Controlled potential

For this, reversible and quasi reversible systems are different. For reversible systems, we start with Eq. 4.20 and, substituting a general n-point expansion for both g, Eq. 4.85, instead of the simple 2-point form, Eq. 4.21, we get 

For quasi reversible systems, the method described in Sect. 4.3.2 is sufficient we first use present values of c q and c q to compute --dg and then the controlled- (or known) current expression, Eq. 4.93, to recompute c q and c q. 

---

The largest division of interfacial electrochemical methods is the group of dynamic methods, in which current flows and concentrations change as the result of a redox reaction. Dynamic methods are further subdivided by whether we choose to control the current or the potential. In controlled-current coulometry, which is covered in Section IIC, we completely oxidize or reduce the analyte by passing a fixed current through the analytical solution. Controlled-potential methods are subdivided further into controlled-potential coulometry and amperometry, in which a constant potential is applied during the analysis, and voltammetry, in which the potential is systematically varied. Controlled-potential coulometry is discussed in Section IIC, and amperometry and voltammetry are discussed in Section IID. 

Coulometric methods of analysis are based on an exhaustive electrolysis of the analyte. By exhaustive we mean that the analyte is quantitatively oxidized or reduced at the working electrode or reacts quantitatively with a reagent generated at the working electrode. There are two forms of coulometry controlled-potential coulometry, in which a constant potential is applied to the electrochemical cell, and controlled-current coulometry, in which a constant current is passed through the electrochemical cell. 

Selecting a Constant Potential In controlled-potential coulometry, the potential is selected so that the desired oxidation or reduction reaction goes to completion without interference from redox reactions involving other components of the sample matrix. To see how an appropriate potential for the working electrode is selected, let s develop a constant-potential coulometric method for Cu + based on its reduction to copper metal at a Pt cathode working electrode. 

If the initial concentration of Cu + is 1.00 X 10 M, for example, then the cathode s potential must be more negative than -1-0.105 V versus the SHE (-0.139 V versus the SCE) to achieve a quantitative reduction of Cu + to Cu. Note that at this potential H3O+ is not reduced to H2, maintaining a 100% current efficiency. Many of the published procedures for the controlled-potential coulometric analysis of Cu + call for potentials that are more negative than that shown for the reduction of H3O+ in Figure 11.21. Such potentials can be used, however, because the slow kinetics for reducing H3O+ results in a significant overpotential that shifts the potential of the H3O+/H2 redox couple to more negative potentials. 

Current-time curve for controlled-potential coulometry. 

Minimizing Electrolysis Time The current-time curve for controlled-potential coulometry in Figure 11.20 shows that the current decreases continuously throughout electrolysis. An exhaustive electrolysis, therefore, may require a long time. Since time is an important consideration in choosing and designing analytical methods, the factors that determine the analysis time need to be considered. 

The change in current as a function of time in controlled-potential coulometry is approximated by an exponential decay thus, the current at time t is... 

From this equation we see that increasing k leads to a shorter analysis time. For this reason controlled-potential coulometry is carried out in small-volume electrochemical cells, using electrodes with large surface areas and with high stirring rates. A quantitative electrolysis typically requires approximately 30-60 min, although shorter or longer times are possible. 

A second approach to coulometry is to use a constant current in place of a constant potential (Figure 11.23). Controlled-current coulometry, also known as amperostatic coulometry or coulometric titrimetry, has two advantages over controlled-potential coulometry. First, using a constant current makes for a more rapid analysis since the current does not decrease over time. Thus, a typical analysis time for controlled-current coulometry is less than 10 min, as opposed to approximately 30-60 min for controlled-potential coulometry. Second, with a constant current the total charge is simply the product of current and time (equation 11.24). A method for integrating the current-time curve, therefore, is not necessary. 

Coulometry may be used for the quantitative analysis of both inorganic and organic compounds. Examples of controlled-potential and controlled-current coulometric methods are discussed in the following sections. 

Control led-Potential Coulometry The majority of controlled-potential coulometric analyses involve the determination of inorganic cations and anions, including trace metals and halides. Table 11.8 provides a summary of several of these methods. 

The ability to control selectivity by carefully selecting the working electrode s potential, makes controlled-potential coulometry particularly useful for the analysis of alloys. For example, the composition of an alloy containing Ag, Bi, Cd, and Sb... 

Representative Examples for the Controlled-Potential Coulometric Analysis of Inorganic Ions... 

Source Compiled from Rechnitz, G. A. Controlled-Potential Analysis. Macmillan New York, 1963, p. 49. Electrolytic reactions are written in terms of the change in oxidation state. The actual species in solution depend on the composition of the sample matrix. 

Another area where controlled-potential coulometry has found application is in nuclear chemistry, in which elements such as uranium and polonium can be determined at trace levels. Eor example, microgram quantities of uranium in a medium of H2SO4 can be determined by reducing U(VI) to U(IV) at a mercury working electrode. 

Controlled-potential coulometry also can be applied to the quantitative analysis of organic compounds, although the number of applications is significantly less than that for inorganic analytes. One example is the six-electron reduction of a nitro group, -NO2, to a primary amine, -NH2, at a mercury electrode. Solutions of picric acid, for instance, can be analyzed by reducing to triaminophenol. 

Controllcd-Currcnt Coulomctry The use of a mediator makes controlled-current coulometry a more versatile analytical method than controlled-potential coulome-try. For example, the direct oxidation or reduction of a protein at the working electrode in controlled-potential coulometry is difficult if the protein s active redox site lies deep within its structure. The controlled-current coulometric analysis of the protein is made possible, however, by coupling its oxidation or reduction to a mediator that is reduced or oxidized at the working electrode. Controlled-current coulometric methods have been developed for many of the same analytes that may be determined by conventional redox titrimetry. These methods, several of which are summarized in Table 11.9, also are called coulometric redox titrations. 

Representative Method Every controlled-potential or controlled-current coulo-metric method has its own unique considerations. Nevertheless, the following procedure for the determination of dichromate by a coulometric redox titration provides an instructive example. 

Studies aimed at characterizing the mechanisms of electrode reactions often make use of coulometry for determining the number of electrons involved in the reaction. To make such measurements a known amount of a pure compound is subject to a controlled-potential electrolysis. The coulombs of charge needed to complete the electrolysis are used to determine the value of n using Faraday s law (equation 11.23). 

A 0.3619-g sample of tetrachloropicolinic acid, C6HNO2CI4, is dissolved in distilled water, transferred to a 1000-mL volumetric flask, and diluted to volume. An exhaustive controlled-potential electrolysis of a 10.00-mL portion of this solution at a spongy silver cathode requires 5.374 C of charge. What is the value of n for this reduction reaction ... 

In controlled-potential coulometry, accuracy is determined by current efficiency and the determination of charge. Provided that no interferents are present that are easier to oxidize or reduce than the analyte, current efficiencies of greater than 99.9% are easily obtained. When interferents are present, however, they can often be eliminated by applying a potential such that the exhaustive electrolysis of the interferents is possible without the simultaneous electrolysis of the analyte. Once the interferents have been removed the potential can be switched to a level at... 

Precision Precision is determined by the uncertainties of measuring current, time, and the end point in controlled-current coulometry and of measuring charge in controlled-potential coulometry. Precisions of +0.1-0.3% are routinely obtained for coulometric titrations, and precisions of +0.5% are typical for controlled-potential coulometry. 

Time, Cost, and Equipment Controlled-potential coulometry is a relatively time-consuming analysis, with a typical analysis requiring 30-60 min. Coulometric titrations, on the other hand, require only a few minutes and are easily adapted for automated analysis. Commercial instrumentation for both controlled-potential and controlled-current coulometry is available and is relatively inexpensive. Low-cost potentiostats and constant-current sources are available for less than 1000. 

Anodic stripping voltammetry consists of two steps (Figure 11.37). The first is a controlled potential electrolysis in which the working electrode, usually a hanging mercury drop or mercury film, is held at a cathodic potential sufficient to deposit the metal ion on the electrode. For example, with Cu + the deposition reaction is... 

The purity of a sample of picric acid, C6H3N3O7, is determined by controlled-potential coulometry, converting the picric acid to triaminophenol, C6H9N3O. A 0.2917-g sample of picric acid is placed in a 1000-mL volumetric flask... 

Rechnitz, G. A. Controlled-Potential Analysis. Macmillan New York, 1963. 

The electrochemical route to duoroaromatics (90) based on controlled potential electrolysis in the absence of hydrogen duoride (platinum anode, +2.4 V acetonitrile solvent tetraalkylammonium duoride electrolyte) has not been commercialized. However, considerable industrial interest in the electrochemical approach stiU exists (91—93). 

The electrochemical reduction of 3-nitrophthalic acid at controlled potentials gave 2,1-benzisoxazole-3-carboxylic acid. Cyclization is presumed to proceed via an intermediate oxime (67AHC(8)277). Treating 5-iodoanthranilic acid with acetic anhydride gave 3-acetoxy-5-iodo-2,l-benzisoxazole (596) (65JMC550). 

FIG. 28-8 The potentiostat apparatus and circuitry associated with controlled potential measurements of polarization curves. 

---