Emission detection limits, flame

Table A1 Flame Atomic Emission Detection Limits...

A comparison of the detection limits for the rare earth elements in flame atomic emission and absorption spectrometry (table 37D.3 in section 2.2.5) allows certain conclusions to be made. The fuel-rich oxyacetylene and nitrous oxide-acetylene flames are very effective in producing free atoms of these elements and are the flames of choice for both atomic emission and absorption analysis. The emission detection limits are equal to or better than those obtained by absorption techniques, and thus flame atomic emission methods are generally superior. Future improvements in hollow cathode discharge tubes (or development of other primary sources) may lower the atomic absorption detection limits and thereby make the two techniques more complementary. However, Kinnunen and Lindsjo (1967) have emphasized that locating the proper rare earth ab-... 

The detection limits in the table correspond generally to the concentration of an element required to give a net signal equal to three times the standard deviation of the noise (background) in accordance with lUPAC recommendations. Detection limits can be confusing when steady-state techniques such as flame atomic emission or absorption, and plasma atomic emission or fluorescence, which... 

The section on Spectroscopy has been retained but with some revisions and expansion. The section includes ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy, fluorescence, infrared and Raman spectroscopy, and X-ray spectrometry. Detection limits are listed for the elements when using flame emission, flame atomic absorption, electrothermal atomic absorption, argon induction coupled plasma, and flame atomic fluorescence. Nuclear magnetic resonance embraces tables for the nuclear properties of the elements, proton chemical shifts and coupling constants, and similar material for carbon-13, boron-11, nitrogen-15, fluorine-19, silicon-19, and phosphoms-31. 

Choice of Atomization and Excitation Source Except for the alkali metals, detection limits when using an ICP are significantly better than those obtained with flame emission (Table 10.14). Plasmas also are subject to fewer spectral and chemical interferences. For these reasons a plasma emission source is usually the better choice. 

Precision For samples and standards in which the concentration of analyte exceeds the detection limit by at least a factor of 50, the relative standard deviation for both flame and plasma emission is about 1-5%. Perhaps the most important factor affecting precision is the stability of the flame s or plasma s temperature. For example, in a 2500 K flame a temperature fluctuation of +2.5 K gives a relative standard deviation of 1% in emission intensity. Significant improvements in precision may be realized when using internal standards. 

Atomic Absorption/Emission Spectrometry. Atomic absorption or emission spectrometric methods are commonly used for inorganic elements in a variety of matrices. The general principles and appHcations have been reviewed (43). Flame-emission spectrometry allows detection at low levels (10 g). It has been claimed that flame methods give better reproducibiHty than electrical excitation methods, owing to better control of several variables involved in flame excitation. Detection limits for selected elements by flame-emission spectrometry given in Table 4. Inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometry may also be employed. 

Table 4. Elemental Detection Limits by Flame Emission Spectrometry ...

Na+ and K+ with a detection limit of 10 9 M. The sensor compositions exhibited wide response ranges between 10 9 and 10 5 M Na+ or K+, and, therefore, may be an alternative method to flame emission spectroscopy. The sensor is fully reversible within the dynamic range and the response time is 3 min under batch conditions. Cross sensitivity to pH is negligible in the pH range of 6.2-7.3. 

Brenner et al. [ 169] applied inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry to the determination of calcium (and sulfate) in brines. The principal advantage of the technique was that it avoided tedious matrix matching of calibration standards when sulfate was determined indirectly by flame techniques. It also avoided time-consuming sample handling when the samples were processed by the gravimetric method. The detection limit was 70 ig/l and a linear dynamic range of 1 g/1 was obtained for sulfate. 

Flame emission spectrometry is used extensively for the determination of trace metals in solution and in particular the alkali and alkaline earth metals. The most notable applications are the determinations of Na, K, Ca and Mg in body fluids and other biological samples for clinical diagnosis. Simple filter instruments generally provide adequate resolution for this type of analysis. The same elements, together with B, Fe, Cu and Mn, are important constituents of soils and fertilizers and the technique is therefore also useful for the analysis of agricultural materials. Although many other trace metals can be determined in a variety of matrices, there has been a preference for the use of atomic absorption spectrometry because variations in flame temperature are much less critical and spectral interference is negligible. Detection limits for flame emission techniques are comparable to those for atomic absorption, i.e. from < 0.01 to 10 ppm (Table 8.6). Flame emission spectrometry complements atomic absorption spectrometry because it operates most effectively for elements which are easily ionized, whilst atomic absorption methods demand a minimum of ionization (Table 8.7). 

Atomic absorption spectrometry is one of the most widely used techniques for the determination of metals at trace levels in solution. Its popularity as compared with that of flame emission is due to its relative freedom from interferences by inter-element effects and its relative insensitivity to variations in flame temperature. Only for the routine determination of alkali and alkaline earth metals, is flame photometry usually preferred. Over sixty elements can be determined in almost any matrix by atomic absorption. Examples include heavy metals in body fluids, polluted waters, foodstuffs, soft drinks and beer, the analysis of metallurgical and geochemical samples and the determination of many metals in soils, crude oils, petroleum products and plastics. Detection limits generally lie in the range 100-0.1 ppb (Table 8.4) but these can be improved by chemical pre-concentration procedures involving solvent extraction or ion exchange. 

In principle, atomic fluorescence is a simpler and more versatile technique than atomic absorption, but suffers from a susceptibility to quenching effects and to background noise arising from the scattering of radiation by particles in the flame. The latter is particularly serious for refractory materials and in high-temperature flames. Detection limits for some elements are lower than by atomic absorption or flame emission measurements, e.g. elements with resonance lines around 200 nm or below, such as As, Se,... 

Table 8.6 Some detection limits for atomic absorption, fluorescence and flame emission methods...

Chromatographic methods have been applied with hydridization. Jackson et al. [98] used a commercial purge and trap apparatus fitted to a packed gas chromatographic column and flame photometric detector to achieve a O.lng detection. Purge and trap procedures followed by boiling point separations and detection by spectrophotometric methods yield detection limits in water of between 0.01 and lng. Detection of SnH emission by flame emission gives the greatest sensitivity. 

Manganese in aqueous solution may be analyzed by several instrumental techniques including flame and furnace AA, ICP, ICP-MS, x-ray fluorescence and neutron activation. For atomic absorption and emission spectrometric determination the measurement may be done at the wavelengths 279.5, 257.61 or 294.92 nm respectively. The metal or its insoluble compounds must be digested with nitric acid alone or in combination with another acid. Soluble salts may be dissolved in water and the aqueous solution analyzed. X-ray methods may be applied for non-destructive determination of the metal. The detection limits in these methods are higher than those obtained by the AA or ICP methods. ICP-MS is the most sensitive technique. Several colorimetric methods also are known, but such measurements require that the manganese salts be aqueous. These methods are susceptible to interference. 

Analysis. Na or a Na compound in the flame gives a bright yellow color due to its emission of 589.0 and 589.6 nm photons. This is the property that allows for the spectrophotometric determination of Na by emission or absorption flame or plasma spectroscopy. AAS and ETAAS are capable down to 10 ppb. ICPAES extends this to 1 ppb, and a limit of detection of 0.1 ppb can be obtained by ICPMS and IC. A spot test for 250 ppm or more can... 

More recent flame photometric methods rely on direct measurement of the phosphorus emission. If organophosphorus compounds are injected into a hydrogen flame, a continuous emission is obtained in the 490-650 nm region. A broad band system, with an intensity maximum at 526 nm, is superimposed on this background139 it is attributed to the HPO species formed in the flame. An early determination of phosphorus at 0.01-0.04 m concentrations was based on examination of the continuous emission standard and sample solutions were injected into the burner and the intensities were measured at 540 nm the calibration graph was linear down to the detection limit of 10 4 M phosphorus sodium or calcium, if present in the sample, interfered with the results140. 

Its rapidity and detection limits, which are in the order of a few ppt (10-12) for many elements, make atomic emission one of the best techniques currently available for elemental analysis. These sophisticated instruments, however, are not intended to replace the flame photometers that are still used for many simple measurements. 

Figure 21-24 Flame, furnace, and inductively coupled plasma emission and inductively coupled plasma—mass spectrometry detection limils (ng/g = ppb) with instruments from GBC Scientific Equipment, Australia. [Flame, furnace. ICP from R. J. Gill. Am. Lab. November 1993, 24F. ICP-MS from T. T. Nham, Am. Lab. August 1998. 17A Data for Ct Br, and l are from reference 14.] Accurate quantitative analysis requires concentrations 10-100 times greater than the detection limit.

Fluorescence excitation and emission spectra of the two sodium D lines in an air-acetylene flame, (a) In the excitation spectrum, the laser was scanned, (to) In the emission spectrum, the monochromator was scanned. The monochromator slit width was the same for both spectra. [From s. J. Weeks, H. Haraguchl, and J. D. Wlnefordner, Improvement of Detection Limits in Laser-Excited Atomic Fluorescence Flame Spectrometry," Anal. Chem. 1976t 50,360.]... 

---