Acidic clay catalyst

Acidic clay catalysts can also be used in alkylation with alcohols 98 The main advantages of these catalysts are the reduced amount necessary to carry out alkylation compared with conventional Friedel-Crafts halides, possible regeneration, and good yields. Natural montmorillonite (K10 clay) doped with transition metal cations was shown to be an effective catalyst 200... 

Alkylation of toluene with methanol, a process of practical importance, was investigated over several acidic clay catalysts.98 Cation-exchanged synthetic saponites201 and fluor-terasilicic mica modified by La3+ ions202 were found to exhibit increased para selectivity compared with H-ZSM-5. 

This methodology has also been extended [57] to high-valent metal cations such as Al3+ and Fe3+ a simple ball-grinding with the corresponding metal nitrate at ambient temperature in air yields the Al- or Fe-exchanged montmorillonite. Such products are interesting acid-clay catalysts, their Bronsted acidity arising mainly from the dissociation of adsorbed water ... 

However, the large-scale preparation of such acid-clay catalysts was until recently hampered by two problems ... 

These cyclic bis(arylene tetrasulfides) were originally synthesized by Z. S. Ariyan and R. L. Martin (13, 14, 15) by the reaction of the appropriate aromatic moiety with sulfur monochloride in the presence of a mineral acid-clay catalyst. 

The above-mentioned acidic clay catalysts, such as Ti -mont particles, can also be combined with basic, layered claylike HT particles for one-pot sequential reactions [135], Because the acid sites of Ti -mont are located within the narrow interlayer spacing, basic sites on the surface of micron-sized HT particles cannot contact these. Ti +-mont catalyzed the deprotection of acetals to produce carbonyls, with the HT subsequently promoting the aldol reaction of nitriles with such carbonyl compounds to afford the corresponding nitrile compounds (Scheme 6.23). Notably, the HT cannot work with p-Ts0H-H20, and the Ti -mont caimot work with piperidine, as shown in Table 6.1. Compound 1 was obtained only when Ti " -mont and HT were used together. 

The variables affecting the product distribution are aniline concentration, hydrochloric acid concentration, and temperature. The higher the excess of aniline, the higher is the diamine concentration. Higher hydrochloric acid concentration and lower initial temperature favor the formation of 4,4 -MDA. Attempts were made over the years to replace the aqueous hydrochloric acid catalyst with slower reacting solid acidic clay catalysts, but the obtained product distribution was different, and therefore this approach was never used. 

The reduction of the unsaturated ketone succeeds with boranate, or by the Meerwein-Pondorf method. Dehydration with acidic clay catalyst [163], or more conventionally with acids, acidic salts or FeCl3 [165] leads to the product. 

Thiofunctional polysiloxanes have been reported to be used as metal protectants and as release agents on metal substrates [62]. For example thiofunctional polysiloxane can be prepared by reaction of hexamethyl-siloxane and 3-mercaptopropyl trimethoxysilane in the presence of an acid clay catalyst at 80 C to give a polymer with a 14.4% SH content [62]. Another example of a thiofunctional polysiloxane involves the reaction of hexamethylcyclotrisiloxane with 3-mercaptanpropyl trimethoxysilane and hexamethyldisiloxane in the presence of an acid clay catalyst at 80°C [62]. 

Chemicals responsible for odor in some PUR foams were synthesised by polymerisation of PO in CH2CI2 with Bp2(C2H )20 catalyst (114). The yield was 25% volatile material and 75% polymeric material. The 25% fraction consisted of dimethyldioxane isomers, dioxolane isomers, DPG, TPG, crown ethers, tetramers, pentamers, etc, and 2-ethy1-4,7-dimethyl-1,3,6-trioxacane (acetal of DPG and propionaldehyde). The latter compound is mainly responsible for the musty odor found in some PUR foams. This material is not formed under basic conditions but probably arises during the workup when acidic clays are used for catalyst removal. 

Many other polymerization processes have been patented, but only some of them appear to be developed or under development ia 1996. One large-scale process uses an acid montmorrillonite clay and acetic anhydride (209) another process uses strong perfiuorosulfonic acid reski catalysts (170,210). The polymerization product ia these processes is a poly(tetramethylene ether) with acetate end groups, which have to be removed by alkaline hydrolysis (211) or hydrogenolysis (212). If necessary, the product is then neutralized, eg, with phosphoric acid (213), and the salts removed by filtration. Instead of montmorrillonite clay, other acidic catalysts can be used, such as EuUer s earth or zeoHtes (214—216). 

The choice of catalyst is based primarily on economic effects and product purity requirements. More recentiy, the handling of waste associated with the choice of catalyst has become an important factor in the economic evaluation. Catalysts that produce less waste and more easily handled waste by-products are strongly preferred by alkylphenol producers. Some commonly used catalysts are sulfuric acid, boron trifluoride, aluminum phenoxide, methanesulfonic acid, toluene—xylene sulfonic acid, cationic-exchange resin, acidic clays, and modified zeoHtes. 

The initiator usually constitutes less than 1% of the final product, and since starting the process with such a small amount of material in the reaction vessel may be difficult, it is often reacted with propylene oxide to produce a precursor compound, which may be stored until required [6]. The yield of poloxamer is essentially stoichiometric the lengths of the PO and EO blocks are determined by the amount of epoxide fed into the reactor at each stage. Upon completion of the reaction, the mixture is cooled and the alkaline catalyst neutralized. The neutral salt may then be removed or allowed to remain in the product, in which case it is present at a level of 0.5-1.0%. The catalyst may, alternatively, be removed by adsorption on acidic clays or with ion exchangers [7]. Exact maintenance of temperature, pressure, agitation speed, and other parameters are required if the products are to be reproducible, thus poloxamers from different suppliers may exhibit some difference in properties. 

Acid-treated clay catalyst Engelhard F-24 was found to be very effective for the alkylation of diphenylamine (DPA) with an olefin such as a-methyl styrene (AMS) to obtain a mixture of mono and dialkylated diphenylamines (Chitnis and Sharma, 1995). For example, alkylation of DPA with AMS produced a mixture of 4-(a,a-dimethyl benzyl) diphenylamine, i.e. monocumyl-diphenylamine (MCDPA) and 4,4 -bis(a,a-dimethylbenzyl) diphenylamine, i.e. dicumyldiphenylamine (DCDPA) (Eqn.(l 1)). The dialkylated diphenylamine, i.e. DCDPA, is indu.strially important as an antioxidant and heat stabilizer. DCDPA is reported to be an ideal antioxidant for many materials like polyethylene, polypropylene, polyether polyol, polyacetals, nylon 6, synthetic lubricants, hot melt adhesives, etc. 

The various other grades of acid-treated clay catalysts like Engelhard F-25, F-34, F-44,F-54, F-124, F-224, G-62, Tonsil K 306, etc. were also found to be useful catalysts for the alkylation of DPA with AMS. This alkylation reaction was unsuccessful with macroporous... 

Shah et al. (1994) have studied the preparation of a class of compounds called Indans, by cross-dimerization of AMS with amylenes, using an ion-exchange resin and acid-treated clay catalysts (Eqns. (12) and (13)). Indans can be subsequently converted, e.g. by acetylation, into perfumric compounds having mu.sk odour. For example, 1,1,2,3,3-pentamethylindan, the product obtained by cross-dimerization of AMS and wo-amylene (Eqn. (12)), can be reacted with propylene oxide and /7 ra-formaldehyde to give an indan type isochroman musk compound, 6-oxa-l,l,2,3,3,8-hexamethyl-2,3,5,6,7,8-hexahydro-lH-benz(f)-indene, sold as Galaxolide commercially. 

The selectivity for cross-dimerization relative to the dimerization of AMS, was found to be better with the acid-treated clay catalyst Engelhard F-24 than with the ion-exchange resin catalyst Amberlyst-15. Also, the formation of undesired side products, i.e. diisoamylenes, was lower in the case of Engelhard F-24 than for Amberlyst-15. 

Traditionally, the production of LABs has been practiced commercially using either Lewis acid catalysts, or liquid hydrofluoric acid (HF).2 The HF catalysis typically gives 2-phenylalkane selectivities of only 17-18%. More recently, UOP/CEPSA have announced the DetalR process for LAB production that is reported to employ a solid acid catalyst.3 Within the same time frame, a number of papers and patents have been published describing LAB synthesis using a range of solid acid (sterically constrained) catalysts, including acidic clays,4 sulfated oxides,5 plus a variety of acidic zeolite structures.6"9 Many of these solid acids provide improved 2-phenylalkane selectivities. 

K. Lourvanij and G. L. Rorrer, Dehydration of glucose to organic acids in microporous pillared clay catalysts, Appl. Catal. A Gen., 109 (1994) 147-165. 

Most importantly, biomass pyrolysis will be carried out at remote locations, and in distributed manner. Thus, the catalysts should be cheap and simple to use. Acidic clays, silica aluminas and H-FAU type zeolites are relatively cheap and robust materials, can be mixed easily with heat carriers, and used for pyrolysis. Efficient contact between the solids (catalyst and biomass) to maximize catalytic action is one of the challenges that need to be overcome. 

The first cracking catalysts were acid-leached montmorillonite clays. The acid leach was to remove various metal impurities, principally iron, copper, and nickel, that could exert adverse effects on the cracking performance of a catalyst. The catalysts were first used in fixed- and moving-bed reactor systems in the form of shaped pellets. Later, with the development of the fluid catalytic cracking process, clay catalysts were made in the form of a ground, sized powder. Clay catalysts are relatively inexpensive and have been used extensively for many years. 

Also other Type B and C series from Table II are consistent with the above elimination mechanisms. The dehydration rate of the alcohols ROH on an acid clay (series 16) increased with the calculated inductive effect of the group R. For the dehydrochlorination of polychloroethanes on basic catalysts (series 20), the rate could be correlated with a quantum-chemical reactivity index, namely the delocalizability of the hydrogen atoms by a nucleophilic attack similar indices for a radical or electrophilic attack on the chlorine atoms did not fit the data. The rates of alkylbenzene cracking on silica-alumina catalysts have been correlated with the enthalpies of formation of the corresponding alkylcarbonium ions (series 24). Similar correlations have been obtained for the dehydrosulfidation of alkanethiols and dialkyl sulfides on silica-alumina (series 36 and 37) in these cases, correlation by the Taft equation is also possible. The rate of cracking of 1,1-diarylethanes increased with the increasing basicity of the reactants (series 33). 

The activity advantage of zeolite catalysts over amorphous silica-alumina has well been documented, Weisz and his associates [1] reported that faujasite Y zeolite showed 10 to 10 times greater activity for the cracking of n-hexane than silica-alumina. Wang and Lunsford et al. [2] also noted that acidic Y zeolites were active for the disproportionation of toluene while silica-alumina was inactive. The activity difference between zeolite and silica-alumina has been attributed to their acidic properties. It is, however, difficult to explain the superactivity of zeolite relative to silica-alumina on the basis of acidity, since the number of acid sites of Y-type zeolite is only about 10 times larger than that of silica-alumina. To account for it, Wang et al. [2] proposed that the microporous structure of zeolite enhanced the concentration of reactant molecules at the acid sites. The purpose of the present work is to show that such a microporous effect is valid for pillared clay catalysts. 

However, when it comes to the more important 2,2-diaryl derivatives (1.25), the routes illustrated in Figure 1.7 are not very useful. For these derivatives the almost universally adopted synthetic method involves the reaction of a l,l-diarylprop-2-yn-l-ol (1.24) with a substituted phenol or naphthol in the presence of an acid catalyst. The acid catalyst can be alumina, an acidic clay or Nafion for heterogeneous reactions, or trifluoroacetic acid, p-toluenesulfonic acid and dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid for reactions carried out in solution. The alkynols are prepared by reaction of a benzophenone (1.22) with a Na or Li derivative of an alkynide, such as the trimethylsilyl acetylide (1.23), (Figure 1.8). ... 

With this purpose, several different types of solid acid catalysts have been investigated for the acylation of aromatics, but the best performances have been obtained with medium-pore and large-pore zeolites (3-9). In general, however, the use of acylating agents other then halides, e.g., anhydrides or acids, is limited to the transformation of aromatic substrates highly activated towards electrophilic substitution. In a previous work (10), we investigated the benzoylation of resorcinol (1,3-dihydroxybenzene), catalyzed by acid clays. It was found that the reaction mechanism consists of the direct 0-benzoylation with formation of resorcinol monobenzoate, while no primary formation of the product of C-benzoylation (2,4-dihydroxybenzophenone) occurred. The latter product formed exclusively by... 

Compared to sulfuric acid, the clay catalysts produced a cleaner biodiesel due to their bleaching activity. Thus, unrefined oils or waste cooking oils could be employed as feedstock without pretreatment. However, the performance of the clays diminished with repeated use and catalysts had to be reactivated after each run to maintain peak performance, suggesting that some leaching of sulfuric acid took place. 

The alkylation is achieved using an acid activated clay catalyst (73). The reaction is performed in nitrogen atmosphere. Namely, nitrogen gas atmosphere or other inert gas atmospheres, in contrast to air gas atmosphere, suppress the formation of products that deactivate the clay catalyst. 

---