Documentation responsibility for

Documented responsibility for release of product, such as certificate of conformity, authorization to ship (including evidence that testing has been accepted with/without reservations) (see Section 8.1.5)... 

Contractor. A subcontractor (subtler contractor), specialty contractor or other entity as designated in the project documents, responsible for part of the construction process on a construction project. 

Project Constructor. The person, firm or corporation, i.e. construction manager, general contractor, project constructor or other entity, as designated in the project documents, responsible for supervising and controlling all construction work performed on the project. 

Define and document responsibilities for verifying that HOS and available hours for separate operations within company are accormted for, including part-time, intermittent, and relief drivers, and for extended day. ... 

The second aspect of quahty documentation is to detail how the work processes referred to in the manual are performed. The QA unit is often the organization responsible for issuing a set of procedures designed to assure conformance to the appropriate standards or to company poHcy. The procedures, often called standard operation procedures (SOP) or quahty operating procedures (QOP), should include such topics as customer complaints, audit protocols, stabihty testing, preparation of COAs, test method vahdation, etc. 

The ultimate responsibility for safety rests with me operating company OSHA 1910.119 is clear on this. Each company is expected to develop (and enforce) its own practices in the design, installation, testing, and maintenance of safety systems. Fortunately, some companies make these documents public. Monsanto s Safety System Design Practices was published in its entirety in the proceedings of the International Symposium and Workshop on Safe Chemical Process Automation, Houston, Texas, September 27-29, 1994 (available from... 

Review Scheduling A review scheduhng procedure should be estabhshed that documents who is responsible for initiating the review and when the review(s) should occur during the project. The scheduling needs to balance availability of process information, review technique used, and the impact of potential review action items on project costs (i.e., early enough to minimize the cost of any potential changes to the process). The aclual amount of time needed for the review should also be stated in the procedure. On the basis of the number of project reviews required and the estimated time needed for each review, the project cost estimate should include the cost for project reviews as part of the total cost for the project. 

Review Documentation The project review team leader has the ultimate responsibility for documenting the results of the project review. This responsibility may be delegated to a team scribe or secretary to record trie review minutes and issue a summary report with listed action items. The action items could address exceptions to company or industiy standards and government regulations, review team recommendations based on experience and knowledge, and further issues for study that could not be resolved during the review session. 

An action plan shoiild be developed by the appropriate personnel of the audited facility to address any deficiencies stated in the audit report. Action plans should state what is to be done, who is responsible for getting it done, and when it is to be completed. Ration e for not taking any action for any of the stated deficiencies should also be documented. The action plan is an important step in closing the audit process. 

Besides incentives, contracts are important because they define what is supposed to happen and who will be responsible for what. The HASP document should reflect site activities. Having a good understanding of... 

It is not mandatory that you have documented procedures for forming the quality policy and the quality objectives, defining the responsibility of personnel, identifying resources, or conducting management reviews. However, section 4 of the standard is titled Quality s /stem requirements and section 4.2 requires that a quality manual be prepared covering the requirements of the standard. It follows therefore that you need to address the requirements of section 4.1 in your quality manual. You have a choice of how you address the requirements providing they are documented. 

You should develop a documented procedure for the facility planning activity that will ensure the provision of adequate information on which to base plant design decisions. The procedures should provide for a separate development plan with allocation of responsibilities for the various tasks to be undertaken and should cover the layout, specification, procurement, installation, and commissioning of the new or revised plant. 

The standard requires controlled conditions to include documented procedures defining the manner of production, installation, and servicing where the absence of such instructions would adversely affect quality. The supplementary requirements also require job instructions for all employees having responsibilities for the operation of processes and for these job instructions to be accessible for use at the work station without disruption to the job. 

In which documents do you define the responsibility for the review and the authority for the disposition of nonconforming product ... 

An inventory management system should be established - meaning set up on a permanent basis to meet defined inventory policies and objectives approved by executive management. It should be documented - meaning that there should be a description of the system, how it works, the assignment of responsibilities, the codification of best practice, procedures, and instructions. The system should be planned, organized, and controlled in order that it achieves its purpose. A person should therefore be appointed with responsibility for the inventory management system and the responsibilities of those who work the system should be defined and documented. Records should be created and maintained that show how order quantities have been calculated in order that the calculations can be verified and repeated if necessary with new data. The records should also provide adequate data for continual improvement initiatives to be effective. 

Directs national efforts to meet air quality goals, particularly for smog, air toxics, carbon monoxide, lead, particulate matter (soot and dust), sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide. The office is responsible for more than half of the guidance documents, regulations, and regulatory activities required by the Clean Air Act Amendments of1990. 

The individual responsible for completing the data input forms needs formalized training in data collection procedures, with written instructions on form completion, on data handling, and on documentation procedures. Other material needed to encode raw data properly must be available. In addition, these individuals need access to a consultant within the organization to help resolve questions that may arise. 

As new compounds, very limited research has been done to evaluate the biological effects of ionic liquids. The topical effect of [EMIM]C1/A1C13 melts and [EMIMjCl on the integument of laboratory rat has been investigated. The study reports that [EMIMjCl is not in itself responsible for tissue damage. However, the chloroaluminate salt can induce tissue irritation, inflammation, and necrosis, due to the presence of aluminium chloride. However, treatments for aluminium chloride and hydrochloric acid are well documented. This study needs to be expanded to the other ionic liquids, and their toxicity need to be investigated [46]. 

Inquiries with respect to health and safety at the workplace should be directed to the local area office of the HSE or the local authority s Environmental Health Department. The name of the authority responsible for the health and safety in the organization should be displayed prominently within the premises on the poster Health and Safety Law, What You Should Know. This poster gives a brief guide to health and safety law and specific details on key points must be obtained from the relevant legislative documents. 

Much of the recent research on stress-corrosion cracking of austenitic stainless steels has been stimulated by their use in nuclear reactor coolant circuits. The occurrence of stress-corrosion cracking in boiling water reactors (BWR) has been documented by Fox . A major cause for concern was the pipe cracking that occurred in the sensitised HAZ of the Type 304 pipework, which is reported to have been responsible for about 3% of all outages of more than 100 h from the period January 1971 to June 1977. 

---