Scale factors

As described above, the amplitude of the wave (and thus, the intensity, see Eqs. 2.13 to 2.19 and relevant discussion in section 2.5) scattered in a specific direction by a crystal lattice is usually calculated for its symmetrically independent minimum - one unit cell. In order to compare the experimentally observed and the calculated intensities directly, it is necessary to measure the absolute value of the scattered intensity. This necessarily involves 

Obviously, doing all of this is impractical, and in reality the comparison of the observed and calculated intensities is nearly always done after the former are normalized with respect to the latter using the so-called scale factor. As long as all observed intensities are measured under nearly identical conditions (which is relatively easy to achieve), the scale factor is a constant for each phase and is applicable to the entire diffraction pattern. 

scattered intensity is conventionally measured using an arbitrary relative scale and the normalization is usually performed by analyzing all experimental and calculated intensities using a least squares technique. The 

---

There are an infinite number of other integrating factors X with corresponding fiinctions ( ) the new quantities T and. S are chosen for convenience.. S is, of course, the entropy and T, a fiinction of 0 only, is the absolute temperature , which will turn out to be the ideal-gas temperature, 0jg. The constant C is just a scale factor detennining the size of the degree. 

As noted earlier in section A2.5.6.2. the assumption of homogeneity and tlie resnlting principle of two-scale-factor universality requires the amplitude coefficients to be related. In particnlar the following relations can be derived ... 

Steinhauer and Gasteiger [30] developed a new 3D descriptor based on the idea of radial distribution functions (RDFs), which is well known in physics and physico-chemistry in general and in X-ray diffraction in particular [31], The radial distribution function code (RDF code) is closely related to the 3D-MoRSE code. The RDF code is calculated by Eq. (25), where/is a scaling factor, N is the number of atoms in the molecule, p/ and pj are properties of the atoms i and/ B is a smoothing parameter, and Tij is the distance between the atoms i and j g(r) is usually calculated at a number of discrete points within defined intervals [32, 33]. 

The advan tage ol a conjugate gradien t m iniim/er is that it uses th e minim i/ation history to calculate the search direction, and converges t asLer Lhan the steepest descent technique. It also contains a scaling factor, b, for determining step si/e. This makes the step si/es optimal when compared to the steepest descent lechniciue. 

Also use constant dielectric Tor MM+aiul OPLS ciilciilatimis. Use the (lislance-flepeiident dielecinc for AMBER and BlO+to mimic the screening effects of solvation when no explicit solvent molecules are present. The scale factor for the dielectric permittivity, n. can vary from 1 to H(l. IlyperChem sets tt to 1. .5 for MM-r. Use 1.0 for AMBER and OPLS. and 1.0-2..5 for BlO-r. 

Although in teraetion s between vicinal I 4 atom s arc n om in ally treated as non bonded interactions, triost of the force fields treat these somewhat differently from normal 1 5 and greater non-bonded interactions. HyperCbern allows each of these 1 4 non-bonded interactions to be scaled down by a scale factor < 1.0 with AMBHR or OPI-S. bor HIO+ the electrostatic may be scaled and different param eters rn ay be ti sed for I 4 van dcr Waals interactions, fh e. AMBHR force field, for exam pie, n orrn a lly uses a seal in g factor of 0.5 for both van der Waals an d electrostatic interactions. 

The sexlic bending term is a scale factor ST times the t iiadratic bending term. This constant SPcan be set to an arbitrary value by an entry m the Registry or the chem.ini file. The default value for MM+ is SP= 7.0 X 10 . The constant 0.043828 converts the MM-r... 

Atom VDWForm at cn try to SigmaKpsilori. rh e I 4 van der Waals interactions are nsnally scaled in OPLS to one-eighth their nominal value (a scale factor of (1.125 in the Porce Field Options dialog bo.x). 

Sin cc til e basis set is oblairicd from atom ic calcii laliori s, it is still desirable to scale expon eti ts for the rn oleeular en viron tn eti t, Th is is accom piished by defiri in g an in ri er valen ce scale factor 1 and an outer valence scale factor C" ( doiihle zeta ) and multiplying the correspon din g in ri er an d otiler ct s by th e square of these factors. On ly the valen ce sh ells arc scaled. 

Fhe van der Waals and electrostatic interactions between atoms separated by three bonds (i.c. the 1,4 atoms) are often treated differently from other non-bonded interactions. The interaction between such atoms contributes to the rotational barrier about the central bond, in conjunction with the torsional potential. These 1,4 non-bonded interactions are often scaled down by an empirical factor for example, a factor of 2.0 is suggested for both the electrostatic and van der Waals terms in the 1984 AMBER force field (a scale factor of 1/1.2 is used for the electrostatic terms in the 1995 AMBER force field). There are several reasons why one would wish to scale the 1,4 interactions. The error associated wilh the use of an repulsion term (which is too steep compared with the more correct exponential term) would be most significant for 1,4 atoms. In addition, when two 1,4... 

Let H and L be two characteristic lengths associated with the channel height and the lateral dimensions of the flow domain, respectively. To obtain a uniformly valid approximation for the flow equations, in the limit of small channel thickness, the ratio of characteristic height to lateral dimensions is defined as e = (H/L) 0. Coordinate scale factors h, as well as dynamic variables are represented by a power series in e. It is expected that the scale factor h-, in the direction normal to the layer, is 0(e) while hi and /12, are 0(L). It is also anticipated that the leading terms in the expansion of h, are independent of the coordinate x. Similai ly, the physical velocity components, vi and V2, ai e 0(11), whei e U is a characteristic layer wise velocity, while V3, the component perpendicular to the layer, is 0(eU). Therefore we have... 

Plot this orbital with appropriate scale factors to deteiiiiine the behavior of tE in rectangular coordinates. Describe its behavior in spherical polar coordinates. 

Plot the probability density obtained from E in Problem 9 as a function of r, that is, simply square the function above with an appropriate scale factor as determined by trial and error. Comment on the relationship between your plot and the shell structure of the atom. 

The remainder of the input file gives the basis set. The line, 1 0, specifies the atom center 1 (the only atom in this case) and is terminated by 0. The next line contains a shell type, S for the Is orbital, tells the system that there is 1 primitive Gaussian, and gives the scale factor as 1.0 (unsealed). The next line gives Y = 0.282942 for the Gaussian function and a contiaction coefficient. This is the value of Y, the Gaussian exponential parameter that we found in Computer Project 6-1, Part B. [The precise value for y comes from the closed solution for this problem S/Oir (McWeeny, 1979).] There is only one function, so the contiaction coefficient is 1.0. The line of asterisks tells the system that the input is complete. 

The second, third, and fourth corrections to [MPd/b-Jl lG(d,p)] are analogous to A (- -). The zero point energy has been discussed in detail (scale factor 0.8929 see Scott and Radom, 1996), leaving only HLC, called the higher level correction, a purely empirical correction added to make up for the practical necessity of basis set and Cl truncation. In effect, thermodynamic variables are calculated by methods described immediately below and HLC is adjusted to give the best fit to a selected group of experimental results presumed to be reliable. 

It is possible to use computational techniques to gain insight into the vibrational motion of molecules. There are a number of computational methods available that have varying degrees of accuracy. These methods can be powerful tools if the user is aware of their strengths and weaknesses. The user is advised to use ah initio or DFT calculations with an appropriate scale factor if at all possible. Anharmonic corrections should be considered only if very-high-accuracy results are necessary. Semiempirical and molecular mechanics methods should be tried cautiously when the molecular system prevents using the other methods mentioned. 

---