Consequence analysis methods

Random Measurement Error Third, the measurements contain significant random errors. These errors may be due to samphng technique, instrument calibrations, and/or analysis methods. The error-probability-distribution functions are masked by fluctuations in the plant and cost of the measurements. Consequently, it is difficult to know whether, during reconciliation, 5 percent, 10 percent, or even 20 percent adjustments are acceptable to close the constraints. 

A critical assembly is a split bed on which fissionable material used to mock up up a separated reactor core that is stacked half on each half. One half is on roller guides so that the two halves may be quickly pulled apart if the neutron multiplication gets too high. Use the Preliminary Hazards Analysis method described in section 3,2.1 to identify the possible accidents that may occur and the qualitative probabilities and consequences. List the initiators in a matrix to systematically investigate the whole process. Don t forget human error. 

In a more quantitative sense, cause-consequence analysis may be viewed as a blend of fault tree end event tree analysis (discussed in tlie two preceding cliapters) for evaluating potential accidents. A major strengtli of cause-consequence analysis is its use as a communication tool. For example, a cause-consequence diagram displays the interrelationships between tlie accident outcomes (consequences) and Uieir basic causes. The method can be used to quantify the expected frequency of occurrence of the consequences if the appropriate chita are available. 

Logic Diagram Methods (Fault Tree Analysis, Event Tree Analysis, Cause-Consequence Analysis, Human Reliability Analysis, Success and Failure Trees, etc,)... 

The great attraction of SV lies in the effect of pre-concentration of the analyte at the electrode with, as a consequence for the stripping current, a very high ratio of faraday current to charging and impurity currents it is this high ratio which has made SV the most sensitive voltammetric analysis method to date. 

The most serious problem with input analysis methods such as PCA that are designed for dimension reduction is the fact that they focus only on pattern representation rather than on discrimination. Good generalization from a pattern recognition standpoint requires the ability to identify characteristics that both define and discriminate between pattern classes. Methods that do one or the other are insufficient. Consequently, methods such as PLS that simultaneously attempt to reduce the input and output dimensionality while finding the best input-output model may perform better than methods such as PCA that ignore the input-output relationship, or OLS that does not emphasize input dimensionality reduction. 

The what-if analysis method may simply generate a list of questions and answers about the process. However, it usually results in a tabular listing of hazardous situations, their consequences, safety levels, and possible options for risk reduction. 

The what-if/checklist analysis method combines the creative, brainstorming features of the what-if analysis with the systematic features of the checklist analysis. The PrHA team uses the what-if analysis method to brainstorm the types of accidents that can occur within a process. Then the team uses one or more checklists to help fill in any gaps. Finally, the team members suggest ways for reducing the risk of operating the process. The what-if analysis encourages the PrHA team to consider potential accident events and consequences that are beyond the experience of the authors of a good checklist and, thus, are not covered on the checklist. Conversely, the checklist lends a systematic nature to the what-if analysis. 

The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection uses the TXDS method of consequence analysis to estimate potentially catastrophic quantities of toxic substances, as required by the New Jersey Toxic Catastrophe Prevention Act (TCPA). An acute toxic concentration (ATC) is defined as the concentration of a gas or vapor of a toxic substance that will result in acute health effects in the affected population and 1 fatality out of 20 or less (5% or more) during a 1-hr exposure. ATC values, as proposed by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, are estimated for 103 extraordinarily hazardous substances and are based on the lowest value of one of the following (1) the lowest reported lethal concentration (LCLO) value for animal test data, (2) the median lethal concentration (LC50) value from animal test data multiplied by 0.1, or (3) the IDLH value. 

Other possible preliminary safety analysis methods are concept safety review (CSR), critical examination of system safety (CE), concept hazard analysis (CHA), preliminary consequence analysis (PCA) and preliminary hazard analysis (PHA) (Wells et al., 1993). These methods are meant to be carried out from the time of the concept safety review until such time as reasonably firm process flow diagrams or early P I diagrams are available. 

Hazard and Operability Analysis (Hazop) (Kletz, 1992) is one of the most used safety analysis methods in the process industry. It is one of the simplest approaches to hazard identification. Hazop involves a vessel to vessel and a pipe to pipe review of a plant. For each vessel and pipe the possible disturbances and their potential consequences are identified. Hazop is based on guide words such as no, more, less, reverse, other than, which should be asked for every pipe and vessel (Table 1). The intention of the quide words is to stimulate the imagination, and the method relies very much on the expertise of the persons performing the analysis. The idea behind the questions is that any disturbance in a chemical plant can be described in terms of physical state variables. Hazop can be used in different stages of process design but in restricted mode. A complete Hazop study requires final process plannings with flow sheets and PID s. 

Consequence analysis Once hazards and specific incident scenarios through which those hazards might impact people, the environment, or property have been identified, methods exist for analyzing their consequences (size of vapor cloud, blast damage radius, overpressure expected, etc.). This is independent of frequency or probability. 

Conrad-Limpach-Knorr synthesis, of quinolines, 21 189 Conrad recycling process, 21 455 Conradson carbon test method, 11 705, 721 Consensus materials standards, 15 743 Consent decree protocols, in the United States, 11 692-694 Consent decrees, 11 689-690 Consequence analysis, 21 860-861 Consequence modeling, 13 165-166 Conservation applications, high performance fibers in, 13 398 Conservation of energy, 21 290 Conservation of mass, 11 737, 738-739 Conservation, of resources, 24 164-167 Conservation scientists, 11 398-399 Consistent force field, 16 744 Consolidants, in fine art examination/ conservation, 11 410... 

Decision Analysis. An alternative to making assumptions that select single estimates and suppress uncertainties is to use decision analysis methods, which make the uncertainties explicit in risk assessment and risk evaluation. Judgmental probabilities can be used to characterize uncertainties in the dose response relationship, the extent of human exposure, and the economic costs associated with control policies. Decision analysis provides a conceptual framework to separate the questions of information, what will happen as a consequence of control policy choice, from value judgments on how much conservatism is appropriate in decisions involving human health. 

The type of decision that needs to be made will influence the choice of uncertainty analysis method. Consequently, the process must include a dialogue between the risk assessor and decision maker throughout the risk assessment. The uncertainty associated with the risk assessment must be clearly communicated so that all parties involved in the risk assessment process understand it. 

Communication between risk managers, risk assessors, and analysts is essential from the start of the assessment process, not just in communicating results. For example, the choice of uncertainty analysis methods will be dependent on 1) the questions posed by decision makers, 2) the closeness of the risk estimate and its bounds to thresholds of acceptability or unacceptability, 3) the type of decision that must be made, and 4) the consequences of the decision. 

The interaction between a solvated peptide and an RPC sorbent in a fully or partially aqueous solvent environment can be discussed in terms of the interplay of weak physical forces. Based on linear free energy considerations, the effects of these forces can, to a first approximation, be linearly summated. Consequently, knowledge of the amino acid sequence of a peptide permits, to a first approximation, the effective hydrophobicity of the peptide to be derived by correlation analysis methods using data derived from other techniques, or... 

SuperChems Expert 161 is a code developed by Arthur D Little Inc. for risk assessment consequence analysis, which also has a relief system sizing option. The code has a physical properties package that can handle highly non-ideal properties. It can also consider the effect of chemical reaction in the relief system piping. The code uses the DIERS drift flux methods for level swell and has the option of a rigorous two-phase slip model for the. relief system capacity. 

Today the situation is the reverse. Multiple measurements are often made on each subject. By taking as many measurements as possible, it is hoped that the complete picture of each subject will be less error-prone than each individual measurement considered separately. As an illustration, the development of chromatographic separation methods and detection techniques like spectrophotometry has made it possible to identify many substances in one blood sample from a patient. At the same time, the cost of each experiment has increased. Consequently, new methods for data analysis are needed, methods that can utilize the information in the data also when the subjects are few and the measurements are many. 

Chapter 4 covers the site selection and site controlling phase. Consequently, it deals with the assessment of individual production sites based on primarily qualitative criteria. Alternative Multiple Attribute Decision Analysis methods are reviewed and a decision support model employing the Analytic Hierarchy Process, which can be used both for site selection problems and as a controlling tool to perform site portfolio rankings of entire production networks, is proposed. Experiences from application in industry are reported. 

With the detection and introduction of titration (more general volumetry) into the arsenal of analytical methods, an increasing need arose for means which allowed the end-point of such an analysis to be detected. This need stimulated the search for indicator dyes, and consequently the methods of dye synthesis were also used for this purpose. Asa result, most indicator dyes are now synthetic. 

---