Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Interfacial reactive blending, effect mechanical properties

Figures 20.13 and 20.14 describe the effect of dibutyltin dilaurate (DBTDL) on the tensile strength and tensile modulus for the 25/75 LCP/PEN blend fibers at draw ratios of 10 and 20 [13]. As expected, the addition of DBTDL slightly enhances the mechanical properties of the blends up to ca. 500 ppm of DBTDL. The optimum quantity of DBTDL seems to be about 500 ppm at a draw ratio of 20. However, the mechanical properties deteriorate when the concentration of catalyst exceeds this optimum level. From the previous relationships between the rheological properties and the mechanical properties, it can be discerned that the interfacial adhesion and the compatibility between the two phases, PEN and LCP, were enhanced. Hence, DBTDL can be used as a catalyst to achieve reactive compatibility in this blend system. This suggests the possibility of improving the interfacial adhesion between the immiscible polymer blends containing the LCP by reactive extrusion processing with a very short residence time. Figures 20.13 and 20.14 describe the effect of dibutyltin dilaurate (DBTDL) on the tensile strength and tensile modulus for the 25/75 LCP/PEN blend fibers at draw ratios of 10 and 20 [13]. As expected, the addition of DBTDL slightly enhances the mechanical properties of the blends up to ca. 500 ppm of DBTDL. The optimum quantity of DBTDL seems to be about 500 ppm at a draw ratio of 20. However, the mechanical properties deteriorate when the concentration of catalyst exceeds this optimum level. From the previous relationships between the rheological properties and the mechanical properties, it can be discerned that the interfacial adhesion and the compatibility between the two phases, PEN and LCP, were enhanced. Hence, DBTDL can be used as a catalyst to achieve reactive compatibility in this blend system. This suggests the possibility of improving the interfacial adhesion between the immiscible polymer blends containing the LCP by reactive extrusion processing with a very short residence time.
Reaction with vinyl acetate [81], hydroxypropylation [82], reactions with styrene [83], with ethylene glycol and other glycols giving rise to glucosides [63,84] or with acrylamide monomer [85,86] have also been described. Reactive extrusion is also used to decrease the melt viscosity and decrease the interfacial tension of TPS-based blends [76]. Ning et al. [74] studied the effect of adding citric acid on TPS and LLDPE, via a single-step reactive extrusion. The authors showed improvements in the compatibilization and the mechanical properties and shifts of polyethylene peaks observed by FTIR. [Pg.93]

Li et al. reported that immiscible high-density polyethylene (HDPE)/ poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) blends, prepared by means of melt extrusion with ethylene-butyl acrylate-glycidyl methacrylate (EBAGMA) terpoly-mer as a reactive compatibilizer, can exhibit shape memory effects [32]. They observed that the compatibilized blends showed improved shape memory effects along with better mechanical properties as compared to the simple binary blends. In the blend, HDPE acts as a reversible phase, and the response temperature in the shape recovery process is determined by of HDPE. The shape-recovery ratio of the 90/10/5 HDPE/PET/EBAGMA blend reached nearly 100%. Similar behavior was observed for immiscible HDPE/ nylon 6 blends [33]. The addition of maleated polyethylene-octene copolymer (POE-g-MAH) increases compatibility and phase-interfacial adhesion between HDPE and nylon 6, and shape memory property was improved. The shape recovery rate of HDPE/nylon 6/POE-g-MAH (80/20/10) blend is 96.5% when the stretch ratio is 75%. [Pg.134]

Some authors have refused to accept the role of interfacial adhesion on the toughening of thermoset resins. Lavita and co-workers [190] reported that non-reactive rubber can toughen BPA-modified epoxy, but the mechanism was not fully discussed. Huang and co-workers [194] showed that when the second phase consists of micron-size rubber particles, the interfacial bonding has only a modest effect on the fracture properties of blends. [Pg.208]


See other pages where Interfacial reactive blending, effect mechanical properties is mentioned: [Pg.180]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.678]    [Pg.677]    [Pg.678]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.476]    [Pg.740]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.65]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.72 ]




SEARCH



Blend mechanical

Blend reactive

Blending mechanism

Blends mechanical properties

Blends properties

INTERFACIAL PROPERTIES

Interfacial effective

Interfacial effects

Interfacial mechanism

Interfacial reactivity

Reactivation mechanism

Reactive blend/blending

Reactivity effects

Reactivity mechanism

© 2024 chempedia.info