Liquid membrane extraction

Some processes occur simultaneously, e.g., gel filtration and dialysis some processes are implemented in a similar manifold architecture, e.g., supported membrane liquid extraction and solid-phase extraction some... 

Another recent and new variant of membrane liquid extraction was introduced by Cantwell, and is known as liquid-liquid-liquid microextraction (LLLME). In this case three liquid phases are used — ai is the water sample where pH is adjusted to deionize the compounds, a2 the acceptor aqueous phase with pH adjusted to ionize the compounds and an organic liquid phase (o), 40 pi or 80 pi of -octane, which is layered over the donor phase. In this case no physical membrane is needed because the organic layer has this function. This modification is an appropriate application for preconcentration and purification for polar analytes in water samples such as amines... 

DTS different trapping systems solid-phase extraction, micro-porous-membrane liquid extraction (hollow fiber or flat sheet). LLE is off-line. QUASIMEME quality assurance of information for marine environmental monitoring in Europe... 

In recent decades the development of preconcentration steps to be implemented prior to analytical determinations of trace level compounds has been explored in considerable depth. With a view to eliminating or at least minimising the use of organic solvents used in conventional liquid-liquid extraction, other methodologies have been developed, such as membrane extraction, solid-phase extraction, solid-phase microextraction, etc. 

Refinery product separation falls into a number of common classes namely Main fractionators gas plants classical distillation, extraction (liquid-liquid), precipitation (solvent deasphalting), solid facilitated (Parex(TM), PSA), and Membrane (PRSIM(TM)). This list has been ordered from most common to least common. Main fractionators are required in every refinery. Nearly every refinery has some type of gas plant. Most refineries have classical distillation columns. Liquid-liquid extraction is in a few places. Precipitation, solid facilitated and membrane separations are used in specific applications. 

Figure 2.17 Schematic representation of the set-up used for on-line liquid-liquid exti action coupled with capillary GC when using a membrane phase separator. Reprinted from Journal of High Resdution Chromatography, 13, E. C. Goosens et al., Determination of hexachloro-cyclohexanes in gi ound water by coupled liquid-liquid extraction and capillaiy gas cliro-matography , pp. 438-441, 1990, with permission from Wiley-VCH.

Most of the chiral membrane-assisted applications can be considered as a modality of liquid-liquid extraction, and will be discussed in the next section. However, it is worth mentioning here a device developed by Keurentjes et al., in which two miscible chiral liquids with opposing enantiomers of the chiral selector flow counter-currently through a column, separated by a nonmiscible liquid membrane [179]. In this case the selector molecules are located out of the liquid membrane and both enantiomers are needed. The system allows recovery of the two enantiomers of the racemic mixture to be separated. Thus, using dihexyltartrate and poly(lactic acid), the authors described the resolution of different drugs, such as norephedrine, salbu-tamol, terbutaline, ibuprofen or propranolol. 

Liquid-liquid extraction is a basic process already applied as a large-scale method. Usually, it does not require highly sophisticated devices, being very attractive for the preparative-scale separation of enantiomers. In this case, a chiral selector must be added to one of the liquid phases. This principle is common to some of the separation techniques described previously, such as CCC, CPC or supported-liquid membranes. In all of these, partition of the enantiomers of a mixture takes place thanks to their different affinity for the chiral additive in a given system of solvents. 

In supported liquid membranes, a chiral liquid is immobilized in the pores of a membrane by capillary and interfacial tension forces. The immobilized film can keep apart two miscible liquids that do not wet the porous membrane. Vaidya et al. [10] reported the effects of membrane type (structure and wettability) on the stability of solvents in the pores of the membrane. Examples of chiral separation by a supported liquid membrane are extraction of chiral ammonium cations by a supported (micro-porous polypropylene film) membrane [11] and the enantiomeric separation of propranolol (2) and bupranolol (3) by a nitrate membrane with a A/ -hexadecyl-L-hydroxy proline carrier [12]. 

Nonselective membranes can assist enantioselective processes, providing essential nonchiral separation characteristics and thus making a chiral separation based on enantioselectivity outside the membrane technically and economically feasible. For this purpose several configurations can be applied (i) liquid-liquid extraction based on hollow-fiber membrane fractionation (ii) liquid- membrane fractionation and (iii) micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF). 

Important numbers in the design of (membrane-based) liquid- liquid extractions are the extraction factors for both enantiomers, and defined as... 

As described above, the application of classical liquid- liquid extractions often results in extreme flow ratios. To avoid this, a completely symmetrical system has been developed at Akzo Nobel in the early 1990s [64, 65]. In this system, a supported liquid-membrane separates two miscible chiral liquids containing opposite chiral selectors (Fig. 5-13). When the two liquids flow countercurrently, any desired degree of separation can be achieved. As a result of the system being symmetrical, the racemic mixture to be separated must be added in the middle. Due to the fact that enantioselectivity usually is more pronounced in a nonaqueous environment, organic liquids are used as the chiral liquids and the membrane liquid is aqueous. In this case the chiral selector molecules are lipophilic in order to avoid transport across the liquid membrane. 

Liquid-liquid extraction Bulk liquid membrane transport Liquid surfactant membrane transport... 

The most widely employed techniques for the extraction of water samples for triazine compounds include liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), solid-phase extraction (SPE), and liquid-solid extraction (LSE). Although most reports involving SPE are off-line procedures, there is increasing interest and subsequently increasing numbers of reports regarding on-line SPE, the goal of which is to improve overall productivity and safety. To a lesser extent, solid-phase microextraction (SPME), supercritical fluid extraction (SEE), semi-permeable membrane device (SPMD), and molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) techniques have been reported. 

Classical LLEs have also been replaced by membrane extractions such as SLM (supported liquid membrane extraction), MMLLE (microporous membrane liquid-liquid extraction) and MESI (membrane extraction with a sorbent interface). All of these techniques use a nonporous membrane, involving partitioning of the analytes [499]. SLM is a sample handling technique which can be used for selective extraction of a particular class of compounds from complex (aqueous) matrices [500]. Membrane extraction with a sorbent interface (MESI) is suitable for VOC analysis (e.g. in a MESI- xGC-TCD configuration) [501,502]. 

Diffusive sampler Membrane extraction (MESI) Liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) Solid-phase extraction (SPE) SPE-PTV-GC Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) Headspace GC (SHS, DHS) Large-volume injection (LVI) Coupled HPLC-GC Membrane extraction (MESI) Difficult matrix introduction (DMI) Conventional solvent extraction methods 1 Pressurised solvent extraction methods Headspace GC (SHS, DHS) Thermal desorption (TD, DTD) Pyrolysis (Py) Photolysis Photon extraction (LD) Difficult matrix introduction (DMI)... 

MMLLE Microporous membrane liquid-liquid extraction... 

Lachowicz, E., Rozanska, B., Teixidor, F., Meliani, H., Barboiu, M. and Hovnanian, N. (2002) Comparison of sulphur and sulphur-oxygen ligands as ionophores for liquid-liquid extraction and facilitated transport. Journal of Membrane Science, 210, 279—290. 

In one study by Hood et al., 282 of 1153 identified proteins were identified by at least 2 unique tryptic peptides from FFPE prostate cancer (PCa) tissue.9 According to the gene ontology classification of the proteins identified, -65% of proteins were predicted to be intracellular proteins, while -50% of the total human proteome is predicted to be located in the intracellular compartment. Additionally, 20% of the proteins identified in the PCa tissue were classified as membrane proteins, which is significantly less than the predicted 40% for the human proteome. This relative disparity is not unexpected, considering the Liquid Tissue sample preparation kit lacks specific protocols for membrane protein extraction. The Liquid Tissue method has also been used for proteomics studies of a variety of FFPE tissue samples, including pancreatic tumors,28 squamous cell carcinoma,4 and oral human papillomavirus lesions.27... 

Liquicel A liquid-liquid extraction process in which the two liquids are separated by a permeable membrane in the form of hollow plastic fibers. Developed by Hoechst Celanese Corporation. 

Fig. 4. a Schematic of porous membrane-based separation of immiscible liquids with different wetting characteristics, b Liquid-liquid extraction device (Kralj et al. 2007)... 

---