Method precision

By incorporating the entire analytical scheme (enzyme reaction and electrochemical detection) into the flow system a great improvement in precision can be realized. Sample manipulation is minimized because only a single injection into the flow system is required versus sampling of aliquots for the off-line method. Precision is also improved because the timing of the enzyme reaction and detection are much better controlled in the flow system. Finally, less of both enzyme and sample are needed with on-line enzyme reactor methods. 

If F < F a,Vl,v2> then the null hypothesis cannot be rejected and the procedure may be considered as to be robust (strictly speaking robust with regard to method precision). 

Stable labelled isotopes are spiked into samples before extraction and the ratio of unlabelled compound and stable labelled isotope was used to quantitate the unlabelled compound. Analysis is by high-resolution gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Fifteen standard water samples and ten standard soil samples containing 2,4-D at known concentrations were analysed. Compound concentrations ranged from 100 to lOOOOug per kg for soil samples. Average recoveries were over 84% and method precision, given as relative standard deviation, was better than 19%. 

According to the dissolution method, precision is determined by testing at least six aliquots of a homogenous sample for each dosage strength. The precision should be assessed at each specification interval for the dosage form. The precision can be determined by calculating the relative standard deviation (RSD) of the multiple aliquots from each solution. 

IV accuracy profiles are based on total measurement error that is a combination of the systematic error (measured by method biases) and random error (measured by method precision, i.e. RSDIP) (Rozet et... 

The precision of a test method is the variability between test results obtained on the same material using a specific test method (ASTM, 2004 Patnaik, 2004). The precision of a test is usually unrelated to its accuracy. The results may be precise, but not necessarily accurate. In fact, the precision of an analytical method is the amount of scatter in the results obtained from multiple analyses of a homogeneous sample. To be meaningful, the precision study must be performed using the exact sample and standard preparation procedures that will be used in the final method. Precision is expressed as repeatability and reproducibility. 

As an example, the results obtained for method precision and capability are presented in Table 10 for a Gage R R study performed for an oral film-coated tablet in four different labs, using six sample batches, and analyzed in replicate by two analysts in each lab. The %P/T metric was calculated according to the Ph. EUR specifications 95-105% and according to the USP specifications 90-110%. The method standard deviation (apart from the process standard deviation) is also presented, together with average assay results and confidence intervals thereof per lab and for all labs together. 

Methods used to determine the performance characteristics of finished products fall into Category III. Dissolution tests (excluding measurement) and drug release tests are examples of these types of methods. Precision is the only parameter required for these methods according to the regulatory guidances, although all validation parameters may be determined based on the intent of the method. 

To support the development activities, accurate and sensitive analytical methods are required. With progress in development, increasing method validation work is performed and the acceptance criteria for drug quality and test method precision are tightened. 

Aspects which are generally relevant to validate analytical methods Precision... 

Method precision refers to the variability in measurement of the same sample. There are three main components of method precision repeatability (also known as system or intraassay precision), intermediate precision (also known as inter-assay or intra-laboratory precision), and reproducibility precision (also known as ruggedness, overall or inter-laboratory... 

We could introduce Hess s generalization into thermodynamics as another empirical law, which is similar to the first law. However, a firm theoretical framework depends on a minimum of empirical postulates. Thermodynamics is so powerful a method precisely because it leads to so many predictions from only two or three basic assumptions. Hess s law need not be among these postulates, because it can be derived directly from the first law of thermodynamics perhaps most conveniently by using a new thermodynamic function, enthalpy. 

Resorcinol Water solution Non-destructive quantitation method. Precision lower than 0.15% in a temperature range of 9-35 °C. Method validated using ICH-adapted guidelines 151... 

As a consequence of ion suppression, the analytical method is affected in different ways [38]. Eirst of all, it has an effect on the capability to detect analytes due to signal decrease. As a consequence, the true concentration of the analyte can be underestimated to the point of a false negative. If signal suppression involves an internal standard only, one may be induced to overestimate analyte concentration to the point of a false positive. Method precision response linearity can be affected because the degree of suppression can vary significantly in different samples. The presence of co-eluting compounds can modify the mass spectra, thus makiug the database search more complicated. 

Reference Standard. One of the limitations of the external standard method is that a well-characterized reference standard is essential. In addition, each analysis requires accurate weighings of small quantities (e.g., 10 mg) of reference standard. Therefore, weighing error can affect method precision and accuracy. 

Intermediate precision is to determine method precision in different experiments using different analysts and/or instrument setup. Similar to that of repeatability, one should evaluate the results of individual related substances, total related substances, and the consistency of related substance profiles in all experiments. The percent RSD and confidence level of these results are reported to illustrate the intermediate precision. 

Establish and maintain a high degree of accuracy and precision using the INAA method precision was normally less than 25%, and accuracy was estimated at less than 50%. 

Another short note For samples that are relatively clean, one could always resort to employing (and frequently replacing) a guard column. This might be a bit more costly, but it greatly simplifies any sample preparation procedure and will probably lead to better method precision. One should always keep in mind that the largest contributor to poor method precision is usually manual sample preparations. 

Step 9 Method maintenance Incorporate the new method or analyzer into the existing method maintenance systems for the site, to ensure that the method as practiced continues to meet the technical requirements for as long as it is in use. This is done by the receiver. Method maintenance systems may include check sample control-charting, intra-and/or inter-lab uniformity testing, on-site auditing, instrument preventive maintenance (PM) scheduling, control-charting the method precision and/or accuracy, etc. 

Quality control sample, often chosen randomly, from a batch of samples and undergoing separate, but identical sample preparation and analysis whose purpose is to monitor method precision and sample homogeneity. Duplicate testing also aids in the evaluation of analyst proficiency. Volume 1(10). 

If the above approach creates practical problems, an alternative is to perform single analyses on a minimum of five test portions of the study sample. The standard deviation of replicate analysis results is an indicator of sample homogeneity and method precision. The disadvantage of this approach is that it does not provide a simultaneous measure of the analytical variance under the homogeneity test conditions. Analytical variance must be estimated from historical data (e.g. method validation) or spiked recoveries run with the homogeneity test samples. 

Earlier guidelines defined precision in terms of system precision and method precision. System precision was the measure of reproducibility based on multiple measurements of a single sample preparation. Method precision was the measure of reproducibility based on analysis of multiple sample preparations. Ruggedness was a measure of day-to-day, analyst-to-analyst, and instrument-to-instrument variation. 

---