Drinking water testing

Haloacetic acids and dalapon in drinking water Test methods for evaluating solid waste... 

A follow-up assessment with results from a drinking water test installation at Stadtwerke Biberach)... 

Where could one get information on getting their drinking water tested ... 

All the PMBs are Hsted on the U.S. EPA s Toxic Substances Control Act NonConfidential Chemical Substances Inventory (Table 8). In the early to mid-1980s, pseudocumene, mesitylene, hemimellitene, and trimethylbenzene were coveted by TSCA Section 8(a) Preliminary Assessment Information Rule (PAIR) reporting requirements (22) and by TSCA Section 8(d) for health and safety data (23). Mesitylene is the subject of a test rule subacute oral toxicity and subchtonic oral toxicity in tats were underway in 1994 (24). The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) allows monitoring for pseudocumene and mesitylene at the discretion of the State (25). Of the PMBs, only pseudocumene is subject to SARA Tide III section 313 annual release reporting (26). 

Although simple analytical tests often provide the needed information regarding a water sample, such as the formation and presence of chloroform and other organohaUdes in drinking water, require some very speciali2ed methods of analysis. The separation of trace metals into total and uncomplexed species also requires special sample handling and analysis (12). 

Sodium chlorite is not Hsted by the USEPA or any regulatory authority as a carcinogen. Studies conducted ia mice and rats did not show an increase in tumors in animals exposed to sodium chlorite in thek drinking water. Sodium chlorite has been found to have mutagenic activity in some in vitro test systems such as the Ames Salmonella reverse mutation assay without the presence of metaboHc activators. The significance of these test results in regard to human health is not clear because of the oxidizing effects of the chlorite ion (149). 

It is shown that metrological characteristics of the suggested methods are commensurable. Dissolved gas is pushed away by front of crystallization, takes the air and does not influence on the obtained results during the analysis of the water. Process is carried out at the lower temperature (-15°C), expelling chemical transformations of ingredients. The procedure was tested on different samples of natural and drinking water of the Kharkov region. 

Heavy Metals - Heavy metals represent problems in terms of groundwater pollution. The best way to identify their presence is by a lab test of the water or by contacting county health departments. There are concerns of chronic exposure to low levels of heavy metals in drinking water. 

Water sample collection techniques differ depending on the source being tested. The minimum number of water samples collected from a distribution system which are examined each month for coliforms is a function of the population. For example, the minimum number required for populations of 1,000 and 100,000 are 2 and 100, respectively. To ascertain compliance with the bacteriological requirements of drinking water standards, a certain number of positive tests must not be exceeded. When 10-ml standard portions are examined, not more than 10 percent in any month should be positive (that is, the upper limit of coliform density is an average of one per 100 ml). 

Water analysis for drinking-water supplies is concerned mainly with pollution and bacteriological tests. For industrial supplies a mineral analysis is of more interest. Table 2.11 includes a typical selection and gives some indication of the wide range that can be found. 

A British Standards draft for development has been developed which defines a test procedure to determine the potential of metals to contaminate drinking water in contravention of the requirements of the EC Directive. Although primarily meant for new materials, traditional plumbing alloys will also have to be shown to be satisfactory. 

Ataxia was not observed at 475 mg/kg/day. Adult male rats exposed to 312 mg/L trichloroethylene in their drinking water for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks of nonexposure, then 2 more weeks of exposure, showed increased performance in the Morris Swim Test and decreased brain myelination (Isaacson et al. 1990). The rats were exposed to a dose of approximately 23.3 mg/kg/day. 

There is a discrepancy between the cyanide criteria for both aquatic and drinking water standards and the current analytical technology. The criteria are stated for free cyanide (which Includes hydrocyanic acid and the cyanide ion), but the EPA approved analytical methodology for total cyanide measures the free and combined forms (11). This test probably overestimates the potential toxicity. An alternative method (cyanides amenable to chlorination) measures those cyanide complexes which are readily dissociated, but does not measure the iron cyanide complexes which dissociate in sunlight. This method probably tends to underestimate the potential toxicity. Other methods have been proposed, but similar problems exist (12). The Department of Ecology used the EPA-approved APHA procedure which includes a distillation step for the quantification of total cyanide (13,14). A modification of the procedure which omits the distillation step was used for estimation of free cyanide. Later in the study, the Company used a microdiffusion method for free cyanide (15). 

No animal or human data were available for inhalation exposure. There are no data regarding effects in humans after oral exposure. Information is available in animals regarding health effects following acute, intermediate, and chronic oral ingestion of diisopropyl methylphosphonate. The animal data obtained after oral exposure indicate that diisopropyl methylphosphonate is moderately toxic after acute bolus exposure but has a lower order of toxicity after intermediate and chronic exposures in food. No data were found on the toxicity of diisopropyl methylphosphonate after exposure in drinking water. Further, diisopropyl methylphosphonate is rapidly metabolized and excreted and does not accumulate. It does not appear to have reproductive or developmental effects. At the doses tested, it does not appear to be an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, although this issue has not been resolved yet. Limited data are available for dermal exposure in humans and animals. Diisopropyl methylphosphonate does not appear to be a... 

In the laboratory the chemical was put into water at the ordinary spray dilution of 1 to 800 and after 24 hours standing the treated water was used as drinking water for test animals. There were no reactions, evidence of poison, or undesirable effects on any animals as a result of these tests, even with long feeding periods. It was not possible to differentiate between test animals and check animals by any of the customary tests. 

A sample of hops which had been treated with tetraethyl pyrophosphate showed a negative chemical analysis. The plant material was also extracted and the extract added to the drinking water of test animals and sensitive insects. The animals and insects that drank this treated water for several days showed no reaction. With the sensitive insects it would have been possible to detect even a few parts per million. In addition, there have been extensive commercial field applications of the chemical in dust and spray form to crops such as apples, pears, grapes, celery, broccoli, Brussels sprouts, and others up to within a few days of harvest there has been no detectable poison residue on any of the crops. The lack of poison residue with use of tetraethyl pyrophosphate is due to the fact that it hydrolyzes within a few hours of application, breaking down into transient nonresidual and nonpoisonous chemicals. Thus it is possible to use tetraethyl pyrophosphate well up to harvest time of food products without danger of residual poison on crops. The fact that the chemical is used in extremely small amounts is a definite advantage in respect to freedom from poison residue. 

---