Ionomer preparation

FIGURE 13.11 Schematic representation of ionomers prepared by neutralization of maleated ethylene-propylene copolymer (EPM) with zinc acetate. 

Typically, carboxylate ionomers are prepared by direct copolymerization of acrylic or methacrylic acid with ethylene, styrene or similar comonomers by free radical copolymerization (65). More recently, a number of copolymerizations involving sulfonated monomers have been described. For example, Weiss et al. (66-69) prepared ionomers by a free-radical, emulsion copolymerization of sodium sulfonated styrene with butadiene or styrene. Similarly, Allen et al. (70) copolymerized n-butyl acrylate with salts of sulfonated styrene. The ionomers prepared by this route, however, were reported to be "blocky" with regard to the incorporation of the sulfonated styrene monomer. Salamone et al. (71-76) prepared ionomers based on the copolymerization of a neutral monomer, such as styrene, methyl methacrylate, or n-butyl acrylate, with a cationic-anionic monomer pair, 3-methacrylamidopropyl-trimethylammonium 2-acrylamlde-2-methylpropane sulfonate. 

For small-scale preparation of samples for scientific studies, the precursor polymer may be dissolved in xylene at 80°C, followed by addition of the cation source. A gelled fluid is normally obtained immediately, and the ionomer is recovered as a powder by chopping the gel in a large excess of acetone using a laboratory blender. 

Pentenamer Ionomers. Unsaturated polypentenamer elastomers have been derivatized by post-synthesis reactions (72—74). Phosphonate, thioglycolate, sulfonate, and carboxylate derivatives have been prepared and converted into ionomers. 

Bitumen Ionomers. Moisture-resistant asphalts (qv) have been prepared by reaction of metal oxides with acid-functionalized bitumens (75). Maleic anhydride or sulfur trioxide/trimethylamine complexes have been used successfully for introduction of acid groups into asphaltic bitumens. 

Polyoxymethylene Ionomers. Ionic copolymers have been prepared from trioxane and epichlorohydrin, followed by reaction with disodium thioglycolate (76). The ionic forces in these materials dismpt crystalline order and increase melt viscosity (see Acetalresins). 

Electrochemical polymeriza tion of heterocycles is useful in the preparation of conducting composite materials. One technique employed involves the electro-polymerization of pyrrole into a swollen polymer previously deposited on the electrode surface (148—153). This method allows variation of the physical properties of the material by control of the amount of conducting polymer incorporated into the matrix film. If the matrix polymer is an ionomer such as Nation (154—158) it contributes the dopant ion for the oxidized conducting polymer and acts as an effective medium for ion transport during electrochemical switching of the material. 

In September 1964 the Du Pont company announced materials that had characteristics of both thermoplastics and thermosetting materials. These materials, known as ionomers, are prepared by copolymerising ethylene with a small amount (1-10 % in the basic patent) of an unsaturated carboxylic acid such as acrylic acid using the high-pressure process. Such copolymers are then treated... 

The mechanical properties of ionomers can be appreciably altered by the manner in which the ionomer is prepared and treated prior to testing. Some of the factors that are influential are the degree of conversion (neutralization) from the acid form to the salt form, the nature of the thermal treatment or aging, the type of counterion that is introduced, the solvent that is used for preparation of thin films, and the presence and nature of any plasticizers or additives that may be present. In the scope of this chapter, it is not possible to provide a complete description of the influence of each of these variables on the wide variety of ionomers that are now commercially available or produced in the laboratory. Instead, one or more examples of the changes in properties that may be induced by each of the processing variables is presented and discussed. 

In the preparation and processing of ionomers, plasticizers may be added to reduce viscosity at elevated temperatures and to permit easier processing. These plasticizers have an effect, as well, on the mechanical properties, both in the rubbery state and in the glassy state these effects depend on the composition of the ionomer, the polar or nonpolar nature of the plasticizer and on the concentration. Many studies have been carried out on plasticized ionomers and on the influence of plasticizer on viscoelastic and relaxation behavior and a review of this subject has been given 119]. However, there is still relatively little information on effects of plasticizer type and concentration on specific mechanical properties of ionomers in the glassy state or solid state. 

In a partially crystalline homopolymer, nylon 6, property enhancement has been achieved by blending with a poly(ethylene-co-acrylic acid) or its salt form ionomer [24]. Both additives proved to be effective impact modifiers for nylon 6. For the blends of the acid copolymer with nylon 6, maximum impact performance was obtained by addition of about 10 wt% of the modifier and the impact strength was further enhanced by increasing the acrylic acid content from 3.5 to 6%. However, blends prepared using the salt form ionomer (Sur-lyn 9950-Zn salt) instead of the acid, led to the highest impact strength, with the least reduction in tensile... 

Polymers can be modified by the introduction of ionic groups [I]. The ionic polymers, also called ionomers, offer great potential in a variety of applications. Ionic rubbers are mostly prepared by metal ion neutralization of acid functionalized rubbers, such as carboxylated styrene-butadiene rubber, carboxylated polybutadiene rubber, and carboxylated nitrile rubber 12-5]. Ionic rubbers under ambient conditions show moderate to high tensile and tear strength and high elongation. The ionic crosslinks are thermolabile and, thus, the materials can be processed just as thermoplastics are processed [6]. 

This process is highly suitable for rubbers with poor solubility. In this process, the rubber sheet is soaked in TEOS or quite often in TEOS-solvent mixture and the in situ sUica generation is conducted by either acid or base catalysis. The sol-gel reaction is normally carried out at room temperature. Kohjiya et al. [29-31] have reported various nonpolar mbber-silica hybrid nanocomposites based on this technique. The network density of the rubber influences the swelling behavior and hence controls the silica formation. It is very likely that there has been a graded silica concentration from surface to the bulk due to limited swelling of the rubber. This process has been predominantly used to prepare ionomer-inorganic hybrids by Siuzdak et al. [48-50]. 

AB cements are not only formulated from relatively small ions with well defined hydration numbers. They may also be prepared from macromolecules which dissolve in water to give multiply charged species known as polyelectrolytes. Cements which fall into this category are the zinc polycarboxylates and the glass-ionomers, the polyelectrolytes being poly(acrylic acid) or acrylic add copolymers. The interaction of such polymers is a complicated topic, and one which is of wide importance to a number of scientific disciplines. Molyneux (1975) has highlighted the fact that these substances form the focal point of three complex and contentious territories of sdence , namely aqueous systems, ionic systems and polymeric systems. 

The most common poly(alkenoic acid) used in polyalkenoate, ionomer or polycarboxylate cements is poly(acrylic acid), PAA. In addition, copolymers of acrylic acid with other alkenoic acids - maleic and itaconic and 3-butene 1,2,3-tricarboxylic acid - may be employed (Crisp Wilson, 1974c, 1977 Crisp et al, 1980). These polyacids are prepared by free-radical polymerization in aqueous solution using ammonium persulphate as the initiator and propan-2-ol (isopropyl alcohol) as the chain transfer agent (Smith, 1969). The concentration of poly(alkenoic add) is kept below 25 % to avoid the danger of explosion. After polymerization the solution is concentrated to 40-50 % for use. 

No problems arise when the glass-ionomer cement is used to restore abrasion/erosion lesions in primary teeth and as a lining material in shallow cavity preparations (Tobias et al., 1978, 1987). In deeper... 

The glass-ionomer cement is the most versatile of all the dental cements and has been developed for a variety of applications (McLean Wilson, 1974, 1977a,b,c Swift, 1988b van de Voorde, 1988 Wilson McLean, 1988 Mount, 1990). Many of its applications depend on its adhesive quality which means that, unlike the non-adhesive traditional filling materials, it does not require the preparation of mechanical undercuts for retention and the consequent loss of sound tooth material. 

Hunt, P. R. (1984). A modified class II cavity preparation for glass ionomer restorative materials. Quintessence International, 15, 1011-18. 

Kent, B. E., Lewis, B. G. Wilson, A. D. (1979). Glass ionomer cement formulations. I. The preparation of novel fluoridealuminosilicate glasses high in fluorine. Journal of Dental Research, 58, 1607-19. 

Schmidt, W., Purrmann, R., Jochum, P. Glasser, O. (1981b). Mixing compounds for glass-ionomer cements and use of a copolymer for preparing the mixing components. European Patent Application 24,056. 

Setchell, Teo Kuhn (1985) observed that glass-ionomer cements prepared from poly(acrylic acid) were more resistant to erosion than such cements prepared from maleic acid copolymers. This has been confirmed by Wilson et al. (1986) and by Billington (1986), even when, as in the latter case, the same glass was used in both cements. The method has been reviewed recently by Billington, Williams Pearson (1992). 

In practice, the catal5Tic layers are prepared by brushing or spraying catalyst ink (a suspension of the catalyst particles in water and/or an organic solvent with addition of ionomer) either onto diffusion media (carbon paper or carbon cloth, also referred to as substrates), resulting in so-called catalyst-coated substrates (CCS), or directly onto... 

To overcome these disadvantages, a thin-film CL technique was invented, which remains the most commonly used method in PEM fuel cells. Thin-film catalyst layers were initially used in the early 1990s by Los Alamos National Laboratory [6], Ballard, and Johnson-Matthey [7,8]. A thin-film catalyst layer is prepared from catalyst ink, consisting of uniformly distributed ionomer and catalyst. In these thin-film catalyst layers, the binding material is not PTFE but rather hydrophilic Nafion ionomer, which also provides proton conductive paths for the electrochemical reactions. It has been found that the presence of hydrophobic PTFE in thin catalyst layers was not beneficial to fuel cell performance [9]. 

The nanostructured thin-film electrode was first developed at 3M Company by Debe et al. [40] and Debe [41], who prepared thin films of oriented crystalline organic whiskers on which Ft had been deposited. The film was then transferred to the membrane surface using a decal method, and a nanostructured thin-film catalyst-coated membrane was formed as shown in Figure 2.10. Interestingly, both the nanostructured thin-film (NSTF) catalyst and the CL are nonconventional. The latter contains no carbon or additional ionomer and is 20-30 times thinner than the conventional dispersed Pt/ carbon-based CL. In addition, the CL was more durable than conventional CCMs made from Pt/C and Nation ionomer [40]. 

Numerous efforfs have been made to improve existing fhin-film catalysts in order to prepare a CL with low Pt loading and high Pt utilization without sacrificing electiode performance. In fhin-film CL fabrication, fhe most common method is to prepare catalyst ink by mixing the Pt/C agglomerates with a solubilized polymer electrolyte such as Nation ionomer and then to apply this ink on a porous support or membrane using various methods. In this case, the CL always contains some inactive catalyst sites not available for fuel cell reactions because the electrochemical reaction is located only at the interface between the polymer electrolyte and the Pt catalyst where there is reactant access. 

---