atoms and ions, with very variable accuracy (but sufficient for statistical calculations of line blanketing for model atmospheres in which molecules are not too important), is given by... [Pg.114]

C. Allende Prieto, I. Hubeny and D.L. Lambert, Non-LTE Model Atmospheres for Late-Type Stars II Restricted Non-LTE Calculations for a Solar-like Atmosphere , Ap. J., 591, 1192,2003. [Pg.115]

Bengt Stromgren and A. Unsold make quantitative analysis of solar abundances with fairly realistic model atmosphere, including H opacity source just discovered by R. Wildt. [Pg.401]

Atmospheric Dispersion Models Atmospheric dispersion models generally fall into the categories discussed below. Regardless of the modeling approach, models should be verified that the appropriate physical phenomena are being modeled and validated by comparison with relevant data (at field and laboratory scale). The choice of modeling techniques may be influenced by the expected distance to the level of concern. [Pg.64]

Evaluate the potential consequences associated with major and minor loss-of-containment events and other possible emergency situations involving the hazardous materials and energies ana take this information into account in the process of site selection and facility layout and the evaluation of the adequacy of personnel, public, and environmental protection (Source Models, Atmospheric Dispersion, Estimation of Damage Effects). [Pg.98]

Evaluate the risks associated with the process and its safety systems taken as a whole, including consideration of people, property, business, and the environment, that could be affected by loss events and determine whether the risks have been adequately reduced (Hazard Analysis, Risk Analysis, Source Models, Atmospheric Dispersion, Estimation of Damage Effects). [Pg.99]

Sander, R. Modeling atmospheric chemistry Interactions between gas-phase species and liquid cloud/aerosol particles, Surv. Geophys., 20, 1-31, 1999. [Pg.18]


See other pages where ATMOSPHERIC MODELING is mentioned: [Pg.77]    [Pg.434]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.116]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.23 , Pg.27 ]




SEARCH



Abundance analysis model atmosphere

Atmosphere model

Atmosphere thermodynamic models

Atmosphere-ocean models

Atmosphere-vegetation models

Atmospheric Chemical Transport Models

Atmospheric Chemical Transport Models 1 Model Types

Atmospheric Dispersion Models

Atmospheric Oceanic General Circulation Models

Atmospheric Transport Model Evaluation

Atmospheric Transport Model Evaluation Study

Atmospheric chemistry, modeling

Atmospheric circulation models

Atmospheric dispersion flow models

Atmospheric dispersion modelling

Atmospheric first-order kinetic model

Atmospheric flow models

Atmospheric gases transfer models

Atmospheric general circulation model

Atmospheric general circulation model AGCM)

Atmospheric inputs modeling

Atmospheric inverse models

Atmospheric mercury modeling

Atmospheric modeling, source-oriented

Atmospheric models

Atmospheric models

Atmospheric particulates partitioning model

Atmospheric pollutants, modeling

Atmospheric pollutants, modeling future emissions

Atmospheric simulation models

Atmospheric stability, dispersion models

Atmospheric transport models

Coupled Atmosphere-Ice-Ocean Models

Coupled ocean-atmosphere model

Dynamical models, atmospheric flow modelling

Equations atmospheric model

Fast Ocean Atmosphere Model

Homogeneous systems from interstellar space to planetary atmospheres and primitive soup models

Model atmospheric distillation

Models of the Middle Atmosphere

Ocean-atmosphere-vegetation models

Oceans atmosphere climate models

Rate Constants - Modeling Atmospheric Chemistry

Regional Atmospheric Modeling System

Terrestrial ocean atmosphere ecosystem model

Three-Dimensional Atmospheric Chemical Transport Models

© 2024 chempedia.info