Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Calibration approach

Mancozeb is a dithiocarbamate pesticide with a very low solubility in organic and inorganic solvent. In this work we have developed a solvent free, accurate and fast photoacoustic FTIR-based methodology for Mancozeb determination in commercial fungicides. The proposed procedure was based on the direct measurement of the solid samples in the middle infrared region using a photoacoustic detector. A multivariate calibration approach based on the use of partial least squares (PLS) was employed to determine the pesticide content in commercially available formulations. [Pg.93]

Different calibration models, such as classical least squares and multivariate calibration approaches have been considered. [Pg.141]

Ni, Y.N., Bai, J.L., and Jin, L., Simultaneous adsorptive voltammetric analysis of mixed colorants by multivariate calibration approach. Anal. Chim. Acta, 329, 65, 1996. [Pg.546]

An added benefit of the direct SEC-[n] calibration approach is that a new independent way of determining K and a values, using only broad MW standards, has also resulted. As few as three standards (or four, if all are narrow MWD) are needed to obtain both MW and [x]] calibration curves for a particular polymer-solvent system by using the broad-standard, linear calibration approach. From the experimental calibration constants of the two calibration curves, one can calculate K and a directly as described later. [Pg.92]

The advantage of the inverse calibration approach is that we do not have to know all the information on possible constituents, analytes of interest and inter-ferents alike. Nor do we need pure spectra, or enough calibration standards to determine those. The columns of C (and P) only refer to the analytes of interest. Thus, the method can work in principle when unknown chemical interferents are present. It is of utmost importance then that such interferents are present in the Ccdibration samples. A good prediction model can only be derived from calibration data that are representative for the samples to be measured in the future. [Pg.357]

The total content of As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni and Pb was determined in contaminated soils and sediments using the slurry technique and Zeeman GF-AAS, either by calibration with aqueous solutions of the analytes or slurries of some suitable CRMs. Except for Cr, where only the calibration with a solid CRM was successful, good agreement was found between both calibration approaches (Klemm and Baumbach 1995)-... [Pg.141]

Using a newly developed, transversely heated graphite atomizer and D2-back-ground correction (for details see Sections 2.2 and 4.3), Cd, Pb and Cr were determined in cement and river sediment samples. Of the various calibration approaches applied the best results, also in comparison with wet chemical procedures, were achieved with calibration curves constructed by means of different BCR CRMs with different analyte concentrations and usually n = to individual intakes (Nowka and Muller 1997). [Pg.141]

Normally one can assume that most metallic samples contain elemental traces in a homogeneous distribution. Lead, Bi, Zn, Ag and Sb in steel and nickel-base alloys were determined, first by using the graphite boat technique for routine analysis. Several calibration approaches were studied and it was found that the best results could be obtained by using various amounts of a number of solid alloyed steel or pure iron CRMs and to plot absorbance against concentration of the element sought (Backman and Karlsson 1979). [Pg.142]

If one pursues the calibration approach, one has to stick to a given combination of density functional and basis set, since the calibration will change for each such combination. Calibration curves have been reported for a number of widely used density functionals and basis sets. The results of a relatively comprehensive study are collected in Table 5.4. The standard deviation of the best fits is on the order of 0.08 mm s which appears to be the intrinsic reliability of DFT for predicting Mossbauer isomer shifts. [Pg.157]

This theory appears not to involve adjustable parameters (other than the nuclear radius parameters that were taken from the literature). In particular, it was criticized that the calibration approach involved a slope that is too high by about a factor of two. However, in actual calculations with the linear response approach, it was found that the slope of the correlation line between theory and experiment (dependent on the quantum chemical method) is close to 0.5. Thus, it also requires a scaling factor of about 2 in order to reach quantitative agreement with experiment. The standard deviations between the calibration and linear response approaches are comparable thus indicating that the major error in both approaches still stems from errors in the description of the bonding that is responsible for the actual valence shell electron distribution. [Pg.161]

According to internal or external standard calibration approaches. [Pg.85]

The Q-factor approach is based upon the weight-to-size ratios (Q-factors) of the calibration standard and the polymer to be analyzed. The Q-factors are employed to transform the calibration curve for the chemical type of the standards (e.g. polystyrene) into a calibration curve for the chemical type of polymer under study. The inherent assumption In such a calibration approach is that the weight-to-size ratio is not a function of molecular weight but a constant. The assumption is valid for some polymer types (e.g. polyvinylchloride) but not for many polymer types. Hence the Q-factor method is generally referred to as an approximation technique. [Pg.76]

In a kinetic sense, the system is a better solvent than HFIP alone. We postulate that MeCl2 swells the amorphous regions of PET thereby providing HFIP with an easy access to the crystalline regions. This swelling action does not occur with HFIP alone, and the dissolution process takes much longer. At room temperature, amorphous PET is Instantaneously solubilized by this solvent system. PET that has been annealed for >24 hr at 220 C to yield maximum crystallinity dissolves in <4 hr at room temperature. PET annealed in this manner does not dissolve in pure HFIP after 14 days at room temperature. Poly(butylene terephthalate) and aliphatic polyamides are soluble in this solvent system. Polystyrene is also soluble, which permits conventional calibration and the use of the universal calibration approach. We have determined the Mark-Houwlnk relationships for PET and polystyrene in 70/30 MeCl2/HFIP to be... [Pg.220]

The universal calibration approach ([n]. M vs elution volume) for polystyrene standards and narrow molecular triacetate fractions show slight deviation from linearity. This departure from linearity has been attributed to differences in both hydrodynamic behavior and the Mark-Houwink exponent a for the two polymers in question. [Pg.365]

Partial least squares (PLS) and principal component regression (PCR) are the most widely used multivariate calibration methods in chemometrics. Both of these methods make use of the inverse calibration approach, where it i.s... [Pg.144]

FIGURE 5.62. Example of calibration and validation using the classical calibration approach, (a) Initial classical model form (b) estimating concentrations (c) reconstructing the response vector (d) calculating the spectral residual (e) calculating the concentrational residual. [Pg.307]

One solution to the problem is by way of the universal calibration approach suggested by Benoif. Since SEC separations are based mainly on the hydrodyneimic volvune of the polymer molecules, there should exist a universal SEC calibration curve when hydrodyneimic volumes of molecules are used in the calibration plot. According to the basic theories in polymer science ... [Pg.97]

Calibration and quantification procedures are easier in LA-ICP-MS compared to other solid-state mass spectrometric techniques because the laser ablation and the ICP ion source operate at normal pressure and the laser ablation of solid samples and ionization of analytes are separated in space and time. Therefore the advantage of solution calibration in ICP-MS can be applied in this solid-state analytical technique. The introduction of solution based calibration, which is only possible in LA-ICP-MS, was an innovative step in the development of this sensitive mass spectrometric technique. A number of different calibration approaches using aqueous standard solutions in the dual gas flow technique have been discussed by various authors.74 75 In the dual gas flow injection technique , the nebulized standard solution and the laser ablated sample material are mixed in the -piece and the two gas flows from the nebulizer (e.g. ultrasonic nebulizer) and laser ablation chamber are added. Using solution based calibration with the addition of a standard solution, Leach et alP determined minor elements in steel reference materials with a relative accuracy of a few %. In comparison to the so-called dual gas flow technique proposed in the literature, where the argon flow rates through the nebulizer and ablation cell add up to 11 min-1 (e.g. 0.451 min-1 and... [Pg.201]

ICP-IDMS has high potential for the routine analysis of trace elements if accuracy is of predominant analytical importance [19]. In contrast to other calibration approaches, IDMS does not directly suffer from long-term changes or drifts in instrument sensitivity. Moreover, provided that isotopic exchange between the sample and spike is ensured, losses of analyte do not affect the analytical results. Additionally, IDMS can also be used to prevent the final analytical result being affected by analyte losses during sample pretreatment. [Pg.31]

D. C. Baxter and J. Ohman, Multi-component standard additions and partial least squares modelling, a multivariate calibration approach to the resolution of spectral interferences in graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 45(4 5), 1990, 481 491. [Pg.240]

Since all the sensors may respond to all the analytes, a great amount of complex data are generated that must be processed using a multi-variable calibration approach [21], Chemometrics is in charge then, for extraction of the information sought by appropriate processing [22], This coupling, which represents one of the more clear benefits... [Pg.722]

In such cases, one can retreat to the brute force approach of developing a separate calibration for each analyzer. However, for empirical multivariate calibrations, which require a large number of calibration samples each, this approach can become very laborious. Furthermore, if there is a significant cost associated with the collection, preparation, and analysis of calibration standards, the cost of this instrument-specific calibration approach can become prohibitive. [Pg.317]

Multiple linear regression is the usual choice with filter instruments and is also used with those that record whole spectra. It is an effective calibration approach when the... [Pg.377]

One of these methods is called kinetic calibration, in which analyte absorption from the sample to the liquid coating (PDMS) on the fiber is related to analyte desorption from the coating to the sample. The isotropy of absorption and desorption in the kinetic calibration has been described by Chen et al.31 In kinetic calibration, also called in-fiber standardization, desorption of a radio-labeled standard (preloaded on the fiber coating) into the sample is used to calibrate the extraction (absorption/adsorption in the case of a liquid/solid coating) of analyte from the sample into the fiber. This calibration approach considerably facilitates the use of SPME for the on-site field sampling of water, where the control of flow velocity or addition of a standard to the matrix is very difficult. [Pg.74]


See other pages where Calibration approach is mentioned: [Pg.484]    [Pg.490]    [Pg.462]    [Pg.544]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.74]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.150 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info