Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Limits of Detection and Quantitation

Sections 8.1-8.3 presented an introduction to some basic principles of statistical theory with emphasis on some applications of importance for analytical chemists, particularly instrument calibration and its use in determination of unknown concentrations. However, in many cases the critical questions to be answered by analysis are Is the target analyte really present if it is barely detectable what [Pg.418]


An analytical method vahdation study should include demonstration of the accuracy, precision, specificity, limits of detection and quantitation, linearity, range, and interferences. Additionally, peak resolution, peak tailing, and analyte recovery are important, especially in the case of chromatographic methods (37,38). [Pg.369]

Signal-to-noise ratio The ratio of the intensity of the analytical signal to that of the noise. This is used in determining the limits of detection and quantitation. [Pg.311]

Situation and Criteria A method was to be developed to determine trace amounts of cyanide (CN ) in waste water. The nature of the task means precision is not so much of an issue as are the limits of detection and quantitation (LOD, LOQ), and flexibility and ease of use. The responsible chemist expected cyanide levels below 2 ppm. [Pg.221]

LOD) calculate and display the limits of detection and quantitation LOD, LOQ. [Note This form of calculating the LOD or LOQ was chosen because the results are influenced not only by the noise on the baseline, but also by the calibration design from the educational point of view this is more important than the consideration whether any agency has officially adopted this or that LOD-model. For a comparison, see Figs. 2.14, 2.15, and 4.31]. [Pg.375]

Similar considerations were taken into account throughout the process of designing the study and committing the design to a protocol. In addition to analytical quality specifications, decisions were made regarding definitions of limits of detection and quantitation, levels of apparent residues at which confirmation was required, and how such confirmation would be achieved. All of these decisions were based on fulfilling the objectives of the study while operating within unavoidable time and resource constraints. [Pg.239]

A number of experimental considerations must be addressed in order to use XRF as a quantitative tool, and these have been discussed at length [75,76]. The effects on the usual analytical performance parameters (accuracy, precision, linearity, limits of detection and quantitation, and ruggedness) associated with instrument are usually minimal. [Pg.225]

Enantiomeric purity (ratio)—limitations exact calculation of the enantiomeric ratio is defined by the given limits of detection and quantitation of the minor enantiomer (Fig. 17.2). Within this range, the minor enantiomer should be discussed as detectable , but cannot be calculated exactly. Further details on the limits of detection and quantitation are given elsewhere [14]. [Pg.382]

The baseline noise as offered by many UV-Vis detectors is in the range 1 to 2 x 10 5 AU and much lower than the limit of detection and quantitation required for most applications. This value is achieved under optimum conditions, such as with a reasonably new lamp, an ultraclean flow cell, stable ambient temperature, HPLC-grade solvents, and no microleaks in the entire HPLC system. These conditions are always valid at the manufacturer s final test and probably at the time of installation in the user s laboratory. However, after some time, optical and mechanical parts deteriorate (e.g., the lamp loses intensity and the flow cell may become contaminated). If we repeat the test after 3, 6, or 12 months, the noise of 1 x 10 5 AU may no longer be obtained. The recommendation is to select acceptance criteria according to the intended use of the system. [Pg.272]

The reliability of a method can be determined by assessing certain method performance criteria including, specificity, accuracy, precision, limit of detection and quantitation, sensitivity, applicability, and practicability as appropriate (13). This very often requires that an extensive collaborative study be undertaken to obtain the necessary data. Methods that have successfully undergone this performance review testing have been considered to be validated for the purpose of the analysis (14). [Pg.418]

Limits of detection and quantitation. Because wines that have total phenol levels lower than 50 mg/liter are quite rare, this is not a significant issue for wine. For other sample types, however, a limit of quantitation of-0.027 AU or 20 mg/liter would be expected, based on a sample-to-sample variance of0.003 AU (Singleton and Rossi, 1965). [Pg.1236]

Residues of FLU and 7-OH FLU in edible sheep tissues (muscle, liver, kidney, and fat) were determined by HPLC with UV and fluorescence detection (191). Liquid-liquid extraction with ethyl acetate was described, with extraction recoveries of 90,82,89, and 82% for FLU in muscle, liver, kidney, and fat, respectively. Recoveries for 7-OH FLU were 91, 90, 86, and 84%. The method was validated for specificity, linearity, limits of detection and quantitation, and precision. [Pg.672]

Limits of detection and quantitation Linearity and range Ruggedness Robustness... [Pg.289]

Undoubtedly the major responsibility for generating a validated analytical method falls on the shoulders of the analytical chemist. The chemist must select an analytical technique that will fulfill the regulatory and technical requirements set forth by the regulatory professionals. This includes not only the analyte to identify or quantitate, but also the purity specifications for assay methods and the impurity specifications and the limit of detection and quantitation for related compound methods. The analytical technique chosen will depend upon the degree of precision, linearity, range, and accuracy necessary to meet the regulatory requirements. Once a new method is developed or the feasibility of an existing method is established,... [Pg.141]

Cartwright AC, Matthews BR (eds) (1994) International Pharmaceutical Product Registration, Aspects of Quality, Safety and Efficacy. Taylor Francis, London, pp 58Iff Dyer A (1980) Liquid Scintillation Counting Practice. Heyden Son Ltd, London Philadelphia Krull I, Swartz M (1998) Determining limits of detection and quantitation. LCGC Oktober 1998... [Pg.560]

SPE and LEE are considered the methods of choice for preparing biological samples before a GC analysis of cocaine and metabolites. Earina et al. [43] have developed a simple, rapid, and sensitive method for determining cocaine in urine with a single-step LLE and using GC with NPD. A mean extraction recovery of 74% was reported and the limits of detection and quantitation were 5 and 20 ng/mL, respectively. [Pg.353]

Finally, formation of 0-(2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorobenzyl)-hydroxylamine (PFBOA) derivatives and analysis by GC-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) and GC-Electron-Capture Detection (GC-ECD) appears to be a promising technique, de Revel and Bertrand (42, 43) used PFBOA derivatization to analyze a number of saturated and unsaturated aldehydes in wines, however, high concentrations of acetaldehyde made accurate quantitation of the other aldehydes present in lower concentrations difficult, depending on the wine matrix the aldehydes were not always well separated from other chromatographic peaks pH conditions for the derivatization were not specified and removal of excess PFBOA by acidification caused the partial loss of some aldehydes. In addition, no specific information regarding derivatization efficiency and recovery, or absolute limits of detection and quantitation were reported by these authors. [Pg.170]

Overall limits of detection and quantitation may be decreased by concentrating the 3.0 mL extract under Nitrogen. We have not evaluated this possibility at this time. [Pg.173]

The document Note for Guidance " available on website www.efsa.eu.int provides guidance on provision of migration (and other) data for the authorisation of new substances for food contact application. In particular, method performance should be adequate at the given SML with data obtained on the precision and the limits of detection and quantitation. In the event that the SML is exceeded then confirmation of the level present is essential, preferably using mass spectrometry. [Pg.236]

The limits of detection and quantitation of crystalline sucrose were determined to be 0.9 and 1.8 wt% respectively. Water sorption and FT-Raman spectroscopy also appear to be very sensitive with detection possible down to levels of 1 wt%. ... [Pg.4108]

It is commonly recommended [e.g. 2, 28-30] that a number of characteristics such as selectivity/specificity, limits of detection and quantitation, precision and bias, linearity and working ranges be considered as criteria for analytical performance and evaluated in the course of an validation study. In principle, they need to be compared to some standard based on this, judgement is made as to whether the procedure under issue is capable of meeting the specified analytical requirements, that is to say, whether a method is fit-for-purpose [28]. [Pg.151]

As mentioned above, in a competitive ionization process, molecules with the lowest ionization potentials will be preferentially ionized and it is quite possible that this competition, in addition to matrix suppression, will result in the relative abundance of sample metabolites not being reflected in the MS data. Any reduction in the number of analyte ions available for analysis will have an impact on the assay with loss of sensitivity (higher limits of detection and quantitation). [Pg.373]

Some abuse drugs have been extracted from urine by SFE [viz. cocaine and its metabolites (134) and amphetamine and methamphetamine (135). In the first instance, the levels measured using SFE showed analyte recovery better than 70% for cocaine, better than 40% for benzoylecgonine, and better than 85% for ecgonine methyl ester from whole blood and urine. The limits of detection and quantitation were 1 and 10 ng, respectively, based on a 200-pL sample. Regarding amphetamine (AP) and methamphetamine (MA), an in situ SFE and chemical derivatization procedure followed by GC-isotope dilution mass spectrometry in urine was described. The mean recoveries achieved were 95% (RSD = 3.8%) for AP and 89% (RSD = 4%) for MA. The calibration graphs were linear within 100-500,000 ng/mL, varying the limits of detection and quantitation from 19 to 50 and from 21 to 100 ng/mL, respectively. [Pg.563]

SPME is a multiphase equilibrium technique and, therefore, the analytes are not completely extracted from the matrix. Nevertheless, the method is useful for quantitative work and excellent precision and Unearity have been demonstrated. An extraction is complete when the concentration of analytes has reached distribution equilibrium between the sample and coating. This means that once the equihbrium is achieved, the amount extracted is independent of further increase in extraction time. If extraction is terminated before the equihbrium is reached, good precision and reproducibihty is still obtained if incubation temperature, sample agitation, sample pH and ionic strength, sample and headspace volume, extraction and desorption time are kept constant. The theory of the thermodynamic, kinetic and mass transfer processes underlying direct immersion and HS-SPME has been extensively discussed by Pawhszyn [2]. The sensitivity and time required to reach adsorption equilibriiun depends on the partition coefficients between the fiber and the analytes, and the thickness of the phase. Limits of detection and quantitation are often below 1 ppb. [Pg.27]

In the case of cobalt, 1.6 ng cobalt are added to the diesel sample, as the element shows a lower sensitivity in comparison to manganese and iron. Limit of detection and quantitation of cobalt are affected by the low sensitivity of THFA for low volatile elements (Table 4). [Pg.65]

The analytical procedures to assess stability must encompass the elements common to validating analytical assays. The methods must be validated according to the parameters of accuracy, precision, robustness and specificity, limits of detection and quantitation, linearity of active ingredient assays, degradants, and other reaction products. More information on how to develop stability indicating methods is discussed in Chapter 7. Validation of these methods is discussed in Chapter 8. [Pg.15]


See other pages where Limits of Detection and Quantitation is mentioned: [Pg.352]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.473]    [Pg.556]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.203]   


SEARCH



Detectable limit

Detection and Quantitation

Detection and Quantitation Limit

Detection limits

Detection limits, limitations

Detection-limiting

Limit of quantitation

Limits of detection

Quantitation limit of detection

Quantitative limitations

© 2024 chempedia.info