Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Hazard Communication components

All employers are required to develop, implement, and maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program. The program must include the following components (1) a list of hazardous chemicals in the workplace, (2) the methods the employer will use to inform employees of the hazards associated with these chemicals, and (3) a description of how the labeling, material safety data sheet (MSDS), and employee training requirements will be met. [Pg.144]

An estimate of the toxicity or intrinsic hazard is needed for each material identified in the inventory. Such information for many chemicals in the form of a Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) are required by the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard. (Other countries have similar requirements.) Standard hazard-data sources may need to be consulted for those chemical compounds for which no MSDSs are presently available. Adequate hazard data may be lacking for various mixtures that are unique to the plant. For such mixtures, it may be necessary to analyze the contents and then estimate the overall hazard based on the individual components. [Pg.52]

In most workplace and transport chemical hazard communication systems, training is also a component. In consumer settings, however, the container label is the only communication mechanism available to provide information on safe handling and use. [Pg.506]

The needs of the intended target audience influence what label components are used. In transport , for example, the label, placard, and transport documents are all used. In the workplace , the label is one element of a multicomponent system of chemical hazard communication, the other elements being the MSDS and training. In communicating the potential hazard of consumer products , the label plays the major role in providing the user with information about all the potential health, environmental, and physical hazards of the product and advice on using the product safely. [Pg.507]

In addition to labels and MSDS, appropriate training for target audiences who are required to interpret label and/or MSDS information and take corresponding precautionary measures is a component of many hazard communication systems. Training is usually keyed to the nature of the work or exposure and the target audiences that may include workers, emergency responders, those involved in label and MSDS preparation, and in the transport of hazardous chemicals. [Pg.509]

Basic professional development courses offered by SCHC are MSDS and Label Preparation Workshops Science, Toxicology and Industrial Hygiene for Hazard Communication and Hazard Determination Risk Assessment. Regulatory courses include Canadian Mexican Hazard Communication Pesticide Consumer Product Labeling Component Disclosure Requirements European Union Hazard Communication Transportation Classification Labeling HMIS/NEPA Labeling and International Chemical Control Laws. [Pg.2956]

Research and Development Research and development, planning and operation, will obviously be a vital component in a manufacturer s assessment and monitoring of his hazard communication responsibilities. [Pg.243]

Exposure to Hazardous Chemicals in Laboratories, or Laboratory Standard ], and various substance specific standards in Subpaits Z of 29 CFR 1910 and 29 CFR 1926. EPA also has requirements for performing hazard analyses, such as the Chemical Process Safety Standards (40 CFR 68.67). In addition. Section 313, Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) contain hazard assessment requirements. Many of the hazard assessment components of these standards crosscut one another. Therefore, managers should evaluate and describe the relationship of these requirements to assure a coordinated approach which will greatly facilitate the hazard analysis process. [Pg.24]

Many chemical components of hydraulic fracturing fluids used by fracking service companies are listed on the Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDSs) as "proprietary" or "trade secret." OSHA s 29 CFR 1910.1200 (Hazard Communication Standard) section (i) states ... [Pg.148]

There are many hazards that exist in a school environment that can result in harm to faculty, staff, and students. These hazards can include falls, cumulative trauma, and natural disasters. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has created a regulation that is commonly referred to as its hazard communication standard (Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 1996), but it focuses only on the use of hazardous chemicals in the workplace. OSHA addresses the general need for employers to communicate to employees the hazards of various chemicals that are used at work. These chemicals can include products used by maintenance staff, janitorial staff, contractors, visitors, and teachers. Hazardous chemicals must be identified and included within the scope of a school hazard communication program. This chapter will explore the primary components of the hazard communication standard that apply to the use of hazardous chemicals in a school. The regulation will need to be read in its full text to identify all issues, details, and exemptions that might apply. [Pg.197]

OSHA and the Hazard Communication Standard. OSHA is the foremost regulatory body in the United States charged with ensuring that safe worldng conditions are provided for American workers. A major component... [Pg.266]

Existence and requirements of the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard Components of the local hazard communication plan Work areas and operations using hazardous materials... [Pg.130]

Let s look at hazard communication (HAZCOM) from the standpoint of the safety program versus the site-specific safety plan. For HAZCOM, companies will likely have the key components specified in the safety program. These key components might include the following ... [Pg.147]

The components of the hazard communication program in the employees workplaces... [Pg.225]

This series of prohibitions restricts how wastes subject to LDR requirements are handled. The most visible aspect of the LDR program is the disposal prohibition, which includes treatment standards, variances, alternative treatment standards (ATSs), and notification requirements. Land disposal means placement in or on the land, except in a corrective action unit, and includes, but is not limited to, placement in a landfill, surface impoundment, waste pile, injection well, land treatment facility, salt dome formation, salt bed formation, underground mine or cave, or placement in a concrete vault, or bunker intended for disposal purposes. The other two components work in tandem with the disposal prohibition to guide the regulated community in proper hazardous waste management. The dilution prohibition ensures that wastes are properly treated, and the storage prohibition ensures that waste will not be stored indefinitely to avoid treatment. [Pg.452]

Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know (EPCRA). This 1986 act was a component of the (SARA), and it mandates that the use of hazardous materials in a manufacturing operation is preceded by the provision of information on the intent-to-use to regulatory authorities and the local community. This information is usually supplemented with a response plan addressing the actions that would be taken in the event of a spill or other release. [Pg.90]

Community health concerns associated with a site constitute a key data component of the health assessment. The community associated with a hazardous waste site includes the population living around the site, local public health officials, other local officials, and the local media. In order to... [Pg.1302]

Risk assessment is a process where the magnitude of a specific risk is characterized so that decision-makers can conclude whether the potential hazard is sufficiently great that it needs to be managed or regulated, reduced or removed. The National Research Council (NRC, 1983) of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) first described the process of human health risk assessment, with an update in 1994 and 1996, as a four-component paradigm (i.e., hazard identification, dose-response assessment, exposure assessment, and risk characterization), with risk communication as a fifth area of study. The first four components are described briefly below. [Pg.35]


See other pages where Hazard Communication components is mentioned: [Pg.6]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.540]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.655]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.1222]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.650]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.391]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.182 ]




SEARCH



Hazard components

© 2024 chempedia.info