Analyte loss

After the initial extraction with acetone-0.25 N HCl, all traces of acetone must be removed using a TurboVap Evaporator. Traces of solvent can lead to analyte loss through the SPE cartridge(s). 

Validate routine methods, i.e., define the conditions under which the assay results are meaningful.115 To do that, one must select samples that are truly representative of the product stream. This may be a difficult task when the process is still under development and the product stream variable. The linearity of detector response should be defined over a range much broader than that expected to be encountered. Interference from the sample matrix and bias from analyte loss in preparation or separation often can be inferred from studies of linearity. Explicit detection or quantitation limits should be established. The precision (run-to-run repeatability) and accuracy (comparison with known standards) can be estimated with standards. Sample stability should be explored and storage conditions defined. 

Industrial analytical laboratories search for methodologies that allow high quality analysis with enhanced sensitivity, short overall analysis times through significant reductions in sample preparation, reduced cost per analysis through fewer man-hours per sample, reduced solvent usage and disposal costs, and minimisation of errors due to analyte loss and contamination during evaporation. The experience and criticism of analysts influence the economical aspects of analysis methods very substantially. 

Table 3.45 lists the main characteristics of SPME. The technique is sensitive, reduces analyte loss and can successfully be applied to the analysis of both polar and nonpolar volatile and nonvolatile analytes from solid or liquid and in the gas phase [535]. Room temperature operation of SPME favours thermolabile compounds (only heating during injection into GC). Method... 

Total recoverage (quantitation no target analyte loss)... 

Normally no sample analyte loss or on-column reactions... 

Greatly reduced analyte losses (small surface area)... 

Reduced risk for cross-contamination, analyte loss and decomposition... 

The ability of SFE-FTIR to perform a variety of extraction methods is a definite advantage, especially for the study of complex mixtures containing analytes of varying solubility. For analytes which are readily solubilised in C02, direct dynamic and direct static-dynamic SFE-FTIR methods are quite successful. Elimination of the trapping process reduces both analysis time and potential analyte loss arising from... 

Low susceptibility to contamination or analyte loss due to volatilisation, sorption or incomplete solubilisation... 

Modern methods of sample handling for determination of surfactants in aqueous samples are practically all based on SPE and modifications thereof. Substantial reductions in analysis time, solvent consumption, sample volume required, and number of off-line steps have thus been achieved. This has not only increased the analysts capacity and analysis price per sample, but also decreased the risk of both analyte loss and contamination during sample handling. Whether or not this has indeed resulted in an increased quality of analytical results still needs to be validated through, e.g. intercalibration exercises. This aspect is discussed in more detail in Chapter 4. 

The use of robotics can be adopted also in sample preparation steps, in particular on-line SPE [7], This necessity is particular evident when small quantity of starting materials is available and the target molecules are present at low concentration levels. With the advent of miniaturization and automated procedures for samples handling, treatments and analysis, the lost of analytes due to a laboratory steps can be reduced. The reduction of analyte losses and the possibility to analyze even a total sample (no loss) leads to lower limits of detection (and consequently lower limits of quantification). Smaller volumes bring to obtain adequate sensitivity and selectivity for a large variety of compounds. In addition, on-line SPE requires low solvent consumption without the need to remove all residual water from cartridges, since elution solvents are compatible with the separation methods. 

Introduction of a suppression device between the column and the detector can be expected to cause some degree of peak broadening due to diffusional effects. The shape of the analyte band will also be influenced by hydrophobic adsorption effects, especially when the adsorption and desorption processes are slow. Examination of peak shapes and analyte losses can therefore provide important insight into the use of suppressors with organic analytes which are weakly acidic or weakly basic. It can be expected that peak area recovery rates after suppression are governed by a combination of hydrophobic interactions with the suppressor and permeation through the membranes with the balance between these mechanisms being determined by eluent composition, suppression conditions and analyte properties. 

Flame atomic absorption spectrometry can be used to determine trace levels of analyte in a wide range of sample types, with the proviso that the sample is first brought into solution. The methods described in Section 1.6 are all applicable to FAAS. Chemical interferences and ionization suppression cause the greatest problems, and steps must be taken to reduce these (e.g. the analysis of sea-water, refractory geological samples or metals). The analysis of oils and organic solvents is relatively easy since these samples actually provide fuel for the flame however, build-up of carbon in the burner slot must be avoided. Most biological samples can be analysed with ease provided that an appropriate digestion method is used which avoids analyte losses. 

A large number of matrix modifiers have been developed that thermally stabilize the analyte, allowing higher ash temperatures to be used without analyte loss. In this way, more matrix may be removed leaving less to interfere with the analyte s determination. Examples of this type of matrix modifier include some transition metal ions, e g. Ni and Pd, which form thermally stable intermetallic compounds with the metalloids, e.g. As-Ni,... 

ICP-IDMS has high potential for the routine analysis of trace elements if accuracy is of predominant analytical importance [19]. In contrast to other calibration approaches, IDMS does not directly suffer from long-term changes or drifts in instrument sensitivity. Moreover, provided that isotopic exchange between the sample and spike is ensured, losses of analyte do not affect the analytical results. Additionally, IDMS can also be used to prevent the final analytical result being affected by analyte losses during sample pretreatment. 

The lessons of the field studies dealing with the sampling of ambient air all have to do with the deposition of particulate matter and how such deposition affects collection efficiencies in the porous membrane DS devices and analyte losses in the inlet lines and the valves. A strategy for the facile field determination of collection efficiencies using two serial DS devices has been developed (55). However, although periodic recalibration, a part of the routine protocol, can to a large extent correct for any analyte loss or loss of collection efficiency in the scrubber itself, losses prior to the scrubber cannot be corrected for. 

Solid-phase extraction could be coupled online with HPLC. This is becoming increasingly important, because it makes it possible to handle all the situations in which large series of samples have to be analyzed routinely, and therefore rapid, (semi-) automatic, and unattended analysis is an aspect of major concern. Moreover, sensitive trace level determination requires the analysis of total samples or sample extracts rather than aliquots, under conditions in which analyte losses, due to evaporation or irreversible sorption to the vessels walls, and contamination, caused by the solvent or reagents used, laboratory air, and/or sample manipulation in general, must be rigorously minimized (45,46). 

Recent work on soil sample preparation is reviewed below. Rubio and Une [20] have discussed the risks of soil sample contamination using inappropriate materials, containers and tools as well as possible analyte loss during sample loading. 

Numerous approaches, both physical and chemical, are recommended in the literature for the preservation of water samples prior to the analysis of inorganic and organic chemicals. Unfortunately, none of these methods is able to prevent analyte loss from different kinds of water matrices. 

---