Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Errors indeterminate

Errors affecting the distribution of measurements around a central value are called indeterminate and are characterized by a random variation in both magnitude and direction. Indeterminate errors need not affect the accuracy of an analysis. Since indeterminate errors are randomly scattered around a central value, positive and negative errors tend to cancel, provided that enough measurements are made. In such situations the mean or median is largely unaffected by the precision of the analysis. [Pg.62]

Sources of Indeterminate Error Indeterminate errors can be traced to several sources, including the collection of samples, the manipulation of samples during the analysis, and the making of measurements. [Pg.62]

When collecting a sample, for instance, only a small portion of the available material is taken, increasing the likelihood that small-scale inhomogeneities in the sample will affect the repeatability of the analysis. Individual pennies, for example, are expected to show variation from several sources, including the manufacturing process, and the loss of small amounts of metal or the addition of dirt during circulation. These variations are sources of indeterminate error associated with the sampling process. [Pg.62]

During the analysis numerous opportunities arise for random variations in the way individual samples are treated. In determining the mass of a penny, for example, each penny should be handled in the same manner. Cleaning some pennies but not cleaning others introduces an indeterminate error. [Pg.63]

Evaluating Indeterminate Error Although it is impossible to eliminate indeterminate error, its effect can be minimized if the sources and relative magnitudes of the indeterminate error are known. Indeterminate errors may be estimated by an appropriate measure of spread. Typically, a standard deviation is used, although in some cases estimated values are used. The contribution from analytical instruments and equipment are easily measured or estimated. Indeterminate errors introduced by the analyst, such as inconsistencies in the treatment of individual samples, are more difficult to estimate. [Pg.63]

To evaluate the effect of indeterminate error on the data in Table 4.1, ten replicate determinations of the mass of a single penny were made, with results shown in Table 4.7. The standard deviation for the data in Table 4.1 is 0.051, and it is 0.0024 for the data in Table 4.7. The significantly better precision when determining the mass of a single penny suggests that the precision of this analysis is not limited by the balance used to measure mass, but is due to a significant variability in the masses of individual pennies. [Pg.63]

Uncertainty expresses the range of possible values that a measurement or result might reasonably be expected to have. Note that this definition of uncertainty is not the same as that for precision. The precision of an analysis, whether reported as a range or a standard deviation, is calculated from experimental data and provides an estimation of indeterminate error affecting measurements. Uncertainty accounts for all errors, both determinate and indeterminate, that might affect our result. Although we always try to correct determinate errors, the correction itself is subject to random effects or indeterminate errors. [Pg.64]

The distribution of measurements subject to indeterminate errors is often a normal distribution. [Pg.79]

A statement that the difference between two values can be explained by indeterminate error retained if the significance test does not fail Ho). [Pg.83]

Relationship between confidence intervals and results of a significance test, (a) The shaded area under the normal distribution curves shows the apparent confidence intervals for the sample based on fexp. The solid bars in (b) and (c) show the actual confidence intervals that can be explained by indeterminate error using the critical value of (a,v). In part (b) the null hypothesis is rejected and the alternative hypothesis is accepted. In part (c) the null hypothesis is retained. [Pg.85]

Statistical test for comparing two mean values to see if their difference is too large to be explained by indeterminate error. [Pg.85]

The most commonly used form of linear regression is based on three assumptions (1) that any difference between the experimental data and the calculated regression line is due to indeterminate errors affecting the values of y, (2) that these indeterminate errors are normally distributed, and (3) that the indeterminate errors in y do not depend on the value of x. Because we assume that indeterminate errors are the same for all standards, each standard contributes equally in estimating the slope and y-intercept. For this reason the result is considered an unweighted linear regression. [Pg.119]

A more useful representation of uncertainty is to consider the effect of indeterminate errors on the predicted slope and intercept. The standard deviation of the slope and intercept are given as... [Pg.121]

Equations 5.13 for the slope, h, and 5.14 for the y-intercept, ho, assume that indeterminate errors equally affect each value of y. When this assumption is false, as shown in Figure 5.11b, the variance associated with each value of y must be included when estimating [3o and [3i. In this case the predicted slope and intercept are... [Pg.124]

Precision In absorption spectroscopy, precision is limited by indeterminate errors, or instrumental noise, introduced when measuring absorbance. Precision is generally worse with very low absorbances due to the uncertainty of distinguishing a small difference between Pq and and for very high absorbances when Px approaches 0. We might expect, therefore, that precision will vary with transmittance. [Pg.409]

Values of sx are a complex function of transmittance when indeterminate errors are dominated by the noise associated with photon transducers. Curve B in Figure 10.35 shows that the relative uncertainty in concentration is very large for low absorbances, but is less affected by higher absorbances. Although the relative uncertainty reaches a minimum when the absorbance is 0.96, there is little change in the relative uncertainty for absorbances between 0.5 and 2. This source of inde-... [Pg.410]

Finally, values of sx are directly proportional to transmittance for indeterminate errors due to fluctuations in source intensity and for uncertainty in positioning the sample cell within the spectrometer. The latter is of particular importance since the optical properties of any sample cell are not uniform. As a result, repositioning the sample cell may lead to a change in the intensity of transmitted radiation. As shown by curve C in Figure 10.35, the effect of this source of indeterminate error is only important at low absorbances. This source of indeterminate errors is usually the limiting factor for high-quality UV/Vis spectrophotometers when the absorbance is relatively small. [Pg.411]

When using a spectrophotometer for which the precision of absorbance measurements is limited by the uncertainty of reading %T, the analysis of highly absorbing solutions can lead to an unacceptable level of indeterminate errors. Consider the analysis of a sample for which the molar absorptivity is... [Pg.455]

The rate of a reaction is temperature-dependent. To avoid a determinate error resulting from a systematic change in temperature or to minimize indeterminate errors due to fluctuations in temperature, the reaction cell must have a thermostat to maintain a constant temperature. [Pg.633]

Let s use a simple example to develop the rationale behind a one-way ANOVA calculation. The data in Table 14.7 show the results obtained by several analysts in determining the purity of a single pharmaceutical preparation of sulfanilamide. Each column in this table lists the results obtained by an individual analyst. For convenience, entries in the table are represented by the symbol where i identifies the analyst and j indicates the replicate number thus 3 5 is the fifth replicate for the third analyst (and is equal to 94.24%). The variability in the results shown in Table 14.7 arises from two sources indeterminate errors associated with the analytical procedure that are experienced equally by all analysts, and systematic or determinate errors introduced by the analysts. [Pg.693]

A second way to work with the data in Table 14.7 is to treat the results for each analyst separately. Because the repeatability for any analyst is influenced by indeterminate errors, the variance, s, of the data in each column provides an estimate of O rand- A better estimate is obtained by pooling the individual variances. The result, which is called the within-sample variance (s ), is calculated by summing the squares of the differences between the replicates for each sample and that sample s mean, and dividing by the degrees of freedom. [Pg.694]


See other pages where Errors indeterminate is mentioned: [Pg.62]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.769]    [Pg.770]    [Pg.773]    [Pg.775]    [Pg.776]    [Pg.779]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.2 , Pg.118 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.62 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.2 , Pg.118 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.72 , Pg.73 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.534 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.83 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.39 ]




SEARCH



Indeterminate

Indeterminate errors evaluation

Indeterminate errors sources

Indeterminate sampling error

© 2024 chempedia.info