Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Contaminant Adsorption

Contaminant adsorption includes retention on the porous medium solid phase, as a result of cation exchange processes, and surface retention of neutral molecules, due to van der Waals forces. [Pg.179]

Competitive adsorption between the organo-cationic herbicides diquat and paraquat and salts or a monovalent organic compound also was considered by Kookana and Aylmore (1993). An increase in the salt concentration of the soil solution from 0.005 to 0.05 M CaCl2 resulted in decreases in sorption capacities for the studied herbicides. [Pg.181]

The effect of NaCl concentration on the rate of paraquat adsorption on activated clays is reported by Tsai et al. (2003). The rate constant increases with an increase of salts in the aqueous paraquat solution from 0.046 (g mg min at a NaCl concentration of 0.05 M, to 0.059 (g mg min at a solution concentration of 2.50 M NaCl. Studying the effect of various alkali metals ions on paraquat adsorption [Pg.181]

Clay Resident inorganic cation CEC (pEq g- ) Organic adsorption (pEq g- ) Diquat Paraquat Enthalpy change AT/ (KJ moE ) Diquat Paraquat  [Pg.182]

Competitive adsorption on sepiolite clay of a monovalent dye (e.g., methyl green or methyl blue) and of the divalent organo-cationic herbicides diquat and paraquat was studied by Rytwo et al. (2002). To evaluate a possible competitive adsorption between the two organic compounds, separate aqueous solutions of each cation were used and adsorption isotherms were obtained. Fig. 8.27 shows the amount of diquat, paraquat, and methyl green adsorbed on sepiolite as a function of total added divalent cation. It may be observed that, when the added amounts were lower than the cation exchange capacity of the sepiolite (O.Mmol kg ), aU cations were completely adsorbed. [Pg.182]


AC works by attracting and holding certain chemicals as water passes through it. AC is a highly porous material therefore, it has an extremely high surface area for contaminant adsorption. The equivalent surface area of 1 pound of AC ranges from 60 to 150 acres. AC is made of tiny clusters... [Pg.409]

We can correlate our experimental conversions and rates with the extent of (dark) contaminant adsorption (O), and the literature homogeneous second order rate constants for OH and Cl radicals, and the product of the rate constant times coverage. [Pg.442]

Chapter 5 discusses contaminant adsorption on geosorbents and includes a short description of the surface properties of adsorbents and the methodology for quantifying adsorption. The chapter continues with a presentation of adsorption of various types of toxic chemicals on the subsurface solid phase. In addition to physicochemical adsorption, contaminants can be retained in the subsurface by precipitation, deposition, and trapping. These topics, as well as hysteresis phenomena and formation of bound residues, are discussed. [Pg.92]

Contaminants may be adsorbed on the solid phase or on suspended particles in the liquid phase. Environmental factors, such as temperature, pH, and water content in the subsurface prior to contamination, also affect the nature of contaminant adsorption. Other physical processes of retention include precipitation, deposition, and trapping. Under natural conditions, pollutants often consist of more than a single contaminant, comprising a mixture of organic and inorganic toxic compounds. Each of these compounds can react differently with the existing minerals and chemicals in the subsurface. [Pg.93]

Quantifying adsorption of contaminants from gaseous or liquid phases onto the solid phase should be considered valid only when an equilibrium state has been achieved, under controlled environmental conditions. Determination of contaminant adsorption on surfaces, that is, interpretation of adsorption isotherms and the resulting coefficients, help in quantifying and predicting the extent of adsorption. The accuracy of the measurements is important in relation to the heterogeneity of geosorbents in a particular site. The spatial variability of the solid phase is not confined only to field conditions variability is present at all scales, and its effects are apparent even in well-controlled laboratory-scale experiments. [Pg.95]

The main limitation of the Freundhch equation is that it does not predict a maximum adsorption capacity, because linear adsorption generally occurs at very low solute concentration and low loading of the sorbent. However, in spite of this limitation, the Freundlich equation is used widely for describing contaminant adsorption on geosorbents. [Pg.100]

Understanding the kinetics of contaminant adsorption on the subsurface solid phase requires knowledge of both the differential rate law, explaining the reaction system, and the apparent rate law, which includes both chemical kinetics and transport-controlled processes. By studying the rates of chemical processes in the subsurface, we can predict the time necessary to reach equilibrium or quasi-state equilibrium and understand the reaction mechanism. The interested reader can find detailed explanations of subsurface kinetic processes in Sparks (1989) and Pignatello (1989). [Pg.102]

Independent of the molecular properties of contaminants, the subsurface solid phase constituents are a major factor that control the adsorption process. Both the mineral and organic components of the solid phases interact differentially with ionic and nonionic pollutants, and in all cases, environmental factors, such as temperature, subsurface water content, and chemistry, affect the mechanism, extent, and rate of contaminant adsorption. [Pg.112]

Vinten et al. (1983) demonstrated that the vertical retention of contaminated suspended particles in soils is controlled by the soil porosity and the pore size distribution. Figure 5.8 illustrates the fate of a colloidal suspension in contaminated water during transport through soil. Three distinct steps in which contaminant mass transfer may occur can be defined (1) contaminant adsorption on the porous matrix as the contaminant suspension passes through subsurface zones, (2) contaminant desorption from suspended solid phases, and (3) deposition of contaminated particles as the suspension passes through the soil. [Pg.118]

C Is XPS spectra for the treated surfaces are not well resolved. From the deconvoluted spectra, the decreases in the main contamination peak at 284.8 eV, and the other two peaks at 1.7 and 4.0 eV higher binding energy (BE) can be followed. The intensities of these peaks are notably much lower in the oxide samples as compared with those of Y58 wafers, consistent with the lower density of surface silanols or contamination adsorption sites between the two surfaces. After vapor-phase HMDS treatment, the contribution of these peaks is greatly reduced and a new main C Is peak centered at 284.6 eV appears, as for the Y58 samples, which is assigned to the —CH3 group, due to the HMDS stabilization reaction. [Pg.455]

As stated previously, another distinction usually made is between slurry and supported catalyst reactors. In slurry photocatalytic reactors the catalyst is present in the form of small particles suspended in the water being treated. These reactors generally tend to be more efficient than supported catalyst reactors, because the semiconductor particles provide a larger contact surface area per unit mass. In fact, the state of the photocatalyst is important both to increase contaminant adsorption and to improve the distribution of absorbed radiation. In a slurry unit the photocatalyst has a better contact with the dissolved molecules and is allowed to absorb radiation in a more homogeneous manner over the reaction volume. Using suspended catalyst has been the usual practice in PTC, CPC, and other types of tubular reactors. The drawback of this reactor design is the requirement for separation and recovery of the very small particles at the end of the water treatment process. This may eventually complicate and slow down the water throughput. [Pg.191]

The rate of contaminant adsorption onto activated carixm particles is controlled by two parallel diffusion mechanisms of pore and surface diffusion, which operate in different manners and extents depending upon adsorption temperature and adsorbate concentration. The present study showed that two mechanisms are separated successfully using a stepwise linearization technique incorporated with adsorption diffusion model. Surface and pore diffiisivities were obtained based on kinetic data in two types of adsorbers and isothermal data attained from batch bottle technique. Furthermore, intraparticle diffiisivities onto activated carbon particles were estimated by traditional breakthrough curve method and final results were compared with those obtained by more rigorous stepwise linearization technique. [Pg.249]

Contamination Adsorption layer Reaction layer (Cold) deformed layer... [Pg.69]

Films and substrates are held together by very short range forces, the bonds between one atom and the next. The mechanical properties of the films, including their intrinsic stress, are ultimately determined by these same bonds and their interaction with the microstructure. Their behaviour at surfaces can be greatly modified by minute quantities of impurity and they can be blocked completely by one molecular layer of contaminant. Adsorption is a particularly important process in thin films which must also be understood on an atomic scale. [Pg.561]

Besides, the possibility of soil contamination by surfactants is investigated, as well as methods to locate and eliminate these contaminations. Adsorption of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS) on soils has been studied in [319]. At low LAS concentrations (< 90 pg/ml), the adsorption isotherm was linear in nature, and when exceeding this concentration, the LAS adsorption on soil had an exponential nature, and in all cases, the adsorption capacity depends substantially on the content of clay. Under real conditions, at low surfactant concentrations, the adsorption capacity of soil is rather low and leads to an ecological contamination of soil. [Pg.598]

In reality of course, contaminant adsorption is unlikely to be instantaneous and assumption that sorptive equilibrium is reached is likely to be flawed. The extent of departure of the actual kinetic behavior from that predicted by equation 2 will be dependent, at least in part, upon the relative rates of adsorption and... [Pg.379]

The increase in adhesive interaction with increasing contact time between particles and surface in air, by analogy with this sort of process in a liquid medium, is termed aging [89]. There may be several causes of aging an increase in contact area between particle and surface as a result of deformation or as a result of the influence of various contaminants adsorption processes and capillary condensation may take place in the contact zone, so that capillary forces are created. [Pg.121]

Different isotherms are used to represent adsorption under different conditions (Fetter, 1999). One that is commonly used to represent non-polar organic contaminant adsorption to soil is the Freundlich isotherm (Semer and Reddy, 1997). The isotherm may be represented as ... [Pg.303]

Caution should be used, however, when inducing subsurface turbulence. While this turbulence allows for desirable effects, too much movement may force unwanted migration into areas previously free of contamination. Additionally, some mechanisms, especially adsorption/desorption, are reversible, and thus advection/dispersion can act to trap contaminant in dead-end pores as well as force additional contaminant adsorption. Therefore, subsurface air flow should be carefully monitored to help minimize any negative effeets of advection / dispersion. [Pg.306]

Measurement of differential capacitance. Differential capacitances vary with potential, but they can be measured provided the amplitude of the applied a.c. potential E used for measurements does not exceed a few milivolts ([1], p. 29). Differential capacitances are independent of E provided E is small enough. The measurements of the differential capacitance can be erroneous because of contamination by traces of strongly adsorbed organic impurities in the electrolyte. Gra-hame introduced the systematic use of the dropping mercury electrode and was able, in this way, to considerably minimize electrode contamination. Adsorption of impurity traces is generally a slow process because of diffusion control, and frequent renewal of the mercury drop provides a clean surface [21-24]. [Pg.293]

When contaminant presents in the fuel cell, its concentration at the catalyst layer varies with both the inlet contaminant concentration and the current density, as discussed in Shi et al. [18]. Furthermore, the contaminant adsorption (desorption) rate constant is also related to the electrode potential. This variation of the contaminant concentration can be obtained by introducing the CGDL and cathode flow field into the model, which definitely increases its complexity. For simplicity here, we considered the product of the contaminant adsorption (desorption) rate constant and the contaminant concentration at the CCL, as a fimction of current density and contaminant inlet concentration (kCp-- f Cpr J))/ where Cp is the contaminant inlet concentration in the cathode charmel. Based on the experimental data at current densities of 0.2, 0.5, 0.75, and 1 A/cnP, and contaminant inlet concentrations of... [Pg.194]

Be aware of the flow needs of the gas generator(s) that you will be using. With air generators there is an almost 1-1 ratio of incoming gas flow to product gas there is almost no flow loss. However, with nitrogen generators this is not the case. Most of these units, independent of the purification approach (semiper-meable membrane or contaminant adsorption) require large quantities of input air to produce the desired output flow. [Pg.503]

Contaminant adsorption (competitive in mixtures with preferential adsorption of the largest-affinity contaminant), contaminant decomposi-tion/electrochemical reaction intermediates production, O reduction reaction pathway modification (atop Oj adsorption favored rather than bridged Oj, electric double layer structure change induced by cation insertion in iono-mer, Pt oxide modification including kinetics, changes in proton activity) or contaminant deposition reduces the catalyst area, increases the reduction reaction overpotential, decreases faradaic efficiency, and increases product selectivity (increased HjO contaminant production) Pt particle dissolirtion acceleration by adsorbed S on Pt from SOj or other soirrces decreasing iono-mer ionic conductivity... [Pg.285]

Table 19.1 The application of electrospun nanofibers for environmental contaminant adsorption... [Pg.475]


See other pages where Contaminant Adsorption is mentioned: [Pg.282]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.586]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.697]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.697]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.6070]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.500]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.859]   


SEARCH



Adsorption Models and Contaminant Transport Modeling

Adsorption contamination remediation

Adsorption of Ionic Contaminants

Adsorption of Nonionic Contaminants

Carbon adsorption, activated pesticide-contaminated

Contamination by Adsorption

Soil/properties, 4-17 adsorption contaminated

© 2024 chempedia.info