Sprays drift

Biocides should not be present in water used for aquaculture. Sources of herbicides and pesticides are mnoff from agricultural land, contamination of the water table, and spray drift from crop-dusting activity. Excessive levels of phosphoms and nitrogen may occur where mnoff from fertilized land enters an aquaculture faciUty either from surface mnoff or groundwater contamination. Trace metal levels should be low as indicated in Tables 4 and 5. 

Field studies are required to provide a more reaUstic picture of the dissipation of the parent compound and those degradates determined to be significant. Under field conditions pesticides are exposed simultaneously to the individual dissipation processes that were examined separately in the laboratory studies. Thus, in field studies, some dissipation processes may be altered due to competition and interaction. Requirements for spray drift data were outlined in draft Subdivision R, but the EPA agreed that data generated on a generic basis by an industry consortium could represent the potential for drifting of individual pesticides. 

Spray drift may cause annoyance to people in its path, as well as corrosion of adjacent metals and concrete breakdown improved design of drift eliminators available (in PVC) for critical control of drift... 

How to comply with the conditions of approval Selection of protective clothing How to avoid spray drift How to avoid environmental damage... 

To solve this problem, modern pesticide formulations use a variety of additives (adjuvants) to improve the mass efficiency. Surfactants and polymeric rheology modifiers are used to reduce spray drift, surfactants are used to modify surface tension and reduce... 

Methods to determine the a.i., and/or relevant metabolites in air during or shortly after the application must be submitted unless it can be justified that exposure of operators, workers, or bystanders does not occur. In SANCO/825/00 it is stated that spray drift and particle-associated as well as gaseous substances have to be taken into consideration because both can cause relevant exposure of operators, workers, or bystanders. Therefore, an analytical method must also be submitted for relevant substances with a low vapor pressure (< 10-5 Pa). 

Untreated (control) soil is collected to determine the presence of substances that may interfere with the measurement of target analytes. Control soil is also necessary for analytical recovery determinations made using laboratory-fortified samples. Thus, basic field study design divides the test area into one or more treated plots and an untreated control plot. Unlike the treated plots, the untreated control is typically not replicated but must be sufficiently large to provide soil for characterization, analytical method validation, and quality control. To prevent spray drift on to the control area and other potential forms of contamination, the control area is positioned > 15 m away and upwind of the treated plot, relative to prevailing wind patterns. 

Spray nozzle type plays an important role in the success of agrochemical application. For broadcast applications to soil, flat fan nozzles should be used. Newer spray tips such as the DG TeeJet, XR TeeJet, Turbo TeeJet and similar nozzles supplied by Lechler and Hardy have provided acceptable results in a number of studies. For a given nozzle type, the lower the application pressure, the larger is the spray droplet size and the less potential for spray drift. Similarly, the closer the boom is positioned to the soil surface, the less is the potential for spray drift." Most applications are made with spray tips having 80° or 110° spray angles and boom heights of about 50 cm above the soil surface. 

Best practices to conduct spray drift studies... 

Spray drift is defined for this topic by the National Coalition On Drift Minimization (NCODM) as The physical movement of pesticide through the air at the time of pesticide application or soon thereafter from the target site to any non- or off-target site . Secondary drift, defined by NCDOM as vapor drift or subsequent dust and particle movement after the application , is only partially addressed, although most key principles discussed will still also apply to such secondary movements. 

The goal of spray drift sampling is to obtain representative samples of the application being investigated while minimizing any bias introduced by the methods employed to collect those samples. Collected samples are used to investigate whether pesticide products are present in the environment and, if present, at what rates relative to the amount of product(s) applied to the spray area (the field, forest or other spray area). 

Spray drift studies may be conducted to quantify off-target deposition or drift or to determine spray coverage and distributions within a particular application area. A quality study involves four key elements ... 

Some fluorescent dyes are more stable than others. For example, our experience suggests that Pyranine 1OG is sufficiently stable if samples can be collected within less than 30 min. For wind tunnel measurements of spray drift, success has been obtained with Green S. ... 

Water-sensitive papers are readily available in most countries and provide a convenient system for visually assessing spray drift performance. These papers are coated with bromoethyl blue, which turns from yellow to blue when contacted with water. " However, since any water can cause this change in color, care needs to be taken to prevent accidental exposure to sources of water other than the pesticide. Such cards do not work well under humid conditions, and are not appropriate for sampling droplets with diameter below 15 qm. Quantitative estimates of droplet size distributions must take account of the exponential increase in droplet volume as the droplet diameter increases. As droplets strike the paper, the liquid spreads over the surface and leaves a stain with a size that is dependent on the volume of the droplet. The apparent droplet size will be greater for large droplets than for small droplets, and the size determination must be corrected to avoid bias. 

H. Ganzlemeier, D. Rautmann, R. Spangenberg, M. Streloke, M. Herrmann, H. Wenzelburger, and H. Walter, Studies on the Spray Drift of Plant Protection Products, Blackwell, Berlin (1995). 

P. C. H. Miller, P. J. Walklate, and C. J. Mawer, A comparison of spray drift collection techniques, in Proceedings of British Crop Protection Council Brighton Conference on Weeds , British Crop Protection Council, Farnham, pp. 669-676 (1989). 

A.J. Hewitt, D.L. Valcore, and J.E. Bryant, Spray Drift Task Force Atomization Droplet Size Spectra Measurements, in PROC ILASS-Americas 96, San Francisco, CA (1996). 

---