Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Phase Interactions

Poiar stationary phases which have a polar moment. These phases interact with the dipoiar moments of poiar components themselves and those components capable of induced polarization such as aromatics. [Pg.21]

Droplet Dispersion. The primary feature of the dispersed flow regime is that the spray contains generally spherical droplets. In most practical sprays, the volume fraction of the Hquid droplets in the dispersed region is relatively small compared with the continuous gas phase. Depending on the gas-phase conditions, Hquid droplets can encounter acceleration, deceleration, coUision, coalescence, evaporation, and secondary breakup during thein evolution. Through droplet and gas-phase interaction, turbulence plays a significant role in the redistribution of droplets and spray characteristics. [Pg.330]

Since activity coefficients have a strong dependence on composition, the effect of the solvent on the activity coefficients is generally more pronounced. However, the magnitude and direc tion of change is highly dependent on the solvent concentration, as well as the liquid-phase interactions between the key components and the solvent. The solvent acts to lessen the nonideahties of the key component whose liquid-phase behavior is similar to the solvent, while enhancing the nonideal behavior of the dissimilar key. [Pg.1314]

One of the hsted assumptions for Ottengraf s kinetic model was that no gas-phase interactions occur between different chemical species (the ideal-gas assumption). Under ac tual operating conditions, gas-phase interactions can either have a negative or positive impact on biofilter operation. These interactions include ... [Pg.2193]

The sequence just outlined provides a salutary lesson in the nature of explanation in materials science. At first the process was a pure mystery. Then the relationship to the shape of the solid-solubility curve was uncovered that was a partial explanation. Next it was found that the microstructural process that leads to age-hardening involves a succession of intermediate phases, none of them in equilibrium (a very common situation in materials science as we now know). An understanding of how these intermediate phases interact with dislocations was a further stage in explanation. Then came an nnderstanding of the shape of the GP zones (planar in some alloys, globniar in others). Next, the kinetics of the hardening needed to be... [Pg.90]

Curves relating the corrected retention volume to the concentration of moderator (methanol) in the mobile phase [3] are shown in Figure 4. In pure water, the hydrocarbon chains of the brush phase interact with each other and collapse onto the surface in much the same way as drops of an hydrocarbon will coalesce on the... [Pg.92]

In contrast, the alkane chains on the polymeric phase cannot collapse in an environment of water as they are rigidly held in the polymer matrix. Thus, the retention of the solute now continuously falls as the methanol concentration increases as shown in Figure 4. It should be pointed out that if the nature of the solutestationary phase interactions on the surface of a bonded phase is to be examined in a systematic manner with solvents having very high water contents, then a polymeric phase should be used and brush type reversed phases avoided if possible. [Pg.93]

The second type of interaction, displacement interaction, is depicted in Figure 10. This type of interaction occurs when a strongly polar solute, such as an alcohol, can interact directly with the strongly polar silanol group and displaces the adsorbed solvent layer. Depending on the strength of the interaction between the solute molecules and the silica gel, it may displace the more weakly adsorbed solvent and interact directly with the silica gel but interact with the other solvent layer by sorption. Alternatively, if solute-stationary phase interactions are sufficiently strong, then the solute may displace both solvents and interact directly with the stationary phase surface. [Pg.100]

Scott and Kucera [4] carried out some experiments that were designed to confirm that the two types of solute/stationary phase interaction, sorption and displacement, did, in fact, occur in chromatographic systems. They dispersed about 10 g of silica gel in a solvent mixture made up of 0.35 %w/v of ethyl acetate in n-heptane. It is seen from the adsorption isotherms shown in Figure 8 that at an ethyl acetate concentration of 0.35%w/v more than 95% of the first layer of ethyl acetate has been formed on the silica gel. In addition, at this solvent composition, very little of the second layer was formed. Consequently, this concentration was chosen to ensure that if significant amounts of ethyl acetate were displaced by the solute, it would be derived from the first layer on the silica and not the less strongly held second layer. [Pg.102]

The theoretical treatment given above assumes that the presence of a relatively low concentration of solute in the mobile phase does not influence the retentive characteristics of the stationary phase. That is, the presence of a small concentration of solute does not influence either the nature or the magnitude of the solute/phase interactions that determine the extent of retention. The concentration of solute in the eluted peak does not fall to zero until the sample volume is in excess of 100 plate volumes and, at this sample volume, the peak width has become about five times the standard deviation of the normally loaded peak. [Pg.199]

The theoretical treatment of temperature perturbations that result from solute phase interactions also affords an excellent example of the use of the plate concept in a... [Pg.209]

On the other hand, if the stationary phase consists of bonded silica containing hydrocarbon chains, then the stationary phase interactions with the solute would be... [Pg.443]

For the GPC separation mechanism to strictly apply, there must be no adsorption of the polymer onto the stationary phase. Such adsorption would delay elution of the polymer, thereby resulting in the calculation of too low a molecular weight for the polymer. The considerable variety of undesirable interactions between polymers and column stationary phases has been well reviewed for GPC by Barth (1) and this useful reference is recommended to the reader. Thus, the primary requirement for ideal GPC is that the solvent-polymer interaction be strongly thermodynamically favored over the polymerstationary phase interaction. [Pg.541]

With comprehensive GC, we can now choose a rational set of columns that should be able to tune the separation. If we accept that each column has an approximate isovolatility property at the time when solutes are transferred from one column to the other, then separation on the second column will largely arise due to the selective phase interactions. We need only then select a second column that is able to resolve the compound classes of interest, such as a phase that separates aromatic from aliphatic compounds. If it can also separate normal and isoalkanes from cyclic alkanes, then we should be able to achieve second-dimension resolution of all major classes of compounds in petroleum samples. A useful column set is a low polarity 5 % phenyl polysiloxane first column, coupled to a higher phenyl-substituted polysiloxane, such as a 50 % phenyl-type phase. The latter column has the ability to selectively retain aromatic components. [Pg.96]

However, in LC solutes are partitioned according to a more complicated balance among various attractive forces solutes interact with both mobile-phase molecules and stationary-phase molecules (or stationary-phase pendant groups), the stationary-phase interacts with mobile-phase molecules, parts of the stationary phase may interact with each other, and mobile-phase molecules interact with each other. Cavity formation in the mobile phase, overcoming the attractive forces of the mobile-phase molecules for each other, is an important consideration in LC but not in GC. Therefore, even though LC and GC share a considerable amount of basic theory, the mechanisms are very different on a molecular level. This translates into conditions that are very different on a practical level so different, in fact, that separate instruments are required in modern practice. [Pg.151]

Figure 7.3 The positions occupied by LC and GC in a generic Type I phase diagram representing the mobile phase. Note that the GC mobile phase is shown as being composed of 100% component a, but this makes no difference chemically because there are no solute-mobile-phase interactions in GC. Reproduced by permission of the American Chemical Society. Figure 7.3 The positions occupied by LC and GC in a generic Type I phase diagram representing the mobile phase. Note that the GC mobile phase is shown as being composed of 100% component a, but this makes no difference chemically because there are no solute-mobile-phase interactions in GC. Reproduced by permission of the American Chemical Society.
The first attempts employing two Cjg columns showed that the selectivity was not high enough, although this improved when the first column was substituted by a 5 p.m GFF n internal surface rcversed-phase material. This is known as a restricted-access-material (RAM) column which, since it restricts some compounds because of their size and includes rcversed-phase interaction and ionic exchange, is very useful for analysing herbicides in samples with high contents of humic and fulvic acids (54). [Pg.353]

The second kind of interaction takes place between solids and as a pure solid phase interaction, does not release any C02. [Pg.37]

The fluorine concentration in hydrofluorides of tantalum and niobium is an extremely important issue. Fluorine that separates into the gaseous phase interacts with the construction elements of the furnaces, leading to additional contamination of the final product by silicon, aluminum, etc. Thus, it is recommended to perform diying in crucibles made of Teflon or polypropylene with appropriate temperature limitations. Use of crucibles made of carbon-glass ensures high quality and a broad working temperature range, at least up to 300-350°C. [Pg.301]

Sodium reduction development directions, 336 diluted melts, 331-332 of K-Salt, 327-328 principals, 326 Solid-phase interaction mechanism, 34-37 niobium oxyfluorides, 26-31 tantalum oxyfluorides, 32-34 Solubility diagrams (NH4)5Nb3OF18, 22 K2NbF7 in HF solutions, 14 K2TaF7 in HF solutions, 14 RbsNbjOF,, 22-23 Solubility of peroxides, 307 Specific conductivity, 153, 164 Spontaneous polarization, 223 Structural characteristics for X Me=8, 61,... [Pg.388]

If a DB-1 or DB-5 capillary column does not separate the components, make use of the sample functionality stationary phase interactions presented by McReynolds3 (Table A.l). [Pg.173]

Solute retention, and consequently chromatographic resolution, is determined by the magnitude of the distribution coefficients of the solutes with respect to the stationary phase and relative to each other. As already suggested, the magnitude of the distribution coefficient is, in turn, controlled by molecular forces between the solutes and the two phases. The procedure by which the analyst can manipulate the solute/phase interactions to effect the desired resolution will also be discussed in chapter 2. [Pg.7]

The most popular bonded phases are, without doubt, the reverse phases which consist solely of aliphatic hydrocarbon chains bonded to the silica. Reverse phases interact dispersively with solvent and solute molecules and, as a consequence, are employed with very polar solvents or aqueous solvent mixtures such as methanol/water and acetonitrile/water mixtures. The most commonly used reverse phase appears to be the brush type phase with aliphatic chains having four, eight or eighteen carbon atom chains attached. These types of reverse phase have been termed C4, C8 and Cl8 phases respectively. The C8... [Pg.76]

According to frontier molecular orbital theory (FMO), the reactivity, regio-chemistry and stereochemistry of the Diels-Alder reaction are controlled by the suprafacial in phase interaction of the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) of one component and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of the other. [17e, 41-43, 64] These orbitals are the closest in energy Scheme 1.14 illustrates the two dominant orbital interactions of a symmetry-allowed Diels-Alder cycloaddition. [Pg.22]

Unlike the chemistry of simple mixtures of small numbers of reactants as observed in the laboratory, the chemistry of the atmosphere involves complex interactions of large numbers of species. However, several key aspects of these interactions have been identified that account for major observable properties of the atmospheric chemical system. It is convenient to separate the description into gas phase and condensed phase interactions, not the least because different chemical and physical processes are involved in these two cases. [Pg.150]

Condensed phase interactions can be divided roughly into two further categories chemical and physical. The latter involves all purely physical processes such as condensation of species of low volatility onto the surfaces of aerosol particles, adsorption, and absorption into liquid cloud and rainwater. Here, the interactions may be quite complex. For example, cloud droplets require a CCN, which in many instances is a particle of sulfate produced from SO2 and gas-particle conversion. If this particle is strongly acidic (as is often the case) HNO3 will not deposit on the aerosol particle rather, it will be dissolved in liquid water in clouds and rain. Thus, even though HNO3 is not very soluble in... [Pg.150]

The carbonyl n orbital is also assumed to be unsymmetrized arising from the out-of-phase interaction of the orbital attached to the more electron-donating aryl group (9 and 10). These unsymmetrizations of the carbonyl k orbital correspond well to syn addition (9) and anti addition (10), respectively. Thus, the electron-donation of the p-a orbitals controls the facial selectivities. The cyclopentane system was more sensitive to stereoelectronic effects, showing larger induced biases, than the adamantanone system [63]. [Pg.135]


See other pages where Phase Interactions is mentioned: [Pg.578]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.2002]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.541]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.471]    [Pg.473]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.150]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.3 , Pg.7 , Pg.9 ]




SEARCH



Analyte interactions, with the stationary phase

Bonded stationary phases silanophilic interaction

Chiral mobile-phases interactions with

Condensation condensed phase interactions

Condensed Phase Interactions

Condensed phases system-bath interactions

Conducting phases, interactions between

Dense-phase fluidized beds particle interaction

Development of experimental methods for determining the phase separation region, critical point, spinodal and interaction parameter

Diblock copolymers interfacial interaction between blend phases

Electrostatic interactions - Organic mobile phases

Flory-Huggins interaction parameter phase diagrams

Four phase interactions

Gas-phase interactions

Hydrodynamic interacting phase

Hydrophobic interaction chromatography mobile phase

Hydrophobic interaction chromatography mobile phase effects

Hydrophobic interaction chromatography stationary phase

Hydrophobic interactions - Aqueous mobile phases

In-phase interactions

Interaction between phases, multiple

Interaction between phases, multiple emulsions

Interaction mechanisms pharmacokinetic phase

Interactions and Phase Transitions

Interactions in the liquid phase

Interactions phase separation

Intermolecular interactions polymer blend phase separation

Laves phase compounds interaction

Lipid-water interaction and liquid-crystalline phases

Liquid phase interaction term

Metal interaction chromatography mobile phase

Metal interaction chromatography stationary phase

Mineral processing three phase interactions

Mixed phases, interaction

Mobile phase interaction probability

Mobile phase, interactions

Models of Diffusive Two-Phase Interaction

Molecular Interactions Determining the Partitioning of Organic Compounds Between Different Phases

Molecular interactions, phase transitions

Morphology and Phase Interactions

Organic phases molecular interaction

Out-of-phase interactions

Phase solubility analysis, interacting

Phase solubility analysis, interacting components

Phase transition electrostatic interactions

Polar interactions, phase transitions

Polymer-solvent interaction parameter phase equilibria

Reversed phase and hydrophobic interaction chromatography

Reversed-phase chromatography hydrophobic interaction

Size-exclusion chromatography stationary phase interactions

Solid phase extraction interactions

Solid-phase interaction

Solid-phase interaction mechanism

Solid-phase interaction parameter

Solid-phase interaction parameter model

Solid-phase interaction parameter parameters

Solid-phase reactant interactions

Solute interaction with stationary phase

Solute-stationary phase interactions

Stationary phase analyte interaction with

Stationary phase hydrophobic interactions with

Stationary phase surface solute interaction with

Studies of intermolecular interactions in the gas phase

Substrate interactions, polymer blend phase separation

Synthesis solid phase interaction

The Interaction between Mobile and Stationary Phase

Three phase interactions, mineral

Three-dimensional model phases molecular interaction

Transition metal interaction with second phases

Types of Analyte Interactions with the Stationary Phase

Weak Attractive Interactions and Equilibrium Phase Transitions

© 2024 chempedia.info