Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Evaluation of Interfacial Properties

One of the most important focus areas of research in the development of natural fiber-reinforced polymer composites is characterisation of the fiber-matrix interface, since the interface alone can have a significant impact on the mechanical performance of the resulting composite materials, in terms of the strength and toughness. The properties of all heterogeneous materials are determined by component properties, composition, structure and interfacial interactions [62]. There have been a variety of methods used to characterize interfacial properties in natural fiber-reinforced polymer composites, however, the exact mechanism of the interaction between the natural fiber and the polymeric matrix has not been clearly studied on a fundamental level and is presently the major drawback for widespread utilization of such materials. The extent of interfacial adhesion in natural fiber-reinforced polymer composites utilizing PLA as the polymer matrix has been the subject of several recent investigations, hence the focus in this section will be on PLA-based natural fiber composites. [Pg.30]


Griffin, C.W., Limayc, S.Y. and Richerson, D.W. (1988). Evaluation of interfacial properties in borosilicate SiC composites using pull-out tests. Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc. 9, 671-678. [Pg.88]

Ikuta, N., Maekawa, Z., Hamada, H, Ichihashi, M. and Nishio, E. (1991). Evaluation of interfacial properties in glass fiber-epoxy resin compositcs-reconsideration of an embedded single filament shear-strength test. J. Mater. Sci. 26, 4663-4666. [Pg.88]

Lu, G.Y. and Mai, Y.W. (1994). A theoretical model for evaluation of interfacial properties of fiber reinforced ceramics with the slice compression test. Composites Sci. Technol. 51, 565-574. [Pg.89]

Ogata, N., Yasumoto, H., Yamasaki, K., Yu. H., Ogihara, T., Yanagawa, T., Yoshida, K. and Yamada, Y. (1992). Evaluation of interfacial properties between carbon fibers and semi-crystalline thermoplastic matrices in single fiber composites. J. Mater. Sci. 27, 5108-5112. [Pg.90]

Zbou, L.M., Mai, Y.W. and Baillie. C. (1994). Interfacial debonding and fiber pull-out stre.sses. part V. A mctbodology for evaluation of interfacial properties. J. Mater. Sci. 29, 5541 5550. [Pg.169]

G. Rausch, B. Meier and G. Grathwohl, A Push-out Technique for the Evaluation of Interfacial Properties of Fibre-Reinforced Materials, J. Europ. Ceram. Soc. 10, 229-235 (1992). [Pg.481]

Ho, H. and Drzal, L. T., Evaluation of interfacial mechanical properties of fiber reinforced composites using the microindentation method, Composites, A, 27, 961 (1996). [Pg.561]

Ferber, M.K., Wereszczak, A.A., Hansen, D.H. and Homeay, J. (1993). Evaluation of interfacial mechanical properties in SiC fiber-reinforced macro-defect-free cement composites. Composites Sci. Technol. 49, 23-33. [Pg.87]

Therefore, heterogeneous catalysts present a greater potential for the application of HT and Combinatorial methods, because they involve diverse compositional phases that are usually formed by interfacial reactions during their synthesis, which in turn produce a variety of structural and textural properties, often too vast to prepare and test by traditional methods. In this respect the HT and Combinatorial methods extend the capabilities of the R D cycle, which comprises the synthesis, the characterization of physicochemical properties and the evaluation of catalytic properties. The primary screening HT method gives the possibility of performing a rapid test of hundreds or thousands of compounds using infrared detection methods [27-29]. Alternatively, a detection method called REMPI (Resonance Enhanced Multi Photon Ionization) has been used, which consists of the in situ ionization of reaction products by UV lasers, followed by the detection of the photoions or electrons by spatially addressable microelectrodes placed in the vicinity of the laser beam [30, 31]. [Pg.371]

Recently some of our results [74] presented in Fig. 7 were analyzed by Dudo-wicz et al. [47]. In their lattice cluster model each segment can occupy several lattice sites in order to express the segment molecular structure and local correlations. Incompressibility is lifted and unoccupied lattice sites are introduced. The related theory [128] of interfacial properties independently describes the composition profiles of both blend components. Computations [47] performed by Dudowicz well evaluate qualitatively the coexistence curve, the interfacial width as well as the corresponding ( -dependent effective SANS interaction parameter [73] by very similar sets of three contact (van der Waals) energies eHH, eDD> and hd-... [Pg.25]

The relationship between the adsorption (the excess) of a substance and its concentration within the interfacial layer, established by eqs. (II. 1) and (II.3), allows for a better evaluation of the properties of monomolecular layers... [Pg.70]

H Ho, LT Drzal. Evaluation of interfacial mechanical properties of fiber rein-... [Pg.327]

Each point corresponds to nmnerous measurands and even more characterisation techniques. In practice, however, only a few parameters are important for evaluating process performance or product quality. This chapter will focus on characterisation techniques that allow for a quantification of particle size and aggregate structure, which are of fundamental importance in describing any colloidal suspension. Besides this, relevant techniques for the quantification of interfacial properties are presented. [Pg.7]

Both nonionic and anionic surfactants have been evaluated in this application (488,489) including internal olefin sulfonates (487, 490), linear alkylxylene sulfonates (490), petroleum sulfonates (491), alcohol ethoxysulfates (487,489,492). Ethoxylated alcohols have been added to some anionic surfactant formulations to improve interfacial properties (486). The use of water thickening polymers, either xanthan or polyacrylamide to reduce injected fluid mobility mobility has been proposed for both alkaline flooding (493) and surfactant enhanced alkaline flooding (492). Crosslinked polymers have been used to increase volumetric sweep efficiency of surfactant - polymer - alkaline agent formulations (493). [Pg.44]

During the 1960s and 1970s the Office of Saline Water sponsored development of noncellulosic reverse osmosis membranes. Many polymers were evaluated as Loeb-Sourirajan membranes but few matched the properties of cellulose acetate. Following the development of interfacial composite membranes by Cadotte, this line of research was abandoned by most commercial membrane producers. [Pg.200]

The purpose of performing calculations of physical properties parallel to experimental studies is twofold. First, since calculations by necessity involve approximations, the results have to be compared with experimental data in order to test the validity of these approximations. If the comparison turns out to be favourable, the second step in the evaluation of the theoretical data is to make predictions of physical properties that are inaccessible to experimental investigations. This second step can result in new understanding of material properties and make it possible to tune these properties for specific purposes. In the context of this book, theoretical calculations are aimed at understanding of the basic interfacial chemistry of metal-conjugated polymer interfaces. This understanding should be related to structural properties such as stability of the interface and adhesion of the metallic overlayer to the polymer surface. Problems related to the electronic properties of the interface are also addressed. Such properties include, for instance, the formation of localized interfacial states, charge transfer between the metal and the polymer, and electron mobility across the interface. [Pg.8]

A complete evaluation of the permeability model just described would require displacement tests where the gas-liquid interfacial properties (including dynamic interfacial effects) and pore space geometry (capillary pressure and thin section determinations) were fully characterized. This goes beyond the scope of the present work however, we do provide observations relating to the effects of the macroscopic variables Qg and Ql. [Pg.313]

Understanding those components that influence the interfacial binding properties in protein/protein and protein/ligand interactions is of basic importance in protein chemistry. In this report, we have defined a system that should allow the dissection of those chemical properties that influence primary interactions via an evaluation of the transition-state thermodynamic components. [Pg.509]


See other pages where Evaluation of Interfacial Properties is mentioned: [Pg.30]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.729]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.476]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.469]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.559]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.666]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.3273]    [Pg.209]   


SEARCH



INTERFACIAL PROPERTIES

© 2024 chempedia.info