Standards, preparation

Moreover, it is useful to distinguish between the standards prepared by the official standards organizations and the professional standards. The former s mission is to ensure that the conditions of the consensus of the widest assemblage of interested parties are followed. The professional standards are prepared by recognized professional organizations but limit the consensus to only the participating organizations. 

Gluodenis describes the use of ICP to analyze samples containing Pb and Ni in brass. The analysis for Pb uses external standards prepared from brass samples containing known amounts of lead. Results are shown in the following table. ... 

Ion-selective electrodes can be incorporated in flow cells to monitor the concentration of an analyte in standards and samples that are pumped through the flow cell. As the analyte passes through the cell, a potential spike is recorded instead of a steady-state potential. The concentration of K+ in serum has been determined in this fashion, using standards prepared in a matrix of 0.014 M NaCl. ... 

Internal methods of quality assessment should always be viewed with some level of skepticism because of the potential for bias in their execution and interpretation. For this reason, external methods of quality assessment also play an important role in quality assurance programs. One external method of quality assessment is the certification of a laboratory by a sponsoring agency. Certification is based on the successful analysis of a set of proficiency standards prepared by the sponsoring agency. For example, laboratories involved in environmental analyses may be required to analyze standard samples prepared by the Environmental Protection... 

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The NIST is the source of many of the standards used in chemical and physical analyses in the United States and throughout the world. The standards prepared and distributed by the NIST are used to caUbrate measurement systems and to provide a central basis for uniformity and accuracy of measurement. At present, over 1200 Standard Reference Materials (SRMs) are available and are described by the NIST (15). Included are many steels, nonferrous alloys, high purity metals, primary standards for use in volumetric analysis, microchemical standards, clinical laboratory standards, biological material certified for trace elements, environmental standards, trace element standards, ion-activity standards (for pH and ion-selective electrodes), freezing and melting point standards, colorimetry standards, optical standards, radioactivity standards, particle-size standards, and density standards. Certificates are issued with the standard reference materials showing values for the parameters that have been determined. 

Of course, the most reliable and accurate method of quantitative analysis is to calibrate each element with standards prepared in matrices similar to the unknown being analyzed. For a survey technique that is used to examine such a wide variety of materials, however, standards are not available in many cases. When the technique is used mainly in one application (typing steels, specifying the purity of alloys for a selected group of elements, or identifying impurities in silicon boules and... 

Sorbent tube standards preparation by the syringe injection technique... 

Procedure. Prepare a 0.25 per cent solution of diphenylcarbazide in 50 per cent acetone as required. The test solution may contain from 0.2 to 0.5 part per million of chromate. To about 15 mL of this solution add sufficient 3M sulphuric acid to make the concentration about 0.1M when subsequently diluted to 25 mL, add 1 mL of the diphenylcarbazide reagent and make up to 25 mL with water. Match the colour produced against standards prepared from 0.0002M potassium dichromate solution. A green filter having the transmission maximum at about 540 nm may be used. 

Arsenic standards. Prepare a 1 mgL-1 working standard solution from a 1000 mg L-1 SpectrosoL solution of arsenic trichloride in a 4M hydrochloric acid. 

A matrix extract was prepared from poison-free scallop and spiked at the level of 200 ngg of scallop hepatopancreas. The toxins were determined by using LC-MS with calibration employing external standards prepared in methanol. The matrix extract was then spiked further with 300 ngg of each of the toxins and redetermined. The results obtained for each analyte are summarized in Table 5.17 and show that, when using the external calibration method, the values obtained range from 138 to 170 ngg a reduction in accuracy of between 15... 

Laboratory method using porous polymer adsorbent tubes, thermal desorption and gas chromatt raphy MDHS 32 Dioctyl phthalates in air Laboratory method using Tenax adsorbent tubes, solvent desorption and gas chromatography MDHS 33 Adsorbent tu standards Preparation by the syringe loading technique MDHS 34 Arsine in air Colorimetric field method using silver diethyl-dithiocarbamate in the presence of excess silver nitrate... 

MDHS33 Adsorbent tube standards (preparation by the syringe loading technique). 

In each of the assays of potency the amount of the immunoglobulin and the amount of a corresponding standard preparation that are required to neutralize the infectivity or other biological activity of a defined amount of virus or to neutralize a defined amount of a bacterial toxin are determined. The two determined amounts and the assigned unitage of the standard preparation are then used to calculate the potency of the immunoglobulin in International Units (lU). ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. 

The use of standards prepared in control matrices is typically not allowed for determinative procedures because control tissues are not routinely available to regulatory laboratories. When a matrix effect alters the spectrum or chromatography of an analyte relative to the pure standard, so that confirmatory criteria cannot be met, a control extract containing standard may be substituted for pure standard. Justification, with CVM concurrence, should be provided for confirmatory methods that use fortified control extracts. 

The effect of co-extracted matrix components on the analyte response in the final determination step should be assessed. Normally, this is done by comparing the response of standards in solvent with matrix-matched standards, i.e., standards prepared in the extract of a control sample without residues. Because matrix effects tend to be inconsistent, the guidelines propose the general use of matrix-matched calibration unless it is demonstrated to be unnecessary. 

For deuterated standards, prepare a 500 ugmL individual deuterated herbicide solution and a 10.0 ug mL mixed deuterated herbicide solution. 

At least four chromatographic standards prepared at concentrations equivalent to 50-70% of the limit of quantitation (LOQ) up to the maximum levels of analytes expected in the samples should be prepared and analyzed concurrently with the samples. In LC/MS/MS analysis, the first injection should be that of a standard or reagent blank and should be discarded. Then, the lowest standard should be injected, followed by two to four blanks, control samples, fortifications or investigation samples, followed by another chromatographic standard. This sequence is then repeated until all the samples have been injected. The last injection should be that of a standard. In order to permit unattended analysis of a normal analysis set, we recommend that samples and standards be made up in aqueous solutions of ammonium acetate (ca 5 mM) with up to 25% of an organic modifier such as acetonitrile or methanol if needed. In addition, use of a chilled autosampler maintained at 4 °C provides additional prevention of degradation during analysis. 

Trifluoromethanesulfonates of alkyl and allylic alcohols can be prepared by reaction with trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride in halogenated solvents in the presence of pyridine.3 Since the preparation of sulfonate esters does not disturb the C—O bond, problems of rearrangement or racemization do not arise in the ester formation step. However, sensitive sulfonate esters, such as allylic systems, may be subject to reversible ionization reactions, so appropriate precautions must be taken to ensure structural and stereochemical integrity. Tertiary alkyl sulfonates are neither as easily prepared nor as stable as those from primary and secondary alcohols. Under the standard preparative conditions, tertiary alcohols are likely to be converted to the corresponding alkene. 

National Fire Protection Association. Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code. ANSI/NFPA 30 An American National Standard. Prepared in conjunction with the American National Standards Institute. Quincy, MA. 

The items may also be classified differently in cost sheets and cost standards prepared to monitor the performance of the operating plant. For this purpose the fixed-cost items should be those over which the plant supervision has no control, and the variable items those for which they can be held accountable. 

The accuracy of any quantitative assay depends on the use of standards that have been thoroughly characterized by accepted and independent methods. Without careful preparation of standards, the reported values for samples will be systematically higher or lower than the true value. Chiron has devoted considerable effort to the development of gold standard preparations of RNA from HIV-1 and HCV and DNA from HBV for use in the bDNA assays. These standards have been made available to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the World Health Organization. 

The assessors experienced an explosion while drying the oxide in ethyl ether. Rather drastic precautions are recommended in handling it [1], A preparation, allowed to stand for a week rather than the day specified, exploded during concentration [2], Amine oxides from the standard preparation are inclined to retain hydrogen peroxide of hydration unless it is destroyed during work-up. The perox-idate (or diperoxidate) of dimethylamine oxide would be expected to be far more dangerous than the oxide itself [3],... 

Standard preparation Dissolve an accurately weighed quantity of USP Miconazole RS in Mobile phase and dilute quantitatively, and stepwise if necessary, with Mobile phase to obtain a solution having a known concentration of about 0.5 mg/mL. Transfer 10 mL of this solution to 100 mL volumetric flask, dilute with Mobile phase to volume, and mix to obtain a Standard preparation having a known concentration of about 50 pg/mL. 

Chromatographic system (See Chromatography <621 >.) The liquid chromatograph is equipped with a 230 nm detector and a 4.6 mm x 30 cm column that contains packing L7. The flow rate is about 2 mL/min. Chromatograph the Resolution solution and the Standard preparation, and record the peak responses as directed under Procedure the resolution, R, between the dibutyl phthalate and miconazole peaks is not less than 5, the tailing factor for the miconazole peak is not more than 1.3, and the relative standard deviation for replicate injections of the Standard preparation is not more than 2%. The relative retention times are about 0.7 for dibutyl phthalate and 1 for miconazole. 

Procedure (NOTE - Allow the chromatograph to run for at least 16-18 min between injections to allow for elution of all components associated with the injection vehicle.) Separately inject equal volumes (about 20 pL) of the Standard preparation and the Assay preparation into the chromatograph, record the chromatograms, and measure the responses for the major peaks. Calculate the quantity, in mg, of Ci8H14CL4N20 in each milliliter of the injection given by the formula ... 

---