Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Interfacial property

The foamability of the xylans tested [128] was low in comparison to a commercial whipping protein DIOO. Only the highly viscous beech wood xylan and the rye bran AX-protein complex exhibited remarkable foaming activity, which was similar to that of gum arable. As the MGX polymers contain considerable amounts of uronic acid side chains, this may play a role in their foaming activity together with the presence of low amounts of Ugnin. [Pg.19]

A great deal of effort has been made to investigate the role of xylans in bread making. Reviews on cereal xylans [39,41,118] have shown that the xylan component is primarily responsible for the effects on the mechanical properties of the dough as well as the texture and other end-product quality characteristics of baked products. [Pg.20]

Switchable and Responsive Surfaces and Materials for Biomedical Applications [Pg.192]

The hydrophobicity or hydrophilicity of a surface can result from a change in molecular chemical conformation or polarity (Xia et al., 2009) and thus modify the surface chemistry and wettability. This in turn affects protein adsorption and cell-material interactions (Alves et al., 2010 Phadke et al., 2010). Surface wettability has a determining role in cell adhesion (Arima Iwata, 2007). Arima and Iwata (2007) prepared a series of alkanethiol self-assembled monolayers and compared the cell adhesion [Pg.192]

Reprinted with permission from Biomaterials 27,4783-93. Copyright 2006. Science Direct. (Curran, Chen, Hunt, 2006) [Pg.192]

Curvature of a surface deforms the actin cytoskeleton of cells as the cells contour in or around the region of interest. Cell receptors would be either stretched or compressed based on the cell s conformation on the surface topography (Ansetme et al., 2010). The reorganization of the cytoskeleton to adapt to the change in morphology can affect the cell behavior and response. [Pg.193]


By virtue of their simple stnicture, some properties of continuum models can be solved analytically in a mean field approxunation. The phase behaviour interfacial properties and the wetting properties have been explored. The effect of fluctuations is hrvestigated in Monte Carlo simulations as well as non-equilibrium phenomena (e.g., phase separation kinetics). Extensions of this one-order-parameter model are described in the review by Gompper and Schick [76]. A very interesting feature of tiiese models is that effective quantities of the interface—like the interfacial tension and the bending moduli—can be expressed as a fiinctional of the order parameter profiles across an interface [78]. These quantities can then be used as input for an even more coarse-grained description. [Pg.2381]

Pashley R M and Israelachvili J N 1981 A comparison of surface forces and interfacial properties of mica in purified surfactant solutions Colloids Surf. 2 169-87... [Pg.2607]

These relationships predict the binding Hquid content for wet agglomeration with an accuracy of only ca 30%. The Hquid content required to agglomerate a particular feed material depends, for example, on the interfacial properties of the system (45). Typical values of moisture content required for hailing a variety of materials are listed in Table 2. Very accurate information on the optimum Hquid content to agglomerate a particular feed material must be obtained from experimental tests. [Pg.112]

Poly(phenylene sulfide) (PPS) is another semicrystalline polymer used in the composites industry. PPS-based composites are generally processed at 330°C and subsequently cooled rapidly in order to avoid excessive crystallisation and reduced toughness. The superior fire-retardant characteristics of PPS-based composites result in appHcations where fire resistance is an important design consideration. Laminated composites based on this material have shown poor resistance to transverse impact as a result of the poor adhesion of the fibers to the semicrystalline matrix. A PPS material more recently developed by Phillips Petroleum, AVTEL, has improved fiber—matrix interfacial properties, and promises, therefore, an enhanced resistance to transverse impact (see PoLYAffiRS containing sulfur). [Pg.8]

The traditional view of emulsion stability (1,2) was concerned with systems of two isotropic, Newtonian Hquids of which one is dispersed in the other in the form of spherical droplets. The stabilization of such a system was achieved by adsorbed amphiphiles, which modify interfacial properties and to some extent the colloidal forces across a thin Hquid film, after the hydrodynamic conditions of the latter had been taken into consideration. However, a large number of emulsions, in fact, contain more than two phases. The importance of the third phase was recognized early (3) and the lUPAC definition of an emulsion included a third phase (4). With this relation in mind, this article deals with two-phase emulsions as an introduction. These systems are useful in discussing the details of formation and destabilization, because of their relative simplicity. The subsequent treatment focuses on three-phase emulsions, outlining three special cases. The presence of the third phase is shown in order to monitor the properties of the emulsion in a significant manner. [Pg.196]

The van der Waals and other non-covalent interactions are universally present in any adhesive bond, and the contribution of these forces is quantified in terms of two material properties, namely, the surface and interfacial energies. The surface and interfacial energies are macroscopic intrinsic material properties. The surface energy of a material, y, is the energy required to create a unit area of the surface of a material in a thermodynamically reversible manner. As per the definition of Dupre [14], the surface and interfacial properties determine the intrinsic or thermodynamic work of adhesion, W, of an interface. For two identical surfaces in contact ... [Pg.77]

It has been also shown that when a thin polymer film is directly coated onto a substrate with a low modulus ( < 10 MPa), if the contact radius to layer thickness ratio is large (afh> 20), the surface layer will make a negligible contribution to the stiffness of the system and the layered solid system acts as a homogeneous half-space of substrate material while the surface and interfacial properties are governed by those of the layer [32,33]. The extension of the JKR theory to such layered bodies has two important implications. Firstly, hard and opaque materials can be coated on soft and clear substrates which deform more readily by small surface forces. Secondly, viscoelastic materials can be coated on soft elastic substrates, thereby reducing their time-dependent effects. [Pg.88]

Asif, S.A.S., Colton, R.J. and Wahl, K.J., Nanoscale surface mechanical property measurements Force modulation techniques applied to nanoindentation. In Ovemey, R.M. and Frommer, J.E. (Eds.), Interfacial Properties on the Submicron Scale. ACS/Oxford Press, Oxford, 2001. [Pg.220]

An analogous mechanism should also produce polymers on irradiation of epoxies. Crivello s recent mechanistic suggestions [29] are consistent with the mechanisms given above. One can conclude that radiation-induced polymerization of epoxies can proceed via several mechanisms. However, further work is needed to determine the relative contributions of the different mechanisms, which might vary from one epoxy to another. As part of the Interfacial Properties of Electron Beam Cured Composites CRADA [37], an in-depth study of the curing mechanism for the cationic-initiated epoxy polymerization is being undertaken. [Pg.1023]

CRADA, ORNL99-0544, Interfacial Properties of Electron Beam Cured Composites, 1999. Klein, A.J., Repair of eomposites. Adv. Composites, June/July, p. 50 (1987). [Pg.1038]

The influence of amphiphiles on interfacial properties interfacial tension, wetting behavior, dynamical aspects such as the question of how small amounts of surfactant influence the kinetics of phase separation. [Pg.636]

Models of a second type (Sec. IV) restrict themselves to a few very basic ingredients, e.g., the repulsion between oil and water and the orientation of the amphiphiles. They are less versatile than chain models and have to be specified in view of the particular problem one has in mind. On the other hand, they allow an efficient study of structures on intermediate length and time scales, while still establishing a connection with microscopic properties of the materials. Hence, they bridge between the microscopic approaches and the more phenomenological treatments which will be described below. Various microscopic models of this type have been constructed and used to study phase transitions in the bulk of amphiphihc systems, internal phase transitions in monolayers and bilayers, interfacial properties, and dynamical aspects such as the kinetics of phase separation between water and oil in the presence of amphiphiles. [Pg.638]

Even though the basic idea of the Widom model is certainly very appealing, the fact that it ignores the possibihty that oil/water interfaces are not saturated with amphiphiles is a disadvantage in some respect. The influence of the amphiphiles on interfacial properties cannot be studied in principle in particular, the reduction of the interfacial tension cannot be calculated. In a sense, the Widom model is not only the first microscopic lattice model, but also the first random interface model configurations are described entirely by the conformations of their amphiphilic sheets. [Pg.657]

G. Gompper, M. Schick. Correlation between structural and interfacial properties of amphiphilic systems. Phys Rev Lett 65 1116-1119, 1990. [Pg.740]

G. Gompper, R. Holyst, M. Schick. Interfacial properties of amphiphilic systems the approach to Lifshitz points. Phys Rev A 45 3157-3160, 1991. [Pg.740]

Since the interface behaves like a capacitor, Helmholtz described it as two rigid charged planes of opposite sign [2]. For a more quantitative description Gouy and Chapman introduced a model for the electrolyte at a microscopic level [2]. In the Gouy-Chapman approach the interfacial properties are related to ionic distributions at the interface, the solvent is a dielectric medium of dielectric constant e filling the solution half-space up to the perfect charged plane—the wall. The ionic solution is considered as formed... [Pg.803]

Certainly these approaches represent a progress in our understanding of the interfacial properties. All the phenomena taken into account, e.g., the coupling with the metal side, the degree of solvation of ions, etc., play a role in the interfacial structure. However, it appears that the theoretical predictions are very sensitive to the details of the interaction potentials between the various species present at the interface and also to the approximations used in the statistical treatment of the model. In what follows we focus on a small number of basic phenomena which, probably, determine the interfacial properties, and we try to use very transparent approximations to estimate the role of these phenomena. [Pg.805]

Instead of starting from particles, we assume that the interfacial properties can be described in terms of fields [17]. We characterize the state of the interface by specifying two fields which give us the distributions of anions, P- r), and cations, p+ r), or a combination of them such as the charge, q f), and density, j (F) distributions which are defined as [18,19]... [Pg.806]

Unlike incompatible heterogeneous blends of elastomer-elastomer, elastomer-plastic, and plastic-plastic, the reactively processed heterogeneous blends are expected to develop a variable extent of chemical interaction. For this reason the material properties, interfacial properties, and phase morphology of reactively processed blends would differ significantly from heterogeneous mixtures. [Pg.467]

The theory of Leibler holds for mainly compatible systems. Leibler developed a mean field formalism to study the interfacial properties of two polymers, A and B with an A-B copolymer. An expression for interfacial tension reduction was developed by Noolandi and Hong [ 18] based on thermodynamics to explain the emulsifying effect of the A-b-B in immiscible A-B blends (A-A-b-B-B). [18,19]. The expression for interfacial tension reduction Ar) in a binary lend upon the addition of divalent copolymer is given by ... [Pg.637]

Polymer Alloys A class of polymer blends, heterogeneous in nature with modified, controlled interfacial properties or morphology. [Pg.650]

The interfacial properties of gel electrolytes containing ethylene carbonate immobilized in a polyacrylonitrile (PAN) matrix with a lithium (bis)trifluoromethane sulfonimide (LiTFSI) salt have been studied 1139]. SEI stability appeared to be strongly dependent on the LiTFSI concentration. A minimum value of / SE1 of about 1000 Qcm2 was obtained after 200h... [Pg.450]

Koberstein JT (1987) Interfacial properties. In Encyclopedia of polymer science and engineering, J Wiley, vol 8, p 237... [Pg.395]


See other pages where Interfacial property is mentioned: [Pg.101]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.2268]    [Pg.2269]    [Pg.2271]    [Pg.2369]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.516]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.538]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.1476]    [Pg.1878]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.433]    [Pg.1037]    [Pg.801]    [Pg.802]    [Pg.805]    [Pg.835]    [Pg.518]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.523]    [Pg.523]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.279 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.312 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.177 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.8 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.22 , Pg.147 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.505 , Pg.511 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.385 , Pg.408 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.3 , Pg.37 , Pg.58 , Pg.67 , Pg.89 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.12 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.183 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.11 , Pg.102 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.117 , Pg.119 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.85 , Pg.86 , Pg.87 , Pg.88 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.3 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.15 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.49 , Pg.50 , Pg.51 , Pg.52 , Pg.53 , Pg.65 , Pg.312 , Pg.313 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.7 , Pg.9 , Pg.11 , Pg.31 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.8 , Pg.90 , Pg.111 , Pg.141 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.232 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.906 ]




SEARCH



Biocomposite interfacial properties

Characterization of Interfacial Properties

Contact angle polymer surface properties, interfacial

Control of Interfacial Properties Through Tailor-Made Additives

Determination of Interfacial Properties

Effect on interfacial properties

Emulsion interfacial properties

Evaluation of Interfacial Properties

Fiber-matrix interfacial properties testing

Influence of Interfacial Area State on Mechanical Properties

Interfacial Acid-Base Properties of Soils

Interfacial Properties of Biocomposites

Interfacial Thermal Properties of Cross-Linked Polymer-CNT Nanocomposites

Interfacial acid-base properties

Interfacial binding properties

Interfacial layer, properties

Interfacial properties characteristics

Interfacial properties of proteins

Interfacial properties, determination

Interfacial properties, governing crude oil

Interfacial properties, governing crude oil demulsification

Interfacial properties, importance

Interfacial properties, mineral

Interfacial properties, mineral processing

Interfacial properties, polysiloxanes

Interfacial properties, pressure, protein

Interfacial properties, surface acoustic

Interfacial reactions properties

Interfacial reactive blending, effect mechanical properties

Interfacial rheological property

Interfacial stresses mechanical properties

Interfacial tension properties

Interfacial tension, polymer surface properties

Interfacial thermal properties

Liquid crystals interfacial properties

Mechanical properties interfacial area state

Mechanical properties interfacial stress distribution

PEFCs interfacial properties

Polysaccharides interfacial property

Properties, electrical interfacial

Proteins interfacial property

Relations of Geological Origin and Interfacial Properties

Relationship between Interfacial Properties and Geological Origin of Bentonite Clay

Selection of Surfactants Pairs for Optimal Interfacial Properties

Single-walled carbon nanotubes interfacial properties

Spectroscopic Properties of Interfacial Supramolecular Assemblies

Structure-property relationship interfacial regions

Study of Electrode Reactions and Interfacial Properties

Surface and interfacial properties

Surface and interfacial properties of surfactants

Surface or interfacial properties

Surfactants interfacial properties

Thermodynamics interfacial layer properties

Thermodynamics, adsorption interfacial layer properties

Transport and Interfacial Properties

Zeta-Potential and Interfacial Properties

© 2024 chempedia.info