Methyl methacrylate, selective

Selected physical properties of various methacrylate esters, amides, and derivatives are given in Tables 1—4. Tables 3 and 4 describe more commercially available methacrylic acid derivatives. A2eotrope data for MMA are shown in Table 5 (8). The solubiUty of MMA in water at 25°C is 1.5%. Water solubiUty of longer alkyl methacrylates ranges from slight to insoluble. Some functionalized esters such as 2-dimethylaniinoethyl methacrylate are miscible and/or hydrolyze. The solubiUty of 2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate in water at 25°C is 13%. Vapor—Hquid equiUbrium (VLE) data have been pubHshed on methanol, methyl methacrylate, and methacrylic acid pairs (9), as have solubiUty data for this ternary system (10). VLE data are also available for methyl methacrylate, methacrylic acid, methyl a-hydroxyisobutyrate, methanol, and water, which are the critical components obtained in the commercially important acetone cyanohydrin route to methyl methacrylate (11). 

Transesterification of methyl methacrylate with the appropriate alcohol is often the preferred method of preparing higher alkyl and functional methacrylates. The reaction is driven to completion by the use of excess methyl methacrylate and by removal of the methyl methacrylate—methanol a2eotrope. A variety of catalysts have been used, including acids and bases and transition-metal compounds such as dialkjitin oxides (57), titanium(IV) alkoxides (58), and zirconium acetoacetate (59). The use of the transition-metal catalysts allows reaction under nearly neutral conditions and is therefore more tolerant of sensitive functionality in the ester alcohol moiety. In addition, transition-metal catalysts often exhibit higher selectivities than acidic catalysts, particularly with respect to by-product ether formation. 

Plastic Sheet. Poly(methyl methacrylate) plastic sheet is manufactured in a wide variety of types, including cleat and colored transparent, cleat and colored translucent, and colored semiopaque. Various surface textures ate also produced. Additionally, grades with improved weatherabiUty (added uv absorbers), mat resistance, crazing resistance, impact resistance, and flame resistance ate available. Selected physical properties of poly(methyl methacrylate) sheet ate Hsted in Table 12 (102). 

Monomers such as methyl methacrylate [80-62-6] are often used in combination with styrene to modify refractive index and improve uv resistance. Vinyltoluene [25013-15-4] and diaHyl phthalate [131-17-9] are employed as monomers in selective mol ding compositions for thermal improvements. 

In this stage of the investigation, poly(methyl methacrylates) (PMMAs) were selected as the polymeric probes of intermediate polarity. Polymers of medium broad molar mass distribution and of low tacticity (14) were a gift of Dr. W. Wunderlich of Rohm Co., Darmstadt, Germany. Their molar masses ranged from 1.6 X 10" to 6.13 X 10 g-mol. For some comparative tests, narrow polystyrene standards from Pressure Co. (Pittsburgh, PA) were used. 

An effective method of NVF chemical modification is graft copolymerization [34,35]. This reaction is initiated by free radicals of the cellulose molecule. The cellulose is treated with an aqueous solution with selected ions and is exposed to a high-energy radiation. Then, the cellulose molecule cracks and radicals are formed. Afterwards, the radical sites of the cellulose are treated with a suitable solution (compatible with the polymer matrix), for example vinyl monomer [35] acrylonitrile [34], methyl methacrylate [47], polystyrene [41]. The resulting copolymer possesses properties characteristic of both fibrous cellulose and grafted polymer. 

Kochi (1956a, 1956b) and Dickerman et al. (1958, 1959) studied the kinetics of the Meerwein reaction of arenediazonium salts with acrylonitrile, styrene, and other alkenes, based on initial studies on the Sandmeyer reaction. The reactions were found to be first-order in diazonium ion and in cuprous ion. The relative rates of the addition to four alkenes (acrylonitrile, styrene, methyl acrylate, and methyl methacrylate) vary by a factor of only 1.55 (Dickerman et al., 1959). This result indicates that the aryl radical has a low selectivity. The kinetic data are consistent with the mechanism of Schemes 10-52 to 10-56, 10-58 and 10-59. This mechanism was strongly corroborated by Galli s work on the Sandmeyer reaction more than twenty years later (1981-89). 

In this short initial communication we wish to describe a general purpose continuous-flow stirred-tank reactor (CSTR) system which incorporates a digital computer for supervisory control purposes and which has been constructed for use with radical and other polymerization processes. The performance of the system has been tested by attempting to control the MWD of the product from free-radically initiated solution polymerizations of methyl methacrylate (MMA) using oscillatory feed-forward control strategies for the reagent feeds. This reaction has been selected for study because of the ease of experimentation which it affords and because the theoretical aspects of the control of MWD in radical polymerizations has attracted much attention in the scientific literature. 

In order to be successful as part of a medical device a polymer has to resist both biological rejection by the patient s body and degradation. The human body is an enviromnent which is simultaneously hostile and sensitive, so that materials for application in medicine must be carefully selected. The essential requirement is that these materials are biocompafible with the particular part of the body in which they are placed. The extent to which polymers fulfil this requirement of biocompafibility depends partly on the properties of the polymer and partly on the location in which they are expected to perform. For example the requirements for blood biocompafibility are stringent since blood coagulation may be triggered by a variety of materials. By contrast, the requirements for materials to be used in replacement joints in orthopaedic surgery are less severe and materials as diverse as poly (methyl methacrylate) and stainless steel can be used with minimal adverse reaction from the body. 

Carbonylation of methanol to acetic acid is fully discussed in Chapter 9. Another carbonylation process using a phosphine ligand to control the course of the reaction is a highly atom efficient route to the widely used monomer methyl methacrylate (Scheme 4.19). In this process the catalyst is based on palladium acetate and the phosphine ligand, bisphenyl(6-methyl-2-pyridyl) phosphine. This catalyst is remarkably (>99.5%) selective for the 2-carbonylation of propyne under the relatively mild conditions of <100 °C and 60 bar pressure. 

Although the potassium superoxide route can be universally applied to various alkyl methacrylates, it is experimentally more difficult than simple acid hydrolysis. In addition, limited yields do not permit well-defined hydrophobic-hydrophilic blocks. On the other hand, acid catalyzed hydrolysis is limited to only a few esters such as TBMA, but yields of carboxylate are quantitative. Hydrolysis attempts of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and poly(isopropyl methacrylate) (PIPMA) do not yield an observable amount of conversion to the carboxylic acid under the established conditions for poly(t-butyl methacrylate) (PTBMA). This allows for selective hydrolysis of all-acrylic block copolymers. 

Our requirements for certain applications called for the preparation of block copolymers of styrene and alkali metal methacrylates with molecular weights of about 20,000 and methacrylate contents of about 10 mol%. In this report we describe the preparation and reactions of S-b-MM and S-b-tBM. In the course of our investigation, we have found several new methods for the conversion of alkyl methacrylate blocks into methacrylic acid and/or metal methacrylate blocks. Of particular interest is the reaction with trimethylsilyl iodide. Under the same mild conditions, MM blocks are completely unreactive, while tBM blocks are cleanly converted to either methacrylic acid or metal methacrylate blocks. As a consequence of this unexpected selectivity, we also report the preparation of the new block copolymers, poly(methyl methacrylate-b-potassium methacrylate) (MM-b-MA.K) and poly(methyl methacrvlate-b-methacrylic acid) (MM-b-MA). 

The Preparation of MM-b-MA and MM-b-MA.K. Inspired by the unexpected selectivity of the reaction of TMSI with S-b-MM and S-b-tBM, we decided to attempt the preparation of poly(methyl methacrylate-b-t-butyl methacrylate) (MM-b-tBM) and its unprecedented conversion to MM-b-MA. 

Most recently new applications for substrate-controlled branched-selective hydroformylation of alkenes substituted with inductively electron-with drawing substituents have emerged. A recent example is the hydroformylation of acrylamide with a standard rhodium/triphenylphosphine catalyst, which yields the branched aldehyde exclusively (Scheme 4) [40]. Reduction of the aldehyde function furnishes 3-hydroxy-2-methylpropionamide, which is an intermediate en route to methyl methacrylate. 

TiCU readily functionalizes hydrophilic polymers such as poly(vinyl alcohol), m-ciesol novolac and methacrylic acid copolymers as well as moderately hydrophobic polymers such as poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(vinyl acetate), poly(benzyl methacrylate) and fully acetylated m-cresol novolac. HCI4 did not react with poly(styrene) to form etch resistant films indicating that very hydrophobic films follow a different reaction pathway. RBS analysis revealed that Ti is present only on the surface of hydrophilic and moderately hydrophobic polymer films, whereas it was found diffused through the entire thickness of the poly(styrene) films. The reaction pathways of hydrophilic and hydrophobic polymers with HCI4 are different because TiCl is hydrolysed by the surface water at the hydrophilic polymer surfaces to form an etch resistant T1O2 layer. Lack of such surface water in hydrophobic polymers explains the absence of a surface TiC>2 layer and the poor etching selectivities. 

---