Failure mode and effects analysis technique

Use Design Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (Technique 40) to determine what is likely to go wrong with your innovation, as well as the extent of the damage you can expect if it does. 

Since diagnostics are such a critical variable in the calculations, the ability to measure and evaluate the effectiveness of the diagnostics is important. This is done using an extended failure modes and effects analysis technique (Ref. 9) and verified with fault injection testing (Ref. 10 and 11). The techniques were refined to include multiple failure modes (Ref. 12) and today are commonly used to evaluate diagnostic capability and failure mode split (Ref. 13). 

The FuRBaR approach was firstly generated in the reliabihty context to facihtate the development of the failure mode and effects analysis technique (Yang et al, 2008). The kernel of the FuRBaR approach is to... 

A Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Technique for Process Defined in the Little JL Process Definition Language, D. Wang, J. Pan Nanjing University, China G.S. Avrunin, L.A. Clark University Of Masschsetts, USA. 

In recent years it has become necessary to develope techniques to ensure the safety of computer embedded systems controlling potentially dangerous processes. Some works published last years showed that reliability and safety improvements could be achieved by using FTA 4,5 and FMEA 6 (Failure Mode and Effect Analysis) techniques. This paper attemts to apply and evaluate the FTA method in a software embedded system. Such an application will enable the safety engineer to use one method for the system as a whole without separating the software from the hardware. 

Failure Mode and Effects Analysis. The system design activity usually emphasizes the attainment of performance objectives in a timely and cost-efficient fashion. The failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) procedure considers the system from a failure point of view to determine how the product might fail. The terms design failure mode and effects analysis (DFMEA) and failure mode effects and criticaUty analysis (EMECA) also are used. This EMEA technique is used to identify and eliminate potential failure modes early in the design cycle, and its success is well documented (3,4). 

How do you then design an effective system There are several techniques you can use. Failure Modes and Effect Analysis (FMEA), Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), and Theory of Constraints (TOC) are but three. The FMEA is a bottom-up approach, the FTA a top-down approach, and TOC a holistic approach. 

There is one technique widely used in the automotive industry for detecting and analyzing potential nonconformities Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA). There are Design FMEAs and Process FMEAs. The technique is the same - it is only the focus that is different. As clause 4.14 addresses potential nonconformities, the subject of FMEAs is treated in Part 2 Chapter 14. 

The lists of critical items that were described under Identifying controls in Part 2 Chapter 2, together with Failure Modes and Effects Analysis and Hazard Analysis, are techniques that aid the identification of characteristics crucial to the safe and proper functioning of the product. 

Several techniques have evolved to identify potential sources of failure in designs and process. These techniques serve to prevent nonconformity and hence are preventive action measures. One such technique is Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA). 

A failure modes and effects analysis is a systematic analytical technique for identifying potential failures in a design or a process, assessing the probability of occurrence and likely effect, and determining the measures needed to eliminate, contain, or control the effects. Action taken on the basis of an FMEA will improve safety, performance, reliability, maintainability and reduce costs. The outputs are essential to balanced and effective quality plans for both development and production as it will help focus the controls upon those products, processes, and characteristics that are at risk. It is not the intention here to give a full appreciation of the FMEA technique and readers are advised to consult other texts. 

Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) A hazard identification technique in which all known failure modes of components or features of a system are considered in turn and undesired outcomes are noted. 

Preliminary hazard analyses (PHAs) have been conducted for the SILVER II process at various stages of design and have served as building blocks for the EDP PHA effort (AEA, 2001a). These PHAs use the Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) technique in accordance with the following regulations and standards ... 

Analysis Techniques for System Reliability — Procedure for Failure Mode and Effect Analysis, lEC 60812, 2nd Edition, International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland. 

The rest of this section outlines the core sub-processes to support safety analyses (compare [F. Redmill, (2004)], [N. G. Leveson, (2004)], [Ch. Blechinger, (2004)], [J. Zalewski and all, (2003)]). The processes place techniques, such as Hazard And Operability Studies (HAZOP), Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), into context. 

The process hazards analysis is conducted by an experienced, multidisciplinary team that examines the process design, plant equipment, operating procedures, and so on, using techniques such as hazard and operability studies (HAZOP), failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA), and others. The process hazards analysis recommends appropriate measures to reduce the risk, including (but not limited to) the safety interlocks to be implemented in the safety interlock system. 

Identification can be as simple as asking what-iP questions at design reviews. It can also involve the use of a checklist outlining the normal process hazards associated with a specific piece of equipment. The major weakness of the latter approach is that items not on the checklist can easily be overlooked. The more formalized hazard-assessment techniques include, but are not limited to, hazard and operability study (HAZOP), fault-tree analysis (FTA), failure mode-and-effect analysis (FMEA), safety indexes, and safety audits. 

Perform failure mode and effects analysis. This is a technique used to identify all medication errors that could occur, determine how they occur, and estimate what their consequences would be. Steps then should be taken to prevent errors from occurring, when possible, and to minimize the effects of any errors that do occur. 

Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) This is a systematic study of the causes of failures and their effects. All causes or modes of failure are considered for each element of a system, and then all possible outcomes or effects are recorded. This method is usually used in combination with fault tree analysis, a quantitative technique. FMEA is a complicated procedure, usually carried out by experienced risk analysts. 

Phase II focuses upon process development to result in a pilot production line capable of producing 300 bipolar plates per hour. Our goal is a complete functional pilot line, including all relevant quality assurance, failure mode and effects analysis, and statistical manufacturing characterization processes. This will be completed by transferring the most promising mass-production technique to laiger-scale and continuous equipment operation in a dedicated production line. 

Analysis techniques for system reliability - Procedure for failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA). 

Before we can define the mission for any particular test or inspection system we must be able to specify customer needs. While a detailed framework for designing inspection systems is given in Section 7, we must consider now how to define such needs. One way is to apply a failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) to the product and design a test and evaluation system to cover each of the potential failure modes. But this technique does not make the customer an explicit part of the design process, whereas we have seen earlier (Section 1) that direct customer input is increasingly needed in more customized products. A preferable technique is to begin with customer function and quality requirements as the basis for a list of product attributes that form the basis of test and inspection. In attributes inspection (Section 2.1), this list is often a defect list or fault list defining the discrete defects that the inspection system must ensure the customer never experiences. 

Three hazard analysis techniques are currently used widely Fault Tree Analysis, Event Tree Analysis, and HAZOP. Variants that combine aspects of these three techniques, such as Cause-Consequence Analysis (combining top-down fault trees and forward analysis Event Trees) and Bowtie Analysis (combining forward and backward chaining techniques) are also sometimes used. Safeware and other basic textbooks contain more information about these techniques for those unfamiliar with them. FMEA (Failure Modes and Effects Analysis) is sometimes used as a hazard analysis technique, but it is a bottom-up reliability analysis technique and has very limited applicability for safety analysis. 

---