Deposition samplers

Drift deposition samplers consisted of 15 cm diameter petri dishes holding a pre-cleaned film of teflon FEP. Three deposition samplers were placed at each field sampling location in order to receive impinging spray components and any subsequent fallout from our spray operation. The deposition samplers were located at 50, 150, 300 and 500m radians (N, NE, E, SE, S, SW, W, NW) from the orchard. Previous work by Currier a ( ) had shown that... 

From a measurement point of view, there are difficulties in approaching the physically correct removal processes. Dry deposition strongly depends on the surface characteristics correct estimation is only possible by flux measurements (eddy correlation and gradient methods). Any so-called deposition sampler can be installed with a wet-only/dry-only cover-plate to avoid bulk sampling, but it is never possible to avoid the collection of sedimentation dust in dry-only samplers or dry deposition or sedimentation by wet-only samplers. However, with enough accuracy all other deposition processes contribute negligibly to the deposition flux under wet-only and dry-only conditions, respectively. 

For a plasma temperature of 8000 K and N(,= lO Vml, A, is about 0.0006 mm, which is very much smaller than the 1-mm sampler orifice, so ions can pass through easily. Hot gases from the plasma impinge on the edges of the sampler orifice so deposits build up and then reduce its diameter with time. The surrounds of the sampler orifice suffer also from corrosive effects due to bombardment by hot species from the plasma flame. These problems necessitate replacement of the sampler from time to time. 

A nonproportional sampler is suitable for near-constant flow conditions. The sample is simply drawn from the waste stream at a constant flow rate. Sampling lines should be as short as possible and free from sharp bends, which can lead to particle deposition. Proportional samplers are designed to collect either definite volumes at irregular time intervals or variable volumes at equal time intervals. Both types depend on flow rate. Examples of some of these are the vacuum and chain-driven wastewater samplers. Other types, which have cups mounted on motor driven wheels, vacuum suction samplers, and peristaltic pump samplers, are also available (26,27). 

Canada, and Mexico (23). The National Atmospheric Deposition Program has established the nationwide sampling network of —100 stations in the United States. The sampler is shown in Fig. 14-9 with a wet collection container. The wet collection bucket is covered with a lid when it is not raining. A sensor for rain moves the lid to open the wet collector bucket and cover the dry bucket at the beginning of a rainstorm. This process is reversed when the rain stops. 

Check pump status every two hours. More frequent checks may be necessary with heavy filter loading. Ensure that the sampler is still assembled properly and that the hose has not become pinched or detached from the cassette or the pump. For filters, observe for symmetrical deposition, fingerprints, or large particles, etc. Record the flow rate, if possible. 

A beta attenuation sampler uses a 30-mCi Krypton-85 source (with energy of 0.74 MeV) and detector to determinate the attenuation caused by deposited aerosols on a moving filter. lb improve the stability over time, a refiertticc reading is period-icallv made of a foil with attenuation similar to that of the Alter and collected aerosol. 

The previous section described active samplers where the air is swept of particles using mechanical mechanisms. This section describes passive samplers that do not move, but collect material that deposits by impaction or sedimentation deposition. These types of collector are the most common type for field studies aimed at assessing exposure of aquatic and terrestrial organisms to pesticides. 

Other paper collectors that have been used to assess droplet size and distribution patterns include cards such as Kromekote. This was one of several types of collector that provided information on spray deposition in the held, a-Cellulose samplers are fibrous in nature, and include a vertical component to their aspect. This type of collector, along with Mylar cards and other types of card samplers, are often used to provide information on spray coverage as amount of material per unit surface area. 

The fine particle airstream from the cyclone was sampled by two total filters in parallel. A Millipore Fluoropore 47 mm diameter Teflon filter with a 1 pm pore size was used for the first seven samples. Subsequent samples were obtained with a 0.4 pm pore size 47 mm Nuclepore polycarbonate filter because particle absorption measurements and elemental analysis by particle induced X-ray emission (PIXE) were easier and more accurate using the Nuclepore filters. In parallel with the Nuclepore filter, a TWOMASS tape sampler collected aerosol using a Pallflex Tissuequartz tape. The aerosol deposit area was 9.62 cm on the Nuclepore and Millipore filters and 0.317 cm on the Tissuequartz tape. The flow rate was 16-20 1pm through the Nuclepore and Millipore filters and 10 1pm through the Tissuequartz tape. Each Millipore or Nuclepore filter was placed in a labeled plastic container immediately after collected, sealed with Parafilm, enclosed in a ziplock bag, and placed in a refrigerator in the trailer. The tape in the TWOMASS sampler was advanced between samples. The tape sample was removed about once every 8-10 weeks and stored similarly to the Nuclepore filters. The TWOMASS was cleaned at that time. All samples were stored in an ice chest during the return trip to Caltech. Field blanks were handled identically to the samples. Of approximately 100 filter samples collected in 1979, 61 were selected for analysis. The 61 were chosen to span the variation in bjp and to obtain representative seasonal and diurnal samples. Sample times varied from 6 to 72 hours, with an average of 20.1 hours. 

Nearly 23 years of hourly observations on particulate matter concentrations have been collected at downtown Los Angeles and at six other sites in the Los Angeles area using a tape sampler calibrated to read in Km units. The design of these samplers is as described by Hall (20). Ambient air is drawn through a one square-inch (5.07 cm ) area of filter paper at a rate of 25 ft per hour (11.8 1pm) for 51.5 min of each hour. The darkness of the spot developed on the filter is measured by the ratio of the intensity of the reflected light from clean white filter paper, R, to reflected light from the aerosol deposit, R. As used by tfie air pollution control district, the Km unit is related to reflectance by the formula (21). 

For this reason, particulate samplers designed for particulate removal have to generate the maximum possible particulate mass. Modern examples include impactors based on the high-volume sampler (Hi-Vols), the MOUDI (17) of the University of Minnesota, and the BLPI (16). The Hi-Vols, in particular, collect 330 m3 of air in 4 h, giving 1100 xg of deposit for three size cuts below a particle diameter of 2.5 xm. Table I shows some key parameters for a few widely used ambient air impactors for multiple size cuts. 

One of the first reported couplings of GC-ICP-MS was by Van Loon et al. [115], who used a coupled system for the speciation of organotin compounds. A Perkin-Elmer Sciex Elan quadrupole mass filter instrument was used as the detector with 1250 or 1500 W forward power. The GC system comprised a Chromasorb column with 8 ml min 1 Ar/2 ml min-1 02 carrier gas flow with an oven temperature of 250°C. The interface comprised a stainless-steel transfer line (0.8 m long) which connected from the GC column to the base of the ICP torch. The transfer line was heated to 250°C. Oxygen gas was injected at the midpoint of the transfer line to prevent carbon deposits in the ICP torch and on the sampler cone. Carbon deposits were found to contain tin and thus proved detrimental to analytical recoveries. Detection limits were in the range 6-16 ng Sn compared to 0.1 ng obtained by ETAAS, but the authors identified areas for future improvements in detection limits and scope of the coupled system. 

Temperature fluctuation during the sampling period may be a more serious concern than pressure drop (Umlauf, 1999). The liquid-phase vapor pressure of POPs increases by about three-fold for a 10°C rise in temperature (Falconer and Bidleman, 1994 Hinckley et al., 1990). During a normal 24-hour collection run, particle-sorbed species which are deposited on the filter of a hi-vol sampler at night may be revolatilized in the heat of the next day. In some studies, collection periods have been kept to 11-12 hours to avoid the diurnal temperature cycle (Cotham and Bidleman, 1995 Foreman and Bidleman, 1990 Harner and Bidleman, 1998a). 

Garland (1979, 1982, 1983) used the wind tunnel shown in Fig. 6.13 to measure resuspension of radioactive particles from grassland at Harwell. The fan and motor were mounted on a turntable, and the working section could be positioned as required. Radioactive particles were deposited on a strip of grass about 10 m long, and air was then drawn over it in the tunnel. Samplers measured the amount of resuspended activity in the air downwind of the strip. The horizontal flux of activity was deduced and expressed as the rate constant A of resuspension. 

The deposit of active chemical, the drift losses and drop size range can be found and would be functions of the spray formulations and application equipment which are under test In a given weather and application terrain. In order to compare different test run data, the results may be plotted as a series of 2nd degree polynomial regression curves (6). Actual chemical analysis of the released spray caught on the samplers provides the most accurate measure of deposit and airborne losses, but calculation of these functions from the drop sizes found can also be done. A total deposit recovery as a % of the amount released can be determined. 

The data sets reviewed, document our knowledge on the deposition of aerial sprays released over coniferous forests. Conifers are relatively efficient collectors of spray drops as more drops are consistently observed on the ground in open areas than beneath trees. Spray which penetrates the upper canopy, and is unaccounted for on samplers in the lower canopy, probably was filtered out by foliage. More deposits are observed in the upper crown than in the lower crown. Data are lacking, however, on the fate of drops which do not penetrate the canopy. There is a potential for these drops to penetrate the canopy downwind or to drift off target. 

FIGURE 3.3 Examples of passive samplers affected by deposition of suspended particulate matter and biofouling (a) silicone strip sampler, (b) nonpolar version of the Chemcatcher, (c) MESCO sampler fitted with a cellulose membrane, and (d) MESCO sampler fitted with polyethylene membrane (front) and SPMD (back). 

---