Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Desorption interactions

Manheim FX, Pauli, CK (1981) Patterns of ground water salinity changes in a deep continental-oceanic transect off the southeastern Atlantic coast of the U.S.A. J Hydrol 54 95-105 Martin P, Akber RA (1999) Radium isotopes as indicators of adsorption-desorption interactions and barite formation in groundwater. J Environ Radioact 46 271-286 McCarthy J, Shevenell L (1998) Obtaining representative ground water samples in a fractured and karstic formation. Ground Water 36 251-260... [Pg.359]

The components of the starting mixture are in rapid adsorption-desorption interaction with the surface. For example, a part of adsorbed -hexane desorbs as -hexane another part reacts to give benzene. If benzene formation involves an n-hexene surface intermediate, this hexene—the concentration of which may be eventually so small that it does not appear in the gas phase—interacts with the inactive hexene in the starting material and increases its specific radioactivity. [Pg.280]

Figure 17 shows schematically the major transformations of sulfur in aquatic systems and their related isotopic fractionations. Processes that do not significantly fractionate sulfur isotopes include (i) weathering of sulfide and sulfate minerals, (ii) adsorption-desorption interactions with organic matter, and (iii) isotopic exchange between S04 and HS or H2S in low-temperature environments. Precipitation of sulfate minerals is accompanied by only slight isotopic fractionation, and the precipitates are generally... [Pg.2606]

These adsorption isotherms are known as Henry (1801), von Szyszkowski (1908), Langmuir (1916), Frumkin (1925), Volmer (1925) or HOckel-Cassel-isotherm (Huckel 1932, Cassel 1944), respectively. The constants in these isotherms refer to kinetic models of adsorption/desorption, interactions between adsorbed molecules and/or to the minimum area of adsorbed species. [Pg.44]

In the case of NPLC, the stationary phase is polar (silica, alumina, or polar-bonded phase) and the mobile phase is nonpolar (hexane, heptane, etc.). Adsorption mechanism operates and involves adsorption of an analyte by its polar groups on the polar active sites of the stationary phase. Adsorption occurs by polar interactions and formation of hydrogen bonds. The nonpolar mobile phase cannot interact with the adsorbent-active sites and thus its adsorption practically does not occur. However, the mobile phase favors the analyte desorption interacting by dispersion forces with its nonpolar groups that are not involved in the adsorption. This is illustrated in Figure 2 for analysis of an alcohol on silica. This case will be discussed again below. Thus, analyte molecules adsorb and desorb constantly, being... [Pg.2528]

Protein adsorption has been studied with a variety of techniques such as ellipsome-try [107,108], ESCA [109], surface forces measurements [102], total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRE) [103,110], electron microscopy [111], and electrokinetic measurement of latex particles [112,113] and capillaries [114], The TIRE technique has recently been adapted to observe surface diffusion [106] and orientation [IIS] in adsorbed layers. These experiments point toward the significant influence of the protein-surface interaction on the adsorption characteristics [105,108,110]. A very important interaction is due to the hydrophobic interaction between parts of the protein and polymeric surfaces [18], although often electrostatic interactions are also influential [ 116]. Protein desorption can be affected by altering the pH [117] or by the introduction of a complexing agent [118]. [Pg.404]

If adsorption occurs via a physisorbed precursor, then the sticking probability at low coverages will be enhanced due to the ability of the precursor to diflfiise and find a lattice site [30]. The details depend on parameters such as strength of the lateral interactions between the adsorbates and the relative rates of desorption and reaction of the precursor. In figure Al.7,8 an example of a plot of S versus 0 for precursor mediated adsorption is presented. [Pg.298]

Electrons interact with solid surfaces by elastic and inelastic scattering, and these interactions are employed in electron spectroscopy. For example, electrons that elastically scatter will diffract from a single-crystal lattice. The diffraction pattern can be used as a means of stnictural detenuination, as in FEED. Electrons scatter inelastically by inducing electronic and vibrational excitations in the surface region. These losses fonu the basis of electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS). An incident electron can also knock out an iimer-shell, or core, electron from an atom in the solid that will, in turn, initiate an Auger process. Electrons can also be used to induce stimulated desorption, as described in section Al.7.5.6. [Pg.305]

There are many other experiments in which surface atoms have been purposely moved, removed or chemically modified with a scanning probe tip. For example, atoms on a surface have been induced to move via interaction with the large electric field associated with an STM tip [78]. A scaiming force microscope has been used to create three-dimensional nanostructures by pushing adsorbed particles with the tip [79]. In addition, the electrons that are tunnelling from an STM tip to the sample can be used as sources of electrons for stimulated desorption [80]. The tuimelling electrons have also been used to promote dissociation of adsorbed O2 molecules on metal or semiconductor surfaces [81, 82]. [Pg.311]

With the aid of (B1.25.4), it is possible to detennine the activation energy of desorption (usually equal to the adsorption energy) and the preexponential factor of desorption [21, 24]. Attractive or repulsive interactions between the adsorbate molecules make the desorption parameters and v dependent on coverage [22]- hr the case of TPRS one obtains infonnation on surface reactions if the latter is rate detennming for the desorption. [Pg.1863]

Other Interaction Processes. The selectivity of flotation reagents in a pulp and their functions depend on their interactions with the mineral phases to be separated, but other physicochemical and hydrodynamic processes also play roles. AH adsorption—desorption phenomena occur at the sohd—hquid interfacial region. Surface processes that influence such adsorptions include activation and depression. Activators and depressants are auxiUary reagents. [Pg.49]

FIG. 1 Schematic description of the relevant steps involved in a surface catalyzed reaction within the reactive regime. The cycle starts with the empty sites of the surface (top) and is followed by interactions between reactants and the surface (right branch). Such interaction finally leads to the reaction (bottom) and desorption of the products (left branch), a process which generates new empty sites (top). [Pg.389]

The model is intrinsically irreversible. It is assumed that both dissociation of the dimer and reaction between a pair of adjacent species of different type are instantaneous. The ZGB model basically retains the adsorption-desorption selectivity rules of the Langmuir-Hinshelwood mechanism, it has no energy parameters, and the only independent parameter is Fa. Obviously, these crude assumptions imply that, for example, diffusion of adsorbed species is neglected, desorption of the reactants is not considered, lateral interactions are ignored, adsorbate-induced reconstructions of the surface are not considered, etc. Efforts to overcome these shortcomings will be briefly discussed below. [Pg.392]

This review is structured as follows. In the next section we present the theory for adsorbates that remain in quasi-equilibrium throughout the desorption process, in which case a few macroscopic variables, namely the partial coverages 0, and their rate equations are needed. We introduce the lattice gas model and discuss results ranging from non-interacting adsorbates to systems with multiple interactions, treated essentially exactly with the transfer matrix method, in Sec. II. Examples of the accuracy possible in the modehng of experimental data using this theory, from our own work, are presented for such diverse systems as multilayers of alkali metals on metals, competitive desorption of tellurium from tungsten, and dissociative... [Pg.440]

In a recent paper [11] this approach has been generalized to deal with reactions at surfaces, notably dissociation of molecules. A lattice gas model is employed for homonuclear molecules with both atoms and molecules present on the surface, also accounting for lateral interactions between all species. In a series of model calculations equilibrium properties, such as heats of adsorption, are discussed, and the role of dissociation disequilibrium on the time evolution of an adsorbate during temperature-programmed desorption is examined. This approach is adaptable to more complicated systems, provided the individual species remain in local equilibrium, allowing of course for dissociation and reaction disequilibria. [Pg.443]

Note that if sticking is controled by site-exclusion only, i.e., if S 6,T) = 5 o(P)(l — 0), this rate is that of a first-order reaction at low coverage. This simple picture breaks down when either the sticking coefficient depends dilferently on the coverage, as it does for instance for precursor-mediated adsorption, or when lateral interactions become important. It then does not make much physical sense to talk about the order of the desorption process. [Pg.445]

With the availabihty of computers, the transfer matrix method [14] emerged as an alternative and powerful technique for the study of cooperative phenomena of adsorbates resulting from interactions [15-17]. Quantities are calculated exactly on a semi-infinite lattice. Coupled with finite-size scaling towards the infinite lattice, the technique has proved popular for the determination of phase diagrams and critical-point properties of adsorbates [18-23] and magnetic spin systems [24—26], and further references therein. Application to other aspects of adsorbates, e.g., the calculation of desorption rates and heats of adsorption, has been more recent [27-30]. Sufficient accuracy can usually be obtained for the latter without scaling and essentially exact results are possible. In the following, we summarize the elementary but important aspects of the method to emphasize the ease of application. Further details can be found in the above references. [Pg.446]

As an example of a multilayer system we reproduce, in Fig. 3, experimental TPD spectra of Cs/Ru(0001) [34,35] and theoretical spectra [36] calculated from Eq. (4) with 6, T) calculated by the transfer matrix method with M = 6 on a hexagonal lattice. In the lattice gas Hamiltonian we have short-ranged repulsions in the first layer to reproduce the (V X a/3) and p 2 x 2) structures in addition to a long-ranged mean field repulsion. Second and third layers have attractive interactions to account for condensation in layer-by-layer growth. The calculations not only successfully account for the gross features of the TPD spectra but also explain a subtle feature of delayed desorption between third and second layers. As well, the lattice gas parameters obtained by this fit reproduce the bulk sublimation energy of cesium in the third layer. [Pg.453]

It is evident from these results that the interactive properties of the investigated SEC PS/DVB or DVB gels are very different. Because polar electroneutral macromolecules of PMMA were more retained from a nonpolar solvent (toluene) than from polar ones (THF, chloroform), we conclude that the dipol-dipol interactions were operative. Columns No. 1 and No. 2 were very interactive and can be applied successfully to LC techniques that combine exclusion and interaction (adsorption) mechanisms. These emerging techniques are LC at the critical adsorption point (18), the already mentioned LC under limiting conditions of adsorption (15,18), and LC under limiting conditions of desorption (16). In these cases, the adsorptivity of the SEC columns may even be advantageous. In most conventional SEC applications, however, the interactive properties of columns may cause important problems. In any case, interactive properties of SEC columns should be considered when applying the universal calibration, especially for medium polar and polar polymers. It is therefore advisable to check the elution properties of SEC columns before use with the... [Pg.455]


See other pages where Desorption interactions is mentioned: [Pg.158]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.2609]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.474]    [Pg.681]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.2529]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.2609]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.474]    [Pg.681]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.2529]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.602]    [Pg.701]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.529]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.2063]    [Pg.2063]    [Pg.2063]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.444]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.165]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.85 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info