Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Electrolyte Interaction

In fact, the orientation of water at the potential of zero charge is expected to depend approximately linearly on the electronegativity of the metal.9 This orientation (see below) may be deduced from analysis of the variation of the potential drop across the interface with surface charge for different metals and electrolytes. Such analysis leads to the establishment of a hydrophilicity scale of the metals ( solvophilicity for nonaqueous solvents) which expresses the relative strengths of metal-solvent interaction, as well as the relative reactivities of the different metals to oxygen.23 [Pg.7]

In addition to the nonelectrostatic adsorptive force, there is an image force between a dipole and a metal, which will be present whenever charged or dipolar particles in a medium of one dielectric constant are near a region of another dielectric constant. If the metal is treated as an ideal conductor, the image-force contribution to the energy of a dipole in the electrolyte is proportional to p2j z3, where z is the distance of the dipole from the plane boundary of the metal (considered ideal, with no surface structure), and to 1 + cos2 0. This ideal term is, of course, the same for all metals. If [Pg.7]

Specific adsorption of ions (probably anions) of the electrolyte phase on the metal also should depend on the metal. Assuming a Langmuir-type equilibrium, one has22 for ions of charge qt and solution concentration c, [Pg.8]

Here K is a constant, Te and Tf are the number of empty and filled sites per unit area on the metal surface, / , is the adsorption potential, and is the electrostatic potential of the empty site / , depends on surface charge. The sum T0 = Te + T/ total number of sites per unit area, depends on the metal, as does fa. [Pg.8]

The above effects are more familiar than direct contributions of the metal s components to the properties of the interface. In this chapter, we are primarily interested in the latter these contribute to M(S). The two quantities M(S) and S(M) (or 8% and S m) are easily distinguished theoretically, as the contributions to the potential difference of polarizable components of the metal and solution phases, but apparently cannot be measured individually without adducing the results of calculations or theoretical arguments. A model for the interface which ignores one of these contributions to A V may, suitably parameterized, account for experimental data, but this does not prove that the neglected contribution is not important in reality. Of course, the tradition has been to neglect the metal s contribution to properties of the interface. Recently, however, it has been possible to use modern theories of the structure of metals and metal surfaces to calculate, or, at least, estimate reliably, xM(S) and 5 (as well as discuss 8 m, which enters some theories of the interface). It is this work, and its implications for our understanding of the electrochemical double layer, that we discuss in this chapter. [Pg.8]


Hence, for two similarly charged surfaces in electrolyte, interactions are determined by both electrostatic doublelayer and van der Waals forces. The consequent phenomena have been described quantitatively by the DLVO theory [6], named after Derjaguin and Landau, and Verwey and Over-beek. The interaction energy, due to combined actions of double-layer and van der Waals forces are schematically given in Fig. 3 as a function of distance D, from which one can see that the interplay of double-layer and van der Waals forces may affect the stability of a particle suspension system. [Pg.168]

The role of electrolyte is critical in these nanoscopic interfaces, but is difficult to predict and quantify. For sufficiently large rigid interfacial structures, one can apply the model of electrolyte interaction with a single charged surface in Figure 1(a). The double-layer theories or the recent integral-equation theories have been applied. Reviews of this subject are available in the literature [4,5]. For electrolytes in a nanostructure, the double layers from two surfaces overlap and behave differently from the case of a single surface. Ad-... [Pg.625]

What one requires is a self-consistent picture of the interface, including both metal and electrolyte, so that, for a given surface charge, one has distributions of all species of metal and electrolyte phases. Unified theories have proved too difficult but, happily, it seems that some decoupling of the two phases is possible, because the details of the metal-electrolyte interaction are not so important. Thus, one can calculate the structure of each part of the interface in the field of the other, so that the distributions of metal species are appropriate to the field of the electrolyte species, and vice versa. [Pg.89]

Kohs W, Santner H.J., Hofer F., Schrottner H., Doninger J., Barsukov I., Albering J.H., Moller K.-C., Besenhard J.O., and Winter M. A study on electrolyte interactions with graphite anodes exhibiting structures with various amounts of rhombohedral phase. J. [Pg.246]

The electrochemical interface between an electrode and an electrolyte solution is much more difficult to characterize. In addition to adsorbate-substrate and adsorbate-adsorbate interactions, adsorbate-electrolyte interactions play a significant role in the behavior of reactions on electrode surfaces. The strength of the adsorbate-substrate interactions is controlled by the electrode potential, which also determines the configuration of the electrolyte. With solution molecules, ions, and potential variation involved, characterization of the electrochemical interface is extremely difficult. However, by examining solvation, ion adsorption, and potential effects as individual components of the interface, a better understanding is being developed. [Pg.308]

Since the inception of lithium ion technology, there have been several reviews summarizing the knowledge accumulated about this new technology from various perspectives, with the latest being in 2003. Because electrolytes interact closely with both cathode and anode materials during the operation, their effect on cell performance has been discussed in... [Pg.67]

Rajshwar K, Marz T (1983) The n-GaAs electrolyte interface evidence for specificity in lattice-ion electrolyte interactions, dependence for potential drops on ciystal plane orientation to the electrolyte and implications for solar energy conversion. J Phys Chem 87 742-744... [Pg.476]

What is next Several examples were given of modem experimental electrochemical techniques used to characterize electrode-electrolyte interactions. However, we did not mention theoretical methods used for the same purpose. Computer simulations of the dynamic processes occurring in the double layer are found abundantly in the literature of electrochemistry. Examples of topics explored in this area are investigation of lateral adsorbate-adsorbate interactions by the formulation of lattice-gas models and their solution by analytical and numerical techniques (Monte Carlo simulations) [Fig. 6.107(a)] determination of potential-energy curves for metal-ion and lateral-lateral interaction by quantum-chemical studies [Fig. 6.107(b)] and calculation of the electrostatic field and potential drop across an electric double layer by molecular dynamic simulations [Fig. 6.107(c)]. [Pg.248]

This is the case for CdS in acidic or basic aqueous solution where photocurrents are nonlinear at low-light intensities and the dependence of on pH is non-Nernstian. (20) Recent observations by Bard and Wrighton(14,15) indicate that Fermi level pinning and therefore supra-band edge charge transfer can occur in Si and GaAs in those systems (i.e., CH CN/t n-Bu NjClO ) with various redox couples where little electrolyte interaction is anticipated. [Pg.87]

P. Fletcher and G. Sposito, The chemical modelling of clay-electrolyte interactions for montmorillonite, Clay Minerals 24 375 (1989). See also R. S. Mansell, S. A. Bloom, and W. J. Bond, A tool for evaluating a need for variable selectivilies in... [Pg.214]

It is well-known that the traditional interactions of the DLVO theory are not accurate at high electrolyte interactions, particularly at small separation distances. Recent experiments on AOT-based black films apparently suggested that the traditional theory is also not valid at moderate ionic strengths and large separations. In this paper, it was argued that the experiments can be understood in terms of the traditional theory, when the thermal undulations of the interfaces are taken into account. [Pg.357]

Nanocrystalline systems display a number of unusual features that are not fully understood at present. In particular, further work is needed to clarify the relationship between carrier transport, trapping, inter-particle tunnelling and electron-electrolyte interactions in three dimensional nan-oporous systems. The photocurrent response of nanocrystalline electrodes is nonlinear, and the measured properties such as electron lifetime and diffusion coefficient are intensity dependent quantities. Intensity dependent trap occupation may provide an explanation for this behaviour, and methods for distinguishing between trapped and mobile electrons, for example optically, are needed. Most models of electron transport make a priori assumptions that diffusion dominates because the internal electric fields are small. However, field assisted electron transport may also contribute to the measured photocurrent response, and this question needs to be addressed in future work. [Pg.278]

It is possible for plated plastics to corrode if the metal coating is not properly applied or if it is damaged in such a way as to allow electrolytic interaction in the plating layers. However, the plastic substrate will not corrode itself, nor will it contribute to further corrosion of the plating layers. In general, plated plastics will fare better than metals when exposed to corrosive environments. [Pg.553]

Fletcher, P. and Sposito, G.S., The chemical modeling of clay/electrolyte interactions for montmorillonite, Clay Miner., 24, 375, 1989. [Pg.252]

Fletcher, P., and Sposito, G. (1989) The Chemical Modeling of Clay-Electrolyte Interactions for Montmorillonite, Clay Miner. 24, 375-391. [Pg.946]

Sodium, potassium, and chloride work together in all body tissues and fluids, with a kind of dynamic tension among the three. As I have pointed out, sodium and chloride are highly concentrated in the fluid outside the cells of the body while potassium is highly concentrated in the fluid inside them. There are other electrolytes involved also, but the same concentration of electrolytes is maintained in the fluid inside and outside the cells. Electrolytes interact with cell membranes to allow nutrients to enter cells and wastes to leave. When a concentration imbalance occurs, water either enters or leaves the cells until electrolyte concentrations are the same inside and outside the cells. (See Table 3.1.)... [Pg.39]

Jaegermann W. (1996), Semicondnctor snrfaces adsorbate and electrolyte interaction , in Modern Aspects of Electrochemistry, Vol. 30, Plennm Press, New York. [Pg.731]

The idea of an inert (indifferent) electrolyte was coined in the context of electrocapillary studies using the Hg electrode. Grahame [34] found a series of electrolytes that produced the same PZC (determined as the electrocapillary maximum) irrespective of the nature or concentration of the electrolyte. Such behavior suggests that the ions of these electrolytes interact with the surface only by a Coulombic force. In contrast, many other electrolytes induced a shift in the PZC, with the magnitude and direction of this shift depending on the nature or concentration of the electrolyte. A shift in the PZC suggests that ions of these electrolytes can be positively adsorbed in spite of electrostatic repulsion that is, they interact with the surface by a noncoulombic force. This phenomenon is termed specihc adsorption. Thus, an inert electrolyte does not show specific adsorption of either ion. [Pg.12]

Ganguly S, Krishna Mohan V, Jyothi Bhasu VC, Mathews E, Adiseshaiah KS, Kumar AS. Surfactant-electrolyte interactions in concentrated water in oil emulsions. FT-IR spectroscopic and low-temperature differential scanning calorimetric studies. Colloids Surf 1992 65 243-256. [Pg.441]

The SNIFTIRS technique has been used to investigate many processes in the near-electrode region [24, 55, 56], including adsorption [79, 91], electron-transfer [93, 95], solvent-electrolyte interactions [79], and processes occurring at semiconductor [84] and glassy carbon electrodes [96]. Several examples chosen from these applications are given below. [Pg.48]

Actually, interfacial potential differences can develop without an excess charge on either phase. Consider an aqueous electrolyte in contact with an electrode. Since the electrolyte interacts with the metal surface (e.g., wetting it), the water dipoles in contact with the metal generally have some preferential orientation. From a coulombic standpoint, this situation is equivalent to charge separation across the interface, because the dipoles are... [Pg.58]

The applications of the SFM include force measurement between surfaces in liquid and vapor, adhesion between similar or dissimilar materials, contact deformation, wetting and capillary condensation, viscosity in thin films, forces between surfactant and polymer-coated surfaces, and surface chemistry. Fluid-electrolyte interactions between conductive surfaces can also be measured [Smith, et. al., 1988]. A typical microforce of 10 nN can be detected over separation distances to a resolution of 0.1 nm with optical interoferometry between reflective surfaces. With electrostatic forces, relatively large separation are measured 1-100 nm, whereas, short range forces such as van der Waals forces take place over distances of less than 3.0 nm. Ultrasmooth and electrically conductive surfaces can be formed by the deposition of a metal film (40 nm thickness) such as Pt on a smooth substrate of mica [Smith, et. al., 1988]. The separation distance between the two surfaces is controlled by a... [Pg.82]

L. Blum, Solution of a model for the solvent-electrolyte interactions in the mean spherical approximation, J. Chem. Phys. 61, 2129 (1974). [Pg.133]

A combination of the molecular polyelectrolyte theory with the methods of statistical mechanics can be used at least for the description of the chain expansion due to charges along the polysaccharide chain. The physical process of the proton dissociation of a (weak) polyacid is a good way to assess the conformational role of the poly electrolytic interactions, since it is possible of tuning poly electrolyte charge density on an otherwise constant chemical structure. An amylose chain, selectively oxidized on carbon 6 to produce a carboxylic (uronic) group, has proved to be a good example to test theoretical results. ... [Pg.731]


See other pages where Electrolyte Interaction is mentioned: [Pg.103]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.3849]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.546]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.9]   


SEARCH



Aqueous electrolyte, interactions

Aqueous electrolyte, interactions surfaces

Cathodes interaction with electrolyte

Composite polymer electrolytes surface interactions

Electrolyte sulfur compound, interactions

Electrolyte/electrode interactions

Electrolytes interionic interactions

Emulsion particle-electrolyte interaction

Interaction of Anode and Electrolyte

Interaction of Carbon Cathode Blocks with Electrolyte During Startup and in Service Wear. Infiltration

Interaction of Cathode and Electrolytes

Interaction of Electrolyte and Glasses

Interactions electrolyte—solvent

Interactions, metal-electrolyte

Ionic interactions electrolytes

Surface-Electrolyte Interactions

© 2024 chempedia.info