Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Mesocosm studies effects

Schief J, Mutz M (2009) Effects of sudden flow reduction on the decomposition of alder leaves (Alnus glutinosa L (Gaertn.)) in a temperate lowland stream. A mesocosm study. Hydrobiologia 624 205-217... [Pg.40]

Considering evidence from both field and mesocosm studies, it may be concluded that certain groups of aquatic macroinvertebrates are sensitive to pyrethroids and that there can be changes, in the short term, at the population level and above with exposure to environmentally realistic concentrations of them. It should be possible to pick up effects of this kind in natural waters using ecological profiling, for example, the River Invertebrate Prediction and Classification System (RIVPACS). There is... [Pg.237]

Section 4.5). Of these, mesocosms have stimulated the greatest interest. In these, replicated and controlled tests can be carried out to establish the effects of chemicals upon the structure and function of the (artihcial) communities they contain. The major problem is relating effects produced in mesocosms to events in the real world (see Crossland 1994). Nevertheless, it can be argued that mesocosms do incorporate certain relationships (e.g., predator/prey) and processes (e.g., carbon cycle) that are found in the outside world, and they test the effects of chemicals on these. Once again, the judicious use of biomarker assays during the course of mesocosm studies may help to relate effects of chemicals measured by them with similar effects in the natural environment. [Pg.323]

However, the effect of a harmful compound should be studied with respect to the community level, not only for the organism tested. Tests with several species are realized in microcosm and mesocosm studies. Mesocosms are larger with respect to both the species number and the species diversity and are often performed outdoors and under natural conditions. [Pg.17]

In most cases, limited information is available regarding the toxic effects of chemicals. Empirical guidelines are then used in an attempt to protect most of the aquatic ecosystem s biota. The regulation of chemicals, for instance, generally uses safety factors from 10 to 1000 depending on the number of species tested. Mesocosm studies or comparisons with real field situations are accepted with lower safety factors on a case by case basis, since these studies reduce the uncertainty linked to the relevance of laboratory models in terms of site-specific data. [Pg.92]

Juttner I, Peither A, Lay JP, Kettrup A, Ormerod SJ. 1995. An outdoor mesocosm study to assess ecotoxicological effects of atrazine on a natural plankton community. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 29 435-441. [Pg.343]

Mesocosm no-effect data on a rapidly dissipating compound such as a pyrethroid insecticide may not be suitable for a chronic EQS applied to a river. Furthermore, most existing micro- and mesocosm studies are inappropriate for EQS derivation if fish are the most sensitive species because fish have generally been excluded from such tests. There is consequently a need for evidence-based decision making for interpretation of nonstandard mesocosm studies. Microcosm and mesocosm tests can, however, be used directly for EQS derivation if algae, macrophytes, and invertebrates are appropriately represented in the test systems and if they concern substances subject to transient exposure. They are then directly applicable for the derivation of M AC-EQSs. For this purpose, the NOEAEC can be used as it represents the highest initial concentration that causes no ecologically relevant effects. [Pg.73]

Practical aspects. Some endpoints need more elaborate experimental setups than others, for example, microcosm or mesocosm studies on community responses compared to simple beaker tests for determining effects on the survival of a single species. As a consequence, possibilities for the replication or repeating of tests may be limited. This may affect the possibility of meeting requirements for a proper analysis of the resulting toxicity data against the 2 reference models of CA and IA. [Pg.131]

If the chemical composition of the samples is known or at least partly known (in a stepwise TIE approach) or existing data allow for QSAR calculation, the samples can be ranked by TUs. Arts et al. (2006) studied, in 12 outdoor ditch mesocosms, the effects of sequential contamination with 5 pesticides in a regression design. They applied dosages equivalent with 0.2%, 1%, and 5% of the predicted environmental concentration (PEC) subsequently over 17 weeks. Endpoints recorded over 30 weeks included community composition of macroinvertebrates, plankton, and macrophytes, and leaf litter decomposition as functional ecosystem parameters. TUs were calculated in relation to acute toxicity data for the most sensitive standard species Daphnia magna and Lemna minor. Principal response curves (PRCs), a special form of constrained PCA, and Williams test (NOEC, class 2 LOEC) were used to identify the most sensitive taxa. Next to direct effects on certain species, also indirect effects, for example, how the change in abundance of a sensitive species affects the abundance of another, more tolerant species, can be detected only in mesocosm or in situ experiments. All observed effects were summarized in effect classes in a descriptive manner. [Pg.152]

Mousseau, L., Gosselin, M., Levasseur, M., Demers, S., Fauchot, J., Roy, S., Villegas, P. Z., and Mostajir, B. (2000). Effects of ultraviolet-B radiation on simultaneous carbon and nitrogen transport rates by estuarine phytoplankton during a week-long mesocosm study. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 199, 69-81. [Pg.1380]

Gribsholt B. and Kristensen E. (2002) Effects of bioturbation and plant roots on salt marsh biogeochemistry a mesocosm study. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 241, 71-87. [Pg.4266]

In this chapter we present an individual-based population model (Metapopulation model for Assessing Spatial and Temporal Effects of Pesticides [MASTEP]). M ASTEP describes the effects on, and recovery of, populations of the water louse Asellus aqua-ticus following exposure to a fast-acting, nonpersistent insecticide caused by spray drift for pond, ditch, and stream scenarios. The model used the spatial and temporal distribution of the exposure in different treatment conditions as an input parameter. A dose-response relation derived from a hypothetical mesocosm study was used to link the exposure with the effects. The modeled landscape was represented as a lattice of 1 x 1 m cells. The model included processes of mortality of A. aquaticus, life history, random walk between cells, density-dependent population regulation, and in the case of the stream scenario, medium-distance drift of A. aquaticus due to flow. All parameter estimates were based on the results of a thorough review of published information on the ecology of A. aquaticus and expert judgment. [Pg.75]

Whereas the potential adverse effects on rapidly reproducing species (planktonic and benthic invertebrates and algae) are usually investigated during a mesocosm study, the long-term effects on slowly reproducing species with low potential of recovery within a short period of time (e.g., univoltine insect species) are usually not studied, and hence the risk is potentially not covered. Some of those species are of... [Pg.127]

The potential for ecological risks from atrazine in surface waters has been extensively reviewed with respect to its potential effects on organisms in a number of ecological systems l,2). Fish fiill life-cycle studies and mesocosm studies have not suggested effects on reproduction and development at environmentally relevant concentrations. However, there is a lack of specific, data on some non-target aquatic and semiaquatic species such as reptiles and anq>hibians, especially for the newly identified sublethal endpoints related to... [Pg.125]

Apart from the use of this approach to study the ecotoxicology of neurotoxic pollutants in the field, it also has potential for use during the course of environmental risk assessment. An understanding of the relationship between biomarker responses to neurotoxic compounds and effects at the population level can be gained from both field studies and the use of mesocosms and other model systems. From these it may be possible to define critical thresholds in biomarker responses of indicator species above which population effects begin to appear. In the longer term, this approach... [Pg.316]

Microcosm, mesocosm, and macrocosm Small, medium, or large multispecies system in which effects of chemicals can be studied. [Pg.333]


See other pages where Mesocosm studies effects is mentioned: [Pg.93]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.929]    [Pg.637]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.496]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.161]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.315 ]




SEARCH



Mesocosm studies

Mesocosms

© 2024 chempedia.info