Hazard analysis failure modes assessment

Methods for performing hazard analysis and risk assessment include safety review, checkhsts, Dow Fire and Explosion Index, what-if analysis, hazard and operabihty analysis (HAZOP), failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA), fault tree analysis, and event tree analysis. Other methods are also available, but those given are used most often. 

Process Hazards Analysis. Analysis of processes for unrecogni2ed or inadequately controUed ha2ards (see Hazard analysis and risk assessment) is required by OSHA (36). The principal methods of analysis, in an approximate ascending order of intensity, are what-if checklist failure modes and effects ha2ard and operabiHty (HAZOP) and fault-tree analysis. Other complementary methods include human error prediction and cost/benefit analysis. The HAZOP method is the most popular as of 1995 because it can be used to identify ha2ards, pinpoint their causes and consequences, and disclose the need for protective systems. Fault-tree analysis is the method to be used if a quantitative evaluation of operational safety is needed to justify the implementation of process improvements. 

System safety is hazards-focused, as are all the subsets of the practice of safety, whatever they are called. System safety commences with hazard identification and analysis. Do that poorly, and all that follows is misdirected. Applications of the hazard analysis and risk assessment methods developed in the evolution of system safety have been successful. The generalist in safety practice ought to know more about them. As a minimum, generalist safety practitioners should be knowledgeable about these methods Preliminary Hazard Analysis What-If Analysis and Failure Modes and Effects Analysis. (See Chapter 14, Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment. )... 

A Brief Overview of Selected System Safety Analytical Approaches Working with the Risk Assessment Matrix Preliminary Hazard Analysis Energy Flow/Barrier Analysis Failure Modes and Effects Analysis Fault Tree Analysis... 

Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment Techniques Top management shall adopt and apply the hazard analysis and risk assessment techniques suitable to the organization s needs and provide the training necessary to employees who will be involved in the process. Descriptions of eight selected techniques are presented in Addendum G. Addendum H is a Failure Mode and Effects Analysis form. 

In ANSI/ASSE Z590.3—2011, the Prevention through Design standard, Addendum G comments on only eight hazard analysis and risk assessment techniques, intentionally. They are Preliminary Hazard Analysis, What-If Analysis, Checklist Analysis, What-If Checklist Analysis, Hazard and Operability Analysis, Failure Mode and Effects Analysis, Fault Tree Analysis, and Management Oversight and Risk Tree (MORT). It was also said in Z590.3 that ... 

As a practical matter, having knowledge of three risk assessment concepts will be sufficient to address most, but not all, risk situations. They are Preliminary Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment, The What-IF Checkfist Analysis methods, and Failure Mode and Effects Analysis. (p23)... 

There are many hazard analysis formulations which may be used effectively to assess process hazards. These include fault-free analysis, failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA), what-if analysis, hazard and operability analysis (HAZOP), check list analysis, and safety review, among others. The specifics associated with these analyses can be reviewed by consulting the appropriate American Institute of Chemical Engineers Center for Chemical Process Safety reference. " ... 

The techniques for quantifying the predicted frequency of failures are just the same as those previously applied to plant availability, where the cost of equipment failure was the prime concern. The tendency in the last few years has been towards a more rigorous application of these techniques (together with third-party verification) in the field of hazard assessment. They include Fault Tree Analysis, Failure Mode Effect Analysis, Common Cause Failure Assessment, and so on. These will be explained in Chapters 5 and 6. 

Hazard and risk analysis is a vast subject by itself and is extensively covered in the literature [22]. In order to plan to avoid accidental hazards, the hazard potential must be evaluated. Many new methods and techniques have been developed to assess and evaluate potential hazards, employing chemical technology and reliability engineering. These can be deduced from Fault Tree Analysis or Failure Mode Analysis [23], In these techniques, the plant and process hazard potentials are foreseen and rectified as far as possible. Some techniques such as Hazards and operability (HAZOP) studies and Hazard Analysis (HAZAN) have recently been developed to deal with the assessment of hazard potentials [24]. It must be borne in mind that HAZOP and HAZAN studies should be properly viewed not as ends in themselves but as valuable contributors to the overall task of risk management... 

Once the event/failure pathways for loss of containment scenarios have been identified, consequence analysis is used to establish the extent of damage and/or hazard footprints. For simple cases, many operating companies employ qualitative criteria to categorize the consequences of the identified failure modes. For complex cases, complete and detailed calculations are utilized to assess the hazard impact. 

Design Process design checks Unit processes Unit operations Plant equipments Pressure systems Instrument systems Hazard and operability studies (fine scale) Failure modes and effects analysis Fault trees and event trees Hazard analysis Reliability assessments... 

Identification can be as simple as asking what-iP questions at design reviews. It can also involve the use of a checklist outlining the normal process hazards associated with a specific piece of equipment. The major weakness of the latter approach is that items not on the checklist can easily be overlooked. The more formalized hazard-assessment techniques include, but are not limited to, hazard and operability study (HAZOP), fault-tree analysis (FTA), failure mode-and-effect analysis (FMEA), safety indexes, and safety audits. 

A systems hazards analysis (SHA) is a systematic and comprehensive search for and evaluation of all significant failure modes of facility systems components that can be identified by an experienced team. The hazards assessment often includes failure modes and effects analysis, fault tree analysis, event tree analysis, and hazards and operability studies. Generally, the SHA does not include external factors (e.g., natural disasters) or an integrated assessment of systems interactions. However, the tools of SHA are valuable for examining the causes and the effects of chemical events. They provide the basis for the integrated analysis known as quantitative risk assessment. For an example SHA see the TOCDF Functional Analysis Workbook (U.S. Army, 1993-1995). 

A detailed safety assessment including persoimel hazard analysis (PHA), hazardous operations (HAZOP) and failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) has been performed. 

A formal hazard analysis of the anticipated operations was conducted using Preliminary Hazard Assessment (PHA) and Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) techniques to evaluate potential hazards associated with processing operations, waste handling and storage, quality control activities, and maintenance. This process included the identification of various features to control or mitigate the identified hazards. Based on the hazard analysis, a more limited set of accident scenarios was selected for quantitative evaiuation, which bound the risks to the public. These scenarios included radioactive material spills and fires and considered the effects of equipment failure, human error, and the potential effects of natural phenomena and other external events. The hazard analysis process led to the selection of eight design basis accidents (DBA s), which are summarized in Table E.4-1. 

HSE assessments have a long tradition within the oil-and gas industry. These assessments use a wide range of methodologies, from the strict quantitative methods such as QRA (Quantitative Risk Analysis) and FMECA (Failure Mode Effect and Criticality Analysis) to the more qualitative methods such as HAZOP (HAZard OPerability analysis). Most methods combine qualitative and quantitative data and approaches. For example, an FMECA basically uses generic failure data, expert judgments are likewise important. 

As a project is developed and more detailed design data are available, a system hazard analysis (SHA) and subsystem hazard analyses (SSHAs) may be conducted to provide more detailed, in-depth risk assessment information. Two of the more widely used techniques for performing SHAs and SSHAs are the failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) and fault tree analysis (FTA). 

---