Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Aqueous electrolyte, interactions

While the v-a plots for ionized monolayers often show no distinguishing features, it is entirely possible for such to be present and, in fact, for actual phase transitions to be observed. This was the case for films of poly(4-vinylpyri-dinium) bromide at the air-aqueous electrolyte interface [118]. In addition, electrostatic interactions play a large role in the stabilization of solid-supported lipid monolayers [119] as well as in the interactions between bilayers [120]. [Pg.556]

Protems can be physisorbed or covalently attached to mica. Another method is to innnobilise and orient them by specific binding to receptor-fiinctionalized planar lipid bilayers supported on the mica sheets [15]. These surfaces are then brought into contact in an aqueous electrolyte solution, while the pH and the ionic strength are varied. Corresponding variations in the force-versus-distance curve allow conclusions about protein confomiation and interaction to be drawn [99]. The local electrostatic potential of protein-covered surfaces can hence be detemiined with an accuracy of 5 mV. [Pg.1741]

Figure Bl.20.10. Typical force curve for a streptavidin surface interacting with a biotin surface in an aqueous electrolyte of controlled pH. This result demonstrates the power of specific protein interactions. Reproduced with pennission from [81]. Figure Bl.20.10. Typical force curve for a streptavidin surface interacting with a biotin surface in an aqueous electrolyte of controlled pH. This result demonstrates the power of specific protein interactions. Reproduced with pennission from [81].
One of the most remarkable results from the molecular simulation studies of aqueous electrolyte solutions was that no additional molecular forces needed to be introduced to prevent the much smaller ions (Na has a molecular diameter of less than 0.2 nm) from permeating the membrane, while permitting the larger water molecules (about 0.3 nm in diameter) to permeate the membrane. This appeared to be due to the large ionic clusters formed. The ions were surrounded by water molecules, thus increasing their effective size quite considerably to almost 1 nm. A typical cluster formed due to the interaction between the ions and a polar solvent is shown in Fig. 7. These clusters were found to be quite stable, with a fairly high energy of desolvation. The inability of the ions to permeate the membrane is also shown... [Pg.790]

The popular and well-studied primitive model is a degenerate case of the SPM with = 0, shown schematically in Figure (c). The restricted primitive model (RPM) refers to the case when the ions are of equal diameter. This model can realistically represent the packing of a molten salt in which no solvent is present. For an aqueous electrolyte, the primitive model does not treat the solvent molecules exphcitly and the number density of the electrolyte is umealistically low. For modeling nano-surface interactions, short-range interactions are important and the primitive model is expected not to give adequate account of confinement effects. For its simphcity, however, many theories [18-22] and simulation studies [23-25] have been made based on the primitive model for the bulk electrolyte. Ap-phcations to electrolyte interfaces have also been widely reported [26-30]. [Pg.629]

CO bonding produces a considerable weakening of the C-0 bond, but there is appreciable further weakening in the presence of the aqueous electrolyte. This is evidence for significant interaction with solution species. [Pg.559]

Summing up this section, we would like to note that understanding size effects in electrocatalysis requires the application of appropriate model systems that on the one hand represent the intrinsic properties of supported metal nanoparticles, such as small size and interaction with their support, and on the other allow straightforward separation between kinetic, ohmic, and mass transport (internal and external) losses and control of readsorption effects. This requirement is met, for example, by metal particles and nanoparticle arrays on flat nonporous supports. Their investigation allows unambiguous access to reaction kinetics and control of catalyst structure. However, in order to understand how catalysts will behave in the fuel cell environment, these studies must be complemented with GDE and MEA tests to account for the presence of aqueous electrolyte in model experiments. [Pg.526]

The experimental data bearing on the question of the effect of different metals and different crystal orientations on the properties of the metal-electrolyte interface have been discussed by Hamelin et al.27 The results of capacitance measurements for seven sp metals (Ag, Au, Cu, Zn, Pb, Sn, and Bi) in aqueous electrolytes are reviewed. The potential of zero charge is derived from the maximum of the capacitance. Subtracting the diffuse-layer capacitance, one derives the inner-layer capacitance, which, when plotted against surface charge, shows a maximum close to qM = 0. This maximum, which is almost independent of crystal orientation, is explained in terms of the reorientation of water molecules adjacent to the metal surface. Interaction of different faces of metal with water, ions, and organic molecules inside the outer Helmholtz plane are discussed, as well as adsorption. [Pg.16]

The interaction between bare mica surfaces in 0.1 M KNO3 (pH 5.5) aqueous electrolyte is shown in figure 6a. The straight line (curve (a)) indicated on the logarithmic-linear plot is in accord with the exponential relation... [Pg.236]

The pressure-volume-temperature (PVT) properties of aqueous electrolyte and mixed electrolyte solutions are frequently needed to make practical engineering calculations. For example precise PVT properties of natural waters like seawater are required to determine the vertical stability, the circulation, and the mixing of waters in the oceans. Besides the practical interest, the PVT properties of aqueous electrolyte solutions can also yield information on the structure of solutions and the ionic interactions that occur in solution. The derived partial molal volumes of electrolytes yield information on ion-water and ion-ion interactions (1,2 ). The effect of pressure on chemical equilibria can also be derived from partial molal volume data (3). [Pg.581]

M.L. Fielden, R.A. Hayes, and J. Ralston Surface and Capillary Forces Affecting Air Bubble-Particle Interactions in Aqueous Electrolyte. Langmuir 12, 3721 (1996). [Pg.103]

M. Preuss and H.-J. Butt Direct Measurement of Particle-Bubble Interactions in Aqueous Electrolyte Dependence on Surfactant. Langmuir 14, 3164 (1998). [Pg.103]

The acidic or basic character of a semiconductor surface gives rise to interaction with or OH ions of an aqueous electrolyte ... [Pg.140]

It is apparent from this plot that the Debye-Hiickel theory is only correct in a narrow range of extreme dilution, showing (as might have been anticipated) that classical electrostatics is qualitatively inadequate to describe the realistic interactions in aqueous electrolyte solutions, except in the asymptotic limit of extremely large ion-ion separations. [Pg.305]

K. S. Pitzer, Volumetric Ion Interaction Parameters for Single-Solute Aqueous Electrolyte Solutions at Various Temperatures, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 2000, 29, 1123. [Pg.669]

An understanding of equilibrium phenomena in naturally occurring aqueous systems must, in the final analysis, involve understanding the interaction between solutes and water, both in bulk and in interfacial systems. To achieve this goal, it is reasonable to attempt to describe the structure of water, and when and if this can be achieved, to proceed to the problems of water structure in aqueous solutions and solvent-solute interactions for both electrolytes and nonelectrolytes. This paper is particularly concerned with two aspects of these problems—current views of the structure of water and solute-solvent interactions (primarily ion hydration). It is not possible here to give an exhaustive account of all the current structural models of water instead, we shall describe only those which may concern the nature of some reported thermal anomalies in the properties of water and aqueous solutions. Hence, the discussion begins with a brief presentation of these anomalies, followed by a review of current water structure models, and a discussion of some properties of aqueous electrolyte solutions. Finally, solute-solvent interactions in such solutions are discussed in terms of our present understanding of the structural properties of water. [Pg.76]

This is the case for CdS in acidic or basic aqueous solution where photocurrents are nonlinear at low-light intensities and the dependence of on pH is non-Nernstian. (20) Recent observations by Bard and Wrighton(14,15) indicate that Fermi level pinning and therefore supra-band edge charge transfer can occur in Si and GaAs in those systems (i.e., CH CN/t n-Bu NjClO ) with various redox couples where little electrolyte interaction is anticipated. [Pg.87]

The oxide redox energy levels for all elements except gold are cathodic to the redox level of the H2O/O2 couple. Gold, however, is an impractical component for compound semiconductors. All other compound semiconductors employed as electrolysis photoanodes will undergo surface oxidation in aqueous electrolytes to produce a surface oxide film which normally constitutes the stable surface of the photoelectrode. Our proposed mechanism indicates that the proton induced oxide dissolution reaction arises from product ir ion interactions with the oxide anion (0=). [Pg.331]

V at 40°. This AV. /pCl" value for the (100) orientation n-GaAs is approximately one-half that obtained with (111) n-GaAs crystals (2), indicating that the crystal surface atom density and type can be a significant factor in the interactions between substrate and electrolyte. Flat-band potential values for (100) and (111) n-GaAs/molten salt interphases and for the (111) n-GaAs/aqueous electrolyte interphase are compared in Table I. [Pg.349]

Probing Ca++—Phosphate Binding. Although this question has been at the center of the current investigations, little experimentation was reported on direct evidence which could be furnished by IR spectroscopy. In a brief mention of IR absorption of DPL-uranyl nitrate in nujol paste, it was concluded that indeed Ca++ interacts with the lipid phosphate group (7). Subsequently, after thermodynamic analysis of calorimetric studies with DPL dispersions in aqueous electrolyte, the same laboratory suggested the absence of direct Ca++-phosphate interaction (8). Strangely, the authors of the second work (8) failed to provide explanations for the discrepancy between this and a previous report (7). The particular predicament implies that either one of the two experiments had to be... [Pg.70]

Krumgalz BS, Pogorelsky R, Pitzer KS (1996) Volumetric properties of single aqueous electrolytes from zero to saturation concentration at 298.15 °K represented by Pitzer s ion-interaction equations. J Phys Chem Ref Data 25 663-689... [Pg.234]


See other pages where Aqueous electrolyte, interactions is mentioned: [Pg.244]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.714]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.520]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.870]    [Pg.106]   


SEARCH



Aqueous electrolyte, interactions surfaces

Electrolyte Interaction

Electrolytes aqueous

© 2024 chempedia.info