Atmospheric dispersion flow models

In the development of these processes and their transference into an industrial-scale, dimensional analysis and scale-up based on it play only a subordinate role. This is reasonable, because one is often forced to perform experiments in a demonstration plant which copes in its scope with a small produdion plant ( mock-up plant, ca. 1/10-th of the industrial scale). Experiments in such plants are costly and often time-consuming, but they are often indispensable for the lay-out of a technical plant. This is because the experiments performed in them deliver a valuable information about the scale-dependent hydrodynamic behavior (arculation of liquids and of dispersed solids, residence time distributions). As model substances hydrocarbons as the liquid phase and nitrogen or air as the gas phase are used. The operation conditions are ambient temperature and atmospheric pressure ( cold-flow model ). As a rule, the experiments are evaluated according to dimensional analysis. 

Atmospheric dispersion modelling requires an accurate and reliable description of the weather, including descriptions of the prevailing airflow, the atmospheric stability and the effects of flow structures at the spatial and temporal scales of interest. 

As other sections of this Handbook indicate, there have been eonsiderable efforts to model and predict the short-term fate of spilled hazardous materials over hours and days. These include estimates of spreading, evaporation, atmospheric dispersion, and flow in surface waters and groundwaters. A major incentive for such models is the protection of the public and remedial action personnel. Less attention is paid to the longer-term fate of the spilled material over months and years. In this section, we review the use of mass balance models to predict the long-term fate of spilled materials. Ultimately, the residual spUled material combines with the existing contaminant burden in the environment to raise general concentration levels and increase overall human exposure. The focus is thus on chronic exposure as distinct from short-term acute exposure, which is the primary initial concern of response agencies. 

In Gaussian plume computations the change in wind velocity with height is a function both of the terrain and of the time of day. We model the air flow as turbulent flow, with turbulence represented by eddy motion. The effect of eddy motion is important in diluting concentrations of pollutants. If a parcel of air is displaced from one level to another, it can carry momentum and thermal energy with it. It also carries whatever has been placed in it from pollution sources. Eddies exist in different sizes in the atmosphere, and these turbulent eddies are most effective in dispersing the plume. 

Flow in the atmospheric boundary layer is turbulent. Turbulence may be described as a random motion superposed on the mean flow. Many aspects of turbulent dispersion are reasonably well-described by a simple model in which turbulence is viewed as a spectrum of eddies of an extended range of length and time scales (Lumley and Panofsky 1964). 

The published guideline VDI 3881 /2—4/ describes, how to measure odour emissions for application in dispersion models. Results obtained by this method have to be completed with physical data like flow rates etc. As olfactometric odour threshold determination is rather expensive, it is supplemented with tracer gas emissions, easy to quantify. In the mobile tracer gas emission source, fig, 2, up to 50 kg propane per hour are diluted with up to 1000 m2 3 air per hour. This blend is blown into the open atmosphere. The dilution device, including the fan, can be seperated from the trailer and mounted at any place, e.g. 

The following, well-acceptable assumptions are applied in the presented models of automobile exhaust gas converters Ideal gas behavior and constant pressure are considered (system open to ambient atmosphere, very low pressure drop). Relatively low concentration of key reactants enables to approximate diffusion processes by the Fick s law and to assume negligible change in the number of moles caused by the reactions. Axial dispersion and heat conduction effects in the flowing gas can be neglected due to short residence times ( 0.1 s). The description of heat and mass transfer between bulk of flowing gas and catalytic washcoat is approximated by distributed transfer coefficients, calculated from suitable correlations (cf. Section III.C). All physical properties of gas (cp, p, p, X, Z>k) and solid phase heat capacity are evaluated in dependence on temperature. Effective heat conductivity, density and heat capacity are used for the entire solid phase, which consists of catalytic washcoat layer and monolith substrate (wall). 

Apply 1 m/s as flow velocity so that the total contact time in the channel is 500 seconds. The modeling should be done as Id transport model with 10 cells (dispersivity 0.1 m) and last over 750 seconds. Also take into account the contact with the atmosphere. Therefore, ran the model once with a C02 partial pressure of 0.03 Vol% and a second time with 1 Vol%, both times assuming an oxygen partial pressure of 21 Vol% 02. The latter case corresponds rather to a closed carbonate channel. 

The development of these modelling systems is usually focused on the scientific and technical features of emission, atmospheric flow and pollutant dispersion models, while comparatively little attention is devoted to the connection of different models. Meteorological and AQ models often employ different coordinate systems and computational meshes. In principle, interfaces should simply solve this grid system mismatch to connect MetMs output and AQ models input with minimum possible data handling. 

H2 chemisorption. Metal dispersion was determined by H2 chemisorption performed with a pulse flow method (PulseChemisorb 2700, MICROMERITICS). The samples (0.3-1.0 g) were placed in a Pyrex reactor and heated from 20 to 300°C (heating rate of 10°C/min) in N2 flow (15 ml/min), treated at 300°C for 2 h in H2 flow (35 ml/min), kept under a stream of N2 for 1 hr to clean the surface and eventually cooled to 20°C in the same atmosphere. The ehemisorption experiments were performed at 20+/-1°C. Successive pulses of 86 ml of H2 were sent to the catalyst in a constant stream of N2 (15 ml/min) the time interval between successive pulses was 90 s. The total amount of adsorbed hydrogen was calculated from the difference between the saturation peak area and the area of the peak before saturation. From this amount metal dispersion parameters were calculated [10] (1) the percent of platinum present on the surface with respect to the total amount in Ae catalyst (Pt /Pt, %), (2) 4e catalyst surface covered by metal particles (Pt area, m Pt/g cat) and (3) the average diameter of the Pt particles on the catalyst surface, using a spherical model for the aggregates (d. A). 

Capel PD, Leuenberger C, GigerW. 1991. Hydrophobic organic chemicals in urban fog. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Wind and Water Tunnel Modelling of Atmospheric Flow and Dispersion, Karlsruhe, Germany, October 3-5, 1988. Atmos Environ [A] 25 1335-1346. 

This paper is mainly a general review of turbulent atmospheric flows through canopy flows and the various mathematical and computational modelling approaches that are available. The review which is mostly non-mathematical in its presentations, is particularly relevant to urban areas because of the urgency of developing methods for dealing with accidental releases in urban areas. The dispersion of contaminants flow studies is also included in this review. We focus on dispersion from localised sources released suddenly, or over longer periods. 

Where obstacles are shaped like cuboids and hemispheres and are isolated, the main characteristic features of the air flow and dispersion are the interactions between the wakes of upwind buildings and the flows around downwind buildings. This is the basis of the UDM model (Hall et al., 2001 [247]) developed for accidental atmospheric releases of pollutants in urban areas DSTL (see also chapter 9). 

The static stability of the air stream usually changes as it moves into and out of the urban area, typically becoming less and more stable, respectively. However it should not be assumed that the boundary layer profiles over the urban area and downwind are identical to the equilibrium states found in neutral, stable and unstable boundary layers over flat terrain. In fact as the flow adjusts characteristic distortions of the air flow profiles occur on these scales, such as blocked flow, unsteady slope flows, gravity currents and boundary layer jets especially near hills, coasts and urban/rural boundaries. These distorted profiles (which are ignored in most mesoscale atmospheric models) significantly affect dispersion (e.g. Hogstrom and Smedman, [274] Owinoh et al., [477]). 

For dispersion in flows with significant variation in direction and speed at different heights and different times, the only reliable modelling method is to track individual fluid particles or track many clouds of particles from the source. The former method is now used for regional and synoptic scale dispersion prediction from localised sources, such as nuclear accidents and volcanoes, e.g. Maryon and Buckland, 1995 [396], Assumptions have to be made about how atmospheric turbulence on scales less than 3Ax diffuses particles as they are advected by the resolved flow field on scale Ax. This method requires large computer resources and then can be computed in minutes. For studying critical events in UK urban areas this method should be considered. 

It is apparent from equations 3.2.4-3.2.7 that the determination of the concentration field is dependent on the values of the Gaussian dispersion parameters a, (or Oy in the fully coupled puff model). Drawing on the fundamental result provided by Taylor (1923), it would be expected that these parameters would relate directly to the statistics of the components of the fluctuating element of the flow velocity. In a neutral atmosphere, the factors affecting these components can be explored by considering the fundamental equations of fluid motion in an incompressible fluid (for airflows less than 70% of the speed of sound, airflows can reasonably be modeled as incompressible) when the temperature of the atmosphere varies with elevation, the fluid must be modeled as compressible (in other words, the density is treated as a variable). The set of equations governing the flow of an incompressible Newtonian fluid at any point at any instant is as follows ... 

The general concept of the atmospheric transport and deposition computational method is that the concentration of any substance determined on the basis of its emissions, is subsequently transported by (averaged) wind flow and dispersed over the impacted area due to atmospheric turbulence. Basically, the rate of substance removal from the atmosphere by wet and dry deposition and photochemical degradation is described by general model algorithms. The transport and dispersion of HM in the atmosphere are assumed to be similar to those for other air pollutants, for instance, such as SO2 and smog compounds (Pacina et al, 1993 de Leeuw, 1994, EMEP/MSC-E, 1996 Dutchak et al, 1998). Based on such an approach, the computational results of sulfur deposition over the area of interest obtained by other authors might be particularly used for the estimation of HM depositions. 

---