Imipramine effects

There was a problem with this first version of the biochemical theory of depression. Iproniazid was not the only drug that had been reported to be effective as an antidepressant. Imipramine, the drug that had been tested by the Swiss psychiatrist Roland Kuhn, seemed to have similar effects. But imipramine is not an MAOI it does not inhibit the destruction of neurotransmitters in the synapse. So if antidepressants worked by inhibiting monoamine oxidase, why was imipramine effective How could its apparent effectiveness be reconciled with the chemical-imbalance theory ... 

Gittleman-Klein, R. and Klein, D.F. (1973) School phobia diagnostic considerations in the light of imipramine effects./ Nerv Merit Dis 156 199-215. 

I Efficacy. Imipramine is the most studied TCA, alleviating panic attacks in 75% of patients with panic disorder. Imipramine effectively blocks panic attacks within at least 4 weeks however, maximal improvement (including antiphobic response) does not occur until 8 to 12 weeks. The sequence of patient response is an initial decrease in the number of panic attacks, then diminution of anticipatory anxiety, followed by a reduction in agoraphobic avoidance. ... 

Trigclic Antidepressants. Imipramine (38) was introduced in the late 1950s as one of the first pharmacotherapies for depression. At that time, chlorproma2ine [50-53-3] was the first effective antipsychotic treatment to be discovered. Researchers looked for similar chemical stmctures and imipramine was found to be effective in the symptomatic treatment of depression. Over the years, other congeners, such as desipramine (39), amitriptyline (40), and dothiepin (41), were synthesized and shown to be clinically efficacious antidepressant dmgs (121). These substances, known under the general mbric of tricycHc antidepressants, share a basic chemical stmcture comprising... 

Selected for clinical trials as a compound to calm agitated patients, imipramine was relatively ineffective. However, it was observed to be effective in the treatment of certain depressed patients (38). Early studies on the mechanism of action showed that imipramine potentiates the effects of the catecholamines, primarily norepinephrine. This finding, along with other evidence, led to the hypothesis that the compound exerts its antidepressant effects by elevating norepinephrine levels at central adrenergic synapses. Subsequent studies have shown that the compound is a potent inhibitor of norepinephrine reuptake and, to a lesser extent, the uptake of serotonin, thus fitting the hypothesis that had been developed to explain the antidepressant actions ofMAOIs. 

Research for an antidepressant among non-tricyclic compounds with pharmacological effects qualitatively different from those of the conventional tricyclic compounds led to the preparation and testing of a series of indazole derivatives for reserpine-like activity in mice. l-[3-(Dimethylamino)propyl]-5-methyl-3-phenyl-l//-indazole (FS-32 692) antagonizes reserpine-induced effects and potentiates amphetamine-induced self-stimulation and l-Dopa-induced increase in motor activity. FS-32 produces an anticholinergic action mainly on the central nervous System, while the action of imipramine occurs centrally as well as peripherally (79AF511). 

Antidepressants are used in the treatment of neuropathic pain and headache. They include the classic tricyclic compounds and are divided into nonselective nor-adrenaline/5-HT reuptake inhibitors (e.g., amitriptyline, imipramine, clomipramine, venlafaxine), preferential noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (e.g., desipramine, nortriptyline) and selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitors (e.g., citalopram, paroxetine, fluoxetine). The reuptake block leads to a stimulation of endogenous monoaminer-gic pain inhibition in the spinal cord and brain. In addition, tricyclics have NMDA receptor antagonist, endogenous opioid enhancing, Na+ channel blocking, and K+ channel opening effects which can suppress peripheral and central sensitization. Block of cardiac ion channels by tricyclics can lead to life-threatening arrhythmias. The selective 5-HT transporter inhibitors have a different side effect profile and are safer in cases of overdose [3]. 

When the anabolic steroids are administered with anticoagulants the anticoagulant effect maybe increased. Administration of methyitestosterone with imipramine may cause a paranoid response in some patients The anabolic steroids may increase the hypoglycemic action when administered with thesulfonylureas... 

Ciraulo DA, Jaffe JH Tricyclic antidepressants in the treatment of depression associated with alcoholism. Clin Psychopharmacol 1 146—150, 1981 Ciraulo DA, Nace E Benzodiazepine treatment of anxiety or insomnia in substance abuse patients. Am J Addict 9 276—284, 2000 Ciraulo DA, Barnhill JG, Jaffe JH, et al Intravenous pharmacokinetics of 2-hydroxy-imipramine in alcoholics and normal controls. J StudAlcohol 51 366-372, 1990 Ciraulo DA, Knapp CM, LoCastro J, et al A benzodiazepine mood effect scale reliability and validity determined for alcohol-dependent subjects and adults with a parental history of alcoholism. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 27 339—347, 2001 Collins MA Tetrahydropapaveroline in Parkinson s disease and alcoholism a look back in honor of Merton Sandler. Neurotoxicology 25 117-120, 2004 COMBINE Study Research Group Testing combined pharmacotherapies and behavioral interventions in alcohol dependence rationale and methods. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 27 1107-1122, 2003a... 

Antidepressants Desipramine, imipramine, sertraline, fluoxetine, paroxetine, venlafaxine, bupropion, nefazodone, mirtazapine, gepirone, amineptine Mixed findings suggest that better designed studies may find a niche for some of these drugs. Amineptine was effective for withdrawal symptoms. 

In 1958, another agent, imipramine, was discovered by chance to have beneficial effects in depression. This compound is not a MAOI and its actions were first described as a complete riddle . Axelrod s group in Washington (Hertting, Axelrod and Whitby... 

All TCAs are either secondary- or tertiary-amines of a dibenzazepine nucleus (Fig. 20.3), and they all inhibit neuronal reuptake of noradrenaline and/or 5-HT but are much less potent as dopamine reuptake blockers. A common claim is that secondary amines (e.g. desipramine) are preferential inhibitors of noradrenaline uptake whereas the tertiary derivatives (e.g. imipramine, doxepin and amitryptyline) preferentially inhibit 5-HT uptake. However, when Richelson and Pfenning (1984) actually compared the effects of a wide range of antidepressants on the synaptosomal uptake of [ H]monoamines in vitro, and compared their A s, instead of merely ranking /C50S collected from different studies, they found that tertiary- and secondary-substituted compounds were equi-potent inhibitors of [ H]noradrenaline uptake. Moreover, all the TCAs turned out to be more potent inhibitors of [ H]noradrenaline than of [ H]5-HT uptake. Tertiary amines are even less convincing inhibitors of 5-HT reuptake in vivo, because any such action is diminished by their metabolism to secondary amines (e.g. imipramine to desipramine amitriptyline to nortriptyline). Only clomipramine retains any appreciable 5-HT uptake blocking activity in vivo with (an unimpressive) five-fold selectivity for 5-HT versus noradrenaline. 

Set against this background is the finding that the inhibition of [ H]noradrenaline uptake by the neuroleptic, chlorpromazine, is even greater than that of imipramine and yet chlorpromazine has no apparent antidepressant effects. This serves as a testimony... 

Salama, A.I., and Goldberg, M.E. Neurochemical effects of imipramine and amphetamine in aggressive mouse-killing (muricidal) rats. Biochem Pharmacol 19 2023-2032, 1970. 

Imipramine treatment resulted in a higher rate of remission of anxiety symptoms than trazodone, diazepam, or placebo (e.g., 73% versus 69% versus 66% versus 47%) in an 8-week controlled trial of DSM-III-diagnosed GAD patients. Antidepressants were more effective than diazepam or placebo in reducing psychic symptoms of anxiety. The use of TCAs generally is limited by bothersome adverse effects (e.g., sedation, orthostatic hypotension, anticholinergic effects, and weight gain). 

Treatment with imipramine, the most studied TCA, leaves 45% to 70% of patients panic free. Both desipramine and clomipramine have demonstrated effectiveness in PD as well. Despite their efficacy, TCAs are considered second- or third-line pharmacotherapy due to poorer tolerability and toxicity on overdose.48,49 TCAs are associated with a greater rate of discontinuation from treatment than SSRIs.53 PD patients taking TCAs may experience anticholinergic effects, orthostatic hypotension, sweating, sleep disturbances, dizziness, fatigue, sexual dysfunction, and weight gain. Stimulant-like side effects occur in up to 40% of patients.49... 

The tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), such as imipramine, can alleviate symptoms of ADHD. Like bupropion, TCAs likely will improve symptoms associated with comorbid anxiety and depression. The mechanism of action of TCAs is in blocking norepinephrine transporters, thus increasing norepinephrine concentrations in the synapse the increase in norepinephrine is believed to alleviate the symptoms of ADHD. TCAs have been demonstrated to be an effective non-stimulant option for ADHD but less effective than stimulants. However, their use in ADHD has declined owing to case reports of sudden death and anticholinergic side effects6,13 (Table 39-3). Further, TCAs may lower seizure threshold and increase the risk of car-diotoxicity, (e.g., arrythmias). Patients starting on TCAs should have a baseline and routine electrocardiograms. 

Other drugs, such as propantheline, flavoxate, tricyclic antidepressants (especially imipramine), dicyclomine, and scopolamine, are less effective, no safer, and/or have not been adequately studied therefore, their use is not recommended.6... 

Examples abound regarding the role of serendipity in the discovery of new therapeutic approaches, which on closer examination usually turned out to be the result of clinicians paying attention to unexpected clinical effects rather than discounting them. For example, lithium was tried first for hypertension, chlorpro-mazine was initially developed as an anesthetic, and imipramine was originally regarded as an antihistamine and an antipsychotic agent. Without astute clinical observations, these drugs would not have found their niche, nor would clozapine have been revived for the benefit of millions of the most difficult to treat schizophrenic patients. Other examples include the expanded indications of newer... 

It is important to note that claims for the effectiveness of iproniazid and imipramine were not based on placebo-controlled clinical trials. Instead, they were based on clinical impressions.6 In discovering the antidepressant effects of imipramine, Kuhn did not even use precise measurement, rating scales or statistics. His claim was that precise measurement led to stagnation rather than progress in medicine, and he preferred to rely on his extensive medical experience and artistic imagination instead.7... 

Despite the weakness of the data, the idea that iproniazid and imipramine were effective antidepressants came to be widely accepted. This is not really surprising, in the context of the times. In the 1950s and 1960s, the power of the placebo effect was just beginning to be recognized, and placebo-controlled clinical trials were rare. New treatments were often accepted on the basis of clinical experience and the testimony of experts in the field. 

Iproniazid and imipramine seemed to work as antidepressants, but how did they achieve their effects It would be another decade before the chemical-imbalance theory was launched. In 1965, Joseph Schildkraut at the National Institute of Mental Health in Washington, DC, published a groundbreaking paper in which he argued that depression was caused by a deficiency of the neurotransmitter norepinephrine in the gaps between neurons in the brain.8 Two years later Alec Coppen, a physician at West Park Hospital in Surrey, published another version of the chemical-imbalance theory. His version differed from Schildkraut s in that it put most of the blame on a different neurotransmitter, emphasizing serotonin rather than norepinephrine as the neurotransmitter that was lacking.9... 

---